REVIEW 1 cited by
Sui Generis: Large Language Models for Authorship Attribution and Verification in Latin
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This paper evaluates the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) in authorship attribution and authorship verification tasks for Latin texts of the Patristic Era. The study showcases that LLMs can be robust in zero-shot authorship verification even on short texts without sophisticated feature engineering. Yet, the models can also be easily "mislead" by semantics. The experiments also demonstrate that steering the model's authorship analysis and decision-making is challenging, unlike what is reported in the studies dealing with high-resource modern languages. Although LLMs prove to be able to beat, under certain circumstances, the traditional baselines, obtaining a nuanced and truly explainable decision requires at best a lot of experimentation.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Trends and Challenges in Authorship Analysis: A Review of ML, DL, and LLM Approaches
A systematic review of 93 papers on authorship analysis, summarizing ML, DL, and LLM methods, datasets, and open challenges from 2015 to 2024.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.