Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

AI Model Registries: A Foundational Tool for AI Governance

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.09645 v1 pith:7UYIF6QH submitted 2024-10-12 cs.CY

classification cs.CY
keywords registriesgovernancemodelfoundationalexploreframeworkgovernmentalimplementation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this report, we propose the implementation of national registries for frontier AI models as a foundational tool for AI governance. We explore the rationale, design, and implementation of such registries, drawing on comparisons with registries in analogous industries to make recommendations for a registry that is efficient, unintrusive, and which will bring AI governance closer to parity with the governmental insight into other high-impact industries. We explore key information that should be collected, including model architecture, model size, compute and data used during training, and we survey the viability and utility of evaluations developed specifically for AI. Our proposal is designed to provide governmental insight and enhance AI safety while fostering innovation and minimizing the regulatory burden on developers. By providing a framework that respects intellectual property concerns and safeguards sensitive information, this registry approach supports responsible AI development without impeding progress. We propose that timely and accurate registration should be encouraged primarily through injunctive action, by requiring third parties to use only registered models, and secondarily through direct financial penalties for non-compliance. By providing a comprehensive framework for AI model registries, we aim to support policymakers in developing foundational governance structures to monitor and mitigate risks associated with advanced AI systems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Documenting Deployment with Fabric: A Repository of Real-World AI Governance

    cs.CY 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Fabric is a public repository of 20 deployed AI systems with co-designed workflow diagrams, plus a four-level human oversight and five-level institutional oversight taxonomy.

  2. The AI Agent Index

    cs.SE 2025-02 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    The AI Agent Index catalogs 67 deployed agentic AI systems and shows that most developers publicly disclose little about safety policies and evaluations.

Pith tools