Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Quality Analysis of the Coding Bitrate Tradeoff Between Geometry and Attributes for Colored Point Clouds

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.21613 v1 pith:ZUOWROWF submitted 2024-10-28 eess.IV

Quality Analysis of the Coding Bitrate Tradeoff Between Geometry and Attributes for Colored Point Clouds

classification eess.IV
keywords pointgeometryattributesbitratecloudqualitytradeoffclouds
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Typically, point cloud encoders allocate a similar bitrate for geometry and attributes (usually RGB color components) information coding. This paper reports a quality study considering different coding bitrate tradeoff between geometry and attributes. A set of five point clouds, representing different characteristics and types of content was encoded with the MPEG standard Geometry Point Cloud Compression (G-PCC), using octree to encode geometry information, and both the Region Adaptive Hierarchical Transform and the Prediction Lifting transform for attributes. Furthermore, the JPEG Pleno Point Cloud Verification Model was also tested. Five different attributes/geometry bitrate tradeoffs were considered, notably 70%/30%, 60%/40%, 50%/50%, 40%/60%, 30%/70%. Three point cloud objective metrics were selected to assess the quality of the reconstructed point clouds, notably the PSNR YUV, the Point Cloud Quality Metric, and GraphSIM. Furthermore, for each encoder, the Bjonteegaard Deltas were computed for each tradeoff, using the 50%/50% tradeoff as a reference. The reported results indicate that using a higher bitrate allocation for attribute encoding usually yields slightly better results.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.