pith. sign in

arxiv: 2411.00350 · v2 · submitted 2024-11-01 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

X-ray and Radio Campaign of the Z-source GX 340+0 II: the X-ray polarization in the normal branch

Yash Bhargava , Thomas D. Russell , Mason Ng , Arvind Balasubramanian , Liang Zhang , Swati Ravi , Vishal Jadoliya , Sudip Bhattacharyya
show 6 more authors
Mayukh Pahari Jeroen Homan Herman L. Marshall Deepto Chakrabarty Francesco Carotenuto Aman Kaushik
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 18:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords X-ray polarizationZ-sourceGX 340+0normal branchneutron starspectro-polarimetryaccretion
0
0 comments X

The pith

X-ray polarization in GX 340+0 during the normal branch originates from either the blackbody or Comptonized emission component.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper measures X-ray polarization from the Z-source GX 340+0 while the source spends most of its time in the normal branch. The degree reaches 1.22 percent at an angle of 38 degrees in the 2-8 keV band. Joint modeling of the spectrum and polarization shows that this signal arises from a single component, either the blackbody or the Comptonized emission. The accretion disk contributes no measurable polarization. Radio flux drops from the horizontal branch to the normal branch, indicating the jet changes with position on the Z-track.

Core claim

The joint spectro-polarimetric modeling is consistent with the observed X-ray polarization originating from a single spectral component from the blackbody or the Comptonized emission while the disk emission does not contribute towards the X-ray polarization.

What carries the argument

Joint spectro-polarimetric modeling that isolates polarization contributions from individual spectral components (blackbody, disk, Comptonized).

If this is right

  • Polarization degree is weaker in the normal branch than in the horizontal branch but the angle remains the same.
  • Polarization degree shows a marginal rise with energy while the angle stays constant.
  • Radio flux is lower in the normal branch than in the horizontal branch, consistent with an evolving jet.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The single-component origin would constrain the geometry of the inner flow or corona around the neutron star.
  • Absence of disk polarization suggests either the disk itself produces little polarized light or its contribution is diluted in the observed band.
  • Repeating the campaign on other Z-sources could test whether polarization attribution follows the same pattern across the class.

Load-bearing premise

The X-ray spectrum can be decomposed into distinct blackbody, disk, and Comptonized components whose polarization can be attributed reliably to only one of them.

What would settle it

A spectro-polarimetric fit in which allowing the disk a nonzero polarization contribution improves the match to the data by more than the single-component model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.00350 by Aman Kaushik, Arvind Balasubramanian, Deepto Chakrabarty, Francesco Carotenuto, Herman L. Marshall, Jeroen Homan, Liang Zhang, Mason Ng, Mayukh Pahari, Sudip Bhattacharyya, Swati Ravi, Thomas D. Russell, Vishal Jadoliya, Yash Bhargava.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The evolution of GX 340+0 as seen by IXPE is shown as black diamonds. The IXPE observation was supplemented with joint observations with NICER (in orange circles), AstroSat (LAXPC light curve as green crosses), and Insight-HXMT (LE light curve as purple squares). The observation log of these instruments is noted in table 1. The light curves from NICER, AstroSat-LAXPC and Insight-HXMT/LE are scaled to highl… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Hardness intensity diagrams (HIDs) of GX 340+0 as seen by different observatories during the X-ray and radio campaign. The NICER and AstroSat HIDs (top left and bottom left, respectively) indicate that the source traversed through all the states during the campaign. Comparing the HID and light curve in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Top-left: Count spectra of GX 340+0 as observed during the NB by various instruments (depicted in different colors and markers indicated in the legend). Bottom-left: Best fit model (tbabs*(diskbb+bbodyrad+nthcomp+gaussian)*edge) used to fit the count spectra is shown in the black solid curve, individual components are shown as various lines (indicated in the legend). Right panels: Residuals (χ = data−model… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Model-independent polarization of GX 340+0 during the NB. The markers depict the estimated PD and PA in the corresponding energy bins while the solid and the dashed lines correspond to 1 and 3σ confidence intervals. Polarization was detected at > 3σ level in the 3.2–5 keV and 5–8 keV energy bands, and at > 4σ level for 2–8 keV, but not detected in the 2–3.2 keV energy band. As shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:fi… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: HID of GX 340+0 as seen by AstroSat-LAXPC in the soft energy range. To highlight the overlap of the FB/EFB and the NB in the soft energy range, we depict the FB/EFB (as seen in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present the first X-ray polarization measurement of the neutron star low-mass X-ray binary and Z-source, GX 340$+$0, in the normal branch (NB) using a 200 ks observation with the Imaging X-ray Polarimetric Explorer (IXPE). This observation was performed in 2024 August. Along with IXPE, we also conducted simultaneous observations with NICER, AstroSat, Insight-HXMT, ATCA, and GMRT to investigate the broadband spectral and timing properties in the X-ray and radio wavelengths. During the campaign, the source traced a complete Z-track during the IXPE observation but spent most of the time in the NB. We measure X-ray polarization degree (PD) of $1.22\pm0.25\%$ in the 2-8 keV energy band with a polarization angle (PA) of $38\pm6^\circ$. The PD in the NB is observed to be weaker than in the horizontal branch (HB) but aligned in the same direction. The PD of the source exhibits a marginal increase with energy while the PA shows no energy dependence. The joint spectro-polarimetric modeling is consistent with the observed X-ray polarization originating from a single spectral component from the blackbody or the Comptonized emission while the disk emission does not contribute towards the X-ray polarization. GMRT observations at 1.26 GHz during HB had a tentative detection at 4.5$\pm$0.7 mJy while ATCA observations a day later during the NB detected the source at 0.70$\pm$0.05 mJy and 0.59$\pm$0.05 mJy in the 5.5 & 9 GHz bands, respectively, suggesting an evolving jet structure depending on the Z-track position.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports the first IXPE X-ray polarization measurement of the Z-source GX 340+0 in the normal branch (NB), yielding PD = 1.22 ± 0.25% and PA = 38 ± 6° in 2–8 keV from a 200 ks observation. Simultaneous NICER, AstroSat, Insight-HXMT, ATCA, and GMRT data show the source tracing a full Z-track, with radio flux decreasing from HB to NB. Joint spectro-polarimetric fits indicate the observed polarization is consistent with arising from a single component (blackbody or Comptonized emission) while the diskbb component contributes zero polarization; PD is weaker than in the HB but PA is aligned.

Significance. If the component attribution holds, the result supplies the first direct polarization constraint on emission geometry in the NB of a Z-source and shows continuity of PA across branches, tightening models of Comptonization and boundary-layer emission. The multi-instrument campaign and energy-dependent PD trend are additional strengths.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.3] §4.3 (joint spectro-polarimetric modeling): the claim that 'the disk emission does not contribute towards the X-ray polarization' is load-bearing for the central interpretation yet rests on a single continuum parametrization (diskbb + bbody + comptt/nthcomp). No Δχ² or posterior comparison is reported when PD of the diskbb component is left free, nor when seed-photon temperature or optical depth are varied within their 1σ ranges; given known 2–8 keV degeneracies among the three continua, this leaves the attribution model-dependent rather than data-driven.
  2. [Table 2 / Figure 5] Table 2 / Figure 5 (polarization vs. component flux fractions): the reported PD values for individual components assume the best-fit fluxes from the joint IXPE+NICER+AstroSat+HXMT continuum model; no systematic test is shown for how ±10% shifts in NH or blackbody normalization (within the quoted uncertainties) re-partition flux and alter which component is required to carry the polarization.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§2.1] §2.1: the energy band for the quoted PD/PA (2–8 keV) should be stated explicitly in the abstract as well.
  2. [Figure 3] Figure 3: the radio light-curve panels lack error bars on the non-detections; clarify whether they are 3σ upper limits.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough and constructive review. The comments identify important aspects of the spectro-polarimetric analysis that require additional robustness checks. We address each point below and will incorporate the suggested tests in the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4.3] §4.3 (joint spectro-polarimetric modeling): the claim that 'the disk emission does not contribute towards the X-ray polarization' is load-bearing for the central interpretation yet rests on a single continuum parametrization (diskbb + bbody + comptt/nthcomp). No Δχ² or posterior comparison is reported when PD of the diskbb component is left free, nor when seed-photon temperature or optical depth are varied within their 1σ ranges; given known 2–8 keV degeneracies among the three continua, this leaves the attribution model-dependent rather than data-driven.

    Authors: We agree that the current presentation relies on the best-fit continuum model without explicit tests of the diskbb polarization degree. In the revised manuscript we will add fits in which the PD of the diskbb component is left free, report the resulting Δχ² (or Bayesian evidence) relative to the baseline model, and repeat the exercise after shifting the seed-photon temperature and optical depth within their 1σ uncertainties. These new results will be presented in an expanded §4.3. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Table 2 / Figure 5] Table 2 / Figure 5 (polarization vs. component flux fractions): the reported PD values for individual components assume the best-fit fluxes from the joint IXPE+NICER+AstroSat+HXMT continuum model; no systematic test is shown for how ±10% shifts in NH or blackbody normalization (within the quoted uncertainties) re-partition flux and alter which component is required to carry the polarization.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the flux partitioning between components is sensitive to the adopted N_H and blackbody normalization. In the revision we will perform the requested systematic test: we will vary N_H and the blackbody normalization by ±10% (and within their quoted 1σ uncertainties), re-fit the polarized components, and show how the required PD values for each component change. The updated results will be added to the discussion of Table 2 and Figure 5. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct observational measurement and standard spectral modeling

full rationale

The paper reports a direct IXPE polarization measurement (PD 1.22±0.25%, PA 38±6°) and uses joint spectro-polarimetric fitting across instruments to test component contributions. No equation or modeling step reduces by construction to a parameter defined in terms of the target polarization attribution; the disk-non-contribution conclusion follows from comparing model fits to the observed Stokes parameters rather than from any self-referential definition or fitted-input prediction. Self-citations, if present, are not load-bearing for the central claim, which remains externally falsifiable against the raw polarization data.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard instrument calibration and spectral component separation rather than new postulates or free parameters introduced by the paper.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption IXPE instrument response and calibration allow accurate polarization measurements in the 2-8 keV band.
    Required for any reported polarization degree and angle.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5930 in / 1167 out tokens · 47924 ms · 2026-05-23T18:31:45.023731+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages · 6 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

    work page

  3. [3]

    F 0j7 7-qERu P)JI(> ? q 0 K5>kx_0s 7KVO7R zU W9 93 9

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command E...

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.831784 2021

  4. [4]

    M., Agrawal , P

    Antia , H. M., Agrawal , P. C., Dedhia , D., et al. 2021, Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy, 42, 32, 10.1007/s12036-021-09712-8

    work page doi:10.1007/s12036-021-09712-8 2021

  5. [5]

    arXiv.org , author =

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Sip o cz , B. M., et al. 2018, , 156, 123, 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f 2018

  6. [6]

    D., et al

    Baldini , L., Bucciantini , N., Lalla , N. D., et al. 2022, SoftwareX, 19, 101194, 10.1016/j.softx.2022.101194

    work page doi:10.1016/j.softx.2022.101194 2022

  7. [7]

    K., & Church , M

    Ba uci \'n ska-Church , M., Gibiec , A., Jackson , N. K., & Church , M. J. 2010, , 512, A9, 10.1051/0004-6361/200913199

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200913199 2010

  8. [8]

    Berendsen , S. G. H., Fender , R., Kuulkers , E., Heise , J., & van der Klis , M. 2000, , 318, 599, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03850.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03850.x 2000

  9. [9]

    2023, , 955, 102, 10.3847/1538-4357/acee7a

    Bhargava , Y., Bhattacharyya , S., Homan , J., & Pahari , M. 2023, , 955, 102, 10.3847/1538-4357/acee7a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acee7a 2023

  10. [10]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.19324, 10.48550/arXiv.2405.19324

    Bhargava , Y., Ng , M., Zhang , L., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.19324, 10.48550/arXiv.2405.19324

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.19324 2024

  11. [11]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.16023, 10.48550/arXiv.2409.16023

    Bobrikova , A., Poutanen , J., & Loktev , V. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.16023, 10.48550/arXiv.2409.16023

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.16023 2024

  12. [12]

    F., Geldzahler , B

    Bradshaw , C. F., Geldzahler , B. J., & Fomalont , E. B. 2003, , 592, 486, 10.1086/375577

    work page doi:10.1086/375577 2003

  13. [13]

    2022, , 134, 114501, 10.1088/1538-3873/ac9642

    CASA Team , Bean , B., Bhatnagar , S., et al. 2022, , 134, 114501, 10.1088/1538-3873/ac9642

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ac9642 2022

  14. [14]

    , keywords =

    Chakraborty, M., Bhattacharyya, S., & Mukherjee, A. 2011, , 418, 490, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19499.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19499.x 2011

  15. [15]

    P., Zhang , S., Qu , J

    Chen , Y. P., Zhang , S., Qu , J. L., et al. 2018, , 864, L30, 10.3847/2041-8213/aadc0e

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aadc0e 2018

  16. [16]

    The nature of the 4th track in GX 5-1: discovery of Fe XXVI RRC in massive flares

    Church , M. J., Dimbylow , O., Peach , C., & Balucinska-Church , M. 2010, , 81, 275, 10.48550/arXiv.0910.4260

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.0910.4260 2010

  17. [17]

    J., Gibiec , A., Ba uci \'n ska-Church , M., & Jackson , N

    Church , M. J., Gibiec , A., Ba uci \'n ska-Church , M., & Jackson , N. K. 2012, , 546, A35, 10.1051/0004-6361/201218987

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201218987 2012

  18. [18]

    J., Halai , G

    Church , M. J., Halai , G. S., & Ba uci \'n ska-Church , M. 2006, , 460, 233, 10.1051/0004-6361:20065035

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20065035 2006

  19. [19]

    2023, , 674, L10, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346275

    Cocchi , M., Gnarini , A., Fabiani , S., et al. 2023, , 674, L10, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346275

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346275 2023

  20. [20]

    2022, , 164, 103, 10.3847/1538-3881/ac7719

    Di Marco , A., Fabiani , S., La Monaca , F., et al. 2022, , 164, 103, 10.3847/1538-3881/ac7719

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac7719 2022

  21. [21]

    2023, , 165, 143, 10.3847/1538-3881/acba0f

    Di Marco , A., Soffitta , P., Costa , E., et al. 2023, , 165, 143, 10.3847/1538-3881/acba0f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/acba0f 2023

  22. [22]

    2024, , 684, A137, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347374

    Fabiani , S., Capitanio , F., Iaria , R., et al. 2024, , 684, A137, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347374

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347374 2024

  23. [23]

    2023, , 519, 3681, 10.1093/mnras/stac3726

    Farinelli , R., Fabiani , S., Poutanen , J., et al. 2023, , 519, 3681, 10.1093/mnras/stac3726

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3726 2023

  24. [24]

    2004 a , , 427, 222, 10.1038/nature02137

    Fender , R., Wu , K., Johnston , H., et al. 2004 a , , 427, 222, 10.1038/nature02137

    work page doi:10.1038/nature02137 2004

  25. [25]

    , keywords =

    Fender , R. P., Belloni , T. M., & Gallo , E. 2004 b , , 355, 1105, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08384.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08384.x 2004

  26. [26]

    B., Geldzahler , B

    Fomalont , E. B., Geldzahler , B. J., & Bradshaw , C. F. 2001 a , , 553, L27, 10.1086/320490

    work page doi:10.1086/320490 2001

  27. [27]

    2001 b , , 558, 283, 10.1086/322479

    ---. 2001 b , , 558, 283, 10.1086/322479

    work page doi:10.1086/322479 2001

  28. [28]

    V., Tsygankov , S

    Forsblom , S. V., Tsygankov , S. S., Poutanen , J., et al. 2024, , 691, A216, 10.1051/0004-6361/202450937

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450937 2024

  29. [29]

    K., Homan , J., & Remillard , R

    Fridriksson , J. K., Homan , J., & Remillard , R. A. 2015, , 809, 52, 10.1088/0004-637X/809/1/52

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/809/1/52 2015

  30. [30]

    Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2016: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray , year = 2016, editor =

    Gendreau , K. C., Arzoumanian , Z., Adkins , P. W., et al. 2016, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9905, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2016: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray, 99051H, 10.1117/12.2231304

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2231304 2016

  31. [31]

    2011, in The X-ray Universe 2011, ed

    Gibiec , A., Balucinska-Church , M., & Church , M. 2011, in The X-ray Universe 2011, ed. J.-U. Ness & M. Ehle , 212

    work page 2011

  32. [32]

    2022, , 514, 2561, 10.1093/mnras/stac1523

    Gnarini , A., Ursini , F., Matt , G., et al. 2022, , 514, 2561, 10.1093/mnras/stac1523

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1523 2022

  33. [33]

    1989, , 225, 79

    Hasinger , G., & van der Klis , M. 1989, , 225, 79

    work page 1989

  34. [34]

    2016, , 594, A116, 10.1051/0004-6361/201629178

    HI4PI Collaboration , Ben Bekhti , N., Fl \"o er , L., et al. 2016, , 594, A116, 10.1051/0004-6361/201629178

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629178 2016

  35. [35]

    M., Han , X

    Hjellming , R. M., Han , X. H., Cordova , F. A., & Hasinger , G. 1990 a , , 235, 147

    work page 1990

  36. [36]

    M., Stewart , R

    Hjellming , R. M., Stewart , R. T., White , G. L., et al. 1990 b , , 365, 681, 10.1086/169522

    work page doi:10.1086/169522 1990

  37. [37]

    2007, , 656, 420, 10.1086/510447

    Homan , J., van der Klis , M., Wijnands , R., et al. 2007, , 656, 420, 10.1086/510447

    work page doi:10.1086/510447 2007

  38. [38]

    K., et al

    Homan , J., van der Klis , M., Fridriksson , J. K., et al. 2010, , 719, 201, 10.1088/0004-637X/719/1/201

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/719/1/201 2010

  39. [39]

    2019, Journal of Open Source Software, 4, 1393, 10.21105/joss.01393

    Huppenkothen , D., Bachetti , M., Stevens , A., et al. 2019 a , The Journal of Open Source Software, 4, 1393, 10.21105/joss.01393

    work page doi:10.21105/joss.01393 2019

  40. [40]

    L., et al

    Huppenkothen , D., Bachetti , M., Stevens , A. L., et al. 2019 b , , 881, 39, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab258d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab258d 2019

  41. [41]

    2006, Chinese Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement, 6, 257, 10.1088/1009-9271/6/S1/33

    Iaria , R., Lavagetto , G., Di Salvo , T., et al. 2006, Chinese Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement, 6, 257, 10.1088/1009-9271/6/S1/33

    work page doi:10.1088/1009-9271/6/s1/33 2006

  42. [42]

    Spread of Matter Over a Neutron-Star Surface During Disk Accretion

    Inogamov , N. A., & Sunyaev , R. A. 1999, Astronomy Letters, 25, 269, 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9904333

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/9904333 1999

  43. [43]

    G., van der Klis , M., Wijnands , R., et al

    Jonker , P. G., van der Klis , M., Wijnands , R., et al. 2000, , 537, 374, 10.1086/309029

    work page doi:10.1086/309029 2000

  44. [44]

    S., & Bleeker , J

    Kaastra , J. S., & Bleeker , J. A. M. 2016, , 587, A151, 10.1051/0004-6361/201527395

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527395 2016

  45. [45]

    A., Sudha , M., & Ludlam , R

    Kaddouh , M. A., Sudha , M., & Ludlam , R. M. 2024, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 8, 243, 10.3847/2515-5172/ad7e22

    work page doi:10.3847/2515-5172/ad7e22 2024

  46. [46]

    Kale , R., & Ishwara-Chandra , C. H. 2021, Experimental Astronomy, 51, 95, 10.1007/s10686-020-09677-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s10686-020-09677-6 2021

  47. [47]

    2015, Astroparticle Physics, 68, 45, 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2015.02.007

    Kislat , F., Clark , B., Beilicke , M., & Krawczynski , H. 2015, Astroparticle Physics, 68, 45, 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2015.02.007

    work page doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2015.02.007 2015

  48. [48]

    M., et al

    La Monaca , F., Di Marco , A., Ludlam , R. M., et al. 2024 a , , 691, A253, 10.1051/0004-6361/202451966

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451966 2024

  49. [49]

    2024 b , , 960, L11, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad132d

    La Monaca , F., Di Marco , A., Poutanen , J., et al. 2024 b , , 960, L11, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad132d

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad132d 2024

  50. [50]

    I., & Sunyaev , R

    Lapidus , I. I., & Sunyaev , R. A. 1985, , 217, 291, 10.1093/mnras/217.2.291

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/217.2.291 1985

  51. [51]

    Li , L.-X., Narayan , R., & McClintock , J. E. 2009, , 691, 847, 10.1088/0004-637X/691/1/847

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/691/1/847 2009

  52. [52]

    A., & Homan , J

    Lin , D., Remillard , R. A., & Homan , J. 2009, , 696, 1257, 10.1088/0004-637X/696/2/1257

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/696/2/1257 2009

  53. [53]

    A., Homan , J., & Barret , D

    Lin , D., Remillard , R. A., Homan , J., & Barret , D. 2012, , 756, 34, 10.1088/0004-637X/756/1/34

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/756/1/34 2012

  54. [54]

    2024, in AAS/High Energy Astrophysics Division, Vol

    Markwardt , C., Arzoumanian , Z., Gendreau , K., Hare , J., & Nicer Team . 2024, in AAS/High Energy Astrophysics Division, Vol. 21, AAS/High Energy Astrophysics Division, 105.36

    work page 2024

  55. [55]

    Migliari , S., & Fender , R. P. 2006, , 366, 79, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09777.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09777.x 2006

  56. [56]

    Migliari , S., Miller-Jones , J. C. A., Fender , R. P., et al. 2007, , 671, 706, 10.1086/522516

    work page doi:10.1086/522516 2007

  57. [57]

    W., Margon , B., & Burton , M

    Miller , B. W., Margon , B., & Burton , M. G. 1993, , 106, 28, 10.1086/116617

    work page doi:10.1086/116617 1993

  58. [58]

    M., Raymond , J., Cackett , E., Grinberg , V., & Nowak , M

    Miller , J. M., Raymond , J., Cackett , E., Grinberg , V., & Nowak , M. 2016, , 822, L18, 10.3847/2041-8205/822/1/L18

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8205/822/1/l18 2016

  59. [59]

    Misra , R., Roy , J., & Yadav , J. S. 2021, Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy, 42, 55, 10.1007/s12036-021-09734-2

    work page doi:10.1007/s12036-021-09734-2 2021

  60. [60]

    1989, , 41, 97

    Mitsuda , K., Inoue , H., Nakamura , N., & Tanaka , Y. 1989, , 41, 97

    work page 1989

  61. [61]

    E., & Fender , R

    Motta , S. E., & Fender , R. P. 2019, , 483, 3686, 10.1093/mnras/sty3331

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty3331 2019

  62. [62]

    K., Homan , J., et al

    Ng , M., Hughes , A. K., Homan , J., et al. 2024, , 966, 232, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad35bd

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad35bd 2024

  63. [63]

    Oosterbroek , T., Lewin , W. H. G., van Paradijs , J., et al. 1994, , 281, 803

    work page 1994

  64. [64]

    Penninx , W., Zwarthoed , G. A. A., van Paradijs , J., et al. 1993, , 267, 92

    work page 1993

  65. [65]

    Priedhorsky , W., Hasinger , G., Lewin , W. H. G., et al. 1986, , 306, L91, 10.1086/184712

    work page doi:10.1086/184712 1986

  66. [66]

    2024, , 961, L8, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad1832

    Rankin , J., La Monaca , F., Di Marco , A., et al. 2024, , 961, L8, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad1832

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad1832 2024

  67. [67]

    2013, , 766, 63, 10.1088/0004-637X/766/1/63

    Seifina , E., Titarchuk , L., & Frontera , F. 2013, , 766, 63, 10.1088/0004-637X/766/1/63

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/766/1/63 2013

  68. [68]

    I., & Sunyaev , R

    Shakura , N. I., & Sunyaev , R. A. 1988, Advances in Space Research, 8, 135, 10.1016/0273-1177(88)90396-1

    work page doi:10.1016/0273-1177(88)90396-1 1988

  69. [69]

    P., Tandon , S

    Singh , K. P., Tandon , S. N., Agrawal , P. C., et al. 2014, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9144, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2014: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray, ed. T. Takahashi , J.-W. A. den Herder , & M. Bautz , 91441S, 10.1117/12.2062667

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2062667 2014

  70. [70]

    P., Homan , J., & Kuulkers , E

    Smale , A. P., Homan , J., & Kuulkers , E. 2003, , 590, 1035, 10.1086/375047

    work page doi:10.1086/375047 2003

  71. [71]

    R., & Choi , C

    Sriram , K., Rao , A. R., & Choi , C. S. 2011, , 743, L31, 10.1088/2041-8205/743/2/L31

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/743/2/l31 2011

  72. [72]

    A review of rapid X-ray variability in X-ray binaries

    van der Klis , M. 2004, arXiv e-prints, astro. astro-ph/0410551

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  73. [73]

    A., Ferland , G

    Verner , D. A., Ferland , G. J., Korista , K. T., & Yakovlev , D. G. 1996, , 465, 487, 10.1086/177435

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/177435 1996

  74. [74]

    E., Stella , L., & Parmar , A

    White , N. E., Stella , L., & Parmar , A. N. 1988, , 324, 363, 10.1086/165901

    work page doi:10.1086/165901 1988

  75. [75]

    2000, ApJ, 542, 914, doi: 10.1086/317016

    Wilms , J., Allen , A., & McCray , R. 2000, , 542, 914, 10.1086/317016

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/317016 2000

  76. [76]

    S., Agrawal , P

    Yadav , J. S., Agrawal , P. C., Antia , H. M., et al. 2017, Current Science, 113, 591, 10.18520/cs/v113/i04/591-594

    work page doi:10.18520/cs/v113/i04/591-594 2017

  77. [77]

    S., Agrawal , P

    Yadav , J. S., Agrawal , P. C., Antia , H. M., et al. 2016, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9905, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2016: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray, ed. J.-W. A. den Herder , T. Takahashi , & M. Bautz , 99051D, 10.1117/12.2231857

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2231857 2016

  78. [78]

    A., Johnson , W

    Zdziarski , A. A., Johnson , W. N., & Magdziarz , P. 1996, , 283, 193, 10.1093/mnras/283.1.193

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/283.1.193 1996

  79. [79]

    2020, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 63, 249502, 10.1007/s11433-019-1432-6

    Zhang , S.-N., Li , T., Lu , F., et al. 2020, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 63, 249502, 10.1007/s11433-019-1432-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s11433-019-1432-6 2020

  80. [80]

    , keywords =

    \.Z ycki , P. T., Done , C., & Smith , D. A. 1999, , 309, 561, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02885.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02885.x 1999