Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Diffusion Density Estimators

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.06986 v1 pith:EFI2JLLH submitted 2024-10-09 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords densitydiffusionflowmodelsapproachestimatorstrainingaccuracy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We investigate the use of diffusion models as neural density estimators. The current approach to this problem involves converting the generative process to a smooth flow, known as the Probability Flow ODE. The log density at a given sample can be obtained by solving the ODE with a black-box solver. We introduce a new, highly parallelizable method that computes log densities without the need to solve a flow. Our approach is based on estimating a path integral by Monte Carlo, in a manner identical to the simulation-free training of diffusion models. We also study how different training parameters affect the accuracy of the density calculation, and offer insights into how these models can be made more scalable and efficient.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Comparing Normalizing Flows with Kernel Density Estimation in Estimating Risk of Automated Driving Systems

    cs.RO 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Normalizing flows fit scenario parameter densities better than KDE on held-out data, but produce roughly 40 times lower collision risk estimates, with no ground truth to decide which is correct.

Pith tools