pith. sign in

arxiv: 2410.13071 · v3 · pith:PZGPQO7Anew · submitted 2024-10-16 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · hep-ph

Particle Acceleration Time due to Turbulent-Induced Magnetic Reconnection

Elisabete M. de Gouveia Dal Pino , Tania E. Medina-Torrejon This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 18:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE hep-ph
keywords particle accelerationmagnetic reconnectionturbulencerelativistic jetsFermi accelerationdrift accelerationcurrent sheets
0
0 comments X

The pith

Acceleration time stays nearly independent of particle energy in the Fermi regime of turbulent reconnection.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how long it takes for particles to gain energy through magnetic reconnection driven by turbulence inside a relativistic jet. It distinguishes a Fermi regime where acceleration time does not depend on particle energy from a later drift regime where the time grows strongly with energy. The authors calculate an average acceleration time from the statistical properties of current-sheet thicknesses and reconnection speeds, then compare it directly to the time measured by tracking fifty thousand particles in the simulation. They show that the Fermi regime matches theoretical expectations and dominates until the particle Larmor radius reaches the thickness of the largest current sheets, after which the slower drift regime appears. This establishes that efficient, energy-independent acceleration operates over a wide range before the process slows.

Core claim

The acceleration time during the Fermi regime remains nearly independent of particle energy and aligns with the acceleration time theoretical relations up to the threshold energy, attained when the particles Larmor radius becomes as large as the thickness of the largest current sheets. Beyond this threshold, the acceleration regime shifts to the slower drift regime, showing strong energy dependence. The results also indicate a clear dominance of the Fermi regime of acceleration.

What carries the argument

Average acceleration time computed from statistical distributions of current-sheet thicknesses and reconnection velocities, validated against direct tracking of 50,000 particles in the jet simulation.

If this is right

  • Fermi-regime acceleration operates with constant time until the Larmor-radius threshold, allowing rapid energy gain across many decades.
  • After the threshold the process switches to drift acceleration whose time scales with energy, slowing further gains.
  • The Fermi regime dominates the overall acceleration process in the turbulent jet.
  • The three conditions for reconnection acceleration time identified by Xu and Lazarian are satisfied by the measured distributions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same threshold behavior may set an upper limit on the energies that can be reached efficiently in other turbulent reconnection sites such as the solar corona.
  • If the largest current sheets are thinner in real jets than in the simulation, the Fermi regime would extend to higher energies.
  • The energy-independent phase could allow particles to reach the knee of the cosmic-ray spectrum before drift effects become important.

Load-bearing premise

The statistical distributions of current-sheet thicknesses and reconnection velocities can be averaged over time to produce a representative acceleration time that matches the time measured by tracking individual particles.

What would settle it

A direct measurement showing that acceleration time in the Fermi regime varies strongly with particle energy even while the Larmor radius remains smaller than the largest current-sheet thickness.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2410.13071 by Elisabete M. de Gouveia Dal Pino, Tania E. Medina-Torrejon.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A 3D view of the simulated jet at three different snapshots t = 24, 40 and 45 L/c. In both panels the black lines represent the magnetic field. In the right panels the squares correspond to the central positions of all the magnetic reconnection events, the colors stand for the three different conditions as described in eqs. 1 to 3. In the left panels, the circles represent the particles kinetic energy norm… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Top panel: Average particle acceleration time calculated from two independent methods. In red: the accel￾eration time as a function of both the particle kinetic energy normalized by the proton rest mass energy and the time, cal￾culated directly from the particles accelerated in the MHD￾PIC simulation of the jet, between t = 30 and 60L/c. In green: the acceleration time evolution, calculated directly from t… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Histograms of the acceleration time evolution, calculated from the magnetic reconnection sites identified by the search algorithm (Kadowaki et al. 2018; Kadowaki et al. 2021), using eqs. 1 to 3. Top: condtion I given by eq. 1. Middle: condition II given by eq. 2. Bottom: condition III given by eq. 3. The green squares give the mean acceleration time in each snapshot. 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 Time[L/c] 10 15 20… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Top panel: accumulated acceleration time of the particles injected in the nearly stationary turbulent jet at snapshot t= 45 L/c (RMHD-GACCEL model in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Histograms of the thickness ∆ (left), the sinθ (middle), and angle θ (right) between the reconnecting field and the guide field, as functions of the dynamical time evolution of the simulated jet. The blue lines give the mean values in each time. APPENDIX A. HISTOGRAMS OF THE PARAMETERS OF THE RECONNECTION SITES IDENTIFIED IN THE SIMULATED JET [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We numerically investigate a crucial parameter for understanding particle acceleration theory via turbulence-induced magnetic reconnection: the particle acceleration time. We examine particles accelerated either during the jet's dynamic evolution or in a post-processing, nearly stationary regime. We derive the particle acceleration time and compare it with theoretical predictions for both the Fermi and drift regimes identified in the simulations. In the Fermi regime, the acceleration time is expected to be independent of the particles' energy, for constant reconnection velocity, as energy increases exponentially with time. Conversely, we expect the reconnection acceleration time to depend on the current sheet's thickness and the reconnection velocity, a dependence recently revisited by xu and lazarian 2023. They identified three conditions for \(t_{acc}\). We tested these relations using statistical distributions of the current sheets' thickness and reconnection velocities in the turbulent jet over time. The resulting average value of \(t_{acc}\) was found to be nearly constant with particle energy. We compared this acceleration time with the average acceleration time derived directly from 50,000 particles accelerated in situ in the same relativistic jet. When considering a longer time interval for particle acceleration in a nearly stationary snapshot of the turbulent jet, we find that the acceleration time during the Fermi regime remains nearly independent of particle energy and aligns with the acceleration time theoretical relations up to the threshold energy, attained when the particles Larmor radius becomes as large as the thickness of the largest current sheets. Beyond this threshold, the acceleration regime shifts to the slower drift regime, showing strong energy dependence, as predicted. The results also indicate a clear dominance of the Fermi regime of acceleration.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript numerically investigates the particle acceleration time t_acc in turbulence-induced magnetic reconnection within a relativistic jet simulation. The authors compute an average t_acc from statistical distributions of current sheet thicknesses and reconnection velocities over time, test it against the three conditions in Xu & Lazarian (2023), and compare the result to the average t_acc obtained from direct tracking of 50,000 particles. They report that t_acc remains nearly energy-independent in the Fermi regime (consistent with exponential energy growth at constant reconnection velocity) up to a threshold where the Larmor radius equals the thickness of the largest current sheets, after which acceleration shifts to the slower, energy-dependent drift regime, with clear dominance of the Fermi process. Comparisons are performed both during the jet's dynamic evolution and in a post-processing nearly stationary regime.

Significance. If the central comparison holds, the work supplies numerical support for the Xu & Lazarian (2023) acceleration-time relations in a turbulent reconnection setting and identifies a concrete energy threshold for the Fermi-to-drift transition. This would be useful for modeling nonthermal particle spectra in astrophysical jets. The direct tracking of 50,000 particles provides a statistically meaningful benchmark against the distribution-derived average.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / Results] Abstract (and the results section describing the averaging procedure): The claim that the global statistical average of t_acc from current-sheet distributions is representative and matches the average from direct particle tracking rests on the untested assumption that these distributions faithfully sample the reconnection events actually encountered by the tracked particles. Trajectory selection, residence-time weighting, and the post-processing stationary snapshot could bias the subset of events experienced by particles; without showing the distribution of per-particle t_acc values or demonstrating that the averaging accounts for encounter probabilities, the reported near-independence of t_acc and the dominance of the Fermi regime could be an artifact of the procedure rather than a validation of the physics.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The threshold energy is identified when the particle Larmor radius equals the thickness of the largest current sheets, yet the manuscript provides no quantitative detail on how the largest-sheet thickness is extracted from the time-dependent distributions or which magnetic-field value is used to compute r_L in the simulation. This definition is load-bearing for locating the Fermi-to-drift transition and for the claim that the alignment with theory holds only up to that point.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract contains inconsistent capitalization and citation style: 'xu and lazarian 2023' should read 'Xu & Lazarian (2023)'; 'Larmor' should be consistently capitalized.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'a longer time interval for particle acceleration in a nearly stationary snapshot' without specifying the interval length, the criterion used to assess stationarity, or how the snapshot is selected from the turbulent jet evolution.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and insightful comments. We address each major comment point by point below and indicate where revisions will be made.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Results] Abstract (and the results section describing the averaging procedure): The claim that the global statistical average of t_acc from current-sheet distributions is representative and matches the average from direct particle tracking rests on the untested assumption that these distributions faithfully sample the reconnection events actually encountered by the tracked particles. Trajectory selection, residence-time weighting, and the post-processing stationary snapshot could bias the subset of events experienced by particles; without showing the distribution of per-particle t_acc values or demonstrating that the averaging accounts for encounter probabilities, the reported near-independence of t_acc and the dominance of the Fermi regime could be an artifact of the procedure rather than a validation of the physics.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the comparison of averages assumes the distributions capture the events experienced by tracked particles. The manuscript shows that the two independent averages agree closely in the Fermi regime, which provides supporting evidence that the procedure is representative. To strengthen this and directly address possible biases from trajectory selection or weighting, the revised manuscript will include the distribution of per-particle t_acc values together with a brief discussion of how the averaging incorporates encounter probabilities. These additions will appear in the results section. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The threshold energy is identified when the particle Larmor radius equals the thickness of the largest current sheets, yet the manuscript provides no quantitative detail on how the largest-sheet thickness is extracted from the time-dependent distributions or which magnetic-field value is used to compute r_L in the simulation. This definition is load-bearing for locating the Fermi-to-drift transition and for the claim that the alignment with theory holds only up to that point.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative details on the extraction of the largest current-sheet thickness and the precise B value for r_L are needed. The revised manuscript will specify the criterion used to identify the maximum thickness from the time-dependent distributions (e.g., the highest value recorded across snapshots) and will state the magnetic-field value employed for the Larmor-radius calculation. These clarifications will be added to the abstract and results sections. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; derivation relies on independent simulation statistics and external theory

full rationale

The paper computes an average t_acc from the statistical distributions of current-sheet thickness and reconnection velocity drawn from the turbulent jet simulation, then compares that average both to the external Xu & Lazarian (2023) relations and to a separate direct-tracking average obtained from 50,000 particles. No equation or claim reduces the reported constancy or the Fermi-regime dominance to a fitted parameter, a self-citation, or a definitional identity; the two averaging procedures are presented as distinct checks whose agreement is offered as evidence rather than presupposed. The cited theoretical relations originate outside the author set and are not invoked as a uniqueness theorem that forces the present result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper relies on standard assumptions in plasma astrophysics about reconnection and turbulence; no new entities or free parameters explicitly fitted in the abstract. The central claim rests on domain assumptions about regime behavior and statistical averaging.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Turbulent magnetic reconnection occurs in relativistic jets and leads to particle acceleration in Fermi and drift regimes.
    This is the foundational assumption for the entire study as stated in the abstract.
  • domain assumption The reconnection velocity is constant in the Fermi regime, making acceleration time independent of energy.
    Stated in the abstract as the expectation for the Fermi regime behavior.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5828 in / 1386 out tokens · 27395 ms · 2026-05-23T18:46:49.116973+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 88 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.co...

    work page

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" "doi:" doi * if FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix ":" * if eprint field.or.null * if FUNCTION format.pid eprint empty format.doi format.eprint if FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t...

    work page

  3. [3]

    - [1] #1 = = ^ ^ ^ .\!\!^ d .\!\!^ h .\!\!^ m .\!\!^ s .\!\!^ @mss

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command Each re...

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.831784 2017

  4. [4]

    P., Zrake , J., & Fiuza , F

    Alves , E. P., Zrake , J., & Fiuza , F. 2018, , 121, 245101

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    2013, in Particle Acceleration in Cosmic Plasmas

    Arons , J. 2013, in Particle Acceleration in Cosmic Plasmas. Series: Space Sciences Series of ISSI, ed. A. Balogh , A. Bykov , R. P. Lin , J. Raymond , & M. Scholer , Vol. 45, 341--367

    work page 2013

  6. [6]

    2018, , 862, 80

    Ball , D., Sironi , L., & \"O zel , F. 2018, , 862, 80

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    M., Xu , S., & Lazarian , A

    Barreto-Mota , L., de Gouveia Dal Pino , E. M., Xu , S., & Lazarian , A. 2024, arXiv e-prints, ApJ in press, arXiv:2405.12146

    work page arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    J., & Hornig, G

    Beg, R., Russell, A. J., & Hornig, G. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal, 940, 94

    work page 2022

  9. [9]

    2016, , 819, 90

    Beresnyak , A., & Li , H. 2016, , 819, 90

    work page 2016

  10. [10]

    2016, , 456, 1739

    Bromberg , O., & Tchekhovskoy , A. 2016, , 456, 1739

    work page 2016

  11. [11]

    A., & Begelman , M

    Cerutti , B., Uzdensky , D. A., & Begelman , M. C. 2012, , 746, 148

    work page 2012

  12. [12]

    R., Uzdensky , D

    Cerutti , B., Werner , G. R., Uzdensky , D. A., & Begelman , M. C. 2013, , 770, 147

    work page 2013

  13. [13]

    2014, Physics of Plasmas, 21, 056501

    ---. 2014, Physics of Plasmas, 21, 056501

    work page 2014

  14. [14]

    2012, in High Performance Visualization--Enabling Extreme-Scale Scientific Insight, 357--372

    Childs, H., Brugger, E., Whitlock, B., et al. 2012, in High Performance Visualization--Enabling Extreme-Scale Scientific Insight, 357--372

    work page 2012

  15. [15]

    M., Petropoulou , M., Sironi , L., & Giannios , D

    Christie , I. M., Petropoulou , M., Sironi , L., & Giannios , D. 2019, , 482, 65

    work page 2019

  16. [16]

    2012, , 426, 1374

    Clausen-Brown , E., & Lyutikov , M. 2012, , 426, 1374

    work page 2012

  17. [17]

    2018, , 121, 255101

    Comisso , L., & Sironi , L. 2018, , 121, 255101

    work page 2018

  18. [18]

    2021, , 127, 255102

    ---. 2021, , 127, 255102

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    M., & Kowal , G

    de Gouveia Dal Pino , E. M., & Kowal , G. 2015, Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Vol. 407, Particle Acceleration by Magnetic Reconnection , ed. A. Lazarian , E. M. de Gouveia Dal Pino , & C. Melioli (Springer Berlin Heidelberg), 373

    work page 2015

  20. [20]

    M., Kowal , G., Kadowaki , L

    de Gouveia Dal Pino , E. M., Kowal , G., Kadowaki , L. H. S., Piovezan , P., & Lazarian , A. 2010 a , International Journal of Modern Physics D, 19, 729

    work page 2010

  21. [21]

    M., & Lazarian , A

    de Gouveia Dal Pino , E. M., & Lazarian , A. 2005, , 441, 845

    work page 2005

  22. [22]

    M., Piovezan , P

    de Gouveia Dal Pino , E. M., Piovezan , P. P., & Kadowaki , L. H. S. 2010 b , A&A, 518, 5

    work page 2010

  23. [23]

    M., Rodr \' guez-Ram \' rez , J

    de Gouveia Dal Pino , E. M., Rodr \' guez-Ram \' rez , J. C., & del Valle , M. V. 2025, , 537, 3895

    work page 2025

  24. [24]

    V., de Gouveia Dal Pino , E

    del Valle , M. V., de Gouveia Dal Pino , E. M., & Kowal , G. 2016, , 463, 4331

    work page 2016

  25. [25]

    F., Opher , M., Swisdak , M., & Chamoun , J

    Drake , J. F., Opher , M., Swisdak , M., & Chamoun , J. N. 2010, , 709, 963

    work page 2010

  26. [26]

    F., Swisdak , M., Che , H., & Shay , M

    Drake , J. F., Swisdak , M., Che , H., & Shay , M. A. 2006, , 443, 553

    work page 2006

  27. [27]

    2013, , 497, 466

    Eyink , G., Vishniac , E., Lalescu , C., et al. 2013, , 497, 466

    work page 2013

  28. [28]

    A., & Begelman , M

    Giannios , D., Uzdensky , D. A., & Begelman , M. C. 2009, , 395, L29

    work page 2009

  29. [29]

    2016, Physics of Plasmas, 23, 055708

    Guo , F., Li , H., Daughton , W., Li , X., & Liu , Y.-H. 2016, Physics of Plasmas, 23, 055708

    work page 2016

  30. [30]

    2019, , 879, L23

    Guo , F., Li , X., Daughton , W., et al. 2019, , 879, L23

    work page 2019

  31. [31]

    2015, , 806, 167

    Guo , F., Liu , Y.-H., Daughton , W., & Li , H. 2015, , 806, 167

    work page 2015

  32. [32]

    2020, Physics of Plasmas, 27, 080501

    Guo , F., Liu , Y.-H., Li , X., et al. 2020, Physics of Plasmas, 27, 080501

    work page 2020

  33. [33]

    2023, , 130, 189501

    Guo , F., Li , X., French , O., et al. 2023, , 130, 189501

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    2012, , 173, 521

    Hoshino , M., & Lyubarsky , Y. 2012, , 173, 521

    work page 2012

  35. [35]

    2016, The Astrophysical Journal, 818, 20

    Huang, Y.-M., & Bhattacharjee, A. 2016, The Astrophysical Journal, 818, 20. https://dx.doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/818/1/20

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/818/1/20 2016

  36. [36]

    T., Kowal , G., & Lazarian , A

    Jafari , A., Vishniac , E. T., Kowal , G., & Lazarian , A. 2018, , 860, 52

    work page 2018

  37. [37]

    Kadowaki , L. H. S., de Gouveia Dal Pino , E. M., Medina-Torrej \'o n , T. E., Mizuno , Y., & Kushwaha , P. 2021, , 912, 109

    work page 2021

  38. [38]

    Kadowaki , L. H. S., de Gouveia Dal Pino , E. M., & Singh , C. B. 2015, , 802, 113

    work page 2015

  39. [39]

    Kadowaki, L. H. S., de Gouveia Dal Pino, E. M., & Stone, J. M. 2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 864, 52. https://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aad4ff

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aad4ff 2018

  40. [40]

    2020, , 899, 151

    Kilian , P., Li , X., Guo , F., & Li , H. 2020, , 899, 151

    work page 2020

  41. [41]

    M., & Lazarian , A

    Kowal , G., de Gouveia Dal Pino , E. M., & Lazarian , A. 2011, , 735, 102

    work page 2011

  42. [42]

    2012, , 108, 241102

    ---. 2012, , 108, 241102

    work page 2012

  43. [43]

    A., Lazarian , A., & Vishniac , E

    Kowal , G., Falceta-Gon c alves , D. A., Lazarian , A., & Vishniac , E. T. 2020, , 892, 50

    work page 2020

  44. [44]

    T., & Otmianowska-Mazur , K

    Kowal , G., Lazarian , A., Vishniac , E. T., & Otmianowska-Mazur , K. 2009, ApJ, 700, 63

    work page 2009

  45. [45]

    L., Jafari , A., et al

    Lazarian , A., Eyink , G. L., Jafari , A., et al. 2020, Physics of Plasmas, 27, 012305

    work page 2020

  46. [46]

    Lazarian , A., & Vishniac , E. T. 1999, , 517, 700

    work page 1999

  47. [47]

    2012, , 173, 557

    Lazarian , A., Vlahos , L., Kowal , G., et al. 2012, , 173, 557

    work page 2012

  48. [48]

    2015, , 811, L24

    Li , X., Guo , F., Li , H., & Li , G. 2015, , 811, L24

    work page 2015

  49. [49]

    2021, Physics of Plasmas, 28, 052905

    Li , X., Guo , F., & Liu , Y.-H. 2021, Physics of Plasmas, 28, 052905

    work page 2021

  50. [50]

    2017, , 118, 085101

    Liu , Y.-H., Hesse , M., Guo , F., et al. 2017, , 118, 085101

    work page 2017

  51. [51]

    2008, , 682, 1436

    Lyubarsky , Y., & Liverts , M. 2008, , 682, 1436

    work page 2008

  52. [52]

    2018, Journal of Plasma Physics, 84, 635840201

    Lyutikov , M., Komissarov , S., Sironi , L., & Porth , O. 2018, Journal of Plasma Physics, 84, 635840201

    work page 2018

  53. [53]

    S., & Porth , O

    Lyutikov , M., Sironi , L., Komissarov , S. S., & Porth , O. 2017, Journal of Plasma Physics, 83, 635830602

    work page 2017

  54. [54]

    C., & Uzdensky , D

    McKinney , J. C., & Uzdensky , D. A. 2012, , 419, 573

    work page 2012

  55. [55]

    E., de Gouveia Dal Pino , E

    Medina-Torrej \'o n , T. E., de Gouveia Dal Pino , E. M., Kadowaki , L. H. S., et al. 2021, , 908, 193

    work page 2021

  56. [56]

    E., de Gouveia Dal Pino , E

    Medina-Torrej \'o n , T. E., de Gouveia Dal Pino , E. M., & Kowal , G. 2023, , 952, 168

    work page 2023

  57. [57]

    2018, , 859, 13

    Mignone , A., Bodo , G., Vaidya , B., & Mattia , G. 2018, , 859, 13

    work page 2018

  58. [58]

    S., & Fang , K

    Murase , K., Mukhopadhyay , M., Kheirandish , A., Kimura , S. S., & Fang , K. 2022, , 941, L10

    work page 2022

  59. [59]

    2016, , 462, 3325

    Petropoulou , M., Giannios , D., & Sironi , L. 2016, , 462, 3325

    work page 2016

  60. [60]

    2022, , 517, 1452

    Puzzoni , E., Mignone , A., & Bodo , G. 2022, , 517, 1452

    work page 2022

  61. [61]

    2017, , 471, 3465

    Ripperda , B., Porth , O., Xia , C., & Keppens , R. 2017, , 471, 3465

    work page 2017

  62. [62]

    M., & Lazarian , A

    Santos-Lima , R., Guerrero , G., de Gouveia Dal Pino , E. M., & Lazarian , A. 2020, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2005.07775

    work page arXiv 2020

  63. [63]

    M., & Cho , J

    Santos-Lima , R., Lazarian , A., de Gouveia Dal Pino , E. M., & Cho , J. 2010, , 714, 442

    work page 2010

  64. [64]

    B., de Gouveia Dal Pino , E

    Singh , C. B., de Gouveia Dal Pino , E. M., & Kadowaki , L. H. S. 2015, , 799, L20

    work page 2015

  65. [65]

    B., Mizuno , Y., & de Gouveia Dal Pino , E

    Singh , C. B., Mizuno , Y., & de Gouveia Dal Pino , E. M. 2016, , 824, 48

    work page 2016

  66. [66]

    2022, , 128, 145102

    Sironi , L. 2022, , 128, 145102

    work page 2022

  67. [67]

    2015, , 450, 183

    Sironi , L., Petropoulou , M., & Giannios , D. 2015, , 450, 183

    work page 2015

  68. [68]

    2014, , 783, L21

    Sironi , L., & Spitkovsky , A. 2014, , 783, L21

    work page 2014

  69. [69]

    2015, , 815, 16

    Takamoto , M., Inoue , T., & Lazarian , A. 2015, , 815, 16

    work page 2015

  70. [70]

    Van Rossum, G., & Drake, F. L. 2009, Python 3 Reference Manual (Scotts Valley, CA: CreateSpace)

    work page 2009

  71. [71]

    H., Kowal , G., de Gouveia Dal Pino , E

    Vicentin , G. H., Kowal , G., de Gouveia Dal Pino , E. M., & Lazarian , A. 2024, arXiv e-prints, ApJ in press, arXiv:2405.15909

    work page arXiv 2024

  72. [72]

    2023, , 954, L36

    Wang , Y., Cheng , X., Ding , M., et al. 2023, , 954, L36

    work page 2023

  73. [73]

    R., Philippov , A

    Werner , G. R., Philippov , A. A., & Uzdensky , D. A. 2019, , 482, L60

    work page 2019

  74. [74]

    R., Uzdensky , D

    Werner , G. R., Uzdensky , D. A., Begelman , M. C., Cerutti , B., & Nalewajko , K. 2018, , 473, 4840

    work page 2018

  75. [75]

    2023, , 942, 21

    Xu , S., & Lazarian , A. 2023, , 942, 21

    work page 2023

  76. [76]

    E., & Blandford , R

    Yuan , Y., Nalewajko , K., Zrake , J., East , W. E., & Blandford , R. D. 2016, , 828, 92

    work page 2016

  77. [77]

    2001, Apjl, 562, L63

    Zenitani , S., & Hoshino , M. 2001, Apjl, 562, L63

    work page 2001

  78. [78]

    2007, , 670, 702

    ---. 2007, , 670, 702

    work page 2007

  79. [79]

    2008, , 677, 530

    ---. 2008, , 677, 530

    work page 2008

  80. [80]

    2011, , 726, 90

    Zhang , B., & Yan , H. 2011, , 726, 90

    work page 2011

Showing first 80 references.