Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Adam Exploits $\ell_\infty$-geometry of Loss Landscape via Coordinate-wise Adaptivity

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.08198 v3 pith:KSSC3NVU submitted 2024-10-10 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords adamgeometryinftyanalysisconvergenceunderadvantageassumptions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Adam outperforms SGD when training language models. Yet this advantage is not well-understood theoretically -- previous convergence analysis for Adam and SGD mainly focuses on the number of steps $T$ and is already minimax-optimal in non-convex cases, which are both $\widetilde{O}(T^{-1/4})$. In this work, we argue that the exploitation of nice $\ell_\infty$-geometry is the key advantage of Adam over SGD. More specifically, we give a new convergence analysis for Adam under novel assumptions that loss is smooth under $\ell_\infty$-geometry rather than the more common $\ell_2$-geometry, which yields a much better empirical smoothness constant for GPT-2 and ResNet models. Our experiments confirm that Adam performs much worse when the favorable $\ell_\infty$-geometry is changed while SGD provably remains unaffected. We also extend the convergence analysis to blockwise Adam under novel blockwise smoothness assumptions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Seesaw: Accelerating Training by Balancing Learning Rate and Batch Size Scheduling

    cs.LG 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    When a cosine schedule would halve the learning rate, Seesaw cuts it by √2 and doubles the batch, matching loss curves with ~36% fewer serial steps.

  2. Is your batch size the problem? Revisiting the Adam-SGD gap in language modeling

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SGD with momentum can match Adam's performance in language modeling when trained with small batches and careful tuning, a result that contradicts several popular explanations for the optimizer gap.

Pith tools