REVIEW 2 cited by
Optimizing Supercell Structures for Heisenberg Exchange Interaction Calculations
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In this paper, we introduce an efficient, linear algebra-based method for optimizing supercell selection to determine Heisenberg exchange parameters from DFT calculations. A widely used approach for deriving these parameters involves mapping DFT energies from various magnetic configurations within a supercell to the Heisenberg Hamiltonian. However, periodic boundary conditions in crystals limit the number of exchange parameters that can be extracted. To identify supercells that allow for more exchange parameters, we generate all possible supercell sizes within a specified range and apply null space analysis to the coefficient matrix derived from mapping DFT results to the Heisenberg Hamiltonian. By selecting optimal supercells, we significantly reduce computational time and resource consumption. This method, which involves generating and analyzing supercells before performing DFT calculations, has demonstrated a reduction in computational costs by 1-2 orders of magnitude in many cases.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Origin of $A$-type antiferromagnetism and chiral split magnons in altermagnetic $\alpha$-MnTe
DFT+U total-energy mapping over 60 magnetic configurations shows the in-plane exchange J2 in α-MnTe is ferromagnetic, and the direction-dependent J10 interaction produces chiral magnon splitting, both enhanced under 1...
-
Evaluating SCAN and r$^2$SCAN meta-GGA functionals for predicting transition temperatures in antiferromagnetic materials
SCAN and r2SCAN predict the Neel temperatures of 48 antiferromagnetic insulators with mean absolute percentage errors of 23% and 22% and Pearson correlations of 0.97 and 0.98 against experiment.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.