REVIEW 2 cited by
mHumanEval -- A Multilingual Benchmark to Evaluate Large Language Models for Code Generation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have significantly enhanced code generation from natural language prompts. The HumanEval Benchmark, developed by OpenAI, remains the most widely used code generation benchmark. However, this and other Code LLM benchmarks face critical limitations, particularly in task diversity, test coverage, and linguistic scope. Current evaluations primarily focus on English-to-Python conversion tasks with limited test cases, potentially overestimating model performance. While recent works have addressed test coverage and programming language (PL) diversity, code generation from low-resource language prompts remains largely unexplored. To address this gap, we introduce mHumanEval, an extended benchmark supporting prompts in over 200 natural languages. We employ established machine translation methods to compile the benchmark, coupled with a quality assurance process. Furthermore, we provide expert human translations for 15 diverse natural languages (NLs). We conclude by analyzing the multilingual code generation capabilities of state-of-the-art (SOTA) Code LLMs, offering insights into the current landscape of cross-lingual code generation.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
SIMCODE: A Benchmark for Natural Language to ns-3 Network Simulation Code Generation
SIMCODE provides 400 verified ns-3 simulation coding tasks with tests and shows current LLMs compile and run fewer than a third of generated programs.
-
SwiftEval: Developing a Language-Specific Benchmark for LLM-generated Code Evaluation
SwiftEval, a 28-problem hand-crafted Swift benchmark, evaluates 44 code LLMs and shows large performance drops on Swift tasks, especially for smaller models.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.