Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

ActPlan-1K: Benchmarking the Procedural Planning Ability of Visual Language Models in Household Activities

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.03907 v1 pith:F5LM7OP2 submitted 2024-10-04 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords planningabilityactivitieslanguagetaskactplan-1kbenchmarkcounterfactual
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models~(LLMs) have been adopted to process textual task description and accomplish procedural planning in embodied AI tasks because of their powerful reasoning ability. However, there is still lack of study on how vision language models~(VLMs) behave when multi-modal task inputs are considered. Counterfactual planning that evaluates the model's reasoning ability over alternative task situations are also under exploited. In order to evaluate the planning ability of both multi-modal and counterfactual aspects, we propose ActPlan-1K. ActPlan-1K is a multi-modal planning benchmark constructed based on ChatGPT and household activity simulator iGibson2. The benchmark consists of 153 activities and 1,187 instances. Each instance describing one activity has a natural language task description and multiple environment images from the simulator. The gold plan of each instance is action sequences over the objects in provided scenes. Both the correctness and commonsense satisfaction are evaluated on typical VLMs. It turns out that current VLMs are still struggling at generating human-level procedural plans for both normal activities and counterfactual activities. We further provide automatic evaluation metrics by finetuning over BLEURT model to facilitate future research on our benchmark.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LLaPa: A Vision-Language Model Framework for Counterfactual-Aware Procedural Planning

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A VLM-based planner with task-oriented segmentation reranking and a clause-level condition retriever reports state-of-the-art scores on ActPlan-1K and ALFRED, though the reported ablation numbers are internally inconsistent.

  2. Large Language Models for Planning: A Comprehensive and Systematic Survey

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A structured survey of LLM planning methods, benchmarks, and interpretability work, organized around a three-way taxonomy.

Pith tools