Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Dual Active Learning for Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.02504 v2 pith:L35O5XZN submitted 2024-10-03 stat.ML cs.LG

classification stat.MLcs.LG
keywords humanlearningfeedbackrewardreinforcementteachersactivealgorithm
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences is critical to recent advances in generative artificial intelligence. Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) is widely applied to achieve this objective. A key step in RLHF is to learn the reward function from human feedback. However, human feedback is costly and time-consuming, making it essential to collect high-quality conversation data for human teachers to label. Additionally, different human teachers have different levels of expertise. It is thus critical to query the most appropriate teacher for their opinions. In this paper, we use offline reinforcement learning (RL) to formulate the alignment problem. Motivated by the idea of $D$-optimal design, we first propose a dual active reward learning algorithm for the simultaneous selection of conversations and teachers. Next, we apply pessimistic RL to solve the alignment problem, based on the learned reward estimator. Theoretically, we show that the reward estimator obtained through our proposed adaptive selection strategy achieves minimal generalized variance asymptotically, and prove that the sub-optimality of our pessimistic policy scales as $O(1/\sqrt{T})$ with a given sample budget $T$. Through simulations and experiments on LLMs, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our algorithm and its superiority over state-of-the-arts.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. FisherSFT: Data-Efficient Supervised Fine-Tuning of Language Models Using Information Gain

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A greedy token-level Fisher information data selection method that reports improved sample efficiency for GPT-2 supervised fine-tuning on Shakespeare text relative to uniform, density, and AskLLM baselines.

Pith tools