Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Certifying Guidance & Control Networks: Uncertainty Propagation to an Event Manifold

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.03729 v1 pith:42KOML3K submitted 2024-09-30 eess.SY cs.LGcs.SY

classification eess.SYcs.LGcs.SY
keywords controleventmanifoldnetworksguidancepropagationuncertaintycertification
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We perform uncertainty propagation on an event manifold for Guidance & Control Networks (G&CNETs), aiming to enhance the certification tools for neural networks in this field. This work utilizes three previously solved optimal control problems with varying levels of dynamics nonlinearity and event manifold complexity. The G&CNETs are trained to represent the optimal control policies of a time-optimal interplanetary transfer, a mass-optimal landing on an asteroid and energy-optimal drone racing, respectively. For each of these problems, we describe analytically the terminal conditions on an event manifold with respect to initial state uncertainties. Crucially, this expansion does not depend on time but solely on the initial conditions of the system, thereby making it possible to study the robustness of the G&CNET at any specific stage of a mission defined by the event manifold. Once this analytical expression is found, we provide confidence bounds by applying the Cauchy-Hadamard theorem and perform uncertainty propagation using moment generating functions. While Monte Carlo-based (MC) methods can yield the results we present, this work is driven by the recognition that MC simulations alone may be insufficient for future certification of neural networks in guidance and control applications.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Comparing Behavioural Cloning and Reinforcement Learning for Spacecraft Guidance and Control Networks

    eess.SY 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    On four spacecraft guidance problems, reinforcement learning trains networks that are more robust to disturbances than behavioural cloning, but behavioural cloning matches optimal control when the expert data is accurate.

Pith tools