Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

HERM: Benchmarking and Enhancing Multimodal LLMs for Human-Centric Understanding

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.06777 v1 pith:CDV5YM6S submitted 2024-10-09 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords human-centricunderstandingmllmsdataexistingtrainingvisualannotations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The significant advancements in visual understanding and instruction following from Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have opened up more possibilities for broader applications in diverse and universal human-centric scenarios. However, existing image-text data may not support the precise modality alignment and integration of multi-grained information, which is crucial for human-centric visual understanding. In this paper, we introduce HERM-Bench, a benchmark for evaluating the human-centric understanding capabilities of MLLMs. Our work reveals the limitations of existing MLLMs in understanding complex human-centric scenarios. To address these challenges, we present HERM-100K, a comprehensive dataset with multi-level human-centric annotations, aimed at enhancing MLLMs' training. Furthermore, we develop HERM-7B, a MLLM that leverages enhanced training data from HERM-100K. Evaluations on HERM-Bench demonstrate that HERM-7B significantly outperforms existing MLLMs across various human-centric dimensions, reflecting the current inadequacy of data annotations used in MLLM training for human-centric visual understanding. This research emphasizes the importance of specialized datasets and benchmarks in advancing the MLLMs' capabilities for human-centric understanding.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. HumanPCR: Probing MLLM Capabilities in Diverse Human-Centric Scenes

    cs.CV 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A hierarchical benchmark for multimodal models on human-centric visual understanding finds frontier models average under 60% and miss question-uncued visual evidence, with test-time scaling helping only marginally.

  2. HumaniBench: A Human-Centric Framework for Large Multimodal Models Evaluation

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    HumaniBench, a news-image benchmark with 32,000 expert-verified items across seven tasks, reveals that no evaluated multimodal model aligns well across all seven human-centric principles.

Pith tools