Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Scalable Influence and Fact Tracing for Large Language Model Pretraining

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.17413 v3 pith:WXBKJPT4 submitted 2024-10-22 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords modelexamplesmethodsinfluenceattributionfactfactualinfluential
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Training data attribution (TDA) methods aim to attribute model outputs back to specific training examples, and the application of these methods to large language model (LLM) outputs could significantly advance model transparency and data curation. However, it has been challenging to date to apply these methods to the full scale of LLM pretraining. In this paper, we refine existing gradient-based methods to work effectively at scale, allowing us to retrieve influential examples for an 8B-parameter language model from a pretraining corpus of over 160B tokens with no need for subsampling or pre-filtering. Our method combines several techniques, including optimizer state correction, a task-specific Hessian approximation, and normalized encodings, which we find to be critical for performance at scale. In quantitative evaluations on a fact tracing task, our method performs best at identifying examples that influence model predictions, but classical, model-agnostic retrieval methods such as BM25 still perform better at finding passages which explicitly contain relevant facts. These results demonstrate a misalignment between factual *attribution* and causal *influence*. With increasing model size and training tokens, we find that influence more closely aligns with factual attribution. Finally, we examine different types of examples identified as influential by our method, finding that while many directly entail a particular fact, others support the same output by reinforcing priors on relation types, common entities, and names. We release our prompt set and model outputs, along with a web-based visualization tool to explore influential examples for factual predictions, commonsense reasoning, arithmetic, and open-ended generation for an 8B-parameter LLM.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Small edits, large models: How Wikipedia advocacy shapes LLM values

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Wikipedia edits by animal welfare advocates measurably influence LLM outputs on animal welfare topics, shown via retrieval and gradient attribution plus fine-tuning experiments.

  2. Assert, don't describe: Linguistic features that shift LLM reasoning about animal welfare

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Seven stance-making linguistic features strengthen pro-animal-welfare preference in fine-tuned Llama-3.2-1B and Mistral-7B; hedging and concreteness dilute it; first-person is null.

  3. Sketching the Readout of Large Language Models for Scalable Data Attribution and Valuation

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    RISE applies CountSketch to dual lexical and semantic channels derived from output-layer gradient outer products, cutting data attribution storage by up to 112x and enabling retrospective and prospective influence ana...

  4. Low-Perplexity LLM-Generated Sequences and Where To Find Them

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Only about 40% of low-perplexity 6-token spans generated by Pythia-6.9B can be exactly matched to The Pile, and the authors categorize matched and unmatched spans into four classes.

Pith tools