Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Fragility of Chess positions: measure, universality and tipping points

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.02333 v3 pith:XCRG6JLN submitted 2024-10-03 physics.soc-ph cond-mat.dis-nn

classification physics.soc-phcond-mat.dis-nn
keywords fragilitygamesmoveschessgamemomentspositionsapprox
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We introduce a novel metric to quantify the fragility of chess positions using the interaction graph of pieces. This fragility score $F$ captures the tension within a position and serves as a strong indicator of tipping points in a game. In well-known games, maximum fragility often aligns with decisive moments marked by brilliant moves. Analyzing a large dataset of games, we find that fragility typically peaks around move $15$, with pawns ($\approx 60\%$) and knights ($\approx 20\%$) frequently involved in high-tension positions. Comparing the Stockfish evaluation with the fragility score, we observe that the maximum fragility ply often serves as a critical turning point, where the moves made afterward can determine the outcome of the game. Remarkably, average fragility curves show a universal pattern across a wide range of players, games, and openings, with a subtle deviation observed in games played by the engine Stockfish. Our analysis reveals a gradual buildup of fragility starting around $8$ moves before the peak, followed by a prolonged fragile state lasting up to $15$ moves. This suggests a gradual intensification of positional tension leading to decisive moments in the game. These insights offer a valuable tool for both players and engines to assess critical moments in chess.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Inferring Piece Value in Chess and Chess Variants

    stat.AP 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Using logistic regression on millions of Lichess games, the author estimates piece values in standard chess and variants, finding bishops slightly better than knights and negative values in Antichess.

Pith tools