Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Any Other Thoughts, Hedgehog? Linking Deliberation Chains in Collaborative Dialogues

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.19301 v1 pith:LVC7R7YW submitted 2024-10-25 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords collaborativechainsprobingproblemtaskcausaldeliberationdialogue
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Question-asking in collaborative dialogue has long been established as key to knowledge construction, both in internal and collaborative problem solving. In this work, we examine probing questions in collaborative dialogues: questions that explicitly elicit responses from the speaker's interlocutors. Specifically, we focus on modeling the causal relations that lead directly from utterances earlier in the dialogue to the emergence of the probing question. We model these relations using a novel graph-based framework of deliberation chains, and reframe the problem of constructing such chains as a coreference-style clustering problem. Our framework jointly models probing and causal utterances and the links between them, and we evaluate on two challenging collaborative task datasets: the Weights Task and DeliData. Our results demonstrate the effectiveness of our theoretically-grounded approach compared to both baselines and stronger coreference approaches, and establish a standard of performance in this novel task.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Dude, where's my utterance? Evaluating the effects of automatic segmentation and transcription on CPS detection

    cs.HC 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Automated transcription and segmentation achieve CPS detection accuracy comparable to manual pipelines on the Weights Task Dataset, but reduce utterance count by 26.5% and granularity.

  2. An Exploration of Internal States in Collaborative Problem Solving

    cs.HC 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    In a Lego-based collaborative task, participants' retrospective verbal reports show distinct linguistic patterns, with positive emotion labels such as 'Engaged' and 'Optimistic' appearing most frequently.

Pith tools