Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Energy Price Modelling: A Comparative Evaluation of four Generations of Forecasting Methods

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.03372 v1 pith:TQ6YBCU7 submitted 2024-11-05 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords forecastingenergyliteraturemethodsempiricalfourlearningprice
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Energy is a critical driver of modern economic systems. Accurate energy price forecasting plays an important role in supporting decision-making at various levels, from operational purchasing decisions at individual business organizations to policy-making. A significant body of literature has looked into energy price forecasting, investigating a wide range of methods to improve accuracy and inform these critical decisions. Given the evolving landscape of forecasting techniques, the literature lacks a thorough empirical comparison that systematically contrasts these methods. This paper provides an in-depth review of the evolution of forecasting modeling frameworks, from well-established econometric models to machine learning methods, early sequence learners such LSTMs, and more recent advancements in deep learning with transformer networks, which represent the cutting edge in forecasting. We offer a detailed review of the related literature and categorize forecasting methodologies into four model families. We also explore emerging concepts like pre-training and transfer learning, which have transformed the analysis of unstructured data and hold significant promise for time series forecasting. We address a gap in the literature by performing a comprehensive empirical analysis on these four family models, using data from the EU energy markets, we conduct a large-scale empirical study, which contrasts the forecasting accuracy of different approaches, focusing especially on alternative propositions for time series transformers.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. NSW-EPNews: A News-Augmented Benchmark for Electricity Price Forecasting with LLMs

    cs.LG 2025-05 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLMs forecast electricity prices worse than ARIMA on the new NSW-EPNews benchmark and frequently hallucinate by echoing, offsetting, or repeating historical prices.

  2. Benchmarking Pre-Trained Time Series Models for Electricity Price Forecasting

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    No time series foundation model statistically outperforms the biseasonal MSTL model in most European day-ahead electricity price markets in 2024, though Chronos-Bolt and Time-MoE match traditional methods.

Pith tools