Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Current Trends in Global Quantum Metrology

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.03850 v2 pith:VJ7NXREX submitted 2024-11-06 quant-ph

classification quant-ph
keywords sensingglobalquantumapproachdevelopmentsmeasurementparadigmprecision
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Quantum sensors are now universally acknowledged as one of the most promising near-term quantum technologies. The traditional formulation of quantum sensing introduces a concrete bound on ultimate precision through the so-called local sensing framework, in which a significant knowledge of prior information about the unknown parameter value is implicitly assumed. Moreover, the framework provides a systematic approach for optimizing the sensing protocol. In contrast, the paradigm of global sensing aims to find a precision bound for parameter estimation in the absence of such prior information. In recent years, vigorous research has been pursued to describe the contours of global quantum estimation. Here, we review some of these emerging developments. These developments are both in the realm of finding ultimate precision bounds with respect to appropriate figures of merit in the global sensing paradigm, as well as in the search for algorithms that achieve these bounds. We categorize these developments into two largely mutually exclusive camps; one employing Bayesian updating and the other seeking to generalize the frequentist picture of local sensing towards the global paradigm. In the first approach, in order to achieve the best performance, one has to optimize the measurement settings adaptively. In the second approach, the measurement setting is fixed, however the challenge is to identify this fixed measurement optimally.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Measurement incompatibility in Bayesian multiparameter quantum estimation

    quant-ph 2025-11 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Measurement incompatibility at most doubles the minimum mean-square loss in Bayesian multiparameter quantum estimation, relative to the symmetric-posterior-mean bound.

  2. Experimental Realization of Criticality-Enhanced Global Quantum Sensing via Non-Equilibrium Dynamics

    quant-ph 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A two-qubit superconducting experiment demonstrates that quenching near a first-order critical point yields time-squared (Heisenberg) scaling of sensing precision and that adaptive feedback achieves the quantum Cramér...

Pith tools