Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

XForecast: Evaluating Natural Language Explanations for Time Series Forecasting

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.14180 v2 pith:3PM3LD4D submitted 2024-10-18 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords explanationsseriestimelanguagemetricsdataevaluatingforecasting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Time series forecasting aids decision-making, especially for stakeholders who rely on accurate predictions, making it very important to understand and explain these models to ensure informed decisions. Traditional explainable AI (XAI) methods, which underline feature or temporal importance, often require expert knowledge. In contrast, natural language explanations (NLEs) are more accessible to laypeople. However, evaluating forecast NLEs is difficult due to the complex causal relationships in time series data. To address this, we introduce two new performance metrics based on simulatability, assessing how well a human surrogate can predict model forecasts using the explanations. Experiments show these metrics differentiate good from poor explanations and align with human judgments. Utilizing these metrics, we further evaluate the ability of state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) to generate explanations for time series data, finding that numerical reasoning, rather than model size, is the main factor influencing explanation quality.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. From Time Series Analysis to Question Answering: A Survey in the LLM Era

    cs.LG 2025-06 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    A survey proposing a taxonomy of Injective, Bridging, and Internal Alignment paradigms to evolve TSA into user-driven Time Series Question Answering with LLMs.

Pith tools