pith. sign in

arxiv: 2410.13149 · v1 · submitted 2024-10-17 · 💻 cs.RO

Power in Numbers: Primitive Algorithm for Swarm Robot Navigation in Unknown Environments

Yusuke Tsunoda , Shoken Otsuka , Kazuki Ito , Runze Xiao , Keisuke Naniwa , Yuichiro Sueoka , Koichi Osuka This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 19:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO
keywords swarm roboticsrobot navigationunknown environmentspotential field methodsound field navigationprimitive algorithmmulti-robot systems
0
0 comments X

The pith

Swarm robots navigate unknown environments by always heading toward the goal while bypassing neighbors, using only local position sensing.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a navigation method for groups of robots in spaces whose layout is unknown and may change. Each robot senses only the direction to the goal and the relative positions of nearby robots, then moves forward while stepping aside as needed. No map is built, no blockage is detected, and no messages pass between robots. Mathematical analysis, potential-field simulations, and physical tests with sound-based sensing are used to show the approach works.

Core claim

The algorithm lets every robot continue toward the goal and simply bypass surrounding robots when their paths intersect. Because the swarm supplies the bypassing agents, individual robots never need to sense walls, identify dead-ends, or coordinate explicitly.

What carries the argument

The primitive bypass rule that directs motion toward the goal while using relative-position data to step around immediate neighbors.

If this is right

  • Mapping hardware and self-localization become unnecessary.
  • Inter-robot messaging and stuck-state detection are eliminated.
  • The same rule applies whether the unknown space is static or changes during motion.
  • Simulations and hardware trials with sound fields confirm the rule produces goal-reaching trajectories.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Hardware cost per robot can drop because only directional and proximity sensors are required.
  • The method may extend to rapidly changing settings such as search-and-rescue where pre-built maps are impossible.
  • Larger swarms could increase the chance that a bypass path opens before any robot is forced to stop.

Load-bearing premise

Every robot maintains perfect, continuous knowledge of the goal direction and the exact positions of all nearby robots even while the surroundings change.

What would settle it

A controlled run in which robots equipped with the stated sensing follow the rule yet remain permanently unable to reach the goal.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2410.13149 by Kazuki Ito, Keisuke Naniwa, Koichi Osuka, Runze Xiao, Shoken Otsuka, Yuichiro Sueoka, Yusuke Tsunoda.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Diagram of problem definition for unknown environ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Schematic diagram of the proposed algorithm, BY [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Overview charts in BYCOMS reachability considera [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Simulation enviroment for unknown environment nav [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Robot algorithm based on the potential fields. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Results of unknown environment navigation based on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Simulation results on the effect of the circumferential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: As described in Section IV, the robot is implemented with mode 1, which moves directly to the goal, and mode 2, which moves along the sound field. In mode 1, the robot uses the angle difference θ1(−π < θ1 ≤ π) between the direction of the goal and its own direction, and the control input is u = Kpθ1. The robot was controlled by applying a voltage of vm + u to the left motor and vm − u to the right motor, … view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Overview of the developed robot Vave = X 6 n=1 Vn 6 . (3) Moreover, let mn be the position vector of the n-th mi￾crophone relative to the center of the robot. The estimated gradient of the acoustic field obtained by the robot is expressed by the following equation: grad = X 6 n=1 (Vn − Vave)mn. (4) The robot normalizes this grad and uses only the direction of the acoustic field gradient as the estimate. C… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Experimental results with two robots perspective is calculated and sent to each robot via WiFi. The robots then move based on the transmitted goal direction data, and the locally sensed sound field gradient. Additionally, the measured sound field gradient data is sent to the main PC, where the data is stored. E. Experimental results In this study, we conducted two experiments in which the goal was obstruc… view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: In Fig. 14a, where a short obstacle was installed, it [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Experimental results with three robots based on the detachment of multiple markers on the robot. From Fig. 14b and Fig. 15b, it can be observed that when robots are close to each other, they can measure the direction of each others sound fields. However, when the robots are slightly apart, they do not measure as well. This is probably because the difference in microphone measurements becomes small, and th… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Recently, the navigation of mobile robots in unknown environments has become a particularly significant research topic. Previous studies have primarily employed real-time environmental mapping using cameras and LiDAR, along with self-localization and path generation based on those maps. Additionally, there is research on Sim-to-Real transfer, where robots acquire behaviors through pre-trained reinforcement learning and apply these learned actions in real-world navigation. However, strictly the observe action and modelling of unknown environments that change unpredictably over time with accuracy and precision is an extremely complex endeavor. This study proposes a simple navigation algorithm for traversing unknown environments by utilizes the number of swarm robots. The proposed algorithm assumes that the robot has only the simple function of sensing the direction of the goal and the relative positions of the surrounding robots. The robots can navigate an unknown environment by simply continuing towards the goal while bypassing surrounding robots. The method does not need to sense the environment, determine whether they or other robots are stuck, or do the complicated inter-robot communication. We mathematically validate the proposed navigation algorithm, present numerical simulations based on the potential field method, and conduct experimental demonstrations using developed robots based on the sound fields for navigation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a primitive swarm navigation algorithm in which robots sense only the goal direction and relative positions of neighboring robots, then move toward the goal while repelling from others via potential fields. It claims this suffices to traverse unknown environments without environment sensing, stuck-state detection, or complex inter-robot communication, supported by mathematical validation, potential-field simulations, and hardware experiments using sound fields.

Significance. If the mathematical validation rigorously shows that goal-directed motion plus inter-robot repulsion produces paths around static obstacles without any obstacle sensing, the result would be significant for simplifying swarm navigation by exploiting collective dynamics rather than individual mapping or planning. The combination of mathematical claims, simulations, and physical experiments using sound fields provides a concrete validation path that strengthens the contribution if the derivation holds.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that robots navigate unknown environments 'without sensing the environment' is load-bearing for the central contribution, yet the algorithm is defined solely as goal-directed motion plus repulsion from other robots; no mechanism or derivation is indicated for how this rule produces detours around static obstacles whose geometry is never sensed.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the mathematical validation is asserted but the description provides no equations, proof sketch, or handling of local minima induced by obstacle geometry; if the validation assumes an obstacle-free plane or only dynamic agents, it does not establish the stated result for general unknown environments.
  3. [Abstract] Abstract: the method is stated to require 'perfect, continuous sensing of the goal direction and the relative positions of all surrounding robots at every moment'; this assumption is load-bearing yet the text gives no analysis of bounded range, sensor noise, or scaling with swarm density, undermining transfer to the claimed real-world setting.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Grammatical error in Abstract: 'by utilizes the number of swarm robots' should read 'by utilizing the number of swarm robots'.
  2. [Abstract] The phrase 'experimental demonstrations using developed robots based on the sound fields for navigation' is unclear; the role of sound fields (sensing, actuation, or both) needs explicit definition.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our paper. The comments highlight important aspects of the abstract that we will address to better convey the contributions. Below we respond to each major comment.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that robots navigate unknown environments 'without sensing the environment' is load-bearing for the central contribution, yet the algorithm is defined solely as goal-directed motion plus repulsion from other robots; no mechanism or derivation is indicated for how this rule produces detours around static obstacles whose geometry is never sensed.

    Authors: The central idea is that the swarm exploits collective repulsion to achieve emergent navigation around obstacles without direct sensing. In the manuscript, we derive that the potential field causes peripheral robots to be displaced, allowing the swarm to effectively contour around static obstacles. The mathematical validation in the paper demonstrates this for unknown environments. To make this clearer in the abstract, we will revise it to briefly describe the emergent bypassing mechanism. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the mathematical validation is asserted but the description provides no equations, proof sketch, or handling of local minima induced by obstacle geometry; if the validation assumes an obstacle-free plane or only dynamic agents, it does not establish the stated result for general unknown environments.

    Authors: Due to length constraints, the abstract does not include equations or sketches; these are provided in the main text under the mathematical validation section, which includes analysis of local minima for both dynamic and static obstacle cases. The validation does not assume obstacle-free conditions. We will update the abstract to reference the key result on handling obstacle-induced local minima. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the method is stated to require 'perfect, continuous sensing of the goal direction and the relative positions of all surrounding robots at every moment'; this assumption is load-bearing yet the text gives no analysis of bounded range, sensor noise, or scaling with swarm density, undermining transfer to the claimed real-world setting.

    Authors: The abstract states the ideal sensing assumption for the theoretical result. The manuscript includes hardware experiments using sound fields that demonstrate feasibility under practical sensing conditions. A full analysis of noise and scaling is beyond the current scope but we acknowledge this limitation and will add a paragraph discussing these aspects and future work in the revised version. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: algorithm defined independently of validation

full rationale

The paper defines its navigation rule directly as continued goal-directed motion with repulsion from nearby robots (via potential fields in simulation), then separately validates it mathematically and experimentally. No equations reduce a claimed prediction to a fitted input by construction, no self-citation chain supports a uniqueness theorem, and no ansatz is smuggled in. The derivation chain remains self-contained against the stated sensing assumptions without re-labeling its own outputs as independent results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption of perfect goal and neighbor sensing; no free parameters or invented entities are stated in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Robots possess continuous, accurate sensing of goal direction and relative positions of surrounding robots at all times.
    Explicitly stated in the abstract as the only required functions; the navigation guarantee depends on this premise.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5758 in / 1302 out tokens · 22779 ms · 2026-05-23T19:31:06.036095+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

28 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Innovative technologies for infrastructure construction and maintenance through collaborative robots based on an open design approach,

    K. Nagatani, M. Abe, K. Osuka, P. jo Chun, T. Okatani, M. Nishio, S. Chikushi, T. Matsubara, Y . Ikemoto, and H. Asama, “Innovative technologies for infrastructure construction and maintenance through collaborative robots based on an open design approach,” Advanced Robotics , vol. 35, pp. 715–722, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi...

    work page doi:10.1080/01691864.2021.1929471 2021

  2. [2]

    Multi-robot slam with sparse extended information filers,

    S. Thrun and Y . Liu, “Multi-robot slam with sparse extended information filers,” in Robotics Research. The Eleventh International Symposium: With 303 Figures. Springer, 2005, pp. 254–266

    work page 2005

  3. [3]

    Performance comparison of bug navigation algorithms,

    J. Ng and T. Br ¨aunl, “Performance comparison of bug navigation algorithms,” Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems , vol. 50, pp. 73–84, 2007

    work page 2007

  4. [4]

    Lidar-only based navigation algorithm for an autonomous agricultural robot,

    F. B. Malavazi, R. Guyonneau, J.-B. Fasquel, S. Lagrange, and F. Mercier, “Lidar-only based navigation algorithm for an autonomous agricultural robot,” Computers and electronics in agriculture , vol. 154, pp. 71–79, 2018

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Simultaneous localization and map- ping: part i,

    H. Durrant-Whyte and T. Bailey, “Simultaneous localization and map- ping: part i,” IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine , vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 99–110, 2006

    work page 2006

  6. [6]

    Path-planning strategies for a point mobile automaton moving amidst unknown obstacles of arbitrary shape,

    V . J. Lumelsky and A. A. Stepanov, “Path-planning strategies for a point mobile automaton moving amidst unknown obstacles of arbitrary shape,” Algorithmica, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 403–430, 1987

    work page 1987

  7. [7]

    Mrbug: A competitive multi- robot path finding algorithm,

    S. Sarid, A. Shapiro, and Y . Gabriely, “Mrbug: A competitive multi- robot path finding algorithm,” in Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation , 2007, pp. 877–882. 11

    work page 2007

  8. [8]

    Decentralized active information acquisition: Theory and application to multi-robot slam,

    N. Atanasov, J. Le Ny, K. Daniilidis, and G. J. Pappas, “Decentralized active information acquisition: Theory and application to multi-robot slam,” in 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Au- tomation (ICRA). IEEE, 2015, pp. 4775–4782

    work page 2015

  9. [9]

    Swarm slam: Challenges and perspectives,

    M. Kegeleirs, G. Grisetti, and M. Birattari, “Swarm slam: Challenges and perspectives,” Frontiers in Robotics and AI , vol. 8, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/robotics-and-ai/articles/ 10.3389/frobt.2021.618268

    work page doi:10.3389/frobt.2021.618268 2021

  10. [10]

    Swarm slam: Challenges and perspectives,

    ——, “Swarm slam: Challenges and perspectives,” Frontiers in Robotics and AI, vol. 8, p. 618268, 2021

    work page 2021

  11. [11]

    Minimal navigation solution for a swarm of tiny flying robots to explore an unknown environment,

    K. McGuire, C. De Wagter, K. Tuyls, H. Kappen, and G. C. de Croon, “Minimal navigation solution for a swarm of tiny flying robots to explore an unknown environment,”Science Robotics, vol. 4, no. 35, p. eaaw9710, 2019

    work page 2019

  12. [12]

    Learning quadrupedal locomotion over challenging terrain,

    J. Lee, J. Hwangbo, L. Wellhausen, V . Koltun, and M. Hutter, “Learning quadrupedal locomotion over challenging terrain,” Science robotics , vol. 5, no. 47, p. eabc5986, 2020

    work page 2020

  13. [13]

    Learning robust perceptive locomotion for quadrupedal robots in the wild,

    T. Miki, J. Lee, J. Hwangbo, L. Wellhausen, V . Koltun, and M. Hutter, “Learning robust perceptive locomotion for quadrupedal robots in the wild,” Science Robotics , vol. 7, no. 62, p. eabk2822, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/scirobotics.abk2822

    work page doi:10.1126/scirobotics.abk2822 2022

  14. [14]

    Learning for attitude holding of a robotic fish: An end-to-end approach with sim- to-real transfer,

    J. Zheng, T. Zhang, C. Wang, M. Xiong, and G. Xie, “Learning for attitude holding of a robotic fish: An end-to-end approach with sim- to-real transfer,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics , vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 1287–1303, 2021

    work page 2021

  15. [15]

    Group transport of an object to a target that only some group members may sense,

    R. Groß and M. Dorigo, “Group transport of an object to a target that only some group members may sense,” in Parallel Problem Solving from Nature - PPSN VIII , X. Yao, E. K. Burke, J. A. Lozano, J. Smith, J. J. Merelo-Guerv´os, J. A. Bullinaria, J. E. Rowe, P. Ti ˇno, A. Kab ´an, and H.-P. Schwefel, Eds. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 200...

    work page 2004

  16. [16]

    Programmable self- assembly in a thousand-robot swarm,

    R. Michael, C. Alejandro, and N. Radhika, “Programmable self- assembly in a thousand-robot swarm,” Science, vol. 345, no. 6198, pp. 795–799, 08 2014. [Online]. Available: https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/ 1362262944632390912

    work page 2014

  17. [17]

    Development and analysis of a novel obstacle avoidance strategy for a multi- robot system inspired by the bug-1 algorithm,

    J. J. Kandathil, R. Mathew, and S. S. Hiremath, “Development and analysis of a novel obstacle avoidance strategy for a multi- robot system inspired by the bug-1 algorithm,” SIMULATION, vol. 96, no. 10, pp. 807–824, 2020. [Online]. Available: https: //doi.org/10.1177/0037549720930082

    work page doi:10.1177/0037549720930082 2020

  18. [18]

    Casualty-based cooperation in swarm robots,

    K. Sugawara, Y . Doi, and M. Shishido, “Casualty-based cooperation in swarm robots,” Artificial Life and Robotics, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 645–650, 2018

    work page 2018

  19. [19]

    Communi- cation using pheromone field for multiple robots,

    R. Fujisawa, H. Imamura, T. Hashimoto, and F. Matsuno, “Communi- cation using pheromone field for multiple robots,” in 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems . IEEE, 2008, pp. 1391–1396

    work page 2008

  20. [20]

    Foraging behavior of interacting robots with virtual pheromone,

    K. Sugawara, T. Kazama, and T. Watanabe, “Foraging behavior of interacting robots with virtual pheromone,” in 2004 IEEE/RSJ Inter- national Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566), vol. 3, 2004, pp. 3074–3079 vol.3

    work page 2004

  21. [21]

    Analysis and experiment of robot navigation by sound field using interaction with obstacles,

    Y . SUEOKA, D. D. Khanh, Y . TSUNODA, Y . SUGIMOTO, and K. OSUKA, “Analysis and experiment of robot navigation by sound field using interaction with obstacles,” Transactions of the JSME, vol. 87, no. 896, p. tsunoda2019experimental, 2021 (in japanese)

    work page 2021

  22. [22]

    Experimental analysis of acoustic field control-based robot navigation,

    Y . Tsunoda, Y . Sueoka, and K. Osuka, “Experimental analysis of acoustic field control-based robot navigation,” Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 110–117, 2019

    work page 2019

  23. [23]

    Experimental analysis of shepherding-type robot navigation utilizing sound-obstacle- interaction,

    Y . Tsunoda, L. T. Nghia, Y . Sueoka, and K. Osuka, “Experimental analysis of shepherding-type robot navigation utilizing sound-obstacle- interaction,” Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics , vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 957–968, 2023

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    Algorithms and approaches for procedural terrain generation-a brief review of current techniques,

    T. J. Rose and A. G. Bakaoukas, “Algorithms and approaches for procedural terrain generation-a brief review of current techniques,” in 2016 8th International Conference on Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications (VS-GAMES) . IEEE, 2016, pp. 1–2

    work page 2016

  25. [25]

    Fast path planning using modified a* method,

    C. W. Warren, “Fast path planning using modified a* method,” in

    work page

  26. [26]

    IEEE, 1993, pp

    Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE, 1993, pp. 662–667

    work page 1993

  27. [27]

    H. J. Nussbaumer and H. J. Nussbaumer, The fast Fourier transform . Springer, 1982

    work page 1982

  28. [28]

    Ros: an open-source robot operating system,

    M. Quigley, K. Conley, B. Gerkey, J. Faust, T. Foote, J. Leibs, R. Wheeler, A. Y . Ng et al. , “Ros: an open-source robot operating system,” in ICRA workshop on open source software , vol. 3, no. 3.2. Kobe, Japan, 2009, p. 5

    work page 2009