Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

ChatTracker: Enhancing Visual Tracking Performance via Chatting with Multimodal Large Language Model

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.01756 v2 pith:CCSPRQ3T submitted 2024-11-04 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords trackinglanguageperformancedescriptionstrackersvisualchattrackerproposed
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Visual object tracking aims to locate a targeted object in a video sequence based on an initial bounding box. Recently, Vision-Language~(VL) trackers have proposed to utilize additional natural language descriptions to enhance versatility in various applications. However, VL trackers are still inferior to State-of-The-Art (SoTA) visual trackers in terms of tracking performance. We found that this inferiority primarily results from their heavy reliance on manual textual annotations, which include the frequent provision of ambiguous language descriptions. In this paper, we propose ChatTracker to leverage the wealth of world knowledge in the Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) to generate high-quality language descriptions and enhance tracking performance. To this end, we propose a novel reflection-based prompt optimization module to iteratively refine the ambiguous and inaccurate descriptions of the target with tracking feedback. To further utilize semantic information produced by MLLM, a simple yet effective VL tracking framework is proposed and can be easily integrated as a plug-and-play module to boost the performance of both VL and visual trackers. Experimental results show that our proposed ChatTracker achieves a performance comparable to existing methods.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Are They the Same? Exploring Visual Correspondence Shortcomings of Multimodal LLMs

    cs.CV 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Multimodal LLMs show systematic weaknesses in instance-level visual correspondence, and CoLVA, trained with a fine-grained vision expert and object-level contrastive learning, reaches 49.8% accuracy on the new MMVM be...

  2. How Texts Help? A Fine-grained Evaluation to Reveal the Role of Language in Vision-Language Tracking

    cs.CV 2024-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A fine-grained benchmark combining 10 challenge labels and 6 text types shows the value of language in vision-language tracking varies by scenario and tracker.

Pith tools