Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Using Generative AI and Multi-Agents to Provide Automatic Feedback

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.07407 v1 pith:4BRQO4MZ submitted 2024-11-11 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords feedbackmulti-agentstudentsystemsassessmentsautofeedbackautomaticeducational
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This study investigates the use of generative AI and multi-agent systems to provide automatic feedback in educational contexts, particularly for student constructed responses in science assessments. The research addresses a key gap in the field by exploring how multi-agent systems, called AutoFeedback, can improve the quality of GenAI-generated feedback, overcoming known issues such as over-praise and over-inference that are common in single-agent large language models (LLMs). The study developed a multi-agent system consisting of two AI agents: one for generating feedback and another for validating and refining it. The system was tested on a dataset of 240 student responses, and its performance was compared to that of a single-agent LLM. Results showed that AutoFeedback significantly reduced the occurrence of over-praise and over-inference errors, providing more accurate and pedagogically sound feedback. The findings suggest that multi-agent systems can offer a more reliable solution for generating automated feedback in educational settings, highlighting their potential for scalable and personalized learning support. These results have important implications for educators and researchers seeking to leverage AI in formative assessments, offering a pathway to more effective feedback mechanisms that enhance student learning outcomes.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Partnering with AI: A Pedagogical Feedback System for LLM Integration into Programming Education

    cs.CY 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A multi-agent LLM feedback system for Python programming, built on pedagogical principles of mastery and progress, earned positive ratings from eight teachers though it cannot replace human context.

Pith tools