REVIEW 3 cited by
Elucidating the Design Choice of Probability Paths in Flow Matching for Forecasting
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Flow matching has recently emerged as a powerful paradigm for generative modeling and has been extended to probabilistic time series forecasting in latent spaces. However, the impact of the specific choice of probability path model on forecasting performance remains under-explored. In this work, we demonstrate that forecasting spatio-temporal data with flow matching is highly sensitive to the selection of the probability path model. Motivated by this insight, we propose a novel probability path model designed to improve forecasting performance. Our empirical results across various dynamical system benchmarks show that our model achieves faster convergence during training and improved predictive performance compared to existing probability path models. Importantly, our approach is efficient during inference, requiring only a few sampling steps. This makes our proposed model practical for real-world applications and opens new avenues for probabilistic forecasting.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Trajectory-Aware Flow Matching for Topology Optimisation
A trajectory-aware flow matching method that builds its training path from volume-fraction-indexed BESO states generates feasible topologies in about 20 Euler steps and beats a diffusion baseline on compliance, volume...
-
Autoregressive One-Step Generative Modeling for Dynamical System Forecasting
MeLISA extends pixel-space MeanFlow to one-step window-conditioned autoregressive forecasting, improving long-horizon turbulence statistics over neural-operator baselines.
-
Flow Learners for PDEs: Toward a Physics-to-Physics Paradigm for Scientific Computing
Learned PDE solving should target transport over admissible futures via flow learners, not snapshot state regression.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.