Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Deep Learning for Active Region Classification: A Systematic Study from Convolutional Neural Networks to Vision Transformers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.17816 v1 pith:VGB3JONJ submitted 2024-10-23 astro-ph.SR cs.CV

classification astro-ph.SRcs.CV
keywords classificationactiveregionsolarconvolutionalcrucialdeeplatest
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

A solar active region can significantly disrupt the Sun Earth space environment, often leading to severe space weather events such as solar flares and coronal mass ejections. As a consequence, the automatic classification of active region groups is the crucial starting point for accurately and promptly predicting solar activity. This study presents our results concerned with the application of deep learning techniques to the classification of active region cutouts based on the Mount Wilson classification scheme. Specifically, we have explored the latest advancements in image classification architectures, from Convolutional Neural Networks to Vision Transformers, and reported on their performances for the active region classification task, showing that the crucial point for their effectiveness consists in a robust training process based on the latest advances in the field.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Artificial Intelligence Could Have Predicted All Space Weather Events Associated with the May 2024 Superstorm

    astro-ph.SR 2025-01 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A single-event retrospective study claims AI could have foreseen the May 2024 superstorm, but the evidence is undermined by a false positive, an autoregressive SYM-H forecast, and a misquoted CME error.

Pith tools