pith. sign in

arxiv: 2410.07275 · v2 · submitted 2024-10-09 · 🪐 quant-ph · nlin.AO· physics.optics

Power-law distributions in nonequilibrium open quantum systems

Wai-Keong Mok This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 19:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph nlin.AOphysics.optics
keywords power-law distributionsopen quantum systemsnonlinear dissipationnonequilibrium steady statesquantum noiseheavy tailsquantum Liénard systems
0
0 comments X

The pith

Nonlinear dissipation in open quantum systems generates power-law tails in steady-state energy distributions via multiplicative quantum noise.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that power-law distributions emerge naturally in the energy statistics of open quantum systems featuring nonlinear dissipation. This arises from an amplification of quantum noise where fluctuations grow with the system's energy, leading to heavy tails in the nonequilibrium steady state. The authors prove this analytically using a family of quantum models and confirm it through simulations of quantum Liénard systems, proposing it as a general mechanism enforced by quantum mechanics constraints. This finding indicates that such heavy-tail behavior can occur without parameter fine-tuning, even when the corresponding classical system remains stable.

Core claim

In open quantum systems with nonlinear dissipation, the steady state energy distribution exhibits power-law tails originating from the amplification of quantum noise whose microscopic fluctuations grow with energy. Nonlinear dissipation generically induces multiplicative quantum noise enforced by quantum mechanics constraints, which is responsible for the heavy-tail behavior in nonequilibrium steady states.

What carries the argument

Multiplicative quantum noise induced by nonlinear dissipation, which amplifies fluctuations with increasing energy in quantum dynamical models like the quantum Liénard systems.

Load-bearing premise

The prototypical family of quantum dynamical models captures the nonlinear dissipation in real open quantum systems, and multiplicative noise follows directly from quantum mechanics without extra assumptions on the bath.

What would settle it

Measuring an exponential rather than power-law decay in the high-energy tail of the steady-state distribution for a system with nonlinear dissipation, such as in a quantum Liénard oscillator experiment.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2410.07275 by Wai-Keong Mok.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) A quantum particle trapped in a one-dimensional [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Physical signatures of the power-law tail in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Magnitudes of density matrix element [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Power-law probability distributions are widely used to model extreme statistical events in complex systems, with applications to a vast array of natural phenomena ranging from earthquakes to stock market crashes to pandemics. We show that analogous heavy tails arise naturally in open quantum systems with nonlinear dissipation. Introducing a prototypical family of quantum dynamical models, we analytically prove the emergence of power-law tails in the steady state energy distribution, originating from an amplification of quantum noise whose microscopic fluctuations grow with energy. Moreover, our analysis suggests a general mechanism for heavy-tail statistics in the nonequilibrium steady states of open quantum systems: Nonlinear dissipation generically induces multiplicative quantum noise, enforced by the constraints of quantum mechanics, which is responsible for the heavy-tail behavior. This is supported by numerical simulations of a general class of nonlinear dynamics known as quantum Li\'{e}nard systems. Remarkably, even when the corresponding classical system is stable, we find power-law tails in both steady-state populations and coherences, which occur for typical parameters without fine-tuning. This phenomenon can potentially be harnessed to develop extreme photon sources for novel applications in light-matter interaction and sensing.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a prototypical family of open quantum systems with nonlinear dissipation and analytically proves the emergence of power-law tails in the steady-state energy distribution, arising from amplification of quantum noise whose fluctuations grow with energy. It further suggests this as a general mechanism in nonequilibrium open quantum systems whereby nonlinear dissipation induces multiplicative quantum noise enforced by quantum mechanics constraints, supported by numerical simulations of quantum Liénard systems showing power-law tails in populations and coherences even when the corresponding classical system is stable and without fine-tuning.

Significance. If the analytical result for the prototypical family holds and the mechanism can be shown to apply more broadly, the work would identify a quantum-origin mechanism for heavy-tailed statistics in open quantum systems, with potential implications for extreme events in quantum optics and applications to extreme photon sources in light-matter interaction and sensing. The combination of an analytical proof and numerical evidence for the specific models constitutes a concrete contribution.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that nonlinear dissipation 'generically induces multiplicative quantum noise, enforced by the constraints of quantum mechanics' is not supported by a derivation applicable to arbitrary nonlinear system-bath couplings; the analytical proof and numerics are confined to the specific prototypical family of models, which may already embed the energy-dependent fluctuation growth, leaving the generality assertion as an unproven extension rather than a derived result.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of the work's significance and for the constructive comment. We respond to the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that nonlinear dissipation 'generically induces multiplicative quantum noise, enforced by the constraints of quantum mechanics' is not supported by a derivation applicable to arbitrary nonlinear system-bath couplings; the analytical proof and numerics are confined to the specific prototypical family of models, which may already embed the energy-dependent fluctuation growth, leaving the generality assertion as an unproven extension rather than a derived result.

    Authors: We agree that the analytical proof is specific to the prototypical family and the numerics to quantum Liénard systems; no general derivation for arbitrary nonlinear couplings is provided. The manuscript frames the broader mechanism as a suggestion ('our analysis suggests a general mechanism') arising from the quantum constraints observed in these models, rather than a proven result for all cases. To address the concern, we will revise the abstract to clarify that the generality is conjectural and illustrated by the studied models, without claiming a derivation applicable to arbitrary couplings. The core analytical result for the family and the numerical evidence remain unchanged. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: analytical proof and numerics are confined to explicitly introduced prototypical family without definitional reduction or fitted inputs.

full rationale

The paper defines a prototypical family of quantum dynamical models, analytically proves power-law tails inside that family, and supports the claim with numerics on quantum Liénard systems. The general-mechanism suggestion is framed as an inference from the family rather than a derivation that reduces to its own inputs by construction. No self-citations, parameter-fitting steps renamed as predictions, or ansatz smuggling appear in the abstract or description. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained for the models it actually analyzes.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the prototypical models and the assertion that quantum mechanics enforces multiplicative noise under nonlinear dissipation; no free parameters, invented entities, or additional axioms are explicitly introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Nonlinear dissipation generically induces multiplicative quantum noise enforced by the constraints of quantum mechanics
    This is presented as the general mechanism responsible for heavy-tail behavior.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5720 in / 1275 out tokens · 48567 ms · 2026-05-23T19:24:54.491363+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Newman, Power laws, pareto distributions and zipf’s law, Contemp

    M. Newman, Power laws, pareto distributions and zipf’s law, Contemp. Phys. 46, 323 (2005)

    work page 2005

  2. [2]

    P. A. Marquet, R. A. Qui˜ nones, S. Abades, F. Labra, M. Tognelli, M. Arim, and M. Rivadeneira, Scaling and power-laws in ecological systems, J. Exp. Biol. 208, 1749 (2005)

    work page 2005

  3. [3]

    Corral and A

    A. Corral and A. Gonz´ alez, Power law size distributions in geoscience revisited, Earth Space Sci. 6, 673 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Gabaix, Power laws in economics and finance, Annu

    X. Gabaix, Power laws in economics and finance, Annu. Rev. Econ. 1, 255 (2009)

    work page 2009

  5. [5]

    C. M. Pinto, A. Mendes Lopes, and J. T. Machado, A review of power laws in real life phenomena, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 17, 3558 (2012)

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    Markovi´ c and C

    D. Markovi´ c and C. Gros, Power laws and self-organized criticality in theory and nature, Phys. Rep. 536, 41 (2014)

    work page 2014

  7. [7]

    Sornette, L

    D. Sornette, L. Knopoff, Y. Y. Kagan, and C. Vanneste, Rank-ordering statistics of extreme events: Application to the distribution of large earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 101, 13883 (1996)

    work page 1996

  8. [8]

    J. M. Dudley, G. Genty, A. Mussot, A. Chabchoub, and F. Dias, Rogue waves and analogies in optics and oceanography, Nat. Rev. Phys. 1, 675 (2019)

    work page 2019

  9. [9]

    E. W. Cliver, C. J. Schrijver, K. Shibata, and I. G. Usoskin, Extreme solar events, Living Rev. Sol. Phys. 19, 2 (2022)

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    Gabaix, P

    X. Gabaix, P. Gopikrishnan, V. Plerou, and H. E. Stan- ley, A theory of power-law distributions in financial mar- ket fluctuations, Nature 423, 267 (2003)

    work page 2003

  11. [11]

    J. A. T. Machado and A. M. Lopes, Rare and extreme events: the case of covid-19 pandemic, Nonlinear Dyn. 100, 2953 (2020). 6

    work page 2020

  12. [12]

    Lillo and R

    F. Lillo and R. N. Mantegna, Anomalous spreading of power-law quantum wave packets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1061 (2000)

    work page 2000

  13. [13]

    Batle, A

    J. Batle, A. Plastino, M. Casas, and A. Plastino, Quan- tum evolution of power-law mixed states, Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 308, 233 (2002)

    work page 2002

  14. [14]

    C. W. Gardiner and P. Zoller, Quantum Noise , 2nd ed., edited by H. Haken (Springer, 2000)

    work page 2000

  15. [15]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems (Oxford University Press, 2007)

    work page 2007

  16. [16]

    H. J. Carmichael, Statistical methods in quantum optics: Vol. 1: Master equations and Fokker-Planck equations; 1st ed., 2nd corr. print , Texts and monographs in physics (Springer, Berlin, 1999) p. 365 p

    work page 1999

  17. [17]

    A. Chia, M. Hajduˇ sek, R. Nair, R. Fazio, L. C. Kwek, and V. Vedral, Phase-preserving linear amplifiers not simula- ble by the parametric amplifier, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 163603 (2020)

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    Chia, W.-K

    A. Chia, W.-K. D. Mok, C. Noh, and L.-C. Kwek, Quan- tum pure noise-induced transitions: A truly nonclassical limit cycle sensitive to number parity, SciPost Phys. 15, 121 (2023)

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    Manceau, K

    M. Manceau, K. Y. Spasibko, G. Leuchs, R. Filip, and M. V. Chekhova, Indefinite-mean pareto photon distri- bution from amplified quantum noise, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 123606 (2019)

    work page 2019

  20. [20]

    McNeil and D

    K. McNeil and D. Walls, Possibility of observing en- hanced photon bunching from two photon emission, Phys. Lett. A 51, 233 (1975)

    work page 1975

  21. [21]

    Mok, Quantum dynamics of nonlinear dissipative systems, Bachelor thesis, National University of Singa- pore (2022)

    W.-K. Mok, Quantum dynamics of nonlinear dissipative systems, Bachelor thesis, National University of Singa- pore (2022)

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    Chia, W.-K

    A. Chia, W.-K. Mok, L.-C. Kwek, and C. Noh, Quanti- sation of nonlinear non-hamiltonian systems, (in prepa- ration)

    work page

  23. [23]

    S. H. Strogatz, Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: With Applications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry and Engi- neering (Westview Press, 2000)

    work page 2000

  24. [24]

    Walter, A

    S. Walter, A. Nunnenkamp, and C. Bruder, Quan- tum synchronization of a driven self-sustained oscillator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 094102 (2014)

    work page 2014

  25. [25]

    Walter, A

    S. Walter, A. Nunnenkamp, and C. Bruder, Quantum synchronization of two van der pol oscillators, Ann. Phys. (Berlin) 527, 131 (2015)

    work page 2015

  26. [26]

    L¨ orch, E

    N. L¨ orch, E. Amitai, A. Nunnenkamp, and C. Bruder, Genuine quantum signatures in synchronization of an- harmonic self-oscillators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 073601 (2016)

    work page 2016

  27. [27]

    Mok, L.-C

    W.-K. Mok, L.-C. Kwek, and H. Heimonen, Synchro- nization boost with single-photon dissipation in the deep quantum regime, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033422 (2020)

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    Leghtas, S

    Z. Leghtas, S. Touzard, I. M. Pop, A. Kou, B. Vlas- takis, A. Petrenko, K. M. Sliwa, A. Narla, S. Shankar, M. J. Hatridge, M. Reagor, L. Frunzio, R. J. Schoelkopf, M. Mirrahimi, and M. H. Devoret, Confining the state of light to a quantum manifold by engineered two-photon loss, Science 347, 853 (2015)

    work page 2015

  29. [29]

    Lescanne, M

    R. Lescanne, M. Villiers, T. Peronnin, A. Sarlette, M. Delbecq, B. Huard, T. Kontos, M. Mirrahimi, and Z. Leghtas, Exponential suppression of bit-flips in a qubit encoded in an oscillator, Nat. Phys. 16, 509 (2020)

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    [40, 41]

    See Supplementary Materials for additional calculation details, which includes Refs. [40, 41]

    work page

  31. [31]

    R. L. Hudson and K. R. Parthasarathy, Quantum Ito’s formula and stochastic evolutions, Commun. Math. Phys. 93, 301 (1984)

    work page 1984

  32. [32]

    Mandel and E

    L. Mandel and E. Wolf, Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press, 1995)

    work page 1995

  33. [33]

    Sonar, M

    S. Sonar, M. Hajduˇ sek, M. Mukherjee, R. Fazio, V. Ve- dral, S. Vinjanampathy, and L.-C. Kwek, Squeezing en- hances quantum synchronization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 163601 (2018)

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    Shen, W.-K

    Y. Shen, W.-K. Mok, C. Noh, A. Q. Liu, L.-C. Kwek, W. Fan, and A. Chia, Quantum synchronization effects induced by strong nonlinearities, Phys. Rev. A 107, 053713 (2023)

    work page 2023

  35. [35]

    Heimerl, A

    J. Heimerl, A. Mikhaylov, S. Meier, H. H¨ ollerer, I. Kaminer, M. Chekhova, and P. Hommelhoff, Multi- photon electron emission with non-classical light, Nature Physics 20, 945 (2024)

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    Stammer, J

    P. Stammer, J. Rivera-Dean, A. Maxwell, T. Lamprou, A. Ord´ o˜ nez, M. F. Ciappina, P. Tzallas, and M. Lewen- stein, Quantum electrodynamics of intense laser-matter interactions: A tool for quantum state engineering, PRX Quantum 4, 010201 (2023)

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    Gorlach, M

    A. Gorlach, M. E. Tzur, M. Birk, M. Kr¨ uger, N. Rivera, O. Cohen, and I. Kaminer, High-harmonic generation driven by quantum light, Nat. Phys. 19, 1689 (2023)

    work page 2023

  38. [38]

    Gatti, E

    A. Gatti, E. Brambilla, M. Bache, and L. A. Lugiato, Ghost imaging with thermal light: Comparing entan- glement and classical correlation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 093602 (2004)

    work page 2004

  39. [39]

    K. W. C. Chan, M. N. O’Sullivan, and R. W. Boyd, High- order thermal ghost imaging, Opt. Lett. 34, 3343 (2009)

    work page 2009

  40. [40]

    Ben Arosh, M

    L. Ben Arosh, M. C. Cross, and R. Lifshitz, Quantum limit cycles and the rayleigh and van der pol oscillators, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 013130 (2021)

    work page 2021

  41. [41]

    P. D. Drummond and M. Hillery, The Quantum Theory of Nonlinear Optics (Cambridge University Press, 2014). 7 Supplemental Material We provide additional technical details supporting the claims in the main text. CONTENTS I. Steady state number distribution for the M-boson model 7 II. Analytical results for M = 2 at the critical point 8 A. Moments of the num...

    work page 2014

  42. [42]

    g(−q) = −g(q)

    g is an odd function, i.e. g(−q) = −g(q)

    work page

  43. [43]

    f(−q) = f(q)

    f is an even function, i.e. f(−q) = f(q)

    work page

  44. [44]

    Notable examples of dynamical systems that satisfy Li´ enard’s theorem include paradigmatic models such as the van der Pol, Rayleigh, and Duffing oscillators

    F (q) ≡ R q 0 f(u)du has exactly one positive root at some q = a, negative for 0 < q < a , positive and nondecreasing for q > a . Notable examples of dynamical systems that satisfy Li´ enard’s theorem include paradigmatic models such as the van der Pol, Rayleigh, and Duffing oscillators. Inspired by Eq. (49), we consider the quantum equation of motion d ⟨...

    work page

  45. [45]

    Start with the classical equation of motion of interest, of the form ˙q = f1(q, p), ˙p = f2(q, p), (52) where f1 and f2 are arbitrary polynomial functions

    work page

  46. [46]

    Introduce the classical complex variable α = (q + ip)/ √ 2, which has the equation of motion ˙α = 1√ 2 [f1(α, α∗) + if2(α, α∗)] , (53) where f1(α, α∗) ≡ f1(q = ( α + α∗)/ √ 2, p = −i(α − α∗)/ √

    work page

  47. [47]

    (with a slight abuse of notation), and similarly defined for f2(α, α∗)

    work page

  48. [48]

    For convenience, reorder the terms such that all the α∗ appears on the left of α

    Since α is a classical variable (sometimes called a c-number), we can change the order of α and α∗ freely in f1(α, α∗) and f2(α, α∗). For convenience, reorder the terms such that all the α∗ appears on the left of α

    work page

  49. [49]

    (54) The normal ordering of operators comes from Step 3

    Making the substitution α → ˆa and α∗ → ˆa†, we can write down the quantum equation of motion d ⟨ˆa⟩ dt = 1√ 2 ⟨: f1(ˆa, ˆa†) :⟩ + i ⟨: f2(ˆa, ˆa†) :⟩ . (54) The normal ordering of operators comes from Step 3. The choice of ordering here is simply for convenience. In principle, the master equation can be constructed for any arbitrary operator ordering

    work page

  50. [50]

    (54) is satisfied

    Construct a Lindblad master equation ˙ρ = −i[ ˆH, ρ] + X j ΓjD[ˆcj]ρ (55) for a suitable (and in general non-unique) choice of Hamiltonian ˆH, jump operators ˆcj and decay rates Γ j > 0, such that Eq. (54) is satisfied. The solution to this inverse problem is the subject of Refs. [21, 22], which also proved the existence of a master equation for any arbit...

    work page