Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Sui Generis: Large Language Models for Authorship Attribution and Verification in Latin

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.09245 v1 pith:ZVSK5OIH submitted 2024-10-11 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords authorshipllmsmodelsverificationattributionlanguagelargelatin
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper evaluates the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) in authorship attribution and authorship verification tasks for Latin texts of the Patristic Era. The study showcases that LLMs can be robust in zero-shot authorship verification even on short texts without sophisticated feature engineering. Yet, the models can also be easily "mislead" by semantics. The experiments also demonstrate that steering the model's authorship analysis and decision-making is challenging, unlike what is reported in the studies dealing with high-resource modern languages. Although LLMs prove to be able to beat, under certain circumstances, the traditional baselines, obtaining a nuanced and truly explainable decision requires at best a lot of experimentation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Trends and Challenges in Authorship Analysis: A Review of ML, DL, and LLM Approaches

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A systematic review of 93 papers on authorship analysis, summarizing ML, DL, and LLM methods, datasets, and open challenges from 2015 to 2024.

Pith tools