pith. sign in

arxiv: 2210.02276 · v1 · pith:BUKFWNZ7new · submitted 2022-10-05 · 🌌 astro-ph.IM · astro-ph.GA· astro-ph.HE· astro-ph.SR

CASA, the Common Astronomy Software Applications for Radio Astronomy

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 05:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.GAastro-ph.HEastro-ph.SR
keywords CASAradio astronomyALMAVLAdata calibrationimaging pipelinessoftware applicationsVLBI
0
0 comments X p. Extension
pith:BUKFWNZ7 Add to your LaTeX paper What is a Pith Number?
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{BUKFWNZ7}

Prints a linked pith:BUKFWNZ7 badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more

The pith

CASA serves as the main data processing software for ALMA and VLA radio observations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that CASA is the primary software for handling radio astronomy data from major facilities including ALMA and the VLA. It outlines the software's basic structure along with standard procedures for data calibration and imaging. A reader would care because these steps form the core workflows that turn raw telescope signals into usable astronomical images and measurements. The description covers support for single-dish, aperture-synthesis, and VLBI observations across several telescopes.

Core claim

CASA, the Common Astronomy Software Applications, is the primary data processing software for the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) and the Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array (VLA), and is frequently used also for other radio telescopes. The CASA software can handle data from single-dish, aperture-synthesis, and Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI) telescopes. One of its core functionalities is to support the calibration and imaging pipelines for ALMA, VLA, VLA Sky Survey (VLASS), and the Nobeyama 45m telescope.

What carries the argument

The CASA software package, whose structure and calibration-plus-imaging procedures turn raw radio telescope data into calibrated images and measurements.

If this is right

  • Radio astronomers gain access to unified calibration and imaging tools that work across single-dish, synthesis, and VLBI data sets.
  • Dedicated pipelines exist for ALMA, VLA, VLASS, and Nobeyama observations, reducing the need for custom code in standard cases.
  • International collaboration among NRAO, ESO, NAOJ, and JIV-ERIC maintains and updates the shared software.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • New telescope projects could adopt CASA as a ready-made processing platform rather than building separate tools.
  • Users might develop extensions or scripts that plug into the existing calibration structure to handle specialized data types.
  • Community training and documentation centered on CASA would directly improve data-analysis efficiency for radio astronomy.

Load-bearing premise

The high-level procedures and structure described in the paper accurately represent the current implemented capabilities and recommended workflows of the CASA software as used by the astronomy community.

What would settle it

A direct comparison showing that actual CASA commands or pipeline outputs for ALMA or VLA data do not match the calibration and imaging steps outlined in the paper would falsify the overview.

read the original abstract

CASA, the Common Astronomy Software Applications, is the primary data processing software for the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) and the Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array (VLA), and is frequently used also for other radio telescopes. The CASA software can handle data from single-dish, aperture-synthesis, and Very Long Baseline Interferometery (VLBI) telescopes. One of its core functionalities is to support the calibration and imaging pipelines for ALMA, VLA, VLA Sky Survey (VLASS), and the Nobeyama 45m telescope. This paper presents a high-level overview of the basic structure of the CASA software, as well as procedures for calibrating and imaging astronomical radio data in CASA. CASA is being developed by an international consortium of scientists and software engineers based at the National Radio Astronomical Observatory (NRAO), the European Southern Observatory (ESO), the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan (NAOJ), and the Joint Institute for VLBI European Research Infrastructure Consortium (JIV-ERIC), under the guidance of NRAO.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript provides a high-level overview of the CASA software package, its development by an international consortium, and its role as the primary data processing tool for ALMA and the VLA. It describes CASA's support for single-dish, aperture-synthesis, and VLBI data, along with calibration and imaging procedures for these and other facilities such as VLASS and the Nobeyama 45m telescope.

Significance. If the high-level descriptions accurately reflect current capabilities, the paper serves as a useful community reference documenting standard workflows for a widely adopted radio astronomy package. The collaborative development model and explicit ties to major observatory pipelines are strengths that could aid new users and instrument teams.

minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract and introduction state that CASA 'is the primary data processing software' for ALMA and VLA without citing usage statistics or observatory documentation; adding one or two references to ALMA or VLA pipeline papers would strengthen this factual claim.
  2. The manuscript would benefit from a brief section or paragraph noting the CASA version(s) to which the described procedures apply, given that software capabilities evolve between releases.
  3. Figure captions and any workflow diagrams should explicitly label the CASA tasks or modules invoked at each step to improve reproducibility for readers following the high-level procedures.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary and recommendation for minor revision. The assessment that the paper serves as a useful community reference aligns with our goals in documenting CASA's role for ALMA, VLA, and other facilities. No specific major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper is a purely descriptive high-level overview of the CASA software, its consortium development, and standard usage for ALMA/VLA calibration and imaging pipelines. It contains no derivations, equations, predictions, fitted parameters, or first-principles results. All central assertions are statements of established community practice and consortium facts rather than internally derived claims, making the text self-contained with no load-bearing steps that reduce to inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a descriptive software overview paper. No new free parameters, mathematical axioms, or invented physical entities are introduced.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 6095 in / 967 out tokens · 32908 ms · 2026-05-20T05:11:15.214028+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 19 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Survival of Molecular Complexity under Recent Supernova Feedback: Detection of Hot Cores in RX J1713.7-3946

    astro-ph.GA 2026-05 conditional novelty 8.0

    Hot cores in supernova remnant RX J1713.7-3946 exhibit column density ratios of complex organics, deuterated species, and S/N-bearing molecules that are indistinguishable from those in typical star-forming environments.

  2. The MeerKAT Massive Distant Clusters Survey: a search for diffuse radio emission in 30 massive SZ-selected clusters at $z > 1$

    astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    MeerKAT observations detect radio halos in 27% of 30 massive clusters at z>1, a rate lower than at intermediate redshifts but above model predictions, with power-mass scaling similar to lower-z samples.

  3. HI Observations of Baryon-Dominated Dwarf Galaxy Candidates

    astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Resolved HI observations of six baryon-dominated dwarf galaxy candidates show four are dark-matter deficient with high baryon efficiency, two in isolated environments without tidal signs.

  4. Kinematic Stratification in Extremely Red Quasars Revealed by JWST

    astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    JWST observations of ERQs show stratified gas kinematics via deblended optical emission lines, with UV lines dominated by scattered light and optical lines mixing scattered and obscured emission.

  5. The GECKOS survey: Resolving the molecular and ionised gas in the galactic outflow of ESO~484-036

    astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Multiphase observations show molecular gas mass loading factors 10 times higher than ionised gas in ESO 484-036, creating a 3.5 dex discrepancy with cosmological simulations that underpredict cold gas outflows.

  6. Mitigating residual foregrounds and systematic errors in SKA1-Low AA* EoR observations via Bayesian Gaussian Process Regression

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Bayesian GPR recovers the 21cm signal within 2σ credible intervals for most k-modes (0.06 to 1.0 h/Mpc) in SKA1-Low simulations that include realistic residual foregrounds and systematics.

  7. A Quasar--Companion System Without AGN Outflow at $z \sim 6$: The Case of PSO J083+11

    astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    New ALMA [C II] and FIR data on PSO J083+11 at z=6.34 reveal ordered rotation, typical star-forming ratios, and no outflow signatures in either galaxy, interpreted as a pre-AGN-feedback accretion phase.

  8. A population-based approach to understanding radio AGN feedback with LOFAR: The LoTSS Deep Fields

    astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Radio AGN jets inject a total kinetic power density of 10^32 to 10^33 W per cubic megaparsec from z=0 to 2.5, matching requirements for feedback in galaxy evolution models.

  9. The Ophiuchus DIsc Survey Employing ALMA (ODISEA). Substructures as a function of SED Class and disc mass in 100 systems

    astro-ph.EP 2026-04 conditional novelty 5.0

    ALMA observations of 100 Ophiuchus discs show substructures linked to giant planet formation are common in discs above 10 Earth masses of dust and increase from Class I to Class II stages.

  10. GOALS-JWST: Resolved multi-phase molecular gas in IRAS 20551-4250 using JWST and ALMA

    astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Multi-phase molecular gas in IRAS20551-4250 is dominated by cold CO, shows UV-heated warm H2, tidal features from a merger, and no molecular outflows, consistent with ongoing star formation.

  11. The Impact of the Bar on Dense Gas and Star Formation in M83

    astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    In M83 the efficiency of turning molecular gas and dense gas into stars is suppressed by factors of about 2 and 0.35 in the bar versus spiral arms, with higher CO line widths suggesting turbulence as the cause.

  12. Identification of a Radio Counterpart to SN 2025ulz in the S250818k Localization Area

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A faint radio counterpart to SN 2025ulz was detected at 6-10 GHz, consistent with either supernova ejecta interacting with circumstellar material or an off-axis jet, supporting possible superkilonova scenarios.

  13. Studying Ionospheric Phase Structure Functions Using Wide-Band uGMRT (Band-4) Interferometric Data

    physics.space-ph 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    uGMRT Band-4 data on 3C48 show ionospheric phase structure functions with power-law turbulence, diffractive scales of 6.7-8.3 km, and anisotropy consistent with MSTIDs at ~19°N latitude.

  14. The PARADIGM Project II: Characterising Nuclear and Diffuse Radio Components in Local U/LIRGs

    astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Multi-scale radio observations of 15 local U/LIRGs decompose emission to show nuclear components contribute ~50% on average while diffuse SF-related emission dominates ~80% of total power, with radio excess linked to ...

  15. Taking Inventory of the Most Promising Lensed Radio Sources for Constraining Fundamental Properties of Dark Matter

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Reports results from two searches for new radio lenses in existing surveys and discusses the completeness of the population usable for constraining dark matter properties via astrometric perturbations.

  16. A Dual-Band Centimetre Continuum Monitoring Survey of Young Stellar Objects in the Coronet Cluster

    astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Dual-frequency monitoring detects 20 radio sources in the Coronet Cluster, showing steeper spectral indices in Class 0/I YSOs than in Class II and ubiquitous variability independent of stage.

  17. Multiphase Gas Structure in the Circumnuclear Region of NGC 5506 Observed with ALMA

    astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    New ALMA observations of NGC 5506 show a thick rotating CND where supernova-driven turbulence supplies vertical support and AGN outflow dissociates CO.

  18. A PINK update: Improvements to the CELEBI fast radio burst data reduction and analysis pipeline

    astro-ph.IM 2026-05 accept novelty 3.0

    The PINK updates enhance the CELEBI FRB pipeline with better astrometry, time-frequency gating, polarization calibration, DM optimization tools, and a software container for improved efficiency and localization of eve...

  19. Role of General Users in the Lifecycle of Scientific Software

    astro-ph.IM 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Involving general users in prioritizing development for scientific software like CASA improves alignment with user needs and benefits both communities despite limited support resources.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages · cited by 19 Pith papers · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    W., Beeber, R

    Backus, J. W., Beeber, R. J., Best, et al. 1956, Programmer’s Reference Manual, The Fortran Automatic Coding System for the IBM 704 EDPM, IBM Corporation, New York. Bhatnagar, S. & Cornwell, T. J. 2004, A&A, 426,

  2. [2]

    J., Golap, K., et al

    Bhatnagar, S., Cornwell, T. J., Golap, K., et al. 2008, A&A, 487,

  3. [3]

    2013, ApJ, 770,

    Bhatnagar, S., Rau, U., & Golap, K. 2013, ApJ, 770,

  4. [4]

    High Fidelity Deconvolution of Moderately Resolved Sources

    Bracewell, R. N. 2000, The Fourier transform and its applications / Ronald N. Bracewell. Boston : McGraw Hill, c2000. (McGraw-Hill series in electrical and computer engineering. Circuits and systems). Bremer, M. A. R. 1994, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems III, 61, 175 Briggs, D. S., 1995, PhD Thesis “High Fidelity Deconvolution of Moderate...

  5. [5]

    Calabretta, M. R. 2011, Astrophysics Source Code Library. ascl:1108.003, http://ascl.net/1108.003 Casacore Team 2019, Astrophysics Source Code Library. ascl:1912.002, http://ascl.net/1912.002 Castro, S., Gonzalez, J., Taylor, J., et al. 2017, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXV,

  6. [6]

    Chandler, C. J. & Butler, B. J. 2014, Proc. SPIE, 9149, 914917. Christiansen, W. N. & Hogbom, J. A. 1985, Cambridge Monographs on Physics, Cambridge: University Press, 1985, 2nd ed. Clark, B. G. 1980, A&A, 89,

  7. [7]

    Clark, B. G. 1995, Very Long Baseline Interferometry and the VLBA, 82, 3 Codd, E. F. 1970, Communications of the ACM 13,

  8. [8]

    2021, Zenodo.4905459 Condon, J

    Comrie, A., Wang, K.-S., Hsu, S.-C., et al. 2021, Zenodo.4905459 Condon, J. J., Cotton, W. D., Greisen, E. W., et al. 1994, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems III, 61, 155 Condon, J. J. & Ransom, S. M. 2016, Essential Radio Astronomy, by James J. Condon and Scott M. Ransom. ISBN: 978-0-691-13779-7. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press,

  9. [9]

    E., Cornwell, T

    Conway, J. E., Cornwell, T. J., & Wilkinson, P. N. 1990, MNRAS, 246, 490 Cornwell, T. J. 1988, A&A, 202,

  10. [10]

    1995, Very Long Baseline Interferometry and the VLBA, 82, 39 Cornwell, T

    Cornwell, T. 1995, Very Long Baseline Interferometry and the VLBA, 82, 39 Cornwell, T. J. 2008, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 2,

  11. [11]

    Cornwell, T. J. & Evans, K. F. 1985, A&A, 143,

  12. [12]

    & Braun, R

    Cornwell, T. & Braun, R. 1989, Synthesis Imaging in Radio Astronomy, 6, 167 Cornwell, T. & Fomalont, E. B. 1999, Synthesis Imaging in Radio Astronomy II, 180,

  13. [13]

    Cornwell, T. J. & Perley, R. A. 1992, A&A, 261, 353 Cornwell, T. J., Golap, K., & Bhatnagar, S. 2008, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 2,

  14. [14]

    Cotton, W. D. 2017, PASP, 129, 094501. Dask Development Team 2016, Dask: Library for dynamic task scheduling, URL https://dask.org de Gasperin, F., Mevius, M., Rafferty, D. A., et al. 2018, A&A, 615, A179. Ekers, R. D. & Rots, A. H. 1979, IAU Colloq. 49: Image Formation from Coherence Functions in Astronomy, 76,

  15. [15]

    Ellingson, S. W. 2005, Radio Science, 40, RS5S01. Emrich, A., Andersson, S., Wannerbratt, M., et al. 2009, Twentieth International Symposium on Space Terahertz Technology, 174 Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, Akiyama, K., Alberdi, A., et al. 2019, ApJL, 875, L1. Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, Akiyama, K., Alberdi, A., et al. 2019, ApJL, 875,...

  16. [16]

    Fridman, P. A. & Baan, W. A. 2001, A&A, 378,

  17. [17]

    Geers, V

    18 CASA Team et al. Geers, V. C., Davis, L., Hales, C. A., et al. 2019, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXVI, 521,

  18. [18]

    Glendenning, B. E. 1996, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V, 101, 271 Greisen, E. W. 2003, Information Handling in Astronomy - Historical Vistas, 285,

  19. [19]

    Greisen, E. W. 2016, The FITS Interferometry Data Interchange Convention - Revised, AIPS Memo 114, http: //www.aips.nrao.edu/TEXT/PUBL/AIPSMEM114.PS. Greisen, E. W. 2020, AIPS FITS File Format - Revised, AIPS Memo 117, http: //www.aips.nrao.edu/TEXT/PUBL/AIPSMEM117.PS Hamaker, J. P., Bregman, J. D., & Sault, R. J. 1996, A&AS, 117,

  20. [20]

    Hamaker, J. P. & Bregman, J. D. 1996, A&AS, 117,

  21. [21]

    2001, PASP, 113,

    Heiles, C., Perillat, P., Nolan, M., et al. 2001, PASP, 113,

  22. [22]

    & Ryle, M

    Hinder, R. & Ryle, M. 1971, MNRAS, 154,

  23. [23]

    H¨ ogbom, J. A. 1974, A&AS, 15,

  24. [24]

    Journal of Open Research Software, 5(1), p.10

    Xarray: N-D labeled Arrays and Datasets in Python. Journal of Open Research Software, 5(1), p.10. Hsieh, M., & Bhatnagar, S. 2021, Efficient Adaptive-Scale CLEAN Deconvolution in CASA for Radio Interferometric Images, ARDG Memo Series, https://safe.nrao.edu/wiki/pub/Software/Algorithms/ WebHome/ardg aspclean.pdf Iguchi, S., Morita, K.-I., Sugimoto, M., et a...

  25. [25]

    2018, Ph.D

    Jagannathan, P. 2018, Ph.D. Thesis Jagannathan, P., Bhatnagar, S., Brisken, W., et al. 2018, AJ, 155,

  26. [26]

    M., et al

    Janssen, M., Goddi, C., van Bemmel, I. M., et al. 2019, A&A, 626, A75. Jennison, R. C. 1958, MNRAS, 118,

  27. [27]

    Jones R. C. 1941, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 31, 1 Junklewitz, H., Bell, M. R., Selig, M., & Enßlin, T. A. 2016, A&A, 586, A76. Kellermann, K. I. & Thompson, A. R. 1985, Science, 229,

  28. [28]

    MeasurementSet definition version 2.0

    Kemball, A. J., & Wieringa, M. H. 2000, “MeasurementSet definition version 2.0”, Casacore Note

  29. [29]

    R., Masters, J

    Kent, B. R., Masters, J. S., Chandler, C. J., et al. 2020, ASP Conf. Series, 527,

  30. [30]

    A., Tsutsumi, T., Brogan, C

    Kepley, A. A., Tsutsumi, T., Brogan, C. L., et al. 2020, PASP, 132, 024505. Kluyver, T., Ragan-Kelley, B., P´ erez, F., Granger, B., Bussonnier, M., Frederic, J., et al. 2016, Jupyter Notebooks – a publishing format for reproducible computational workflows. In: Loizides F, Schmidt B, (Eds.), Positioning and Power in Academic Publishing: Players, Agents and...

  31. [31]

    A., Chandler, C

    Lacy, M., Baum, S. A., Chandler, C. J., et al. 2020, PASP, 132, 035001. Lazio, J. 2009, Panoramic Radio Astronomy: Wide-field 1-2 GHz Research on Galaxy Evolution, 58 Likhachev, S. 2005, Future Directions in High Resolution Astronomy, 340, 608 Mangum, J. G., Emerson, D. T., & Greisen, E. W. 2007, A&A, 474,

  32. [32]

    S., Kent, B

    Masters, J. S., Kent, B. R., Sugimoto, K., et al. 2020, ASP Conf. Series, 527,

  33. [33]

    T., Tilanus, R

    Maud, L. T., Tilanus, R. P. J., van Kempen, T. A., et al. 2017, A&A, 605, A121. McMullin, J. P., Shiebel, D. R., Young, W., & Debonis, D. 2006, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XV, ASP Conference Series, 351,

  34. [34]

    P., Waters, B., Schiebel, D., Young, W., & Golap, K

    McMullin, J. P., Waters, B., Schiebel, D., Young, W., & Golap, K. 2007, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVI, ASP Conference Series, 376,

  35. [35]

    2006, PASA, 23,

    Middelberg, E. 2006, PASA, 23,

  36. [36]

    2020, zarr-developers/zarr-python: v2.5.0, Zenodo.4069231

    Miles, A., Jakirkham, Durant, M., et al. 2020, zarr-developers/zarr-python: v2.5.0, Zenodo.4069231. Mueller, H. 1948, J. Opt. Soc. America, 38,

  37. [37]

    2014, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXIII, 485,

    Muders, D., Wyrowski, F., Lightfoot, J., et al. 2014, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXIII, 485,

  38. [38]

    J., Bolatto, A., Chatterjee, S., et al

    Murphy, E. J., Bolatto, A., Chatterjee, S., et al. 2018, Science with a Next Generation Very Large Array, eds. E. Murphy, ASP Conference Series, 517,

  39. [39]

    J., Bagri, D

    Napier, P. J., Bagri, D. S., Clark, B. G., et al. 1994, IEEE Proceedings, 82,

  40. [40]

    F., Bolton, R

    Nikolic, B., Graves, S. F., Bolton, R. C., et al. 2012, Astrophysics Source Code Library. ascl:1207.014 Noordam, J., 1996, AIPS++ Note

  41. [41]

    R., de Bruyn, A

    Offringa, A. R., de Bruyn, A. G., Biehl, M., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 405,

  42. [42]

    2002, Single-Dish Radio Astronomy: Techniques and Applications, 278, 293 Common Astronomy Software Applications 19 Paxson, V

    O’Neil, K. 2002, Single-Dish Radio Astronomy: Techniques and Applications, 278, 293 Common Astronomy Software Applications 19 Paxson, V. & Saltmarsh, C. 1993, Proceedings of the Winter Technical Conference (Berkeley: USENIX Assoc), 141 Pence, W.D., et al. 2010, A&A, 534, A42. Perez, F. & Granger, B. E. 2007, Computing in Science and Engineering, 9,

  43. [43]

    2010, A&A, 517, A12

    Pety, J., & Rodr´ ıguez-Fern´ andez, N. 2010, A&A, 517, A12. Pokorny, M. 2021, High Performance Gridding, ngVLA Computing Memo Series, 5, https://library.nrao.edu/ public/memos/ngvla/NGVLAC 05.pdf Rau, U., Bhatnagar, S., Voronkov, M. A., Cornwell, T. J. 2009, Proc. IEEE, Vol. 97, No. 8,

  44. [44]

    & Cornwell, T

    Rau, U. & Cornwell, T. J. 2011, A&A, 532, A71. Rau, U., Bhatnagar, S., & Owen, F. N. 2016, AJ, 152,

  45. [45]

    2019, AJ, 158,

    Rau, U., Naik, N., & Braun, T. 2019, AJ, 158,

  46. [46]

    Readhead, A. C. S. & Wilkinson, P. N. 1978, ApJ, 223,

  47. [47]

    M., Neilan, R

    Rocken, C., Johnson, J. M., Neilan, R. E., et al. 1991, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 29,

  48. [48]

    Pearson, T. J. & Readhead, A. C. S. 1984, ARA&A, 22,

  49. [49]

    A., Crutcher, R., Young, W., et al

    Roberts, D. A., Crutcher, R., Young, W., et al. 1999, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems VIII, 172, 15 Sault, R. J. & Wieringa, M. H. 1994, A&AS, 108, 585 Sault, R. J., Hamaker, J. P., & Bregman, J. D. 1996a, A&AS, 117,

  50. [50]

    2008, PASJ, 60,

    Sawada, T., Ikeda, N., Sunada, K., et al. 2008, PASJ, 60,

  51. [51]

    Schiebel, D. R. 1996, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V, 101, 315 Schinzel, F. K., Kerr, M., Rau, U., et al. 2019, ApJL, 876, L17. Schwab, F. R. 1984, AJ, 89,

  52. [52]

    Schwarz, U. J. 1978, A&A, 65, 345 Sekhar, S., Jagannathan, P., Kirk, B., Bhatnagar, S., & Taylor, R. 2019, Building a model for antenna aperture illumination pattern, ARDG Memo Series, https://safe.nrao.edu/wiki/pub/Software/Algorithms/ WebHome/AtoZSolver.pdf. Smirnov, O. M. 2011a, A&A, 527, A106. Smirnov, O. M. 2011, A&A, 527, A107. Sramek, R. A. & Schwa...

  53. [53]

    2002, Single-Dish Radio Astronomy: Techniques and Applications, ASP Conf

    Stanimirovic, S. 2002, Single-Dish Radio Astronomy: Techniques and Applications, ASP Conf. Ser., 278,

  54. [54]

    1997, ”The C++ Programming Language (Third ed.)”, ISBN 0-201-88954-4, OCLC 59193992

    Stroustrup, B. 1997, ”The C++ Programming Language (Third ed.)”, ISBN 0-201-88954-4, OCLC 59193992. Tasse, C., van der Tol, S., van Zwieten, J., et al. 2013, A&A, 553, A105. Tasse, C. 2014, A&A, 566, A127. Taylor, G. B., Carilli, C. L., & Perley, R. A. 1999, Synthesis Imaging in Radio Astronomy II,

  55. [55]

    2019, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXVII, 523,

    Teuben, P. 2019, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXVII, 523,

  56. [56]

    The MPI Forum, CORPORATE 1993, Supercomputing ’93: Proceedings of the 1993 ACM/IEEE conference on Supercomputing, p

  57. [57]

    R., Clark, B

    Thompson, A. R., Clark, B. G., Wade, C. M., & Napier, P. J. 1980, ApJS, 44,

  58. [58]

    R., Moran, J

    Thompson, A. R., Moran, J. M., & Swenson, G. W. 1986, A Wiley-Interscience Publication, New York: Wiley,

  59. [59]

    R., Moran, J

    Thompson, A. R., Moran, J. M., & Swenson, G. W. 2017, Interferometry and Synthesis in Radio Astronomy, by A. Richard Thompson, James M. Moran, and George W. Swenson, Jr. 3rd ed. Springer,

  60. [60]

    CASA on the fringe: VLBI data processing in the CASA software package

    van Bemmel, I., Small, D., Kettenis, M., et al. 2019, Proceeding of Science, EVN2018/079 (arXiv:1904.11747). van Bemmel, I., et al. 2022, PASP, in press., DOI: 10.1088/1538-3873/ac81ed van Diepen, G. & Farris, A. 1994, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems III, 61, 417 van Diepen, G. N. J. 2015, Astronomy and Computing, 12,

  61. [61]

    Casacore Table Data System

    van Diepen, G., 2020, Casacore Note 225: “Casacore Table Data System”, https://casacore.github.io/casacore-notes/255.html van Rossum, G., 1995, ”Python Reference Manual.”, Technical Report CS-R9525, May 1995, Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica (CWI), Amsterdam. Viallefond, F., 2006, ”The ALMA Science Data Model”, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and ...

  62. [62]

    C., Greisen, E

    Wells, D. C., Greisen, E. W., & Harten, R. H. 1981, A&AS, 44,

  63. [63]

    Definition of MeasurementSet

    Wieringa, M. H., & Cornwell, T. J. 1996, “Definition of MeasurementSet”, AIPS++ Note

  64. [64]

    Wiesemeyer, H., Nothnagel, A. (2011). Very Long Baseline Interferometry. In: Gupta, H.K. (eds) Encyclopedia of Solid Earth Geophysics. Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series. Springer, Dordrecht. 20 CASA Team et al. Wilkinson, P. N. 1989, Techniques and Applications of Very Long Baseline Interferometry, 283,

  65. [65]

    L., Rohlfs, K., & H¨ uttemeister, S

    Wilson, T. L., Rohlfs, K., & H¨ uttemeister, S. 2013, Tools of Radio Astronomy; Astronomy and Astrophysics Library. ISBN 978-3-642-39949-7. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg,

  66. [66]

    Wootten, A., & Thompson, A. R. 2009, IEEE Proceedings, 97,

  67. [67]

    2015, Proceedings of Science, EVN 2014, 230, 1

    Zensus, A., & and Ros, E. 2015, Proceedings of Science, EVN 2014, 230, 1