Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Scaled Proximal Gradient Methods for Multiobjective Optimization: Improved Linear Convergence and Nesterov's Acceleration

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.07253 v1 pith:HW4YQX64 submitted 2024-10-28 math.OC

classification math.OC
keywords linearconvergencemethodsmultiobjectiveoptimizationimprovedobjectivespgmo
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Over the past two decades, descent methods have received substantial attention within the multiobjective optimization field. Nonetheless, both theoretical analyses and empirical evidence reveal that existing first-order methods for multiobjective optimization converge slowly, even for well-conditioned problems, due to the objective imbalances. To address this limitation, we incorporate curvature information to scale each objective within the direction-finding subproblem, introducing a scaled proximal gradient method for multiobjective optimization (SPGMO). We demonstrate that the proposed method achieves improved linear convergence, exhibiting rapid convergence in well-conditioned scenarios. Furthermore, by applying small scaling to linear objectives, we prove that the SPGMO attains improved linear convergence for problems with multiple linear objectives. Additionally, integrating Nesterov's acceleration technique further enhances the linear convergence of SPGMO. To the best of our knowledge, this advancement in linear convergence is the first theoretical result that directly addresses objective imbalances in multiobjective first-order methods. Finally, we provide numerical experiments to validate the efficiency of the proposed methods and confirm the theoretical findings.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools