REVIEW 1 cited by
Reflected entropy in an evaporating black hole through non-isometric map
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The black hole information paradox has been an important problem in quantum gravity. In the study of evaporating black hole, it has been proposed that the holographic map between the semi-classical effective description in bulk and the fundamental description in boundary cannot be isometric. In this work, we would like to study the reflected entropy in an evaporating black hole model through non-isometric holographic map. We assume that the evaporating is slowly enough that it makes sense to ascribe a slowly varying temperature to the Hawking radiation. We then introduce a two-sided black hole model to canonically purify the semi-classical state. The holographic map to the fundamental description is non-isometric and defined by a Haar random unitary matrix. We show that the entanglement entropy of the radiation in the model matches the result read from the quantum extremal surface formula and agrees with the Page curve. Furthermore, we study the reflected entropies between different regions, including the one between the black holes on different sides, the one between the radiations distributed symmetrically but disconnectedly, and the one between the black hole and the radiation on single side. Our results are consistent with the existing ones based on the effective descriptions.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Manifestation of Quantum Forces in Spacetime: Towards a General Theory of Quantum Forces
The paper defines a 'quantum force wave equation' and a modified Einstein equation, but these reduce to identities once the central operator is defined, and the motivating derivation is flawed.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.