Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Spinal open books and symplectic fillings with exotic fibers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.10697 v2 pith:U2GQMRN5 submitted 2024-10-14 math.GT math.SG

classification math.GTmath.SG
keywords openspinalbookfillingssupportedsymplecticbookscontact
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Spinal open book decompositions provide a natural generalization of open book decompositions. We show that any minimal symplectic filling of a contact 3-manifold supported by a planar spinal open book is deformation equivalent to the complement of a positive multisection in a bordered Lefschetz fibration, which generalizes a result of Wendl. Along the way, we give an explicit local model for a non-compactly supported "singularity at infinity" in a generalized version of bordered Lefschetz fibrations, given by pseudoholomorphic foliations associated to the spinal open books. This provides new tools to classify symplectic fillings of a contact 3-manifold that is not supported by an amenable spinal open book, by studying monodromy factorizations in the newly defined spinal mapping class group. As an application, we complete the classification of strong fillings of all parabolic torus bundles, and make progress towards classifying symplectic fillings of contact 3-manifolds supported by non-planar open books.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Bordered contact invariants and half Giroux torsion

    math.GT 2025-06 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    Separating half Giroux torsion does not force the contact invariant to vanish: infinitely many closed counterexamples exist, disproving Ghiggini's conjecture.

Pith tools