Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

CORAL: Benchmarking Multi-turn Conversational Retrieval-Augmentation Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.23090 v1 pith:6UBCEMOP submitted 2024-10-30 cs.IR cs.CL

classification cs.IRcs.CL
keywords conversationalcoralgenerationmulti-turnconversationsexistingknowledgemethods
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has become a powerful paradigm for enhancing large language models (LLMs) through external knowledge retrieval. Despite its widespread attention, existing academic research predominantly focuses on single-turn RAG, leaving a significant gap in addressing the complexities of multi-turn conversations found in real-world applications. To bridge this gap, we introduce CORAL, a large-scale benchmark designed to assess RAG systems in realistic multi-turn conversational settings. CORAL includes diverse information-seeking conversations automatically derived from Wikipedia and tackles key challenges such as open-domain coverage, knowledge intensity, free-form responses, and topic shifts. It supports three core tasks of conversational RAG: passage retrieval, response generation, and citation labeling. We propose a unified framework to standardize various conversational RAG methods and conduct a comprehensive evaluation of these methods on CORAL, demonstrating substantial opportunities for improving existing approaches.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. UniConv: Unifying Retrieval and Response Generation for Large Language Models in Conversations

    cs.CL 2025-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A single LLM jointly fine-tuned for conversational dense retrieval and retrieval-augmented generation beats separate retriever-plus-generator pipelines on most test collections, though its headline benchmark was conta...

  2. Benchmarking Poisoning Attacks against Retrieval-Augmented Generation

    cs.CR 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A unified benchmark evaluation finds that existing RAG poisoning attacks remain effective on standard QA datasets, drop on expanded knowledge bases, and are only partially mitigated by current defenses.

Pith tools