REVIEW 3 cited by
EEE-Bench: A Comprehensive Multimodal Electrical And Electronics Engineering Benchmark
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Recent studies on large language models (LLMs) and large multimodal models (LMMs) have demonstrated promising skills in various domains including science and mathematics. However, their capability in more challenging and real-world related scenarios like engineering has not been systematically studied. To bridge this gap, we propose EEE-Bench, a multimodal benchmark aimed at assessing LMMs' capabilities in solving practical engineering tasks, using electrical and electronics engineering (EEE) as the testbed. Our benchmark consists of 2860 carefully curated problems spanning 10 essential subdomains such as analog circuits, control systems, etc. Compared to benchmarks in other domains, engineering problems are intrinsically 1) more visually complex and versatile and 2) less deterministic in solutions. Successful solutions to these problems often demand more-than-usual rigorous integration of visual and textual information as models need to understand intricate images like abstract circuits and system diagrams while taking professional instructions, making them excellent candidates for LMM evaluations. Alongside EEE-Bench, we provide extensive quantitative evaluations and fine-grained analysis of 17 widely-used open and closed-sourced LLMs and LMMs. Our results demonstrate notable deficiencies of current foundation models in EEE, with an average performance ranging from 19.48% to 46.78%. Finally, we reveal and explore a critical shortcoming in LMMs which we term laziness: the tendency to take shortcuts by relying on the text while overlooking the visual context when reasoning for technical image problems. In summary, we believe EEE-Bench not only reveals some noteworthy limitations of LMMs but also provides a valuable resource for advancing research on their application in practical engineering tasks, driving future improvements in their capability to handle complex, real-world scenarios.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
EngTrace: A Symbolic Benchmark for Verifiable Process Supervision of Engineering Reasoning
EngTrace, a 1,350-instance symbolic engineering benchmark with gold reasoning traces, shows frontier LLMs outperform math-specialized small models and that trace verification reveals a complexity cliff.
-
SoM-1K: A Thousand-Problem Benchmark Dataset for Strength of Materials
A new multimodal benchmark for strength of materials shows current foundation models solve at most 56.6% of problems, and expert-written diagram descriptions help more than images.
-
Patient-Specific Autoregressive Models for Organ Motion Prediction in Radiotherapy
Auto-RMP, an autoregressive VQGAN plus causal transformer model, predicts future 4D CT phases from prior phases and reports higher lung and heart motion accuracy than DAM and DiffuseRT on public and private datasets.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.