Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

On the consistency of bootstrap for matching estimators

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.23525 v2 pith:VH2CIBOE submitted 2024-10-31 math.ST econ.EMstat.TH

classification math.STecon.EMstat.TH
keywords bootstrapmatchingabadieestimatorsfixedimbensinconsistencymatches
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

In a landmark paper, Abadie and Imbens (2008) showed that the naive bootstrap is inconsistent when applied to nearest neighbor matching estimators of the average treatment effect with a fixed number of matches. Since then, this finding has inspired numerous efforts to address the inconsistency issue, typically by employing alternative bootstrap methods. In contrast, this paper shows that the naive bootstrap is provably consistent for the original matching estimator, provided that the number of matches, $M$, diverges. The bootstrap inconsistency identified by Abadie and Imbens (2008) thus arises solely from the use of a fixed $M$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A sliced Wasserstein and diffusion approach to random coefficient models

    math.ST 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A sliced-Wasserstein and k-nearest-neighbor minimum-distance estimator for the distribution of random coefficients β is consistent with polynomial-in-dimension computation, while its diffusion and causal extensions re...

Pith tools