REVIEW 1 cited by
Underwater Object Detection in the Era of Artificial Intelligence: Current, Challenge, and Future
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Underwater object detection (UOD), aiming to identify and localise the objects in underwater images or videos, presents significant challenges due to the optical distortion, water turbidity, and changing illumination in underwater scenes. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) based methods, especially deep learning methods, have shown promising performance in UOD. To further facilitate future advancements, we comprehensively study AI-based UOD. In this survey, we first categorise existing algorithms into traditional machine learning-based methods and deep learning-based methods, and summarise them by considering learning strategy, experimental dataset, utilised features or frameworks, and learning stage. Next, we discuss the potential challenges and suggest possible solutions and new directions. We also perform both quantitative and qualitative evaluations of mainstream algorithms across multiple benchmark datasets by considering the diverse and biased experimental setups. Finally, we introduce two off-the-shelf detection analysis tools, Diagnosis and TIDE, which well-examine the effects of object characteristics and various types of errors on detectors. These tools help identify the strengths and weaknesses of detectors, providing insigts for further improvement. The source codes, trained models, utilised datasets, detection results, and detection analysis tools are public available at \url{https://github.com/LongChenCV/UODReview}, and will be regularly updated.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Improve Underwater Object Detection through YOLOv12 Architecture and Physics-informed Augmentation
Applying YOLOv12 with physics-flavored augmentations yields high reported mAP on four underwater detection benchmarks, but the claims are weakened by missing code, variance, and inconsistent speed numbers.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.