Unstructured Text Enhanced Open-domain Dialogue System: A Systematic Survey

Jiapeng Li; Longxuan Ma; Mingda Li; Ting Liu; Weinan Zhang

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 256 references

Unstructured Text Enhanced Open-domain Dialogue System: A Systematic Survey

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims to be the first systematic survey of open-domain dialogue systems that ground responses in unstructured text, and it organizes the field into a six-module blueprint.

desk verdict A useful module-based taxonomy of knowledge-grounded dialogue up to 2021, but the 'first systematic survey' and future-trends claims are undercut by a missing search protocol and a reference list that stops before the LLM era. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.09166 v1 pith:22I4UYHR submitted 2024-11-14 cs.CL

Longxuan Ma , Mingda Li , Weinan Zhang , Jiapeng Li , Ting Liu This is my paper · ORCID

classification cs.CL

keywords unstructuredtextenhanceddialoguesystemopen-domainknowledge-groundedconversationdocument-groundedknowledgeselectionretrieval-basedgenerativemodelsevaluation

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims to be the first systematic review of open-domain dialogue systems that use unstructured text, such as Wikipedia articles, movie plots, personas, and reviews, as external knowledge; the paper calls these UTEDS. It sorts the field into a component-level map: retrieval models are built from Fusion, Matching, and Ranking modules, while generative models are built from Dialogue and Knowledge Encoding, Knowledge Selection, and Response Generation modules. The survey compiles the datasets, architectures, training objectives, evaluation metrics, and reported scores behind those components, and draws comparative conclusions from the compiled tables. The authors argue that mining unstructured text during conversation is the future direction for open-domain dialogue research, because most human knowledge is stored in raw text.

What carries the argument

The central organizing device is a module decomposition: retrieval systems as Fusion, Matching, and Ranking, and generative systems as Dialogue and Knowledge Encoding, Knowledge Selection, and Response Generation. Knowledge Selection is identified as the core component, because the model must decide which piece of raw text is semantically and logically relevant before the response can be grounded. The decomposition does the argument's work by giving every surveyed model a coordinate, letting the authors compare datasets, losses, metrics, and reported results on a common grid.

What would settle it

Run a documented search of a major NLP anthology for knowledge-grounded or document-grounded dialogue restricted to publications before 2021 and count peer-reviewed papers that the survey neither cites nor fits into its six components; if the count is substantial, the completeness behind the 'first systematic review' and the trend projections is not supported.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that the scattered UTEDS literature can be read as instances of a single blueprint, so that otherwise unrelated models become comparable module by module. Retrieval systems all fuse dialogue context with external knowledge, match the fused representation against candidate responses, and rank the candidates; generative systems all encode context and knowledge, select the relevant knowledge, and generate a response conditioned on that selection. Under that blueprint the survey catalogs roughly eighteen datasets, compares dozens of models on shared benchmarks such as WoW, Persona-Chat, CMUDoG, Holl-E, and Topical-Chat, and tabulates their reported automatic scores. Its comparative reading supports conclusions that copy mechanisms reliably help, pre-trained models help in most settings, knowledge selection is the central difficulty, and word-overlap automatic metrics do not track dialogue quality. The paper presents this unified view as the first systematic review of UTEDS and uses it to project six research directions: limited-resource learning, semantic representation learning, knowledge mining, interpretable reasoning, better evaluation, and lifelong learning.

Load-bearing premise

The survey assumes the works it catalogs, gathered without a stated search protocol or inclusion criteria, are the complete relevant literature on text-grounded dialogue systems, so its 'first systematic review' and future-trend claims depend on nothing important being left out.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Failures in a grounded dialogue system can be localized to one component, so improvement efforts can target Fusion versus Matching versus Ranking, or Encoding versus Selection versus Generation, rather than treating the system as a black box.
The compiled evidence says copy mechanisms and pre-trained encoders are the interventions that pay off, so future grounded generation systems should treat both as default components.
Because attention blurs over long documents and explicit selection lets models measure selection accuracy, document-grounded dialogue needs explicit selection or hierarchical memory rather than plain attention.
Word-overlap automatic metrics are unreliable, so credible progress claims for UTEDS need model-based or human evaluation alongside automatic scores.
The paper's six future directions define the open problems of the field as the authors see them, from knowledge-sparse and low-resource settings to interpretable reasoning and lifelong learning.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The Fusion-Matching-Ranking and Encoding-Selection-Generation blueprint reads naturally as an early map of retrieval-augmented generation, where query-document fusion, reranking, and grounded decoding occupy the same coordinates; extending the map to modern large-language-model chat systems is a step the paper itself does not take.
The paper's negative result on automatic metrics points toward reference-free model-based evaluation; a testable extension is to score the compiled benchmark outputs with a modern reference-free judge and check correlation with the human judgments the survey collected.
The explicit-versus-implicit selection distinction corresponds to hard-versus-soft retrieval in current systems, and a testable extension is whether making selection explicit improves knowledge attribution when outputs are fact-checked against the source documents.
Because the compiled results run through roughly 2021, the future-trend list predates the large-language-model wave; updating the survey's six directions for decoder-only instruction-tuned models is a natural continuation that the authors leave implicit.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

You should know two things about this one. First, the taxonomy is genuinely good: splitting retrieval models into Fusion/Matching/Ranking and generative models into Encoding/Knowledge Selection/Response Generation gives a clean map of the pre-2021 UTEDS literature, and the dataset tables plus the careful performance caveats (numbers not directly comparable across papers) are worth having. Second, it is not a 2024 survey. The bibliography and the ACM TOIS copyright line stop in 2021, and the arXiv posting is November 2024. There is no stated search protocol, no inclusion criteria, and no discussion of retrieval-augmented generation or LLM-based grounding, which is where the field actually went after 2021.

What the paper does well: the module decomposition is a real organizing contribution, not just a list of models. The dataset comparison (knowledge source, who sees the text, who leads, labeling) is thorough and useful for newcomers. The conclusions in Section 6 — copy mechanisms help, pretrained models help, knowledge selection is central, automatic metrics are unreliable — are actually supported by the compiled tables, and the authors are appropriately careful about not over-reading cross-paper numbers.

The soft spots are real but proportionate. The claim to be the first systematic review of UTEDS is unverifiable without a search methodology; the earlier surveys cited (Guo et al., Santhanam and Shaikh, Yu et al.) are dismissed as incomplete, but the grounds for that dismissal are not argued. The future-trends discussion reads as a 2020 snapshot — model-based evaluation and lifelong learning are plausible, but the paper says nothing about in-context learning, Agentic recall, or the RAG paradigm that defines current practice. The self-citations (CAT, GDR, Persona-CVAE, RCDG) are fine; those are legitimate works in the surveyed area, not padding.

None of this invalidates the historical taxonomy. If the paper is reframed as a systematic survey of the 2018--2021 period, it holds up well. As a 2024 submission, it needs either a substantial update or an explicit historical framing with a dated scope statement.

I'd send this to a serious referee, but with a clear mandate: the authors must either add a methodology section and update through at least 2023, or honestly scope the paper as a historical survey. The taxonomy deserves to be available; the 'first' and 'future trends' claims do not.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper presents a survey of open-domain dialogue systems that augment response generation or retrieval with unstructured text as external knowledge (UTEDS). It defines UTEDS-related concepts, organizes datasets by source and type, and introduces a component-based taxonomy: retrieval models are decomposed into Fusion, Matching, and Ranking; generative models into Dialogue and Knowledge Encoding, Knowledge Selection, and Response Generation. Sections 5 and 6 review automatic and human evaluation metrics and compile reported results from the primary literature, and Section 7 proposes six future research directions. The authors state in Section 1 that this is the first systematic review of UTEDS.

Significance. If the claims are properly scoped, the paper offers a coherent map of the pre-2021 UTEDS literature. The dataset table (Table 3) and the model tables (Tables 5-11) are broad, and the component-wise decomposition is a useful organizing device for newcomers. The paper is also careful to state in Section 6 that cross-paper numbers 'can only be used as a reference' because of differing data-processing schemes, and it interprets the compiled results rather than merely transcribing them. These strengths make the historical taxonomy genuinely useful. However, the survey's status as a 'systematic' and current review is not established: no search protocol is reported, and the bibliography ends around 2021 while the arXiv version is dated November 2024. Those issues bear directly on the paper's central claims, not on the historical taxonomy itself.

major comments (2)

[Section 1] The central claim 'As far as we know, we are the first to make a systematic review of the UTEDS' is not verifiable as stated. The manuscript reports no search methodology: no databases, query strings, years, inclusion/exclusion criteria, screening steps, or PRISMA-style flow are given. The references cited as prior work (Guo et al. [61], Santhanam and Shaikh [155], Yu et al. [224]) are dismissed as 'incomplete' without a documented overlap analysis. Because the paper is posted to arXiv in November 2024 while the reference list's newest entries are from 2021 (e.g., [31], [41], [68], [80]), the reader cannot determine whether the surveyed set is complete even for the claimed pre-2021 scope, let alone whether the survey is the first systematic treatment. I recommend adding a methodology section and either updating coverage to 2024 or explicitly reframing the paper as a historical survey of work up to 2021.
[Section 7] The future-trends discussion is presented as guidance for current research but does not engage with post-2021 developments that are directly relevant to UTEDS, such as retrieval-augmented generation, LLM-based knowledge grounding, long-context in-context learning, and agentic retrieval. As a consequence, Section 7's six directions (limited resources, semantic representation, knowledge mining, interpretable reasoning, evaluation, lifelong learning) read as a 2020-2021 snapshot. If the authors intend the arXiv version to be current, Section 7 must be revised to address these developments, or the entire paper must be explicitly dated as a survey of the literature up to 2021. This is load-bearing because the paper's value proposition includes projecting 'future development trends' for the field.

minor comments (5)

[Section 2, Table 4] Some statistics are marked as computed by the authors ('*'), but the estimation method is not described; please state how averages and totals were computed and how missing entries (e.g., T-Chat Words/Text) are handled.
[Section 3.2] The description of FIRE is hard to follow because the superscript/subscript notation for the intermediate tensors is not introduced; a small diagram or a notation table would improve readability.
[Section 6.3] The conclusion 'Adding a copy mechanism is always helpful' is too strong; the compiled tables do not isolate the copy mechanism in controlled comparisons, and several strong models in Tables 10-11 do not use it. Please soften this to 'copy mechanisms have been reported to help on specific datasets.'
[Table 8] The display of the R@1/2/5 columns is malformed, with repeated headers and dashes that make some rows ambiguous; please re-typeset the table so each entry is readable.
[Throughout] There are numerous typos and inconsistent abbreviations (e.g., 'Tabel 1', 'CUMDoG', 'metircs', 'A verage length', and the alternation between UTEDS and UTED); a careful copy-edit would improve the presentation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the survey taxonomy and conclusions are grounded in the cited literature; self-citations are surveyed models, not load-bearing premises.

full rationale

This is a literature survey, so there is no fitted parameter, formal derivation, or uniqueness theorem whose conclusion is equivalent to its input. The component taxonomy (Fusion/Matching/Ranking; Dialogue and Knowledge Encoding/Knowledge Selection/Response Generation) is the authors' organizational scheme, defined in Sections 3 and 4 and applied to previously published models; it is a classification, not a derivation, so it cannot reduce to its own inputs. The performance conclusions in Section 6 (e.g., copy mechanisms help, PTMs help) are syntheses of externally reported results in Tables 8-11, not predictions from a model fitted to those tables. The authors cite several of their own prior papers ([110] CAT, [165] GDR, [166] Persona-CVAE, [167] RCDG) as surveyed systems, but those citations are not used to justify the paper's central claims. The claim that this is the first systematic UTEDS review (Section 1) is an assertion about coverage that lacks a stated search protocol; that is a completeness and verifiability concern, not a circular reduction. No step in the paper reduces by construction to its own definition, to a re-labeled empirical pattern, or to a self-citation chain. The appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented entities appear because the paper is a literature survey. The analysis rests on three assumptions: fidelity of reported numbers, completeness and currency of the chosen literature, and adequacy of the paper's own taxonomy.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption The tables in Sections 6.1 and 6.2 correctly reproduce the reported metrics from the original papers.
The survey's conclusions, such as 'copy mechanism is always helpful' and 'PTMs are better in most cases,' are read from these tables without re-running experiments or significance tests.
domain assumption The surveyed literature, which ends around 2021, is the relevant universe for a systematic UTEDS review and for forward-looking claims.
The paper claims to be the first systematic review and to identify future trends, but it does not state a search protocol and does not cover post-2021 LLM-era work. The 2024 submission date makes this scope assumption load-bearing.
domain assumption The proposed module decomposition (Fusion, Matching, Ranking for retrieval; Encoding, Knowledge Selection, Response Generation for generative) faithfully exhausts existing UTEDS architectures.
The survey organizes the whole field around this taxonomy in Sections 3 and 4 without proving that all models fit it; hybrid retrieve-and-refine models are mentioned only briefly.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Unstructured Text Enhanced Open-domain Dialogue System: A Systematic Survey." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/22I4UYHR

@misc{pith2026241109166,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Unstructured Text Enhanced Open-domain Dialogue System: A Systematic Survey},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/22I4UYHR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.09166}
}

read the original abstract

Incorporating external knowledge into dialogue generation has been proven to benefit the performance of an open-domain Dialogue System (DS), such as generating informative or stylized responses, controlling conversation topics. In this article, we study the open-domain DS that uses unstructured text as external knowledge sources (\textbf{U}nstructured \textbf{T}ext \textbf{E}nhanced \textbf{D}ialogue \textbf{S}ystem, \textbf{UTEDS}). The existence of unstructured text entails distinctions between UTEDS and traditional data-driven DS and we aim to analyze these differences. We first give the definition of the UTEDS related concepts, then summarize the recently released datasets and models. We categorize UTEDS into Retrieval and Generative models and introduce them from the perspective of model components. The retrieval models consist of Fusion, Matching, and Ranking modules, while the generative models comprise Dialogue and Knowledge Encoding, Knowledge Selection, and Response Generation modules. We further summarize the evaluation methods utilized in UTEDS and analyze the current models' performance. At last, we discuss the future development trends of UTEDS, hoping to inspire new research in this field.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.09166 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** The general system component of the Generative models in UTEDS. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** The future research trends of the UTEDS. Each direction points to the related modules of Retrieval [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

256 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages

[61]

Bin Guo, Hao Wang, Yasan Ding, Wei Wu, Shaoyang Hao, Yueqi Sun, and Zhiwen Yu. 2021. Conditional Text Generation for Harmonious Human-Machine Interaction. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 12, 2, Article 14 (Feb. 2021), 50 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3439816

work page doi:10.1145/3439816 2021
[155]

Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, Rewon Child, David Luan, Dario Amodei, and Ilya Sutskever. 2019. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI Blog 1, 8 (2019)

2019
[224]

Minghong Xu, Piji Li, Haoran Yang, Pengjie Ren, Zhaochun Ren, Zhumin Chen, and Jun Ma. 2020. A Neural Topical Expansion Framework for Unstructured Persona-Oriented Dialogue Generation. In ECAI 2020 - 24th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 29 August-8 September 2020, Santiago de Compostela, Spain, August 29 - September 8, 2020 - Including 10t...

2020
[31]

Jan Deriu, Álvaro Rodrigo, Arantxa Otegi, Guillermo Echegoyen, Sophie Rosset, Eneko Agirre, and Mark Cieliebak
[41]

Angela Fan, Claire Gardent, Chloé Braud, and Antoine Bordes. 2021. Augmenting Transformers with KNN-Based Composite Memory for Dialog. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics 9, 0 (2021), 82–99. https://transacl.org/ojs/index.php/tacl/article/view/2419

2021
[68]

Don’t Stop Pretraining: Adapt Language Models to Domains and Tasks. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2020, Online, July 5-10, 2020 , Dan Jurafsky, Joyce Chai, Natalie Schluter, and Joel R. Tetreault (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, 8342–8360. https: //www.aclweb.org/anthology...

2020
[80]

Seokhwan Kim, Mihail Eric, Behnam Hedayatnia, Karthik Gopalakrishnan, Yang Liu, Chao-Wei Huang, and Dilek Hakkani-Tür. 2021. Beyond Domain APIs: Task-oriented Conversational Modeling with Unstructured Knowledge Access Track in DSTC9. CoRR abs/2101.09276 (2021). arXiv:2101.09276 https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.09276

arXiv 2021
[2]

Yeonchan Ahn, Sang-Goo Lee, and Jaehui Park. 2020. Exploiting Text Matching Techniques for Knowledge-Grounded Conversation. IEEE Access 8 (2020), 126201–126214. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3007893 ACM Transactions on Information Systems, Vol. 1, No. 1, Article 1. Publication date: January 2021. 1:30 Longxuan Ma, Mingda Li, Wei-Nan Zhang, Jiapeng L...

arXiv 2020

Show all 256 references

[3]

Martín Arjovsky and Léon Bottou. 2017. Towards Principled Methods for Training Generative Adversarial Networks. In 5th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2017, Toulon, France, April 24-26, 2017, Conference Track Proceedings. OpenReview.net. https://open...

2017
[4]

Khapra, and Harish G

Siddhartha Arora, Mitesh M. Khapra, and Harish G. Ramaswamy. 2019. On Knowledge distillation from complex networks for response prediction. In NAACL-HLT (1). Association for Computational Linguistics, 3813–3822

2019
[5]

Dzmitry Bahdanau, Kyunghyun Cho, and Yoshua Bengio. 2015. Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translate. In 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2015, San Diego, CA, USA, May 7-9, 2015, Conference Track Proceedings , Yoshua Ben...

2015 arXiv
[6]

Siqi Bao, Huang He, Fan Wang, Rongzhong Lian, and Hua Wu. 2019. Know More about Each Other: Evolving Dialogue Strategy via Compound Assessment. In Proceedings of the 57th Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2019, Florence, Italy, July 28- August 2,...

2019 doi
[7]

Siqi Bao, Huang He, Fan Wang, Hua Wu, and Haifeng Wang. 2020. PLATO: Pre-trained Dialogue Generation Model with Discrete Latent Variable. InProceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2020, Online, July 5-10, 2020 , Dan Jurafsky...

2020
[8]

Yoshua Bengio, Réjean Ducharme, and Pascal Vincent. 2000. A Neural Probabilistic Language Model. In NIPS. MIT Press, 932–938

2000
[9]

Christopher M. Bishop. 2007. Pattern recognition and machine learning, 5th Edition . Springer. https://www.worldcat. org/oclc/71008143

2007
[10]

Bruce Croft, Falk Scholer, and Mark Sanderson

Valeria Bolotova, Vladislav Blinov, Yukun Zheng, W. Bruce Croft, Falk Scholer, and Mark Sanderson. 2020. Do People and Neural Nets Pay Attention to the Same Words: Studying Eye-tracking Data for Non-factoid QA Evaluation. In CIKM ’20: The 29th ACM International Conference on I...

2020
[11]

Antoine Bosselut, Hannah Rashkin, Maarten Sap, Chaitanya Malaviya, Asli Çelikyilmaz, and Yejin Choi. 2019. COMET: Commonsense Transformers for Automatic Knowledge Graph Construction. In Proceedings of the 57th Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 20...

2019 doi
[12]

Alex Boyd, Raul Puri, Mohammad Shoeybi, Mostofa Patwary, and Bryan Catanzaro. 2020. Large Scale Multi-Actor Generative Dialog Modeling. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2020, Online, July 5-10, 2020 , Dan Jurafsky,...

2020
[13]

Tom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Sandhini Agarwal, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Gretchen Krueger, Tom Henighan, Rewon Child, Aditya Ramesh, Daniel M. Ziegler, Jeffr...

2020
[14]

Danqi Chen, Adam Fisch, Jason Weston, and Antoine Bordes. 2017. Reading Wikipedia to Answer Open-Domain Questions. In ACL (1). Association for Computational Linguistics, 1870–1879

2017
[15]

Hongshen Chen, Xiaorui Liu, Dawei Yin, and Jiliang Tang. 2017. A Survey on Dialogue Systems: Recent Advances and New Frontiers. SIGKDD Explorations 19, 2 (2017), 25–35

2017
[16]

Wenhu Chen, Yu Su, Xifeng Yan, and William Yang Wang. 2020. KGPT: Knowledge-Grounded Pre-Training for Data-to-Text Generation. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2020, Online, November 16-20, 2020 , Bonnie Webber, T...

2020 doi
[17]

Xiuyi Chen, Fandong Meng, Peng Li, Feilong Chen, Shuang Xu, Bo Xu, and Jie Zhou. 2020. Bridging the Gap between Prior and Posterior Knowledge Selection for Knowledge-Grounded Dialogue Generation. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Pr...

2020 doi
[18]

Zhiyuan Chen and Bing Liu. 2014. Topic Modeling using Topics from Many Domains, Lifelong Learning and Big Data. In Proceedings of the 31th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2014, Beijing, China, 21-26 June ACM Transactions on Information Systems, Vol. 1, No. 1...

2014
[19]

Zewen Chi, Li Dong, Furu Wei, Wenhui Wang, Xian-Ling Mao, and Heyan Huang. 2020. Cross-Lingual Natural Language Generation via Pre-Training. In The Thirty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2020, The Thirty-Second Innovative Applications of Artificial Inte...

2020
[20]

Hyundong Cho and Jonathan May. 2020. Grounding Conversations with Improvised Dialogues. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2020, Online, July 5-10, 2020 , Dan Jurafsky, Joyce Chai, Natalie Schluter, and Joel R. Tetre...

2020
[21]

Kyunghyun Cho, Bart van Merrienboer, Çaglar Gülçehre, Dzmitry Bahdanau, Fethi Bougares, Holger Schwenk, and Yoshua Bengio. 2014. Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Me...

2014
[22]

Eunsol Choi, He He, Mohit Iyyer, Mark Yatskar, Wen-tau Yih, Yejin Choi, Percy Liang, and Luke Zettlemoyer. 2018. QuAC: Question Answering in Context. In EMNLP. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2174–2184

2018
[23]

Junyoung Chung, Çaglar Gülçehre, KyungHyun Cho, and Yoshua Bengio. 2014. Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modeling. CoRR abs/1412.3555 (2014). arXiv:1412.3555 https://arxiv.org/ abs/1412.3555

2014 arXiv
[24]

Kenneth Ward Church and Patrick Hanks. 1989. Word Association Norms, Mutual Information and Lexicography. In 27th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 26-29 June 1989, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, Proceedings, Julia Hirschb...

1989
[25]

Peter Clark. 2015. Elementary School Science and Math Tests as a Driver for AI: Take the Aristo Challenge!. In AAAI. AAAI Press, 4019–4021

2015
[26]

Kenneth Mark Colby, Sylvia Weber, and Franklin Dennis Hilf. 1971. Artificial Paranoia. Artif. Intell. 2, 1 (1971), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(71)90002-6

1971 doi
[27]

Alexis Conneau, Kartikay Khandelwal, Naman Goyal, Vishrav Chaudhary, Guillaume Wenzek, Francisco Guzmán, Edouard Grave, Myle Ott, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Veselin Stoyanov. 2020. Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scale. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meetin...

2020
[28]

Sumanth Dathathri, Andrea Madotto, Janice Lan, Jane Hung, Eric Frank, Piero Molino, Jason Yosinski, and Rosanne Liu. 2020. Plug and Play Language Models: A Simple Approach to Controlled Text Generation. In 8th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2020, Ad...

2020
[29]

Cyprien de Masson d’Autume, Shakir Mohamed, Mihaela Rosca, and Jack W. Rae. 2019. Training Language GANs from Scratch. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2019, NeurIPS 2019, December 8-14, 2019, V...

2019
[30]

Denkowski and Alon Lavie

Michael J. Denkowski and Alon Lavie. 2014. Meteor Universal: Language Specific Translation Evaluation for Any Target Language. In Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, WMT@ACL 2014, June 26-27, 2014, Baltimore, Maryland, USA . The Association fo...

2014 doi
[32]

Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2019. BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human...

2019
[33]

Emily Dinan, Stephen Roller, Kurt Shuster, Angela Fan, Michael Auli, and Jason Weston. 2019. Wizard of Wikipedia: Knowledge-Powered Conversational Agents. In 7th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2019, New Orleans, LA, USA, May 6-9, 2019 . OpenReview.n...

2019
[34]

Xiao Ding, Zhongyang Li, Ting Liu, and Kuo Liao. 2019. ELG: An Event Logic Graph. CoRR abs/1907.08015 (2019). arXiv:1907.08015 https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.08015

2019 arXiv
[35]

George Doddington. 2002. Automatic evaluation of machine translation quality using n-gram co-occurrence statistics. In Proceedings of the second international conference on Human Language Technology Research . Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 138–145

2002
[36]

Li Dong, Nan Yang, Wenhui Wang, Furu Wei, Xiaodong Liu, Yu Wang, Jianfeng Gao, Ming Zhou, and Hsiao-Wuen Hon. 2019. Unified Language Model Pre-training for Natural Language Understanding and Generation. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32: Annual Conference...

2019
[37]

Xin Dong, Evgeniy Gabrilovich, Geremy Heitz, Wilko Horn, Ni Lao, Kevin Murphy, Thomas Strohmann, Shaohua Sun, and Wei Zhang. 2014. Knowledge vault: a web-scale approach to probabilistic knowledge fusion. In The 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery an...

2014
[38]

Wenchao Du and Alan W. Black. 2019. Boosting Dialog Response Generation. In Proceedings of the 57th Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2019, Florence, Italy, July 28- August 2, 2019, Volume 1: Long Papers, Anna Korhonen, David R. Traum, and Lluís ...

2019 doi
[39]

Wenchao Du and Alan W. Black. 2019. Top-Down Structurally-Constrained Neural Response Generation with Lexicalized Probabilistic Context-Free Grammar. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Lan...

2019
[40]

Dheeru Dua, Yizhong Wang, Pradeep Dasigi, Gabriel Stanovsky, Sameer Singh, and Matt Gardner. 2019. DROP: A Reading Comprehension Benchmark Requiring Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphs. In NAACL-HLT (1). Association for Computational Linguistics, 2368–2378

2019
[42]

Angela Fan, Mike Lewis, and Yann N. Dauphin. 2018. Hierarchical Neural Story Generation. In Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2018, Melbourne, Australia, July 15-20, 2018, Volume 1: Long Papers, Iryna Gurevych and Yusu...

2018 doi
[43]

Fadnis, Q

Song Feng, Kshitij P. Fadnis, Q. Vera Liao, and Luis A. Lastras. 2020. Doc2Dial: A Framework for Dialogue Composition Grounded in Documents. In The Thirty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2020, The Thirty-Second Innovative Applications of Artificial Inte...

2020
[44]

Chulaka Gunasekara, Siva Sankalp Patel, Sachindra Joshi, and Luis A

Song Feng, Hui Wan, R. Chulaka Gunasekara, Siva Sankalp Patel, Sachindra Joshi, and Luis A. Lastras. 2020. doc2dial: A Goal-Oriented Document-Grounded Dialogue Dataset. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2020, Onlin...

2020 doi
[45]

Finch and Jinho D

Sarah E. Finch and Jinho D. Choi. 2020. Towards Unified Dialogue System Evaluation: A Comprehensive Analysis of Current Evaluation Protocols. In Proceedings of the 21th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue, SIGdial 2020, 1st virtual meeting, J...

2020
[46]

Chelsea Finn, Pieter Abbeel, and Sergey Levine. 2017. Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networks. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2017, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 6-11 August 2017 (Proceedings of Machine Learnin...

2017
[47]

Fischer and Frances S

Alice E. Fischer and Frances S. Grodzinsky. 1993. The anatomy of programming languages . Prentice Hall

1993
[48]

Gabriel Forgues, Joelle Pineau, Jean-Marie Larchevêque, and Réal Tremblay. 2014. Bootstrapping dialog systems with word embeddings. In Nips, modern machine learning and natural language processing workshop , Vol. 2. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, Vol. 1, No. 1, Artic...

2014
[49]

Fabian Galetzka, Chukwuemeka Uchenna Eneh, and David Schlangen. 2020. A Corpus of Controlled Opinionated and Knowledgeable Movie Discussions for Training Neural Conversation Models. In Proceedings of The 12th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, LREC 2020, Marseille, ...

2020
[50]

Jianfeng Gao, Baolin Peng, Chunyuan Li, Jinchao Li, Shahin Shayandeh, Lars Liden, and Heung-Yeung Shum
[51]

Xiang Gao, Sungjin Lee, Yizhe Zhang, Chris Brockett, Michel Galley, Jianfeng Gao, and Bill Dolan. 2019. Jointly Optimizing Diversity and Relevance in Neural Response Generation. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computat...

2019
[52]

Xiang Gao, Yizhe Zhang, Sungjin Lee, Michel Galley, Chris Brockett, Jianfeng Gao, and Bill Dolan. 2019. Structuring Latent Spaces for Stylized Response Generation. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th Internation...

2019
[53]

Marjan Ghazvininejad, Chris Brockett, Ming-Wei Chang, Bill Dolan, Jianfeng Gao, Wen-tau Yih, and Michel Galley
[54]

Nikolenko, Kyryl Truskovskyi, Alexander Tselousov, and Thomas Wolf

Sergey Golovanov, Rauf Kurbanov, Sergey I. Nikolenko, Kyryl Truskovskyi, Alexander Tselousov, and Thomas Wolf
[55]

Sergey Golovanov, Alexander Tselousov, Rauf Kurbanov, and Sergey I Nikolenko. 2020. Lost in conversation: A conversational agent based on the transformer and transfer learning. In The NeurIPS’18 Competition . Springer, 295–315

2020
[56]

Goodfellow, Jean Pouget-Abadie, Mehdi Mirza, Bing Xu, David Warde-Farley, Sherjil Ozair, Aaron C

Ian J. Goodfellow, Jean Pouget-Abadie, Mehdi Mirza, Bing Xu, David Warde-Farley, Sherjil Ozair, Aaron C. Courville, and Yoshua Bengio. 2014. Generative Adversarial Nets. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 27: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing...

2014
[57]

Karthik Gopalakrishnan, Behnam Hedayatnia, Qinglang Chen, Anna Gottardi, Sanjeev Kwatra, Anu Venkatesh, Raefer Gabriel, and Dilek Hakkani-Tür. 2019. Topical-Chat: Towards Knowledge-Grounded Open-Domain Conversations, Gernot Kubin and Zdravko Kacic (Eds.). ISCA, 1891–1895. http...

2019 doi
[58]

Jia-Chen Gu, Zhen-Hua Ling, Quan Liu, Zhigang Chen, and Xiaodan Zhu. 2020. Filtering before Iteratively Referring for Knowledge-Grounded Response Selection in Retrieval-Based Chatbots. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: F...

2020 doi
[59]

Jiatao Gu, Zhengdong Lu, Hang Li, and Victor O. K. Li. 2016. Incorporating Copying Mechanism in Sequence-to- Sequence Learning. In ACL (1). The Association for Computer Linguistics

2016
[60]

Çaglar Gülçehre, Sungjin Ahn, Ramesh Nallapati, Bowen Zhou, and Yoshua Bengio. 2016. Pointing the Unknown Words. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2016, August 7-12, 2016, Berlin, Germany, Volume 1: Long Papers . Th...

2016 doi
[62]

Bruce Croft

Jiafeng Guo, Yixing Fan, Qingyao Ai, and W. Bruce Croft. 2016. A Deep Relevance Matching Model for Ad-hoc Retrieval. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM 2016, Indianapolis, IN, USA, October 24-28, 2016 , Snehasi...

2016
[63]

Suchin Gururangan, Ana Marasovic, Swabha Swayamdipta, Kyle Lo, Iz Beltagy, Doug Downey, and Noah A. Smith
[64]

Kelvin Guu, Kenton Lee, Zora Tung, Panupong Pasupat, and Ming-Wei Chang. 2020. Retrieval Augmented Language Model Pre-Training. In Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2020, 13-18 July 2020, Virtual Event (Proceedings of Machine Learning R...

2020
[65]

Xu Han, Zhiyuan Liu, and Maosong Sun. 2018. Neural Knowledge Acquisition via Mutual Attention Between Knowledge Graph and Text. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, (AAAI-18), the 30th innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligenc...

2018
[66]

Katsuhiko Hayashi and Masashi Shimbo. 2017. On the Equivalence of Holographic and Complex Embeddings for Link Prediction. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2017, Vancouver, Canada, July 30 - August 4, Volume 2: Shor...

2017 doi
[67]

Shirley Anugrah Hayati, Dongyeop Kang, Qingxiaoyang Zhu, Weiyan Shi, and Zhou Yu. 2020. INSPIRED: Toward Sociable Recommendation Dialog Systems. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2020, Online, November 16-20, 2020 ...

2020
[69]

Rashid, Anisa Rula, Lukas Schmelzeisen, Juan F

Aidan Hogan, Eva Blomqvist, Michael Cochez, Claudia d’Amato, Gerard de Melo, Claudio Gutiérrez, Sabrina Kirrane, José Emilio Labra Gayo, Roberto Navigli, Sebastian Neumaier, Axel-Cyrille Ngonga Ngomo, Axel Polleres, Sabbir M. Rashid, Anisa Rula, Lukas Schmelzeisen, Juan F. Seq...

2021 doi
[70]

Ari Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes, and Yejin Choi. 2020. The Curious Case of Neural Text Degeneration. In 8th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2020, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, April 26-30, 2020 . OpenReview.net. https://openreview.net/forum?id...

2020
[71]

Minlie Huang, Xiaoyan Zhu, and Jianfeng Gao. 2020. Challenges in Building Intelligent Open-domain Dialog Systems. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 38, 3 (2020), 21:1–21:32. https://doi.org/10.1145/3383123

2020 doi
[72]

Samuel Humeau, Kurt Shuster, Marie-Anne Lachaux, and Jason Weston. 2020. Poly-encoders: Architectures and Pre-training Strategies for Fast and Accurate Multi-sentence Scoring. In 8th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2020, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, April ...

2020
[73]

Behnam Hedayatnia, Karthik Gopalakrishnan, Seokhwan Kim, Yang Liu, Mihail Eric, and Dilek Hakkani-Tür. 2020. Policy-Driven Neural Response Generation for Knowledge-Grounded Dialog Systems. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Natural Language Generation, INLG...

2020
[74]

Eric Jang, Shixiang Gu, and Ben Poole. 2017. Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmax. In5th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2017, Toulon, France, April 24-26, 2017, Conference Track Proceedings . OpenReview.net. https://openreview.net/foru...

2017
[75]

Shaoxiong Ji, Shirui Pan, Erik Cambria, Pekka Marttinen, and Philip S. Yu. 2021. A Survey on Knowledge Graphs: Representation, Acquisition and Applications. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems (2021), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3070843

2021
[76]

Daniel Khashabi, Snigdha Chaturvedi, Michael Roth, Shyam Upadhyay, and Dan Roth. 2018. Looking Beyond the Surface: A Challenge Set for Reading Comprehension over Multiple Sentences. In NAACL-HLT. Association for Computational Linguistics, 252–262

2018
[77]

Byeongchang Kim, Jaewoo Ahn, and Gunhee Kim. 2020. Sequential Latent Knowledge Selection for Knowledge- Grounded Dialogue. In 8th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2020, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, April 26-30, 2020. OpenReview.net. https://openreview.net/f...

2020
[78]

Sarthak Jain and Byron C. Wallace. 2019. Attention is not Explanation. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, NAACL-HLT 2019, Minneapolis, MN, USA, June 2-7, 2019, Volum...

2019 doi
[79]

Seokhwan Kim, Mihail Eric, Karthik Gopalakrishnan, Behnam Hedayatnia, Yang Liu, and Dilek Hakkani-Tür. 2020. Beyond Domain APIs: Task-oriented Conversational Modeling with Unstructured Knowledge Access. In Proceedings of the 21th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on...

2020
[81]

Zemel, Raquel Urtasun, Antonio Torralba, and Sanja Fidler

Ryan Kiros, Yukun Zhu, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, Richard S. Zemel, Raquel Urtasun, Antonio Torralba, and Sanja Fidler
[82]

Alon Lavie and Abhaya Agarwal. 2007. METEOR: An Automatic Metric for MT Evaluation with High Levels of Correlation with Human Judgments. In WMT@ACL. Association for Computational Linguistics, 228–231

2007
[83]

Hyunwoo Kim, Byeongchang Kim, and Gunhee Kim. 2020. Will I Sound Like Me? Improving Persona Consistency in Dialogues through Pragmatic Self-Consciousness. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2020, Online, November 16...

2020 doi
[84]

Mike Lewis, Yinhan Liu, Naman Goyal, Marjan Ghazvininejad, Abdelrahman Mohamed, Omer Levy, Veselin Stoyanov, and Luke Zettlemoyer. 2020. BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehension. In Proceedings of the 58t...

2020
[85]

Chunyuan Li, Xiang Gao, Yuan Li, Baolin Peng, Xiujun Li, Yizhe Zhang, and Jianfeng Gao. 2020. Optimus: Organizing Sentences via Pre-trained Modeling of a Latent Space. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2020, Online...

2020
[86]

Jiwei Li, Michel Galley, Chris Brockett, Jianfeng Gao, and Bill Dolan. 2016. A Diversity-Promoting Objective Function for Neural Conversation Models. In HLT-NAACL. The Association for Computational Linguistics, 110–119

2016
[87]

Jiwei Li, Will Monroe, Alan Ritter, Dan Jurafsky, Michel Galley, and Jianfeng Gao. 2016. Deep Reinforcement Learning for Dialogue Generation. In EMNLP. The Association for Computational Linguistics, 1192–1202

2016
[88]

Jiwei Li, Will Monroe, Tianlin Shi, Sébastien Jean, Alan Ritter, and Dan Jurafsky. 2017. Adversarial Learning for Neural Dialogue Generation. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2017, Copenhagen, Denmark, September 9...

2017 doi
[89]

Rémi Lebret, David Grangier, and Michael Auli. 2016. Neural Text Generation from Structured Data with Application to the Biography Domain. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2016, Austin, Texas, USA, November 1-4, 2...

2016 doi
[90]

Margaret Li, Stephen Roller, Ilia Kulikov, Sean Welleck, Y-Lan Boureau, Kyunghyun Cho, and Jason Weston. 2020. Don’t Say That! Making Inconsistent Dialogue Unlikely with Unlikelihood Training. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Lingu...

2020
[91]

Margaret Li, Jason Weston, and Stephen Roller. 2019. ACUTE-EVAL: Improved Dialogue Evaluation with Optimized Questions and Multi-turn Comparisons. CoRR abs/1909.03087 (2019). arXiv:1909.03087 http://arxiv.org/abs/1909.03087

2019 arXiv
[92]

Zekang Li, Cheng Niu, Fandong Meng, Yang Feng, Qian Li, and Jie Zhou. 2019. Incremental Transformer with Deliberation Decoder for Document Grounded Conversations. In ACL (1). Association for Computational Linguistics, 12–21. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, Vol. 1, No....

2019
[93]

Rongzhong Lian, Min Xie, Fan Wang, Jinhua Peng, and Hua Wu. 2019. Learning to Select Knowledge for Response Generation in Dialog Systems. In IJCAI. ijcai.org, 5081–5087

2019
[94]

Chin-Yew Lin. 2004. Rouge: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries. In Text summarization branches out. 74–81

2004
[95]

Linxiao Li, Can Xu, Wei Wu, Yufan Zhao, Xueliang Zhao, and Chongyang Tao. 2020. Zero-Resource Knowledge- Grounded Dialogue Generation. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2020, NeurIPS 2020, Decemb...

2020
[96]

Zhaojiang Lin, Zihan Liu, Genta Indra Winata, Samuel Cahyawijaya, Andrea Madotto, Yejin Bang, Etsuko Ishii, and Pascale Fung. 2020. XPersona: Evaluating Multilingual Personalized Chatbot. CoRR abs/2003.07568 (2020). arXiv:2003.07568 https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.07568

2020 arXiv
[97]

Zhaojiang Lin, Andrea Madotto, Jamin Shin, Peng Xu, and Pascale Fung. 2019. MoEL: Mixture of Empathetic Listeners. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processin...

2019 doi
[98]

Zhaojiang Lin, Genta Indra Winata, Peng Xu, Zihan Liu, and Pascale Fung. 2020. Variational Transformers for Diverse Response Generation. CoRR abs/2003.12738 (2020). arXiv:2003.12738 https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.12738

2020 arXiv
[99]

Zhaojiang Lin, Peng Xu, Genta Indra Winata, Farhad Bin Siddique, Zihan Liu, Jamin Shin, and Pascale Fung. 2020. CAiRE: An End-to-End Empathetic Chatbot. InThe Thirty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2020, The Thirty-Second Innovative Applications of Arti...

2020
[100]

Chia-Wei Liu, Ryan Lowe, Iulian Serban, Michael Noseworthy, Laurent Charlin, and Joelle Pineau. 2016. How NOT To Evaluate Your Dialogue System: An Empirical Study of Unsupervised Evaluation Metrics for Dialogue Response Generation. In EMNLP. The Association for Computational L...

2016
[101]

Xiexiong Lin, Weiyu Jian, Jianshan He, Taifeng Wang, and Wei Chu. 2020. Generating Informative Conversational Response using Recurrent Knowledge-Interaction and Knowledge-Copy. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2020...

2020
[102]

Qian Liu, Yihong Chen, Bei Chen, Jian-Guang Lou, Zixuan Chen, Bin Zhou, and Dongmei Zhang. 2020. You Impress Me: Dialogue Generation via Mutual Persona Perception. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2020, Online, Jul...

2020
[103]

Xiaodong Liu, Yelong Shen, Kevin Duh, and Jianfeng Gao. 2018. Stochastic Answer Networks for Machine Reading Comprehension. In ACL (1). Association for Computational Linguistics, 1694–1704

2018
[104]

Yinhan Liu, Myle Ott, Naman Goyal, Jingfei Du, Mandar Joshi, Danqi Chen, Omer Levy, Mike Lewis, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Veselin Stoyanov. 2019. RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach. CoRR abs/1907.11692 (2019). arXiv:1907.11692 http://arxiv.org/abs/1907.11692

2019 arXiv
[105]

Zhibin Liu, Zheng-Yu Niu, Hua Wu, and Haifeng Wang. 2019. Knowledge Aware Conversation Generation with Reasoning on Augmented Graph. CoRR abs/1903.10245 (2019). arXiv:1903.10245 http://arxiv.org/abs/1903.10245

2019 arXiv
[106]

Ryan Lowe, Michael Noseworthy, Iulian Vlad Serban, Nicolas Angelard-Gontier, Yoshua Bengio, and Joelle Pineau
[107]

Hanxiao Liu, Yuexin Wu, and Yiming Yang. 2017. Analogical Inference for Multi-relational Embeddings. InProceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2017, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 6-11 August 2017 (Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 70) ...

2017
[108]

Ryan Lowe, Nissan Pow, Iulian Serban, and Joelle Pineau. 2015. The Ubuntu Dialogue Corpus: A Large Dataset for Research in Unstructured Multi-Turn Dialogue Systems. In SIGDIAL Conference. The Association for Computer Linguistics, 285–294

2015
[109]

Thang Luong, Hieu Pham, and Christopher D. Manning. 2015. Effective Approaches to Attention-based Neural Machine Translation. In Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2015, Lisbon, Portugal, September 17-21, 2015 , Lluís ...

2015 doi
[110]

Longxuan Ma, Wei-Nan Zhang, Runxin Sun, and Ting Liu. 2020. A Compare Aggregate Transformer for Understanding Document-grounded Dialogue. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: Findings, EMNLP 2020, Online Event, 16-20 Novemb...

2020 doi
[111]

Andrea Madotto, Zhaojiang Lin, Yejin Bang, and Pascale Fung. 2020. The Adapter-Bot: All-In-One Controllable Conversational Model. CoRR abs/2008.12579 (2020). arXiv:2008.12579 https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.12579

2020 arXiv
[112]

Andrea Madotto, Zhaojiang Lin, Chien-Sheng Wu, and Pascale Fung. 2019. Personalizing Dialogue Agents via Meta-Learning. In Proceedings of the 57th Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2019, Florence, Italy, July 28- August 2, 2019, Volume 1: Long Pa...

2019 doi
[113]

Bodhisattwa Prasad Majumder, Harsh Jhamtani, Taylor Berg-Kirkpatrick, and Julian J. McAuley. 2020. Like hiking? You probably enjoy nature: Persona-grounded Dialog with Commonsense Expansions. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Proces...

2020 doi
[114]

Ryan Lowe, Nissan Pow, Iulian Serban, Laurent Charlin, and Joelle Pineau. 2015. Incorporating unstructured textual knowledge sources into neural dialogue systems. In Neural information processing systems workshop on machine learning for spoken language understanding

2015
[115]

Pedro Henrique Martins, Zita Marinho, and André F. T. Martins. 2020. Sparse Text Generation. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2020, Online, November 16-20, 2020 , Bonnie Webber, Trevor Cohn, Yulan He, and Yang Liu...

2020 doi
[116]

Pierre-Emmanuel Mazaré, Samuel Humeau, Martin Raison, and Antoine Bordes. 2018. Training Millions of Personal- ized Dialogue Agents. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Brussels, Belgium, October 31 - November 4, 2018 , El...

2018 doi
[117]

Shikib Mehri and Maxine Eskénazi. 2020. Unsupervised Evaluation of Interactive Dialog with DialoGPT. InProceedings of the 21th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue, SIGdial 2020, 1st virtual meeting, July 1-3, 2020, Olivier Pietquin, Smaranda ...

2020
[118]

Shikib Mehri and Maxine Eskénazi. 2020. USR: An Unsupervised and Reference Free Evaluation Metric for Dialog Generation. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2020, Online, July 5-10, 2020, Dan Jurafsky, Joyce Chai, Nat...

2020
[119]

Chuan Meng, Pengjie Ren, Zhumin Chen, Christof Monz, Jun Ma, and Maarten de Rijke. 2020. RefNet: A Reference- Aware Network for Background Based Conversation. In The Thirty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2020, The Thirty-Second Innovative Applications ...

2020
[120]

Chuan Meng, Pengjie Ren, Zhumin Chen, Weiwei Sun, Zhaochun Ren, Zhaopeng Tu, and Maarten de Rijke. 2020. DukeNet: A Dual Knowledge Interaction Network for Knowledge-Grounded Conversation. In Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR conference on research and development...

2020
[121]

Bodhisattwa Prasad Majumder, Shuyang Li, Jianmo Ni, and Julian J. McAuley. 2020. Interview: Large-scale Modeling of Media Dialog with Discourse Patterns and Knowledge Grounding. InProceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 202...

2020 doi
[122]

Todor Mihaylov, Peter Clark, Tushar Khot, and Ashish Sabharwal. 2018. Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answering. In EMNLP. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2381–2391

2018
[123]

Tomas Mikolov, Kai Chen, Greg Corrado, and Jeffrey Dean. 2013. Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space. In 1st International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2013, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA, May 2-4, 2013, Workshop Track Proceedings, Yoshua Beng...

2013 arXiv
[124]

Miller, Will Feng, Dhruv Batra, Antoine Bordes, Adam Fisch, Jiasen Lu, Devi Parikh, and Jason Weston

Alexander H. Miller, Will Feng, Dhruv Batra, Antoine Bordes, Adam Fisch, Jiasen Lu, Devi Parikh, and Jason Weston
[125]

Miller, Adam Fisch, Jesse Dodge, Amir-Hossein Karimi, Antoine Bordes, and Jason Weston

Alexander H. Miller, Adam Fisch, Jesse Dodge, Amir-Hossein Karimi, Antoine Bordes, and Jason Weston. 2016. Key- Value Memory Networks for Directly Reading Documents. In EMNLP. The Association for Computational Linguistics, 1400–1409

2016
[126]

Mitchell, William W

Tom M. Mitchell, William W. Cohen, Estevam R. Hruschka Jr., Partha Pratim Talukdar, Justin Betteridge, Andrew Carlson, Bhavana Dalvi Mishra, Matthew Gardner, Bryan Kisiel, Jayant Krishnamurthy, Ni Lao, Kathryn Mazaitis, Thahir Mohamed, Ndapandula Nakashole, Emmanouil A. Platan...

2015
[127]

Nikita Moghe, Siddhartha Arora, Suman Banerjee, and Mitesh M. Khapra. 2018. Towards Exploiting Background Knowledge for Building Conversation Systems. In EMNLP. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2322–2332

2018
[128]

Amil Merchant, Elahe Rahimtoroghi, Ellie Pavlick, and Ian Tenney. 2020. What Happens To BERT Embeddings During Fine-tuning?. In Proceedings of the Third BlackboxNLP Workshop on Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP, BlackboxNLP@EMNLP 2020, Online, November 2020 , ...

2020 doi
[129]

Roy Mor, Ben Kantor, and Emma Rapoport. 2018. Adversarial Approach to Persona Based Dialogue Agents. In Proceedings of Machine Learning Research , Vol. 80. Stockholmsmässan, Stockholm Sweden. https://www.cs.tau.ac.il/ ~joberant/teaching/nlp_spring_2019/past_projects/adversaria...

2018
[130]

Maximilian Nickel, Kevin Murphy, Volker Tresp, and Evgeniy Gabrilovich. 2016. A Review of Relational Machine Learning for Knowledge Graphs. Proc. IEEE 104, 1 (2016), 11–33. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2015.2483592

2016
[131]

Maximilian Nickel, Lorenzo Rosasco, and Tomaso A. Poggio. 2016. Holographic Embeddings of Knowledge Graphs. In Proceedings of the Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, February 12-17, 2016, Phoenix, Arizona, USA , Dale Schuurmans and Michael P. Wellman (Eds.). ...

2016
[132]

ParlAI: A Dialog Research Software Platform. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2017, Copenhagen, Denmark, September 9-11, 2017 - System Demonstrations , Lucia Specia, Matt Post, and Michael Paul (Eds.). Association...

2017
[133]

Simon Ostermann, Michael Roth, Ashutosh Modi, Stefan Thater, and Manfred Pinkal. 2018. SemEval-2018 Task 11: Machine Comprehension Using Commonsense Knowledge. In SemEval@NAACL-HLT. Association for Computational Linguistics, 747–757

2018
[134]

Boyuan Pan, Yazheng Yang, Kaizhao Liang, Bhavya Kailkhura, Zhongming Jin, Xian-Sheng Hua, Deng Cai, and Bo Li. 2020. Adversarial Mutual Information for Text Generation. In Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2020, 13-18 July 2020, Virtual...

2020
[135]

Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, Todd Ward, and Wei-Jing Zhu. 2002. Bleu: a Method for Automatic Evaluation of Machine Translation. In ACL. ACL, 311–318

2002
[136]

Nikita Moghe, Priyesh Vijayan, Balaraman Ravindran, and Mitesh M. Khapra. 2020. On Incorporating Structural Information to improve Dialogue Response Generation. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Conversational AI . 11–24

2020
[137]

Gustavo Penha, Alexandru Balan, and Claudia Hauff. 2019. Introducing MANtIS: a novel Multi-Domain Information Seeking Dialogues Dataset. CoRR abs/1912.04639 (2019). arXiv:1912.04639 https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.04639

2019 arXiv
[138]

Jeffrey Pennington, Richard Socher, and Christopher D. Manning. 2014. Glove: Global Vectors for Word Representation. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2014, October 25-29, 2014, Doha, Qatar, A meeting of SIGDAT, a ...

2014 doi
[139]

Peters, Mark Neumann, Mohit Iyyer, Matt Gardner, Christopher Clark, Kenton Lee, and Luke Zettlemoyer

Matthew E. Peters, Mark Neumann, Mohit Iyyer, Matt Gardner, Christopher Clark, Kenton Lee, and Luke Zettlemoyer
[140]

Mohammad Norouzi, Samy Bengio, Zhifeng Chen, Navdeep Jaitly, Mike Schuster, Yonghui Wu, and Dale Schuurmans
[141]

Lianhui Qin, Michel Galley, Chris Brockett, Xiaodong Liu, Xiang Gao, Bill Dolan, Yejin Choi, and Jianfeng Gao. 2019. Conversing by Reading: Contentful Neural Conversation with On-demand Machine Reading. In ACL (1). Association for Computational Linguistics, 5427–5436

2019
[142]

Xipeng Qiu, Tianxiang Sun, Yige Xu, Yunfan Shao, Ning Dai, and Xuanjing Huang. 2020. Pre-trained Models for Natural Language Processing: A Survey. Science China Technological Sciences 63, 10 (2020), 1872–1897. https: //link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11431-020-1647-3

2020 doi
[143]

Meng Qu and Jian Tang. 2019. Probabilistic Logic Neural Networks for Reasoning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2019, NeurIPS 2019, 8-14 December 2019, Vancouver, BC, Canada, Hanna M. Wallach, ...

2019
[144]

Alec Radford, Karthik Narasimhan, Tim Salimans, and Ilya Sutskever. 2018. Improving lan- guage understanding by generative pre-training. URL https://s3-us-west-2. amazonaws. com/openai- assets/researchcovers/languageunsupervised/language understanding paper. pdf (2018)

2018
[145]

Prasanna Parthasarathi and Joelle Pineau. 2018. Extending Neural Generative Conversational Model using External Knowledge Sources. In EMNLP. Association for Computational Linguistics, 690–695

2018
[146]

Pranav Rajpurkar, Jian Zhang, Konstantin Lopyrev, and Percy Liang. 2016. SQuAD: 100, 000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text. In EMNLP. The Association for Computational Linguistics, 2383–2392

2016
[147]

Ashwin Ram, Rohit Prasad, Chandra Khatri, Anu Venkatesh, Raefer Gabriel, Qing Liu, Jeff Nunn, Behnam Hedayatnia, Ming Cheng, Ashish Nagar, Eric King, Kate Bland, Amanda Wartick, Yi Pan, Han Song, Sk Jayadevan, Gene Hwang, and Art Pettigrue. 2018. Conversational AI: The Science...

2018 arXiv
[148]

Hannah Rashkin, Eric Michael Smith, Margaret Li, and Y-Lan Boureau. 2019. Towards Empathetic Open-domain Conversation Models: A New Benchmark and Dataset. In Proceedings of the 57th Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2019, Florence, Italy, July 28...

2019
[149]

In NAACL-HLT

Deep Contextualized Word Representations. In NAACL-HLT. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2227–2237
[150]

Fabio Petroni, Tim Rocktäschel, Sebastian Riedel, Patrick S. H. Lewis, Anton Bakhtin, Yuxiang Wu, and Alexander H. Miller. 2019. Language Models as Knowledge Bases?. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th Internati...

2019
[151]

Pengjie Ren, Zhumin Chen, Zhaochun Ren, Evangelos Kanoulas, Christof Monz, and Maarten de Rijke. 2020. Conver- sations with Search Engines. CoRR abs/2004.14162 (2020). arXiv:2004.14162 https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.14162

2020 arXiv
[152]

Stephen Roller, Emily Dinan, Naman Goyal, Da Ju, Mary Williamson, Yinhan Liu, Jing Xu, Myle Ott, Eric Michael Smith, Y-Lan Boureau, and Jason Weston. 2021. Recipes for Building an Open-Domain Chatbot. In Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Associa...

2021
[153]

Vasile Rus and Mihai C. Lintean. 2012. A Comparison of Greedy and Optimal Assessment of Natural Language Student Input Using Word-to-Word Similarity Metrics. InProceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Building Educational Applications Using NLP, BEA@NAACL-HLT 2012, June 7, 2012,...

2012
[154]

Sai, Mithun Das Gupta, Mitesh M

Ananya B. Sai, Mithun Das Gupta, Mitesh M. Khapra, and Mukundhan Srinivasan. 2019. Re-Evaluating ADEM: A Deeper Look at Scoring Dialogue Responses. In AAAI. AAAI Press, 6220–6227

2019
[156]

Smith, and Yejin Choi

Maarten Sap, Ronan Le Bras, Emily Allaway, Chandra Bhagavatula, Nicholas Lourie, Hannah Rashkin, Brendan Roof, Noah A. Smith, and Yejin Choi. 2019. ATOMIC: An Atlas of Machine Commonsense for If-Then Reasoning. In The Thirty-Third AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AA...

2019
[157]

Thomas Scialom, Serra Sinem Tekiroglu, Jacopo Staiano, and Marco Guerini. 2020. Toward Stance-based Personas for Opinionated Dialogues. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: Findings, EMNLP 2020, Online Event, 16-20 November...

2020 doi
[158]

Liu, and Christopher D

Abigail See, Peter J. Liu, and Christopher D. Manning. 2017. Get To The Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networks. In ACL (1). Association for Computational Linguistics, 1073–1083

2017
[159]

Siva Reddy, Danqi Chen, and Christopher D. Manning. 2019. CoQA: A Conversational Question Answering Challenge. TACL 7 (2019), 249–266

2019
[160]

Pengjie Ren, Zhumin Chen, Christof Monz, Jun Ma, and Maarten de Rijke. 2020. Thinking Globally, Acting Locally: Distantly Supervised Global-to-Local Knowledge Selection for Background Based Conversation. In The Thirty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 202...

2020
[161]

Sofia Serrano and Noah A. Smith. 2019. Is Attention Interpretable?. In Proceedings of the 57th Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2019, Florence, Italy, July 28- August 2, 2019, Volume 1: Long Papers , Anna Korhonen, David R. Traum, and Lluís Màrq...

2019 doi
[162]

Yelong Shen, Po-Sen Huang, Jianfeng Gao, and Weizhu Chen. 2017. ReasoNet: Learning to Stop Reading in Machine Comprehension. In KDD. ACM, 1047–1055

2017
[163]

Heung-Yeung Shum, Xiaodong He, and Di Li. 2018. From Eliza to XiaoIce: challenges and opportunities with social chatbots. Frontiers of IT & EE 19, 1 (2018), 10–26

2018
[164]

Eric Michael Smith, Mary Williamson, Kurt Shuster, Jason Weston, and Y-Lan Boureau. 2020. Can You Put it All Together: Evaluating Conversational Agents’ Ability to Blend Skills. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 202...

2020
[165]

Sashank Santhanam and Samira Shaikh. 2019. A Survey of Natural Language Generation Techniques with a Focus on Dialogue Systems - Past, Present and Future Directions. CoRR abs/1906.00500 (2019). arXiv:1906.00500 http://arxiv.org/abs/1906.00500

2019 arXiv
[166]

Haoyu Song, Weinan Zhang, Yiming Cui, Dong Wang, and Ting Liu. 2019. Exploiting Persona Information for Diverse Generation of Conversational Responses. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2019, Macao, China, Augu...

2019 doi
[167]

Haoyu Song, Wei-Nan Zhang, Jingwen Hu, and Ting Liu. 2020. Generating Persona Consistent Dialogues by Exploiting Natural Language Inference. In The Thirty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2020, The Thirty-Second Innovative Applications of Artificial Inte...

2020
[168]

Yiping Song, Zequn Liu, Wei Bi, Rui Yan, and Ming Zhang. 2020. Learning to Customize Model Structures for Few-shot Dialogue Generation Tasks. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2020, Online, July 5-10, 2020 , Dan Jur...

2020
[169]

Min Joon Seo, Aniruddha Kembhavi, Ali Farhadi, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. 2017. Bidirectional Attention Flow for Machine Comprehension. In 5th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2017, Toulon, France, April 24-26, 2017, Conference Track Proceedings . OpenR...

2017
[170]

Iulian Vlad Serban, Ryan Lowe, Peter Henderson, Laurent Charlin, and Joelle Pineau. 2018. A Survey of Available Corpora For Building Data-Driven Dialogue Systems: The Journal Version. D&D 9, 1 (2018), 1–49

2018
[171]

Hui Su, Xiaoyu Shen, Sanqiang Zhao, Xiao Zhou, Pengwei Hu, Randy Zhong, Cheng Niu, and Jie Zhou. 2020. Diversifying Dialogue Generation with Non-Conversational Text. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2020, Online, J...

2020
[172]

Sainbayar Sukhbaatar, Arthur Szlam, Jason Weston, and Rob Fergus. 2015. End-To-End Memory Networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 28: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems ACM Transactions on Information Systems, Vol. 1, No. 1, Artic...

2015
[173]

Yajing Sun, Yue Hu, Luxi Xing, Jing Yu, and Yuqiang Xie. 2020. History-Adaption Knowledge Incorporation Mechanism for Multi-Turn Dialogue System. In The Thirty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2020, The Thirty-Second Innovative Applications of Artificial...

2020
[174]

Ilya Sutskever, Oriol Vinyals, and Quoc V. Le. 2014. Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networks. In NIPS. 3104–3112

2014
[175]

Haoyu Song, Yan Wang, Weinan Zhang, Xiaojiang Liu, and Ting Liu. 2020. Generate, Delete and Rewrite: A Three-Stage Framework for Improving Persona Consistency of Dialogue Generation. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, AC...

2020
[176]

Alon Talmor and Jonathan Berant. 2018. The Web as a Knowledge-Base for Answering Complex Questions. In NAACL-HLT. Association for Computational Linguistics, 641–651

2018
[177]

Yik-Cheung Tam. 2020. Cluster-based beam search for pointer-generator chatbot grounded by knowledge. Comput. Speech Lang. 64 (2020), 101094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csl.2020.101094

2020
[178]

Ryota Tanaka and Akinobu Lee. 2020. Fact-based Dialogue Generation with Convergent and Divergent Decoding. CoRR abs/2005.03174 (2020). arXiv:2005.03174 https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.03174

2020 arXiv
[179]

Luc Steels. 1995. The biology and technology of intelligent autonomous agents. Robotics Auton. Syst. 15, 1-2 (1995), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-8890(95)00010-D

1995 doi
[180]

Hsu, Yi-Lin Tuan, and Hung-yi Lee

Feng-Guang Su, Aliyah R. Hsu, Yi-Lin Tuan, and Hung-yi Lee. 2019. Personalized Dialogue Response Generation Learned from Monologues. In Interspeech 2019, 20th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, Graz, Austria, 15-19 September 2019 , Gernot ...

2019 doi
[181]

Yi Tay, Dara Bahri, Donald Metzler, Da-Cheng Juan, Zhe Zhao, and Che Zheng. 2021. Synthesizer: Rethinking Self-Attention for Transformer Models. In Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning (Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 139) , Marin...

2021
[182]

Ian Tenney, Dipanjan Das, and Ellie Pavlick. 2019. BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipeline. In Proceedings of the 57th Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2019, Florence, Italy, July 28- August 2, 2019, Volume 1: Long Papers, Anna Korhonen, Dav...

2019 doi
[183]

Thomas McCoy, Najoung Kim, Benjamin Van Durme, Samuel R

Ian Tenney, Patrick Xia, Berlin Chen, Alex Wang, Adam Poliak, R. Thomas McCoy, Najoung Kim, Benjamin Van Durme, Samuel R. Bowman, Dipanjan Das, and Ellie Pavlick. 2019. What do you learn from context? Probing for sentence structure in contextualized word representations. In7th...

2019
[184]

Sebastian Thrun. 1995. Is Learning The n-th Thing Any Easier Than Learning The First?. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 8, NIPS, Denver, CO, USA, November 27-30, 1995 , David S. Touretzky, Michael Mozer, and Michael E. Hasselmo (Eds.). MIT Press, 640–646. h...

1995
[186]

Anna Tigunova, Andrew Yates, Paramita Mirza, and Gerhard Weikum. 2019. Listening between the Lines: Learning Personal Attributes from Conversations. In The World Wide Web Conference, WWW 2019, San Francisco, CA, USA, May 13-17, 2019, Ling Liu, Ryen W. White, Amin Mantrach, Fab...

2019
[187]

Yi-Lin Tuan, Wei Wei, and William Yang Wang. 2020. Unsupervised Injection of Knowledge into Dialogue Generation via Language Models. CoRR abs/2004.14614 (2020). arXiv:2004.14614 https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.14614

2020 arXiv
[188]

Alan M Turing. 2009. Computing machinery and intelligence. In Parsing the Turing Test. Springer, 23–65

2009
[189]

Xiangru Tang and Po Hu. 2019. Knowledge-Aware Self-Attention Networks for Document Grounded Dialogue Generation. In KSEM (2) (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 11776) . Springer, 400–411

2019
[190]

Chongyang Tao, Lili Mou, Dongyan Zhao, and Rui Yan. 2018. RUBER: An Unsupervised Method for Automatic Evaluation of Open-Domain Dialog Systems. In AAAI. AAAI Press, 722–729

2018
[191]

Lawrence Zitnick, and Devi Parikh

Ramakrishna Vedantam, C. Lawrence Zitnick, and Devi Parikh. 2015. CIDEr: Consensus-based image description evaluation. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2015, Boston, MA, USA, June 7-12,

2015
[192]

Ricardo Vilalta and Youssef Drissi. 2002. A Perspective View and Survey of Meta-Learning. Artif. Intell. Rev. 18, 2 (2002), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019956318069

2002 doi
[193]

Hare, and Elena Simperl

Pavlos Vougiouklis, Jonathon S. Hare, and Elena Simperl. 2016. A Neural Network Approach for Knowledge-Driven Response Generation. In COLING. ACL, 3370–3380

2016
[194]

Quan Wang, Zhendong Mao, Bin Wang, and Li Guo. 2017. Knowledge Graph Embedding: A Survey of Approaches and Applications. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 29, 12 (2017), 2724–2743. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2017.2754499

2017
[195]

Zhiliang Tian, Wei Bi, Dongkyu Lee, Lanqing Xue, Yiping Song, Xiaojiang Liu, and Nevin L. Zhang. 2020. Response- Anticipated Memory for On-Demand Knowledge Integration in Response Generation. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Lingui...

2020 doi
[196]

Xuewei Wang, Weiyan Shi, Richard Kim, Yoojung Oh, Sijia Yang, Jingwen Zhang, and Zhou Yu. 2019. Persuasion for Good: Towards a Personalized Persuasive Dialogue System for Social Good. In Proceedings of the 57th Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2...

2019 doi
[197]

Xinyi Wang, Jason Weston, Michael Auli, and Yacine Jernite. 2019. Improving Conditioning in Context-Aware Sequence to Sequence Models. CoRR abs/1911.09728 (2019). arXiv:1911.09728 https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.09728

2019 arXiv
[198]

Joseph Weizenbaum. 1966. ELIZA - a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine. Commun. ACM 9, 1 (1966), 36–45

1966
[199]

Jack Urbanek, Angela Fan, Siddharth Karamcheti, Saachi Jain, Samuel Humeau, Emily Dinan, Tim Rocktäschel, Douwe Kiela, Arthur Szlam, and Jason Weston. 2019. Learning to Speak and Act in a Fantasy Text Adventure Game. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods i...

2019
[200]

Gomez, Lukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin

Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N. Gomez, Lukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention is All you Need. In NIPS. 5998–6008

2017
[201]

Sean Welleck, Ilia Kulikov, Stephen Roller, Emily Dinan, Kyunghyun Cho, and Jason Weston. 2020. Neural Text Generation With Unlikelihood Training. In 8th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2020, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, April 26-30, 2020 . OpenReview.net....

2020
[202]

https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2015.7299087

IEEE Computer Society, 4566–4575. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2015.7299087

2015
[203]

Jason Weston, Sumit Chopra, and Antoine Bordes. 2015. Memory Networks. In 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2015, San Diego, CA, USA, May 7-9, 2015, Conference Track Proceedings , Yoshua Bengio and Yann LeCun (Eds.). http://arxiv.org/abs/1410.3916

2015 arXiv
[204]

Jason Weston, Emily Dinan, and Alexander H. Miller. 2018. Retrieve and Refine: Improved Sequence Generation Models For Dialogue. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Search-Oriented Conversational AI, SCAI@EMNLP 2018, Brussels, Belgium, October 31, 2018 , Aleksa...

2018
[205]

John Wieting, Mohit Bansal, Kevin Gimpel, and Karen Livescu. 2016. Towards Universal Paraphrastic Sentence Embeddings. In 4th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2016, San Juan, Puerto Rico, May 2-4, 2016, Conference Track Proceedings , Yoshua Bengio and...

2016 arXiv
[206]

Shuohang Wang and Jing Jiang. 2017. Machine Comprehension Using Match-LSTM and Answer Pointer. In 5th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2017, Toulon, France, April 24-26, 2017, Conference Track Proceedings. OpenReview.net. https://openreview.net/forum?...

2017
[207]

Sixing Wu, Ying Li, Dawei Zhang, and Zhonghai Wu. 2020. Improving Knowledge-Aware Dialogue Response Generation by Using Human-Written Prototype Dialogues. InProceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: Findings, EMNLP 2020, Online Eve...

2020 doi
[208]

Yu Wu, Furu Wei, Shaohan Huang, Yunli Wang, Zhoujun Li, and Ming Zhou. 2019. Response Generation by Context- Aware Prototype Editing. In The Thirty-Third AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2019, The Thirty-First Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence ...

2019
[209]

Zeqiu Wu, Michel Galley, Chris Brockett, Yizhe Zhang, Xiang Gao, Chris Quirk, Rik Koncel-Kedziorski, Jianfeng Gao, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, Mari Ostendorf, and Bill Dolan. 2021. A Controllable Model of Grounded Response Generation. In Thirty-Fifth AAAI Conference on Artificial Int...

2021
[210]

Liu, and Matt Gardner

Johannes Welbl, Nelson F. Liu, and Matt Gardner. 2017. Crowdsourcing Multiple Choice Science Questions. In NUT@EMNLP. Association for Computational Linguistics, 94–106

2017
[211]

Johannes Welbl, Pontus Stenetorp, and Sebastian Riedel. 2018. Constructing Datasets for Multi-hop Reading Com- prehension Across Documents. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics 6, 0 (05 2018), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00021

2018 doi
[212]

Jun Xu, Zeyang Lei, Haifeng Wang, Zheng-Yu Niu, Hua Wu, and Wanxiang Che. 2020. Enhancing Dialog Coherence with Event Graph Grounded Content Planning. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2020, Christian Bessiere (...

2020 doi
[213]

Jason Weston, Antoine Bordes, Sumit Chopra, and Tomas Mikolov. 2016. Towards AI-Complete Question Answering: A Set of Prerequisite Toy Tasks. In 4th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2016, San Juan, Puerto Rico, May 2-4, 2016, Conference Track Proceedi...

2016 arXiv
[214]

Chitty-Chitty-Chat Bot

Rui Yan. 2018. "Chitty-Chitty-Chat Bot": Deep Learning for Conversational AI. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2018, July 13-19, 2018, Stockholm, Sweden , Jérôme Lang (Ed.). ijcai.org, 5520–5526. https://doi....

2018 doi
[215]

Xinchen Yan, Jimei Yang, Kihyuk Sohn, and Honglak Lee. 2016. Attribute2Image: Conditional Image Generation from Visual Attributes. In Computer Vision - ECCV 2016 - 14th European Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 11-14, 2016, Proceedings, Part IV (Lecture Notes in...

2016 doi
[216]

Fan Yang, Zhilin Yang, and William W. Cohen. 2017. Differentiable Learning of Logical Rules for Knowledge Base Reasoning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2017, 4-9 December 2017, Long Beach, CA...

2017
[217]

Thomas Wolf, Victor Sanh, Julien Chaumond, and Clement Delangue. 2019. TransferTransfo: A Transfer Learning Approach for Neural Network Based Conversational Agents. CoRR abs/1901.08149 (2019). arXiv:1901.08149 http: //arxiv.org/abs/1901.08149

2019 arXiv
[218]

Bruce Croft, Jun Huang, and Haiqing Chen

Liu Yang, Minghui Qiu, Chen Qu, Jiafeng Guo, Yongfeng Zhang, W. Bruce Croft, Jun Huang, and Haiqing Chen. 2018. Response Ranking with Deep Matching Networks and External Knowledge in Information-seeking Conversation Systems. In SIGIR. ACM, 245–254

2018
[219]

Carbonell, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, and Quoc V

Zhilin Yang, Zihang Dai, Yiming Yang, Jaime G. Carbonell, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, and Quoc V. Le. 2019. XLNet: Gener- alized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understanding. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32: Annual Conference on Neural Information Pr...

2019
[220]

Cohen, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, and Christopher D

Zhilin Yang, Peng Qi, Saizheng Zhang, Yoshua Bengio, William W. Cohen, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, and Christopher D. Manning. 2018. HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answering. InEMNLP. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2369–2380

2018
[221]

Qizhe Xie, Xuezhe Ma, Zihang Dai, and Eduard H. Hovy. 2017. An Interpretable Knowledge Transfer Model for Knowledge Base Completion. InProceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2017, Vancouver, Canada, July 30 - August 4, Volu...

2017 doi
[222]

Hu Xu, Bing Liu, Lei Shu, and Philip S. Yu. 2019. Review Conversational Reading Comprehension.CoRR abs/1902.00821 (2019). arXiv:1902.00821 http://arxiv.org/abs/1902.00821

2019 arXiv
[223]

Chulaka Gunasekara, Walter S

Koichiro Yoshino, Chiori Hori, Julien Perez, Luis Fernando D’Haro, Lazaros Polymenakos, R. Chulaka Gunasekara, Walter S. Lasecki, Jonathan K. Kummerfeld, Michel Galley, Chris Brockett, Jianfeng Gao, Bill Dolan, Xiang Gao, Huda AlAmri, Tim K. Marks, Devi Parikh, and Dhruv Batra...

2019 arXiv
[225]

Yury Zemlyanskiy and Fei Sha. 2018. Aiming to Know You Better Perhaps Makes Me a More Engaging Dialogue Partner. In Proceedings of the 22nd Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, CoNLL 2018, Brussels, Belgium, October 31 - November 1, 2018 , Anna Korhonen and I...

2018 doi
[226]

Arafat Sultan, Vittorio Castelli, Anthony Ferritto, Radu Florian, Efsun Sarioglu Kayi, Salim Roukos, Avirup Sil, and Todd Ward

Rong Zhang, Revanth Gangi Reddy, Md. Arafat Sultan, Vittorio Castelli, Anthony Ferritto, Radu Florian, Efsun Sarioglu Kayi, Salim Roukos, Avirup Sil, and Todd Ward. 2020. Multi-Stage Pre-training for Low-Resource Domain Adaptation. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empi...

2020
[227]

Saizheng Zhang, Emily Dinan, Jack Urbanek, Arthur Szlam, Douwe Kiela, and Jason Weston. 2018. Personalizing Dialogue Agents: I have a dog, do you have pets too?. InACL (1). Association for Computational Linguistics, 2204–2213

2018
[228]

Bruce Croft, Xiaodong Liu, Yelong Shen, and Jingjing Liu

Liu Yang, Junjie Hu, Minghui Qiu, Chen Qu, Jianfeng Gao, W. Bruce Croft, Xiaodong Liu, Yelong Shen, and Jingjing Liu. 2019. A Hybrid Retrieval-Generation Neural Conversation Model. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management,...

2019
[229]

Wen Zhang, Bibek Paudel, Wei Zhang, Abraham Bernstein, and Huajun Chen. 2019. Interaction Embeddings for Prediction and Explanation in Knowledge Graphs. In Proceedings of the Twelfth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, WSDM 2019, Melbourne, VIC, Austral...

2019
[230]

Yuyu Zhang, Xinshi Chen, Yuan Yang, Arun Ramamurthy, Bo Li, Yuan Qi, and Le Song. 2020. Efficient Probabilistic Logic Reasoning with Graph Neural Networks. In 8th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2020, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, April 26-30, 2020 . OpenRe...

2020
[231]

Yizhe Zhang, Michel Galley, Jianfeng Gao, Zhe Gan, Xiujun Li, Chris Brockett, and Bill Dolan. 2018. Generating Informative and Diverse Conversational Responses via Adversarial Information Maximization. InNeurIPS. 1815–1825

2018
[232]

Semih Yavuz, Abhinav Rastogi, Guan-Lin Chao, and Dilek Hakkani-Tür. 2019. DeepCopy: Grounded Response Generation with Hierarchical Pointer Networks. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual SIGdial Meeting on Discourse and Dialogue, SIGdial 2019, Stockholm, Sweden, September 11-13, 2...

2019
[233]

Hao-Tong Ye, Kai-Lin Lo, Shang-Yu Su, and Yun-Nung Chen. 2020. Knowledge-Grounded Response Generation with Deep Attentional Latent-Variable Model. Comput. Speech Lang. 63 (2020), 101069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csl.2020. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, Vol. 1, No. 1...

2020 doi
[234]

Tiancheng Zhao, Ran Zhao, and Maxine Eskénazi. 2017. Learning Discourse-level Diversity for Neural Dialog Models using Conditional Variational Autoencoders. In ACL (1). Association for Computational Linguistics, 654–664

2017
[235]

Wenhao Yu, Chenguang Zhu, Zaitang Li, Zhiting Hu, Qingyun Wang, Heng Ji, and Meng Jiang. 2020. A Survey of Knowledge-Enhanced Text Generation.CoRR abs/2010.04389 (2020). arXiv:2010.04389 https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.04389

2020 arXiv
[236]

Xiangyu Zhao, Longbiao Wang, Ruifang He, Ting Yang, Jinxin Chang, and Ruifang Wang. 2020. Multiple Knowledge Syncretic Transformer for Natural Dialogue Generation. In WWW ’20: The Web Conference 2020, Taipei, Taiwan, April 20-24, 2020, Yennun Huang, Irwin King, Tie-Yan Liu, an...

2020
[237]

Xueliang Zhao, Wei Wu, Chongyang Tao, Can Xu, Dongyan Zhao, and Rui Yan. 2020. Low-Resource Knowledge- Grounded Dialogue Generation. In 8th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2020, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, April 26-30, 2020. OpenReview.net. https://openre...

2020
[238]

Xueliang Zhao, Wei Wu, Can Xu, Chongyang Tao, Dongyan Zhao, and Rui Yan. 2020. Knowledge-Grounded Dialogue Generation with Pre-trained Language Models. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2020, Online, November 16-20...

2020 doi
[239]

Weinberger, and Yoav Artzi

Tianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger, and Yoav Artzi. 2020. BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT. In 8th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2020, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, April 26-30, 2020. OpenReview.net. https://openre...

2020
[240]

Wen Zheng, Natasa Milic-Frayling, and Ke Zhou. 2020. Approximation of Response Knowledge Retrieval in Knowledge- grounded Dialogue Generation. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: Findings, EMNLP 2020, Online Event, 16-20 N...

2020 doi
[241]

Wen Zheng and Ke Zhou. 2019. Enhancing Conversational Dialogue Models with Grounded Knowledge. In CIKM. ACM, 709–718

2019
[242]

Yinhe Zheng, Rongsheng Zhang, Minlie Huang, and Xiaoxi Mao. 2020. A Pre-Training Based Personalized Dialogue Generation Model with Persona-Sparse Data. InThe Thirty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2020, The Thirty-Second Innovative Applications of Artif...

2020
[243]

Yangjun Zhang, Pengjie Ren, and Maarten de Rijke. 2019. Improving Background Based Conversation with Context- aware Knowledge Pre-selection. CoRR abs/1906.06685 (2019). arXiv:1906.06685 http://arxiv.org/abs/1906.06685

2019 arXiv
[244]

Yizhe Zhang, Siqi Sun, Michel Galley, Yen-Chun Chen, Chris Brockett, Xiang Gao, Jianfeng Gao, Jingjing Liu, and Bill Dolan. 2020. DIALOGPT : Large-Scale Generative Pre-training for Conversational Response Generation. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association...

2020
[245]

Hao Zhou, Chujie Zheng, Kaili Huang, Minlie Huang, and Xiaoyan Zhu. 2020. KdConv: A Chinese Multi-domain Dialogue Dataset Towards Multi-turn Knowledge-driven Conversation. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2020, Onl...

2020
[246]

Xueliang Zhao, Chongyang Tao, Wei Wu, Can Xu, Dongyan Zhao, and Rui Yan. 2019. A Document-grounded Matching Network for Response Selection in Retrieval-based Chatbots. In IJCAI. ijcai.org, 5443–5449

2019
[247]

Black, and Yulia Tsvetkov

Yiheng Zhou, He He, Alan W. Black, and Yulia Tsvetkov. 2019. A Dynamic Strategy Coach for Effective Negotiation. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual SIGdial Meeting on Discourse and Dialogue, SIGdial 2019, Stockholm, Sweden, September 11-13, 2019, Satoshi Nakamura, Milica Gasic,...

2019 doi
[250]

Chujie Zheng, Yunbo Cao, Daxin Jiang, and Minlie Huang. 2020. Difference-aware Knowledge Selection for Knowledge- grounded Conversation Generation. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: Findings, EMNLP 2020, Online Event, 16...

2020 doi
[254]

Peixiang Zhong, Chen Zhang, Hao Wang, Yong Liu, and Chunyan Miao. 2020. Towards Persona-Based Empathetic Conversational Models. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2020, Online, November 16-20, 2020 , Bonnie Webber, ...

2020 doi
[255]

Hao Zhou, Tom Young, Minlie Huang, Haizhou Zhao, Jingfang Xu, and Xiaoyan Zhu. 2018. Commonsense Knowledge Aware Conversation Generation with Graph Attention. In IJCAI. ijcai.org, 4623–4629

2018
[257]

Kangyan Zhou, Shrimai Prabhumoye, and Alan W. Black. 2018. A Dataset for Document Grounded Conversations. In EMNLP. Association for Computational Linguistics, 708–713

2018
[2015]

Skip-Thought Vectors. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 28: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2015, December 7-12, 2015, Montreal, Quebec, Canada , Corinna Cortes, Neil D. Lawrence, Daniel D. Lee, Masashi Sugiyama, and Roman Garnett ...

2015
[2016]

In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 29: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2016, December 5-10, 2016, Barcelona, Spain, Daniel D

Reward Augmented Maximum Likelihood for Neural Structured Prediction. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 29: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2016, December 5-10, 2016, Barcelona, Spain, Daniel D. Lee, Masashi Sugiyama, Ulrike von Lu...

2016
[2017]

In ACL (1)

Towards an Automatic Turing Test: Learning to Evaluate Dialogue Responses. In ACL (1). Association for Computational Linguistics, 1116–1126
[2018]

A Knowledge-Grounded Neural Conversation Model. In AAAI. AAAI Press, 5110–5117
[2019]

Large-Scale Transfer Learning for Natural Language Generation. In Proceedings of the 57th Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2019, Florence, Italy, July 28- August 2, 2019, Volume 1: Long Papers , Anna Korhonen, David R. Traum, and Lluís Màrquez (...

2019 doi
[2020]

CoRR abs/2009.03457 (2020)

Robust Conversational AI with Grounded Text Generation. CoRR abs/2009.03457 (2020). arXiv:2009.03457 https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.03457

2020 arXiv
[2021]

Survey on evaluation methods for dialogue systems. Artif. Intell. Rev. 54, 1 (2021), 755–810. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s10462-020-09866-x

2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [61]

Bin Guo, Hao Wang, Yasan Ding, Wei Wu, Shaoyang Hao, Yueqi Sun, and Zhiwen Yu. 2021. Conditional Text Generation for Harmonious Human-Machine Interaction. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 12, 2, Article 14 (Feb. 2021), 50 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3439816

work page doi:10.1145/3439816 2021

[2] [155]

Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, Rewon Child, David Luan, Dario Amodei, and Ilya Sutskever. 2019. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI Blog 1, 8 (2019)

2019

[3] [224]

Minghong Xu, Piji Li, Haoran Yang, Pengjie Ren, Zhaochun Ren, Zhumin Chen, and Jun Ma. 2020. A Neural Topical Expansion Framework for Unstructured Persona-Oriented Dialogue Generation. In ECAI 2020 - 24th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 29 August-8 September 2020, Santiago de Compostela, Spain, August 29 - September 8, 2020 - Including 10t...

2020

[4] [31]

Jan Deriu, Álvaro Rodrigo, Arantxa Otegi, Guillermo Echegoyen, Sophie Rosset, Eneko Agirre, and Mark Cieliebak

[5] [41]

Angela Fan, Claire Gardent, Chloé Braud, and Antoine Bordes. 2021. Augmenting Transformers with KNN-Based Composite Memory for Dialog. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics 9, 0 (2021), 82–99. https://transacl.org/ojs/index.php/tacl/article/view/2419

2021

[6] [68]

Don’t Stop Pretraining: Adapt Language Models to Domains and Tasks. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2020, Online, July 5-10, 2020 , Dan Jurafsky, Joyce Chai, Natalie Schluter, and Joel R. Tetreault (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, 8342–8360. https: //www.aclweb.org/anthology...

2020

[7] [80]

Seokhwan Kim, Mihail Eric, Behnam Hedayatnia, Karthik Gopalakrishnan, Yang Liu, Chao-Wei Huang, and Dilek Hakkani-Tür. 2021. Beyond Domain APIs: Task-oriented Conversational Modeling with Unstructured Knowledge Access Track in DSTC9. CoRR abs/2101.09276 (2021). arXiv:2101.09276 https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.09276

arXiv 2021

[8] [2]

Yeonchan Ahn, Sang-Goo Lee, and Jaehui Park. 2020. Exploiting Text Matching Techniques for Knowledge-Grounded Conversation. IEEE Access 8 (2020), 126201–126214. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3007893 ACM Transactions on Information Systems, Vol. 1, No. 1, Article 1. Publication date: January 2021. 1:30 Longxuan Ma, Mingda Li, Wei-Nan Zhang, Jiapeng L...

arXiv 2020