REVIEW 1 cited by
Deep Learning on 3D Semantic Segmentation: A Detailed Review
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In this paper an exhaustive review and comprehensive analysis of recent and former deep learning methods in 3D Semantic Segmentation (3DSS) is presented. In the related literature, the taxonomy scheme used for the classification of the 3DSS deep learning methods is ambiguous. Based on the taxonomy schemes of 9 existing review papers, a new taxonomy scheme of the 3DSS deep learning methods is proposed, aiming to standardize it and improve the comparability and clarity across related studies. Furthermore, an extensive overview of the available 3DSS indoor and outdoor datasets is provided along with their links. The core part of the review is the detailed presentation of recent and former 3DSS deep learning methods and their classification using the proposed taxonomy scheme along with their GitHub repositories. Additionally, a brief but informative analysis of the evaluation metrics and loss functions used in 3DSS is included. Finally, a fruitful discussion of the examined 3DSS methods and datasets, is presented to foster new research directions and applications in the field of 3DSS. Supplementary, to this review a GitHub repository is provided (https://github.com/thobet/Deep-Learning-on-3D-Semantic-Segmentation-a- Detailed-Review) including a quick classification of over 400 3DSS methods, using the proposed taxonomy scheme.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Synthetic LiDAR Data Generation and Deterministic Downsampling for Point Cloud Classification on the Edge
The authors combine a BLAINDER-based synthetic LiDAR variant of ModelNet40 with a standalone pretrained Critical Point Layer frontend, reporting 88.36% accuracy and about 50 FPS on a Raspberry Pi 5.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.