Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Emerging Non-Hermitian Topology in a Chiral Driven-Dissipative Bose-Hubbard Model

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A driven-dissipative Bose-Hubbard chain with a linear phase gradient in its drive develops a steady-state coexistence region where a topological, amplifying domain (non-Hermitian winding number 1) borders a trivial domain (winding number…

desk verdict A plausible extension of non-Hermitian topological amplification to an interacting driven-dissipative Bose-Hubbard chain, but the central topological claim rests on a local winding number applied exactly where its validity condition is strained. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.08965 v1 pith:SGYQLAEC submitted 2024-11-13 quant-ph cond-mat.other

Laszlo Rassaert , Tomás Ramos , Tommaso Roscilde , Diego Porras This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phcond-mat.other
keywords non-Hermitiantopologytopologicalamplificationdriven-dissipativeBose-Hubbardmodelpoint-gapGaussianvariationalansatzwindingnumberphasecoexistencesuperconductingcircuits
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces a chain of coupled lossy photonic modes with Kerr nonlinearity and a coherent drive whose phase advances linearly along the chain, breaking time-reversal symmetry. Using a Gaussian variational ansatz closed by Wick's theorem, it argues that a shaped drive profile (tanh ramps at the boundaries) stabilizes steady states across most of the phase diagram. The central discovery is a phase diagram with low- and high-density photon phases separated by a coexistence region in which the local non-Hermitian winding number is 1 in the low-density segment and 0 in the high-density segment. In that region the zero-frequency Green's function is exponentially enhanced, meaning the chain directionally amplifies inputs; fluctuations are largest at the moving interface between the topological and trivial domains. If correct, this is a concrete route to non-Hermitian topological phases in an interacting, dissipative bosonic lattice implementable with superconducting circuits.

What carries the argument

The argument runs through three objects. First, the Gaussian variational ansatz: writing b_j=a_j-α_j and closing the Heisenberg equations with Wick's theorem yields closed equations of motion for the coherent amplitudes α_j, normal correlators G_jk=⟨b†_j b_k⟩, and anomalous correlators F_jk=⟨b_j b_k⟩; this is what makes N=40 chains tractable and what produces the steady-state profiles. Second, the non-Hermitian dynamical matrix H=JV-i(κ/2)1 (in the Nambu basis), whose Fourier transform H(k) defines the winding number ν=(1/2π) Im ∮ dk Tr ∂_k log H(k); a local version νj=ν(g_j,J,Δ̃_j) is used to label spatial regions as topological or trivial. Third, topological amplification: the singular value decomposition of H, extended to a chiral Hermitian matrix, protects near-zero singular values when ν≠0, and because the Green's function G(0)=-$H^{{-1}}$ contains $s_n^{{-1}}$, these zero modes translate into exponentially large, directionally biased response. A boundary-shaped drive amplitude and detuning, ε_j=ε tanh(j/N0) (mirrored), damps boundary effects and is what lets a steady state exist at all.

What would settle it

Compute the exact steady state of a short chain (N=4 to 8) with the same parameters (φ=π/3, κ/J=1, U/J=-2·$10^{-4}$, ε/J≈40) using a method that does not assume Gaussianity—e.g. matrix-product-operator simulation of the Lindblad master equation—and check whether the νj=1/νj=0 domain splitting, the interface fluctuation peak, and the exponential Green's-function growth survive.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the coexistence region between the low- and high-density steady states, the chain spontaneously divides into two spatial domains with different non-Hermitian topology. Concretely, with N=40 sites, hopping phase φ=π/3, κ/J=1 and U/J=-2·$10^{-4}$, the local winding number νj=ν(gj,J,Δ̃j) equals 1 across the low-density part of the chain and 0 across the high-density part, with a sharp interface whose position moves from right to left as the drive amplitude ε increases. The nonzero winding is tied to topological amplification: the SVD of the non-Hermitian dynamical matrix develops a topologically protected near-zero singular value, so the zero-frequency Green's function, and therefore the linear response, grows roughly exponentially across the topological segment. Fluctuations ⟨b†_j b_j⟩ peak at the interface, and normalized two-point correlations become long-ranged along the critical line, matching the effective quadratic model built from the steady-state order parameters. The paper presents this as evidence that point-gap non-Hermitian topology emerges from the interplay of interactions, dissipation, and the chiral drive.

Load-bearing premise

The whole chain-level result rests on the assumption that the two-point-correlation closure gives the true steady state; the authors verify this exactly only for one site, and for longer chains they substitute a smallness condition that does not guarantee accuracy exactly where the fluctuations are biggest (the interface).

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A chain tuned into the coexistence region should amplify weak input signals exponentially across the low-density topological segment, with gain that grows with system size roughly as e^{N/ξ} because the Green's function is controlled by a protected near-zero singular value.
  • Varying the drive amplitude ε moves the topological/trivial interface through the chain, so the spatial extent of the amplifying region becomes a tunable parameter and the same device can switch between amplification and transparent regimes.
  • The interface where the winding number changes is also the locus of maximal photon-number fluctuations and long-range correlations, making the phase boundary observable through noise measurements and correlation spectroscopy.
  • No such coexistence or amplification appears when the hopping phase is zero (ϕ=0); the chiral drive is therefore the ingredient that generates the topological response.
  • The necessary ingredients—Kerr nonlinearity, photon loss, a phase gradient, and shaped drive amplitude—are all available in superconducting-circuit arrays, so the predicted phase diagram is in reach of current experiments.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the Gaussian closure is accurate, the same mechanism should appear for smaller |U| and for other lattice geometries; a direct check would be to measure the position-resolved gain profile of a driven chain and compare it with the local winding number νj computed from the steady state.
  • The power-law growth of the critical derivative, d|α*_{N/2}|/dε ∝ N^{3.05}, suggests the coexistence boundary sharpens into a genuine first-order transition in the thermodynamic limit; an exact or tensor-network study of larger chains could test whether the exponent is universal.
  • Because gauges (i) and (ii) are equivalent, an experiment needs only a constant phase gradient in the drive rather than complex hopping; this turns the prediction into a comparatively simple superconducting-circuit layout.
  • The paper's local winding-number construction implicitly assumes parameters vary slowly; near the interface, where the density changes sharply, a better characterization may require a nonlocal or scattering-based invariant, which would either confirm or refine the νj=1/0 picture.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies a driven-dissipative Bose-Hubbard chain with a uniform phase gradient, using a Gaussian variational ansatz to approximate the steady state of the master equation. It reports that an inhomogeneous spatial profile of the drive amplitude and detuning stabilizes steady states, and it presents a non-equilibrium phase diagram with low- and high-density regions separated by a coexistence region. The central claim is that the coexistence region exhibits non-Hermitian point-gap topology and topological amplification, identified through a spatially local winding number nu_j computed from the local parameters of the effective quadratic fluctuation Hamiltonian. Supporting results include Green's function data, correlation functions, a single-site benchmark of the Gaussian ansatz, and a finite-size scaling analysis of the apparent first-order transition.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the paper would extend non-Hermitian point-gap topology and topological amplification from linear lattice models to an interacting driven-dissipative Bose-Hubbard model, with a concrete superconducting-circuit implementation. The manuscript has several strengths: the Gaussian equations of motion are derived explicitly, the single-site benchmark in SI II supports the method at weak nonlinearity, the inhomogeneous drive profile is a concrete stabilization mechanism, and the finite-size scaling in SI V provides a falsifiable prediction for the phase transition. However, the topological identification rests on a local winding number that is applied in a sharply inhomogeneous regime and is not independently connected to the full Green's function, so the main claim is not yet established at the level of rigor the paper intends.

major comments (3)
  1. [Topology in the phase coexistence region] The paper's central claim is based on the local winding number nu_j = nu(g_j, J, Delta_j) introduced in the section 'Topology in the phase coexistence region' and shown in Fig. 3(f). The authors state that this local definition is 'correct in a quasi-homogeneous limit in which parameters vary slowly in space.' In the coexistence region this condition is not met: Figs. 3(d,e) show a sharp interface between low- and high-density regions with a pronounced fluctuation maximum, and SI V defines the transition site by maximizing the gradient of |alpha*_j|. The local formula is therefore applied precisely in the regime where its validity is most strained, and no independent calculation of a topological invariant for the full inhomogeneous H is provided. This is load-bearing because the phase-coexistence claim of topological amplification rests on nu_j taking values 1 and 0 in the two regions.
  2. [Green's function and correlation functions] Fig. 4(a,b) and the discussion in SVI demonstrate enhanced and directional Green's function elements for the effective quadratic model, but they do not establish that the enhancement is due to non-Hermitian point-gap topology. The topological amplification theory in SVI predicts a quasi-zero singular value s_0 of H with s_0 ~ e^{-N/xi} in a homogeneous topological phase. The manuscript does not check this scaling for the inhomogeneous coexistence state, nor does it verify that the singular vector associated with the small singular value is localized in the nu_j = 1 region. Without such a check, the large values of ||G||_F in Fig. 4(a) and the spatial growth in Fig. 4(b) could in principle be attributed to proximity to the driven-dissipative transition (the fluctuation maximum in Fig. 3(e)) rather than to topology. A direct computation of the smallest singular values of the full N-site H and their system-size dependence would close this gap.
  3. [Gaussian ansatz and SI II] The Gaussian ansatz is benchmarked only for a single site (Fig. 5(a)); for chains the paper substitutes the condition <b^dag_j b_j>/|alpha_j|^2 << 1. This ratio is necessary but not sufficient for the Wick factorization of four-operator correlators in Eq. (5) to be quantitatively accurate, and the interface region in Fig. 3(e) is exactly where fluctuations are largest. Given that the coexistence interface is the central object of the paper, the authors should provide a controlled check of the Gaussian truncation for small chains (for example N = 2 or 3 with a truncated local Hilbert space, or a higher-order truncation that quantifies the neglected fourth-order cumulants). Otherwise the steady-state profiles that feed into g_j and hence nu_j remain an assumption at the very point where the topological claim is made.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] The phrase 'numerically prove' overstates what numerical integration can show; recommend replacing it with 'demonstrate' or 'show'.
  2. [Eq. (6)] The value of N0 used in the simulations is never specified; since the bulk region is defined as N0 < j < N - N0, the choice of N0 affects the interpretation of the finite-size results in SI V.
  3. [Fig. 2(a)] The grey 'chaotic' region is not defined quantitatively; state the precise criterion used to decide that the Gaussian equations do not converge to a steady state.
  4. [SVI, Eq. (15)] The dynamical matrix H in Eq. (15) uses Delta_j without making clear whether this is the bare detuning or the dressed detuning Delta_tilde_j = Delta_j + 4U|alpha_j|^2 + U that appears in Eq. (3); this should be stated explicitly because the Green's function is computed from this matrix.
  5. [Supplementary references] The in-text references to the supplementary sections (SII, SIII, SIV, SVI) would be easier to follow if they were given in a single consistent style, and if the supplementary section on the phi = 0 case were explicitly cross-referenced in the main text.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the steady-state and Green's-function calculations are self-contained; only a minor, non-load-bearing self-citation links the winding number to topological amplification.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is not circular. The Gaussian variational equations (Eq. 5) are solved numerically for the full chain; the steady-state densities and fluctuations are new outputs, not fitted to the winding number. The non-Hermitian winding number (Eq. 4) is computed from the local effective parameters (g_j, J, tilde Delta_j) via the standard point-gap formula, and the values nu_j=0/1 are outputs of the local Hamiltonian parameters, not inputs fitted to the claimed topological regions. The Green's function G=-H^{-1} and correlation functions are computed independently from the quadratic fluctuation Hamiltonian, and their enhancement/directional growth is a numerical observation that does not presuppose the winding-number value. The only self-citation of note is the use of Refs. [10,35,37] for the theorem that non-zero winding number implies a protected quasi-zero singular value and exponential Green's-function amplification (main text: 'In [37] it was shown...'; SI VI: 'This discussion is a summary of our previous works in [10,35,37]'). This is a general, parameter-free result from prior work by overlapping authors, and it is not equivalent to the present model's outputs; the present paper's own Green's-function numerics provide an independent check of its consequence. The approximation of the Gaussian ansatz (benchmarked only for N=1, with the heuristic condition <b†b>/|alpha|^2<<1) and the use of the local winding number at the coexistence interface, where the quasi-homogeneous limit is strained, are correctness/validity risks rather than circularity: no target quantity is defined in terms of a prediction, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Score 2 reflects the minor self-citation, not a circular derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results rest on the Gaussian closure of the dissipative many-body dynamics, the local application of a non-Hermitian winding number to a spatially inhomogeneous steady state, and the bulk-boundary correspondence for topological amplification. No fundamentally new physical entity is introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • N0 (boundary smoothing scale) = not stated
    The tanh profiles in Eq. (6) depend on N0, which controls how rapidly drive amplitude and detuning ramp at the edges. The paper never gives its value, yet the existence and width of the coexistence region depend on it.
  • U/J = -2*10^-4
    The Kerr nonlinearity is chosen small enough that the Gaussian ansatz and weak-nonlinearity assumptions hold; the phase diagram is computed at this single value.
  • Specific functional form of drive and detuning profiles = tanh(j/N0), tanh^2(j/N0)
    The inhomogeneous profiles in Eq. (6) are introduced ad hoc to stabilize steady states; other smoothing functions could change boundary effects and the coexistence picture.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Wick's theorem closes the equations of motion; Gaussian states remain Gaussian under the dissipative evolution.
    Invoked after Eq. (5) and justified in SI I by coupling to a Gaussian bath and then taking the Markovian limit; benchmarked exactly only for N=1.
  • domain assumption Born-Markov approximation: sum_n g_n^2 e^{-iωn(t-t')} = κ/2 δ(t-t').
    SI I, Eq. (13), converts the system-bath unitary dynamics into the local Lindblad master equation (2).
  • ad hoc to paper The local winding number ν_j=ν(g_j,J,Δ_j) is a faithful indicator of topology in the inhomogeneous chain.
    Main text defines ν_j and states it is correct in a quasi-homogeneous limit; near the steep density interface the parameters do not vary slowly, so the local invariant is approximate.
  • domain assumption Bulk-boundary correspondence: ν=1 implies a protected near-zero singular value and exponential Green's function enhancement.
    Taken from prior works (Refs. 10, 35, 37), summarized in SI VI; this is not rederived here.
  • domain assumption The steady state selected by time evolution from photon vacuum is the relevant physical state, though nonlinear equations may have multiple long-time solutions.
    SI III notes multiple steady states are possible for equations like (5), citing Ref. 47, and chooses vacuum initial state as experimentally motivated.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Emerging Non-Hermitian Topology in a Chiral Driven-Dissipative Bose-Hubbard Model." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SGYQLAEC

@misc{pith2026241108965,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Emerging Non-Hermitian Topology in a Chiral Driven-Dissipative Bose-Hubbard Model},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SGYQLAEC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.08965}
}
read the original abstract

We introduce a driven-dissipative Bose-Hubbard chain describing coupled lossy photonic modes, in which time-reversal symmetry is broken by a coherent drive with a uniform phase gradient. We investigate this model by means of a Gaussian variational ansatz and numerically prove that the steady-state solution is stabilized by an inhomogeneous profile of the driving amplitude, which damps out boundary effects. Our calculations unveil a non-equilibrium phase diagram showing low- and high-density phases for photons separated by a phase coexistence region in which the system exhibits the phenomenon of topological amplification and is characterized by a finite non-Hermitian winding number. Our work shows the emergence of non-Hermitian topological phases in an interacting model that can be naturally implemented with superconducting circuits.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.08965 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Long-time limit of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. (a) Norm of the Green’s function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. FIG. 6. Dynamics of a chain of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Dynamics of a chain of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. (a) Steady-state value of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Two-body interaction induced phase transitions and intermediate phases in nonreciprocal non-Hermitian quasicrystals

    cond-mat.dis-nn 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Interactions expand the localization critical point of a nonreciprocal quasicrystal into an intermediate mobility edge phase, and bound boson pairs acquire a tunable non-Hermitian skin effect.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    K. v. Klitzing, G. Dorda, and M. Pepper, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 494 (1980)

    1980

  2. [2]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010)

    2010

  3. [3]

    Qi and S.-C

    X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2011)

    2011

  4. [4]

    F. D. M. Haldane and S. Raghu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 013904 (2008)

    2008

  5. [5]

    Ozawa, H

    T. Ozawa, H. M. Price, A. Amo, N. Goldman, M. Hafezi, L. Lu, M. C. Rechtsman, D. Schuster, J. Simon, O. Zil- berberg, and I. Carusotto, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 015006 (2019)

    2019

  6. [6]

    Jalali Mehrabad, S

    M. Jalali Mehrabad, S. Mittal, and M. Hafezi, Phys. Rev. A 108, 040101 (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Y. Ota, K. Takata, T. Ozawa, A. Amo, Z. Jia, B. Kante, M. Notomi, Y. Arakawa, and S. Iwamoto, Nanophotonics 9, 547 (2020)

    2020

  8. [8]

    Barik, A

    S. Barik, A. Karasahin, C. Flower, T. Cai, H. Miyake, W. DeGottardi, M. Hafezi, and E. Waks, Science 359, 666 (2018)

    2018

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    Peano, M

    V. Peano, M. Houde, F. Marquardt, and A. A. Clerk, Phys. Rev. X 6, 041026 (2016)

    2016

  2. [10]

    Porras and S

    D. Porras and S. Fern´ andez-Lorenzo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 143901 (2019)

    2019

  3. [11]

    A. Amo, J. Lefr` ere, S. Pigeon, C. Adrados, C. Ciuti, I. Carusotto, R. Houdr´ e, E. Giacobino, and A. Bramati, Nat. Phys. 5, 805 (2009)

    2009

  4. [12]

    Z. Yang, F. Gao, X. Shi, X. Lin, Z. Gao, Y. Chong, and B. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 114301 (2015)

    2015

  5. [13]

    Kiefer, F

    P. Kiefer, F. Hakelberg, M. Wittemer, A. Berm´ udez, D. Porras, U. Warring, and T. Schaetz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 213605 (2019)

    2019

  6. [14]

    Carusotto and C

    I. Carusotto and C. Ciuti, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 299 (2013)

    2013

  7. [15]

    M. J. Hartmann, Journal of Optics 18, 104005 (2016)

    2016

  8. [16]

    M. J. Hartmann, F. G. Brandao, and M. B. Plenio, Laser & Photonics Reviews 2, 527 (2008)

    2008

  9. [17]

    Carusotto, D

    I. Carusotto, D. Gerace, H. E. Tureci, S. De Liberato, C. Ciuti, and A. Imamoˇ glu, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 033601 (2009)

    2009

  10. [18]

    Le Boit´ e, G

    A. Le Boit´ e, G. Orso, and C. Ciuti, Phys. Rev. A 90, 063821 (2014)

    2014

  11. [19]

    Z. Wang, C. Navarrete-Benlloch, and Z. Cai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 115301 (2020)

    2020

  12. [20]

    Le Boit´ e, G

    A. Le Boit´ e, G. Orso, and C. Ciuti, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 233601 (2013)

    2013

  13. [21]

    Vicentini, F

    F. Vicentini, F. Minganti, R. Rota, G. Orso, and C. Ciuti, Phys. Rev. A 97, 013853 (2018)

    2018

  14. [22]

    L. M. Sieberer, M. Buchhold, and S. Diehl, Rep. Prog. Phys. 79, 096001 (2016)

    2016

  15. [23]

    Graß, Phys

    T. Graß, Phys. Rev. A 99, 043607 (2019)

    2019

  16. [24]

    Finazzi, A

    S. Finazzi, A. Le Boit´ e, F. Storme, A. Baksic, and C. Ciuti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 080604 (2015)

    2015

  17. [25]

    Casteels and C

    W. Casteels and C. Ciuti, Phys. Rev. A 95, 013812 (2017)

    2017

  18. [26]

    Dahan, G

    D. Dahan, G. Arwas, and E. Grosfeld, npj Quantum In- formation 8, 1 (2022)

    2022

  19. [27]

    A. A. Houck, H. E. T¨ ureci, and J. Koch, Nat. Phys. 8, 292 (2012)

    2012

  20. [28]

    Yanay, J

    Y. Yanay, J. Braum¨ uller, S. Gustavsson, W. D. Oliver, and C. Tahan, npj Quantum Information 6, 58 (2020)

    2020

  21. [29]

    R. Ma, B. Saxberg, C. Owens, N. Leung, Y. Lu, J. Simon, and D. I. Schuster, Nature 566, 51 (2019)

    2019

  22. [30]

    Fitzpatrick, N

    M. Fitzpatrick, N. M. Sundaresan, A. C. Li, J. Koch, and A. A. Houck, Phys. Rev. X 7, 011016 (2017)

    2017

  23. [31]

    Rodriguez, A

    S. Rodriguez, A. Amo, I. Sagnes, L. Le Gratiet, E. Ga- lopin, A. Lema ˆ ıtre, and J. Bloch, Nat. Commun.7, 11887 (2016)

    2016

  24. [32]

    Porras and J

    D. Porras and J. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 263602 (2004)

    2004

  25. [33]

    Debnath, N

    S. Debnath, N. M. Linke, S.-T. Wang, C. Figgatt, K. A. Landsman, L.-M. Duan, and C. Monroe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 073001 (2018)

    2018

  26. [34]

    C. C. Wanjura, M. Brunelli, and A. Nunnenkamp, Nat. Commun. 11, 3149 (2020)

    2020

  27. [35]

    Ramos, J

    T. Ramos, J. J. Garc ´ ıa-Ripoll, and D. Porras, Phys. Rev. A 103, 033513 (2021)

    2021

  28. [36]

    G´ omez-Le´ on, T

    A. G´ omez-Le´ on, T. Ramos, A. Gonz´ alez-Tudela, and D. Porras, Phys. Rev. A 106, L011501 (2022)

    2022

  29. [37]

    ν is also related to non-Hermitian point-gap topology [39] (see SVI, for details)

    it was shown that non-zero values of ν lead to the chain entering in a regime of directional amplification, which imply large elements of the zero-frequency Green’s function, G = −H−1. ν is also related to non-Hermitian point-gap topology [39] (see SVI, for details). Gaussian ...

  30. [38]

    G´ omez-Le´ on, T

    A. G´ omez-Le´ on, T. Ramos, A. Gonz´ alez-Tudela, and D. Porras, Quantum 7, 1016 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    Z. Gong, Y. Ashida, K. Kawabata, K. Takasan, S. Hi- gashikawa, and M. Ueda, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031079 (2018)

    2018

  32. [40]

    Kawabata, K

    K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, M. Ueda, and M. Sato, Phys. Rev. X 9, 041015 (2019)

    2019

  33. [41]

    Brunelli, C

    M. Brunelli, C. C. Wanjura, and A. Nunnenkamp, Sci- Post Physics 15, 173 (2023)

    2023

  34. [42]

    Guaita, L

    T. Guaita, L. Hackl, T. Shi, C. Hubig, E. Demler, and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. B 100, 094529 (2019)

    2019

  35. [43]

    Hackl, T

    L. Hackl, T. Guaita, T. Shi, J. Haegeman, E. Demler, and J. I. Cirac, SciPost Phys. 9, 048 (2020)

    2020

  36. [44]

    Ramos, ´A

    T. Ramos, ´A. G´ omez-Le´ on, J. J. Garc ´ ıa-Ripoll, A. Gonz´ alez-Tudela, and D. Porras, arXiv:2207.13728 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Guaita, Quantum Variational Methods for Gaussian States and Beyond , Ph.D

    T. Guaita, Quantum Variational Methods for Gaussian States and Beyond , Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universit¨ at M¨ unchen (2022)

    2022

  38. [46]

    C. Vega, A. Mu˜ noz de las Heras, D. Porras, and A. Gonz´ alez-Tudela, arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.10176 (2024)

    2024

  39. [47]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, The theory of open quantum systems (Oxford University Press, USA, 2002)

    2002

  40. [48]

    del Pino, J

    J. del Pino, J. Koˇ sata, and O. Zilberberg, Physical Re- view Research 6, 033180 (2024). 6 SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL I. GAUSSIAN ANSA TZ WITH DISSIP A TION In the case of closed quantum systems, Gaussian wave- functions form a K¨ ahler manifold, which implies that the equations ...

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.