Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Reproducible Machine Learning-based Voice Pathology Detection: Introducing the Pitch Difference Feature

Sound · Submitted 14 Oct 2024

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that by following the proposed methodology and feature engineering, there is a potential in detection of various voice pathologies using ML models applied to the simplest vocal task, a sustained utterance of the vowel /a:/.

how it is stated · asserted 0.62 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2410.10537 (version 3)
Pith IDNY2KYLMU, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationJakub Steinbach, Jan Mare\v{s}, Jan Vrba, Kei Ichiji, Laura Verde, Luk\'a\v{s} H\'ajek, Martin Chovanec, Noriyasu Homma, Roberta De Fazio, Tom\'a\v{s} Jirsa, Yuwen Zeng, Zuzana Sedl\'akov\'a, Zuzana Urb\'aniov\'a. "Reproducible Machine Learning-based Voice Pathology Detection: Introducing the Pitch Difference Feature." arXiv:2410.10537 (2024). https://pith.science/paper/NY2KYLMU
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 7,108 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.11 · states limitation 0.45 · human participants 0.85 · controlled comparison 0.07 · randomized assignment 0.03 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.07 · mentions code or data availability 0.98.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Purpose: We introduce a novel methodology for voice pathology detection using the publicly available Saarbr\"ucken Voice Database (SVD) and a robust feature set combining commonly used acoustic handcrafted features with two novel ones: pitch difference (relative variation in fundamental frequency) and NaN feature (failed fundamental frequency estimation). Methods: We evaluate six machine learning (ML) algorithms -- support vector machine, k-nearest neighbors, naive Bayes, decision tree, random forest, and AdaBoost -- using grid search for feasible hyperparameters and 20480 different feature subsets. Top 1000 classification models -- feature subset combinations for each ML algorithm are validated with repeated stratified cross-validation. To address class imbalance, we apply K-Means SMOTE to augment the training data. Results: Our approach achieves 85.61%, 84.69% and 85.22% unweighted average recall (UAR) for females, males and combined results respectively. We intentionally omit accuracy as it is a highly biased metric for imbalanced data. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that by following the proposed methodology and feature engineering, there is a potential in detection of various voice pathologies using ML models applied to the simplest vocal task, a sustained utterance of the vowel /a:/. To enable easier use of our methodology and to support our claims, we provide a publicly available GitHub repository with DOI 10.5281/zenodo.13771573. Finally, we provide a REFORMS checklist to enhance readability, reproducibility and justification of our approach

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Purpose: We introduce a novel methodology for voice pathology detection using the publicly available Saarbr\"ucken Voice Database (SVD) and a robust feature set combining commonly used acoustic handcrafted features with two novel ones: pitch difference (relative variation in fundamental frequency) and NaN feature (failed fundamental frequency estimation). contribution 1.00 0.89 0.03 asserted 0.98
s1 Methods: We evaluate six machine learning (ML) algorithms -- support vector machine, k-nearest neighbors, naive Bayes, decision tree, random forest, and AdaBoost -- using grid search for feasible hyperparameters and 20480 different feature subsets. method 1.00 0.96 0.01 asserted 0.99
s2 Top 1000 classification models -- feature subset combinations for each ML algorithm are validated with repeated stratified cross-validation. method 1.00 0.93 0.01 asserted 0.95
s3 To address class imbalance, we apply K-Means SMOTE to augment the training data. method 1.00 0.95 0.01 asserted 0.98
s4 Results: Our approach achieves 85.61%, 84.69% and 85.22% unweighted average recall (UAR) for females, males and combined results respectively. result 1.00 0.97 0.05 asserted 1.00
s5 We intentionally omit accuracy as it is a highly biased metric for imbalanced data. method 0.48 0.87 0.02 asserted 1.00
s6 Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that by following the proposed methodology and feature engineering, there is a potential in detection of various voice pathologies using ML models applied to the simplest vocal task, a sustained utterance of the vowel /a:/. interpretation 0.99 0.81 0.97 asserted 0.62
s7 To enable easier use of our methodology and to support our claims, we provide a publicly available GitHub repository with DOI 10.5281/zenodo.13771573. contribution 0.96 0.89 0.02 asserted 0.97
s8 Finally, we provide a REFORMS checklist to enhance readability, reproducibility and justification of our approach contribution 0.97 0.86 0.02 asserted 0.90

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.93 · evidence from analysis of existing data 0.84.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v3
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Purpose: We introduce a novel methodology for voice pathology detection using the publicly available Saarbr\"ucken Voice Database (SVD) and a robust feature set combining commonly used acoustic handcrafted features with two novel ones: pitch difference (relative variation in fundamental frequency) and NaN feature (failed fundamental frequency estimation). Methods: We evaluate six machine learning (ML) algorithms -- support vector machine, k-nearest neighbors, naive Bayes, decision tree, random forest, and AdaBoost -- using grid search for feasible hyperparameters and 20480 different feature subsets. Top 1000 classification models -- feature subset combinations for each ML algorithm are validated with repeated stratified cross-validation. To address class imbalance, we apply K-Means SMOTE to augment the training data. Results: Our approach achieves 85.61%, 84.69% and 85.22% unweighted average recall (UAR) for females, males and combined results respectively. We intentionally omit accuracy as it is a highly biased metric for imbalanced data. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that by following the proposed methodology and feature engineering, there is a potential in detection of various voice pathologies using ML models applied to the simplest vocal task, a sustained utterance of the vowel /a:/. To enable easier use of our methodology and to support our claims, we provide a publicly available GitHub repository with DOI 10.5281/zenodo.13771573. Finally, we provide a REFORMS checklist to enhance readability, reproducibility and justification of our approach

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.