Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Fitting Coarse-Grained Models to Macroscopic Experimental Data via Automatic Differentiation

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Gradient descent can replace hand-tuning in coarse-grained force-field fitting.

desk verdict A genuinely useful framework for gradient-based CG force-field fitting, with one unquantified thermodynamic approximation and a validation framing that overstates what is predicted. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.09216 v2 pith:AOHDYL3V submitted 2024-11-14 physics.bio-ph

Ryan K. Krueger , Megan C. Engel , Ryan Hausen , Michael P. Brenner This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.bio-ph
keywords coarse-grainedforcefieldsautomaticdifferentiationtrajectoryreweightingoxDNAmodelparameterfittingmoleculardynamicsmulti-taskoptimizationmeltingtemperature
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes a systematic pipeline for fitting coarse-grained molecular force fields to macroscopic experimental data by gradient descent, rather than by hand-tuning. Using the oxDNA DNA model as a testbed, it shows that structural (pitch, propeller twist, structure RMSD), mechanical (persistence length, stretch and torsional moduli, twist-stretch coupling), and thermodynamic (melting temperature and curve width) targets can all be optimized with the same gradient machinery. The method combines differentiable trajectory reweighting, implicit differentiation of line-fitting summary statistics, and conflict-free multi-task gradients so that several properties can be fit simultaneously without one objective degrading another. The stated payoff is frictionless reproducibility: force fields that can be transparently updated as new data arrive, demonstrated also on RNA and on DNA-protein hybrid models.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is differentiable trajectory reweighting (DiffTRE), a stochastic gradient estimator that rewrites an expected observable as a weighted sum over reference states sampled under a previous parameter set, with weights equal to ratios of unnormalized Boltzmann probabilities. Because the weights depend smoothly on the parameters while the sampled states do not, gradients flow through energy evaluations only, not through unrolled trajectories, avoiding the memory blow-up and exploding gradients of pathwise differentiable molecular dynamics. Around this core the paper wraps two further mechanisms: implicit differentiation for summary statistics obtained by line fitting (persistence length, moduli, melting temperature), and a conflict-free gradient projector (ConFIG) that maps per-objective gradients to a single update decreasing all objectives simultaneously.

What would settle it

Run a duplex melting-temperature optimization and compare the DiffTRE gradient of $T_m$ with respect to the hydrogen-bonding parameters against a central finite-difference estimate of the same gradient; if the difference exceeds the statistical error of the reweighted estimate, the neglected boundary term in $\nabla_\theta B(i)$ is not negligible and the thermodynamic optimization is biased.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the obstacle to systematic force-field fitting is not the physics but the gradient: if one can compute low-variance derivatives of any experimentally accessible equilibrium average with respect to model parameters, then structural, mechanical, and thermodynamic data can be folded into a single differentiable objective and minimized with standard optimizers. The paper demonstrates this for a 103-parameter coarse-grained DNA model, recovering or exceeding the original hand-fit accuracy and correcting known failures, such as predicting overwinding under low force where the original model predicted underwinding. The same machinery extends to RNA and to a DNA-protein model with a newly introduced sequence-specific Morse interaction, illustrating that the approach does not depend on the specific energy function.

Load-bearing premise

In the melting-temperature derivation (Supporting Information F.1, after Eq. 90), the paper sets the gradient of the thresholded base-pair count to zero and calls this a reasonable approximation in practice, so the thermodynamic optimization is only valid insofar as states near the bonded/unbonded energy threshold contribute negligibly to melting-temperature gradients.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any equilibrium observable whose unnormalized probability is known can in principle become a training target, including observables from umbrella sampling, constant-force ensembles, and temperature extrapolation.
  • Mechanical quantities that require microsecond simulations and downstream fits, including persistence length, torsional modulus, stretch modulus, and twist-stretch coupling, become differentiable end-to-end without differentiating the simulator.
  • Joint optimization with conflict-free gradients keeps every target monotonically decreasing, removing the trade-off that plagues summed objectives and roughly halving the number of gradient updates in the paper's examples.
  • Sensitivity analysis of per-parameter gradients becomes a routine diagnostic, and on this model it repeatedly points to the cross-stacking interaction as the most influential term across structural, mechanical, and thermodynamic properties.
  • The workflow ports to new models: the paper fits RNA to four simultaneous targets and fits DNA-protein complexes to three zinc-finger structures, suggesting the protocol is energy-function-agnostic.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because DiffTRE needs only unnormalized state probabilities, the same pipeline should extend to atomistic and polarizable force fields, where reference states can be harvested from existing production simulations and reweighted onto a parametric correction.
  • The recurring cross-stacking sensitivity, if confirmed by exact-gradient checks, implies that the original oxDNA parameterization may be underdetermined along that direction; refitting with the full joint objective could yield a model with a different balance between stacking, hydrogen bonding, and cross-stacking.
  • A natural testable extension is to replace the thresholded base-pair count in melting calculations with a continuously differentiable soft order parameter, which would remove the unverified gradient approximation and let melting-curve fits be checked against finite differences.
  • If the workflow matures into a shared library of experimental targets and simulation protocols, the fragmented landscape of bespoke coarse-grained models could give way to a single continuously updated model class, though that would require community standardization that this paper does not itself supply.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a systematic framework for fitting coarse-grained molecular force fields to macroscopic experimental data using differentiable trajectory reweighting (DiffTRE), implicit differentiation of summary-statistic fitting procedures, and conflict-free gradient updates from multi-task learning. The authors implement oxDNA and oxRNA energy functions in JAX, benchmark JAX-MD against the standalone codes, and demonstrate parameter optimization for structural properties (pitch, propeller twist, RMSD to a nanopore structure), mechanical properties (persistence length, torsional modulus, effective stretch modulus, twist-stretch coupling), thermodynamic properties (duplex and hairpin melting temperatures and melting width), and joint multi-property optimizations, including extensions to RNA and DNA-protein complexes with a custom sequence-specific Morse potential.

Significance. If the demonstrated gradients are unbiased and the convergence results are robust, the framework is a valuable contribution to coarse-grained model parameterization: it avoids differentiating through long trajectories, handles enhanced sampling and external force/torque ensembles, makes line-fitting procedures differentiable, and supplies a concrete recipe for multi-objective fitting. The sensitivity analyses based on gradient magnitudes are a useful methodological feature, and the use of existing simulation packages for reference-state sampling lowers the barrier to adoption. The paper also reports concrete performance gains over naive gradient estimators and demonstrates transfer to RNA and DNA-protein systems. However, the validation is weakened by an unquantified approximation in the thermodynamic gradient, by a partially circular evaluation against targets included in the loss, by omission of outlier iterations and error estimates in key convergence plots, and by the absence of a code/data availability statement despite the paper's central reproducibility claim.

major comments (4)
  1. [Supporting Information F.1, Eq. (90)] The text after Eq. (90) states that the derivative of the thresholded base-pair indicator B(i) with respect to the force-field parameters is neglected because B is not continuous, calling this 'a reasonable approximation in practice.' This is an unquantified approximation for a discontinuous observable: the exact gradient of the reweighted expectation of delta(N = i) contains boundary terms from configurations where an infinitesimal parameter change flips B(i) between 0 and 1, and DiffTRE as written captures only the smooth part. Because the melting-temperature optimization is one of the three core target classes and is also used in the joint optimization in Figure 6B, the paper should provide a finite-difference or exact-gradient check for a small duplex or hairpin system to bound the resulting bias. At minimum, the magnitude of the omitted term relative to the retained gradient should be reported.
  2. [Section 2.3, Figure 3C; Section 2.5, Figure 6B] The agreement of C, Seff, and g with experimental values is obtained by optimizing the loss function toward exactly those experimental values, so the reported negative g (overwinding) is a fitted outcome rather than a prediction. The statements that the method 'successfully models the overwinding of DNA under low force' and yields parameters that 'agree with experiments' should be reframed as consistency checks of the fitting procedure, not as validation of the model. To support a predictive claim, the paper should include an out-of-sample evaluation, for example fitting to a subset of mechanical targets and reporting held-out properties, or testing the optimized parameters on sequences and salt conditions not used in the loss.
  3. [Section 2.3, Figure 3C caption; Section S10 caption] The captions disclose that outlier iterations are omitted and replaced with dashed lines (twist-stretch coupling at iterations 52-53 in Figure 3C, torsional modulus at iterations 53-55 in Figure S10). Omitting these points and not reporting their magnitudes prevents the reader from assessing the stability and variance of the optimization, which is load-bearing for the claims that conflict-free updates are more stable and that values converge 'within experimental error' or 'with low variance.' The outlier values and iteration-level variability should be reported, together with error bars on the converged property estimates.
  4. [Abstract and Section 1] The paper's central motivation and title claim is 'frictionless reproducibility' of coarse-grained model fitting, yet the manuscript contains no data availability statement, code repository link, or description of where the JAX implementations and optimization scripts can be obtained. Without these artifacts, the reproducibility claim cannot be evaluated and the framework cannot be built upon by the community. A public code repository with the implementation of the energy functions, DiffTRE gradient calculations, and scripts for at least the main optimization demonstrations should be provided.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 1] The first sentence contains a typo: 'in silica biophysical modeling' should be 'in silico biophysical modeling.'
  2. [Figure 6 caption] The caption states 'We use the ConFIG method of Zhang et al. [59]' while Section 2.5 and Section 4.3 attribute ConFIG to Liu et al. ([59] and [56], respectively). These attributions should be made consistent.
  3. [Section 4.3, Eq. (15)] Equation (15) has notation issues: the right-hand side uses 'gi' rather than 'g_i' and the matrix M is introduced without definition; the sentence beginning 'where wi > 0 for all i and M−⊤ is the pseudoinverse of the transposed matrix M⊤' should be completed and the indices corrected.
  4. [Supporting Information E.2, Eqs. (S71)-(S72)] The denominator is written as 'A4A1 − A2^3' but A2 was explicitly omitted for notational consistency and A3 is the torque-twist slope; the expressions for C and g appear to require 'A4 A1 − A3^2'. Please correct this typo or clarify the notation.
  5. [Section 2.3, Figure S6] The description of the WLC optimization states that the persistence length is constrained via the passive calculation, but the corresponding text in the main text does not specify that this constraint is a hard equality or how the uncertainty in the passive Lps value affects the reported stretch modulus; a sentence clarifying this would improve reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the DiffTRE/implicit-differentiation derivation chain is self-contained, and target-property agreements are fitted demonstrations rather than predictions.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that coarse-grained potentials can be fitted to structural, mechanical, and thermodynamic data through differentiable trajectory reweighting, implicit differentiation of summary-statistic fits, and conflict-free gradient updates. That derivation chain does not assume the target properties as inputs: Eq. 9-11 define the reweighted expectation and weights from unnormalized Boltzmann probabilities, Eq. 29 supplies implicit differentiation for line-fitting procedures, and Eqs. 15-17 describe the ConFIG gradient combination. Each component is either independently developed in prior work (Refs. 29, 30, 68, 59), benchmarked against the standalone oxDNA implementation (Fig. S2), or is a transparent algebraic estimator. The target-property demonstrations (pitch, Lps, C, Seff, g, Tm) are optimizations whose objectives are the experimental values, so agreement with those targets is a sanity check of the optimizer rather than an out-of-sample prediction; the phrase 'successfully models the overwinding' in Sec. 2.3 (Fig. 3C) is loose wording but not load-bearing, because the paper's stated contribution is the fitting framework, not an independent prediction of overwinding. I also flag SI Sec. F.1 (Eq. 90) as a correctness risk, not a circularity: setting the gradient of the thresholded base-pair indicator B(i) to zero drops a boundary term in the melting-temperature gradient, and the paper provides no finite-difference check quantifying that bias. This is an unverified approximation that could affect the thermodynamic demonstrations, but it is not an input-output equivalence in the derivation chain. Overall, the framework is self-contained and externally grounded, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The framework itself is a synthesis of existing estimators; its main free choices are optimization hyperparameters and simulation effort. The only new model component is the DNA-protein Morse potential, which is underdetermined and unvalidated. The most consequential assumption is the neglected derivative of the discrete base-pair indicator in thermodynamic gradients.

free parameters (4)
  • DiffTRE resampling threshold lambda = 0.95
    Reference states are resampled when effective sample size Neff < 0.95 Nref, or after 3-5 gradient updates. The threshold is chosen by hand and controls gradient bias and variance; no sensitivity study is shown.
  • Learning rate = 0.001
    Used for all reported optimizations; selected by hand with no schedule or robustness analysis.
  • Simulation effort per property = e.g., 64 x 2.5e6 steps for Lps; 34 x 5e7 VMMC steps for duplex Tm
    Number of parallel simulations and trajectory lengths are manual choices that affect convergence and noise; they are not derived from target uncertainties.
  • DNA-protein Morse potential parameter matrices = six 4x20 matrices (epsilon, alpha, r0 for backbone and hydrogen-bonding sites)
    Introduced in this paper and fit to three zinc finger PDB structures; the fit is explicitly highly overparameterized.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Canonical ensemble Boltzmann weights and DiffTRE reweighting formula (Eqs. 7-11)
    The entire gradient estimator relies on unnormalized probability ratios and assumes sufficient overlap between reference and current ensembles.
  • ad hoc to paper Base-pair order parameter derivative neglected (SI F.1 after Eq. 90)
    The gradient of the thresholded bonded indicator B(i) is set to zero; if boundary contributions matter, Tm gradients are biased.
  • standard math Implicit differentiation for line-fitting procedures (Eq. 29)
    Assumes that the optimization/line-fit solutions satisfy smooth optimality conditions with an invertible Jacobian; used for mechanical and thermodynamic summary statistics.
  • domain assumption ConFIG conflict-free gradient update
    Borrowed from multi-task learning; simultaneous decrease was proved for exact gradients, not for noisy reweighted gradient estimates used here.
invented entities (1)
  • Sequence-specific Morse potential for DNA-protein interactions
    purpose: Attractive, sequence-dependent DNA-protein contact term added to the hard-sphere hybrid model of Procyk et al.; parameterized by epsilon, alpha, and r0 matrices for backbone and hydrogen-bonding sites.
    Fit only to three zinc finger structures in this paper; no independent binding data, no transferability test, and no release of the fitted matrices.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fitting Coarse-Grained Models to Macroscopic Experimental Data via Automatic Differentiation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AOHDYL3V

@misc{pith2026241109216,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fitting Coarse-Grained Models to Macroscopic Experimental Data via Automatic Differentiation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AOHDYL3V}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.09216}
}
read the original abstract

Developing physics-based models for molecular simulation requires fitting many unknown parameters to diverse experimental datasets. Traditionally, this process is piecemeal and difficult to reproduce, leading to a fragmented landscape of models. Here, we establish a systematic, extensible framework for fitting coarse-grained molecular models to macroscopic experimental data by leveraging recently developed methods for computing low-variance gradient estimates with automatic differentiation. Using a widely validated DNA force field as an exemplar, we develop methods for optimizing structural, mechanical, and thermodynamic properties across a range of simulation techniques, including enhanced sampling and external forcing, spanning micro- and millisecond timescales. We highlight how gradients enable efficient sensitivity analyses that yield physical insight. We then demonstrate the broad applicability of these techniques by optimizing diverse biomolecular systems, including RNA and DNA-protein hybrid models. We show how conflict-free gradient methods from multi-task learning can be adapted to impose multiple constraints simultaneously without compromising accuracy. This approach provides a foundation for transparent, reproducible, community-driven force field development, accelerating progress in molecular modeling.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.09216 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Automatically fitting coarse-grained models to experimental data. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Parameter optimization for target structural properties via trajectory reweighting. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Parameter optimization for target mechanical properties via trajectory reweighting. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Fitting to a target propeller twist distribution. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Parameter optimization for target thermodynamic properties via trajectory reweighting. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Jointly fitting to multiple target properties simultaneously via conflict-free gradients. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Refining Coarse-Grained Molecular Topologies: A Bayesian Optimization Approach

    physics.chem-ph 2025-01 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Bayesian optimization of Martini3 bonded parameters reduces density and radius-of-gyration errors for PE, PMMA, and PS melts at four degrees of polymerization, though the reported errors are in-sample fits rather than...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

122 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Dror, Robert M

    Ron O. Dror, Robert M. Dirks, J.P. Grossman, Huafeng Xu, and David E. Shaw. Biomolecular Simulation: A Computational Microscope for Molecular Biology. Annu. Rev. Biophys., 41(1):429–452, June 2012

    2012

  2. [2]

    Mechanisms of virus assembly

    Jason D Perlmutter and Michael F Hagan. Mechanisms of virus assembly. Annual review of physical chemistry, 66(1):217–239, 2015

    2015

  3. [3]

    Multiscale molecular dynamics simulation approaches to the structure and dynamics of viruses

    Roland G Huber, Jan K Marzinek, Daniel A Holdbrook, and Peter J Bond. Multiscale molecular dynamics simulation approaches to the structure and dynamics of viruses. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 128:121–132, 2017

    2017

  4. [4]

    Simulations show that virus assembly and budding are facilitated by membrane microdomains

    Teresa Ruiz-Herrero and Michael F Hagan. Simulations show that virus assembly and budding are facilitated by membrane microdomains. Biophysical journal, 108(3):585–595, 2015

    2015

  5. [5]

    Molecular dynamics simulation in virus research

    Hirotaka Ode, Masaaki Nakashima, Shingo Kitamura, Wataru Sugiura, and Hironori Sato. Molecular dynamics simulation in virus research. Frontiers in microbiology, 3:258, 2012

    2012

  6. [6]

    Protein-folding dynamics: overview of molecular simulation techniques

    Harold A Scheraga, Mey Khalili, and Adam Liwo. Protein-folding dynamics: overview of molecular simulation techniques. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem., 58(1):57–83, 2007

    2007

  7. [7]

    Describing protein folding kinetics by molecular dynamics simulations

    William C Swope, Jed W Pitera, and Frank Suits. Describing protein folding kinetics by molecular dynamics simulations. 1. theory. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 108(21):6571–6581, 2004

    2004

  8. [8]

    How fast-folding proteins fold.Science, 334(6055):517–520, 2011

    Kresten Lindorff-Larsen, Stefano Piana, Ron O Dror, and David E Shaw. How fast-folding proteins fold.Science, 334(6055):517–520, 2011

    2011

Show all 122 references
  1. [9]

    Structure and dynamics of interphase chromosomes

    Angelo Rosa and Ralf Everaers. Structure and dynamics of interphase chromosomes. PLoS computational biology, 4(8):e1000153, 2008

    2008

  2. [10]

    Transferable model for chromosome architecture

    Michele Di Pierro, Bin Zhang, Erez Lieberman Aiden, Peter G Wolynes, and José N Onuchic. Transferable model for chromosome architecture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(43):12168–12173, 2016

    2016

  3. [11]

    Gpt-4 technical report

    Josh Achiam, Steven Adler, Sandhini Agarwal, Lama Ahmad, Ilge Akkaya, Florencia Leoni Aleman, Diogo Almeida, Janko Altenschmidt, Sam Altman, Shyamal Anadkat, et al. Gpt-4 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of context

    Gemini Team, Petko Georgiev, Ving Ian Lei, Ryan Burnell, Libin Bai, Anmol Gulati, Garrett Tanzer, Damien Vincent, Zhufeng Pan, Shibo Wang, et al. Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of context. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.05530, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Highly accurate protein structure prediction with alphafold

    John Jumper, Richard Evans, Alexander Pritzel, Tim Green, Michael Figurnov, Olaf Ronneberger, Kathryn Tunyasuvunakool, Russ Bates, Augustin Žídek, Anna Potapenko, et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with alphafold. nature, 596(7873):583–589, 2021

    2021

  6. [14]

    Data science at the singularity

    David Donoho. Data science at the singularity. Harvard Data Science Review, 6(1), 2024

    2024

  7. [15]

    Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks

    Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Geoffrey E Hinton. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Advances in neural information processing systems, 25, 2012

    2012

  8. [16]

    Language models are few-shot learners

    Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, et al. Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:1877–1901, 2020

    1901

  9. [17]

    Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding

    Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In Proceedings of the 2019 conference of the North American chapter of the association for computational linguistics: human langu...

    2019

  10. [18]

    Deep learning

    Yann LeCun, Yoshua Bengio, and Geoffrey Hinton. Deep learning. nature, 521(7553):436–444, 2015

    2015

  11. [19]

    Christopher Maffeo, Thuy T. M. Ngo, Taekjip Ha, and Aleksei Aksimentiev. A Coarse-Grained Model of Unstructured Single-Stranded DNA Derived from Atomistic Simulation and Single-Molecule Experiment. J. Chem. Theory Comput., 10(8):2891–2896, August 2014

    2014

  12. [20]

    Accurate Sequence-Dependent Coarse-Grained Model for Conformational and Elastic Properties of Double-Stranded DNA

    Salvatore Assenza and Rubén Pérez. Accurate Sequence-Dependent Coarse-Grained Model for Conformational and Elastic Properties of Double-Stranded DNA. J. Chem. Theory Comput., 18(5):3239–3256, May 2022

    2022

  13. [21]

    Scheraga

    Yi He, Adam Liwo, and Harold A. Scheraga. Optimization of a Nucleic Acids united-RESidue 2-Point model (NARES-2P) with a maximum-likelihood approach. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 143(24):243111, December 2015. 15 Fitting Coarse-Grained Models to Macroscopic Experimental Da...

    2015

  14. [22]

    Vercauteren

    Aymeric Naômé, Aatto Laaksonen, and Daniel P. Vercauteren. A Solvent-Mediated Coarse-Grained Model of DNA Derived with the Systematic Newton Inversion Method. J. Chem. Theory Comput., 10(8):3541–3549, August 2014

    2014

  15. [23]

    Sequence-dependent thermodynamics of a coarse-grained dna model

    Petr Šulc, Flavio Romano, Thomas E Ouldridge, Lorenzo Rovigatti, Jonathan PK Doye, and Ard A Louis. Sequence-dependent thermodynamics of a coarse-grained dna model. The Journal of chemical physics, 137(13), 2012

    2012

  16. [24]

    A nucleotide-level coarse-grained model of rna

    Petr Šulc, Flavio Romano, Thomas E Ouldridge, Jonathan PK Doye, and Ard A Louis. A nucleotide-level coarse-grained model of rna. The Journal of chemical physics, 140(23), 2014

    2014

  17. [25]

    Coarse-grained nucleic acid–protein model for hybrid nanotechnol- ogy

    Jonah Procyk, Erik Poppleton, and Petr Šulc. Coarse-grained nucleic acid–protein model for hybrid nanotechnol- ogy. Soft Matter, 17(13):3586–3593, 2021

    2021

  18. [26]

    Introducing improved structural properties and salt dependence into a coarse-grained model of dna

    Benedict EK Snodin, Ferdinando Randisi, Majid Mosayebi, Petr Šulc, John S Schreck, Flavio Romano, Thomas E Ouldridge, Roman Tsukanov, Eyal Nir, Ard A Louis, et al. Introducing improved structural properties and salt dependence into a coarse-grained model of dna. The Journal of...

    2015

  19. [27]

    Coarse-grained modeling of dna–rna hybrids

    Eryk J Ratajczyk, Petr Šulc, Andrew J Turberfield, Jonathan PK Doye, and Ard A Louis. Coarse-grained modeling of dna–rna hybrids. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 160(11), 2024

    2024

  20. [28]

    The oxdna coarse-grained model as a tool to simulate dna origami

    Jonathan PK Doye, Hannah Fowler, Domen Prešern, Joakim Bohlin, Lorenzo Rovigatti, Flavio Romano, Petr Šulc, Chak Kui Wong, Ard A Louis, John S Schreck, et al. The oxdna coarse-grained model as a tool to simulate dna origami. In DNA and RNA Origami: Methods and Protocols, pages...

    2023

  21. [29]

    Learning neural network potentials from experimental data via differentiable trajectory reweighting

    Stephan Thaler and Julija Zavadlav. Learning neural network potentials from experimental data via differentiable trajectory reweighting. Nature communications, 12(1):6884, 2021

    2021

  22. [30]

    Automatic differentiable monte carlo: Theory and application

    Shi-Xin Zhang, Zhou-Quan Wan, and Hong Yao. Automatic differentiable monte carlo: Theory and application. Physical Review Research, 5(3):033041, 2023

    2023

  23. [31]

    Gradients are not all you need

    Luke Metz, C Daniel Freeman, Samuel S Schoenholz, and Tal Kachman. Gradients are not all you need. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.05803, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Differentiable simulation to develop molecular dynamics force fields for disordered proteins

    Joe G Greener. Differentiable simulation to develop molecular dynamics force fields for disordered proteins. Chemical Science, 15(13):4897–4909, 2024

    2024

  25. [33]

    Avoiding unphysical kinetic traps in monte carlo simulations of strongly attractive particles

    Stephen Whitelam and Phillip L Geissler. Avoiding unphysical kinetic traps in monte carlo simulations of strongly attractive particles. The Journal of chemical physics, 127(15), 2007

    2007

  26. [34]

    Štˇepán R˚ užiˇcka and Michael P. Allen. Collective translational and rotational monte carlo cluster move for general pairwise interaction. Physical Review E, 90(3):033302, 2014

    2014

  27. [35]

    Methods for monte carlo simulations of biomacromolecules

    Andreas Vitalis and Rohit V Pappu. Methods for monte carlo simulations of biomacromolecules. Annual reports in computational chemistry, 5:49–76, 2009

    2009

  28. [36]

    Jax md: a framework for differentiable physics

    Samuel Schoenholz and Ekin Dogus Cubuk. Jax md: a framework for differentiable physics. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:11428–11441, 2020

    2020

  29. [37]

    Dna nanotweezers studied with a coarse-grained model of dna

    Thomas E Ouldridge, Ard A Louis, and Jonathan PK Doye. Dna nanotweezers studied with a coarse-grained model of dna. Physical Review Letters, 104(17):178101, 2010

    2010

  30. [38]

    An experimentally-informed coarse-grained 3-site-per-nucleotide model of dna: Structure, thermodynamics, and dynamics of hybridization

    Daniel M Hinckley, Gordon S Freeman, Jonathan K Whitmer, and Juan J De Pablo. An experimentally-informed coarse-grained 3-site-per-nucleotide model of dna: Structure, thermodynamics, and dynamics of hybridization. The Journal of chemical physics, 139(14), 2013

    2013

  31. [39]

    Ouldridge, Ard A

    Thomas E. Ouldridge, Ard A. Louis, and Jonathan P. K. Doye. Structural, mechanical, and thermodynamic properties of a coarse-grained DNA model. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 134(8):085101, February 2011

    2011

  32. [40]

    Martini coarse-grained force field: extension to dna

    Jaakko J Uusitalo, Helgi I Ingoólfsson, Parisa Akhshi, D Peter Tieleman, and Siewert J Marrink. Martini coarse-grained force field: extension to dna. Journal of chemical theory and computation, 11(8):3932–3945, 2015

    2015

  33. [41]

    Mechanical properties of dna and dna nanostructures: Comparison of atomistic, martini and oxdna models

    Supriyo Naskar and Prabal K Maiti. Mechanical properties of dna and dna nanostructures: Comparison of atomistic, martini and oxdna models. Journal of Materials Chemistry B, 9(25):5102–5113, 2021

    2021

  34. [42]

    Determining structural and mechanical properties from molecular dynamics simulations of lipid vesicles

    Anthony R Braun and Jonathan N Sachs. Determining structural and mechanical properties from molecular dynamics simulations of lipid vesicles. Journal of chemical theory and computation, 10(9):4160–4168, 2014

    2014

  35. [43]

    Advances in molecular simulations of protein mechanical properties and function

    Florian Franz, Csaba Daday, and Frauke Gräter. Advances in molecular simulations of protein mechanical properties and function. Current Opinion in Structural Biology, 61:132–138, 2020. 16 Fitting Coarse-Grained Models to Macroscopic Experimental Data via Automatic Differentiation

    2020

  36. [44]

    Mechanical properties of carbon nanotube by molecular dynamics simulation

    Zhenhua Yao, Chang-Chun Zhu, Min Cheng, and Junhua Liu. Mechanical properties of carbon nanotube by molecular dynamics simulation. Computational Materials Science, 22(3-4):180–184, 2001

    2001

  37. [45]

    Characterizing mechanical properties of graphite using molecular dynamics simulation

    Jia-Lin Tsai and Jie-Feng Tu. Characterizing mechanical properties of graphite using molecular dynamics simulation. Materials & Design, 31(1):194–199, 2010

    2010

  38. [46]

    Predicting the mechanical properties of organic semiconductors using coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations

    Samuel E Root, Suchol Savagatrup, Christopher J Pais, Gaurav Arya, and Darren J Lipomi. Predicting the mechanical properties of organic semiconductors using coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations. Macromolecules, 49(7):2886–2894, 2016

    2016

  39. [47]

    Mechanical properties of connected carbon nanorings via molecular dynamics simulation

    Nan Chen, Mark T Lusk, Adri CT Van Duin, and William A Goddard III. Mechanical properties of connected carbon nanorings via molecular dynamics simulation. Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 72(8):085416, 2005

    2005

  40. [48]

    Coarse-grained model of collagen molecules using an extended martini force field.Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 6(4):1210–1218, 2010

    Alfonso Gautieri, Antonio Russo, Simone Vesentini, Alberto Redaelli, and Markus J Buehler. Coarse-grained model of collagen molecules using an extended martini force field.Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 6(4):1210–1218, 2010

    2010

  41. [49]

    Thermodynamics of dna hybridization from atomistic simulations

    Gül H Zerze, Frank H Stillinger, and Pablo G Debenedetti. Thermodynamics of dna hybridization from atomistic simulations. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 125(3):771–779, 2021

    2021

  42. [50]

    The pathway of oligomeric dna melting investigated by molecular dynamics simulations

    Ka-Yiu Wong and B Montgomery Pettitt. The pathway of oligomeric dna melting investigated by molecular dynamics simulations. Biophysical journal, 95(12):5618–5626, 2008

    2008

  43. [51]

    Force field comparison and thermodynamic property calculation of supercritical co2 and ch4 using molecular dynamics simulations

    Cassiano G Aimoli, Edward J Maginn, and Charlles RA Abreu. Force field comparison and thermodynamic property calculation of supercritical co2 and ch4 using molecular dynamics simulations. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 368:80–90, 2014

    2014

  44. [52]

    The weighted histogram analysis method for free-energy calculations on biomolecules

    Shankar Kumar, John M Rosenberg, Djamal Bouzida, Robert H Swendsen, and Peter A Kollman. The weighted histogram analysis method for free-energy calculations on biomolecules. i. the method. Journal of computational chemistry, 13(8):1011–1021, 1992

    1992

  45. [53]

    Statistically optimal analysis of samples from multiple equilibrium states

    Michael R Shirts and John D Chodera. Statistically optimal analysis of samples from multiple equilibrium states. The Journal of chemical physics, 129(12), 2008

    2008

  46. [54]

    ms2: A molecular simulation tool for thermodynamic properties

    Stephan Deublein, Bernhard Eckl, Jürgen Stoll, Sergey V Lishchuk, Gabriela Guevara-Carrion, Colin W Glass, Thorsten Merker, Martin Bernreuther, Hans Hasse, and Jadran Vrabec. ms2: A molecular simulation tool for thermodynamic properties. Computer Physics Communications, 182(11...

    2011

  47. [55]

    Gradient surgery for multi-task learning

    Tianhe Yu, Saurabh Kumar, Abhishek Gupta, Sergey Levine, Karol Hausman, and Chelsea Finn. Gradient surgery for multi-task learning. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:5824–5836, 2020

    2020

  48. [56]

    Towards impartial multi-task learning

    Liyang Liu, Yi Li, Zhanghui Kuang, J Xue, Yimin Chen, Wenming Yang, Qingmin Liao, and Wayne Zhang. Towards impartial multi-task learning. iclr, 2021

    2021

  49. [57]

    Learning multiple tasks with multilinear relationship networks

    Mingsheng Long, Zhangjie Cao, Jianmin Wang, and Philip S Yu. Learning multiple tasks with multilinear relationship networks. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017

    2017

  50. [58]

    Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networks

    James Kirkpatrick, Razvan Pascanu, Neil Rabinowitz, Joel Veness, Guillaume Desjardins, Andrei A Rusu, Kieran Milan, John Quan, Tiago Ramalho, Agnieszka Grabska-Barwinska, et al. Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networks. Proceedings of the national academy of scien...

    2017

  51. [59]

    Config: Towards conflict-free training of physics informed neural networks

    Qiang Liu, Mengyu Chu, and Nils Thuerey. Config: Towards conflict-free training of physics informed neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.11104, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  52. [60]

    A primer on the oxdna model of dna: when to use it, how to simulate it and how to interpret the results

    Aditya Sengar, Thomas E Ouldridge, Oliver Henrich, Lorenzo Rovigatti, and P Šulc. A primer on the oxdna model of dna: when to use it, how to simulate it and how to interpret the results. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, 8:693710, 2021

    2021

  53. [61]

    Gels of dna nanostars never crystallize

    Lorenzo Rovigatti, Frank Smallenburg, Flavio Romano, and Francesco Sciortino. Gels of dna nanostars never crystallize. ACS nano, 8(4):3567–3574, 2014

    2014

  54. [62]

    Switching bonds in a dna gel: An all-dna vitrimer

    Flavio Romano and Francesco Sciortino. Switching bonds in a dna gel: An all-dna vitrimer. Physical Review Letters, 114(7):078104, 2015

    2015

  55. [63]

    A biomimetic dna-based channel for the ligand-controlled transport of charged molecular cargo across a biological membrane

    Jonathan R Burns, Astrid Seifert, Niels Fertig, and Stefan Howorka. A biomimetic dna-based channel for the ligand-controlled transport of charged molecular cargo across a biological membrane. Nature nanotechnology, 11(2):152–156, 2016

    2016

  56. [64]

    JAX: composable transfor- mations of Python+NumPy programs, 2018

    James Bradbury, Roy Frostig, Peter Hawkins, Matthew James Johnson, Chris Leary, Dougal Maclaurin, George Necula, Adam Paszke, Jake VanderPlas, Skye Wanderman-Milne, and Qiao Zhang. JAX: composable transfor- mations of Python+NumPy programs, 2018. 17 Fitting Coarse-Grained Mode...

    2018

  57. [65]

    oxdna: coarse-grained simulations of nucleic acids made simple

    Erik Poppleton, Michael Matthies, Debesh Mandal, Flavio Romano, Petr Šulc, and Lorenzo Rovigatti. oxdna: coarse-grained simulations of nucleic acids made simple. Journal of Open Source Software, 8(81):4693, 2023

    2023

  58. [66]

    A comparison between parallelization approaches in molecular dynamics simulations on gpus

    Lorenzo Rovigatti, Petr Šulc, István Z Reguly, and Flavio Romano. A comparison between parallelization approaches in molecular dynamics simulations on gpus. Journal of computational chemistry, 36(1):1–8, 2015

    2015

  59. [67]

    Monte carlo gradient estimation in machine learning

    Shakir Mohamed, Mihaela Rosca, Michael Figurnov, and Andriy Mnih. Monte carlo gradient estimation in machine learning. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 21(1):5183–5244, 2020

    2020

  60. [68]

    Efficient and modular implicit differentiation.Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:5230–5242, 2022

    Mathieu Blondel, Quentin Berthet, Marco Cuturi, Roy Frostig, Stephan Hoyer, Felipe Llinares-López, Fabian Pedregosa, and Jean-Philippe Vert. Efficient and modular implicit differentiation.Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:5230–5242, 2022

    2022

  61. [69]

    Coarse-grained modelling of DNA and DNA self-assembly

    Thomas E Ouldridge. Coarse-grained modelling of DNA and DNA self-assembly. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012

    2012

  62. [70]

    π-π stacking tackled with density functional theory

    Marcel Swart, Tushar van der Wijst, Célia Fonseca Guerra, and F Matthias Bickelhaupt. π-π stacking tackled with density functional theory. Journal of molecular modeling, 13:1245–1257, 2007

    2007

  63. [71]

    Nature of base stacking: reference quantum-chemical stacking energies in ten unique b-dna base-pair steps

    Jiˇrí Šponer, Petr Jureˇcka, Ivan Marchan, F Javier Luque, Modesto Orozco, and Pavel Hobza. Nature of base stacking: reference quantum-chemical stacking energies in ten unique b-dna base-pair steps. Chemistry–A European Journal, 12(10):2854–2865, 2006

    2006

  64. [72]

    Nanobase

    Erik Poppleton, Aatmik Mallya, Swarup Dey, Joel Joseph, and Petr Šulc. Nanobase. org: a repository for dna and rna nanostructures. Nucleic acids research, 50(D1):D246–D252, 2022

    2022

  65. [73]

    Biophysical chemistry: Part III: the behavior of biological macromolecules

    Charles R Cantor and Paul Reinhard Schimmel. Biophysical chemistry: Part III: the behavior of biological macromolecules. Macmillan, 1980

    1980

  66. [74]

    Shape of a stretched polymer

    Alberto S Sassi, Salvatore Assenza, and Paolo De Los Rios. Shape of a stretched polymer. Physical review letters, 119(3):037801, 2017

    2017

  67. [75]

    Coarse-grained simulation of dna using lammps: An implementation of the oxdna model and its applications

    Oliver Henrich, Yair Augusto Gutiérrez Fosado, Tine Curk, and Thomas E Ouldridge. Coarse-grained simulation of dna using lammps: An implementation of the oxdna model and its applications. The European Physical Journal E, 41:1–16, 2018

    2018

  68. [76]

    Stiff chains and filaments under tension

    Theo Odijk. Stiff chains and filaments under tension. Macromolecules, 28(20):7016–7018, 1995

    1995

  69. [77]

    The thermodynamics of dna structural motifs

    John SantaLucia Jr and Donald Hicks. The thermodynamics of dna structural motifs. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct., 33(1):415–440, 2004

    2004

  70. [78]

    Gdod: Effective gradient descent using orthogonal decomposition for multi-task learning

    Xin Dong, Ruize Wu, Chao Xiong, Hai Li, Lei Cheng, Yong He, Shiyou Qian, Jian Cao, and Linjian Mo. Gdod: Effective gradient descent using orthogonal decomposition for multi-task learning. In Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Manage...

    2022

  71. [79]

    Rotograd: Gradient homogenization in multitask learning

    Adrián Javaloy and Isabel Valera. Rotograd: Gradient homogenization in multitask learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.02631, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Benchmarking rna force fields using hairpin loop folding free energy change

    Louis G Smith, Zhen Tan, Aleksandar Spasic, Alan Grossfield, and David H Mathews. Benchmarking rna force fields using hairpin loop folding free energy change. Biophysical Journal, 114(3):435a, 2018

    2018

  73. [81]

    Benchmarking rna all-atom force fields using hairpin motifs

    Dimitris Stamatis, Chandra Verma, and Jonathan Essex. Benchmarking rna all-atom force fields using hairpin motifs. ChemRxiv, 2023

    2023

  74. [82]

    Benchmarking amber force fields for rna: Comparisons to nmr spectra for single-stranded r (gacc) are improved by revised χ torsions

    Ilyas Yildirim, Harry A Stern, Jason D Tubbs, Scott D Kennedy, and Douglas H Turner. Benchmarking amber force fields for rna: Comparisons to nmr spectra for single-stranded r (gacc) are improved by revised χ torsions. The journal of physical chemistry B, 115(29):9261–9270, 2011

    2011

  75. [83]

    Stacking in rna: Nmr of four tetramers benchmark molecular dynamics

    David E Condon, Scott D Kennedy, Brendan C Mort, Ryszard Kierzek, Ilyas Yildirim, and Douglas H Turner. Stacking in rna: Nmr of four tetramers benchmark molecular dynamics. Journal of chemical theory and computation, 11(6):2729–2742, 2015

    2015

  76. [84]

    Highly sampled tetranucleotide and tetraloop motifs enable evaluation of common rna force fields

    Christina Bergonzo, Niel M Henriksen, Daniel R Roe, and Thomas E Cheatham. Highly sampled tetranucleotide and tetraloop motifs enable evaluation of common rna force fields. Rna, 21(9):1578–1590, 2015

    2015

  77. [85]

    Large-scale analysis of 48 dna and 48 rna tetranucleotides studied by 1 µs explicit-solvent molecular dynamics simulations

    Michael V Schrodt, Casey T Andrews, and Adrian H Elcock. Large-scale analysis of 48 dna and 48 rna tetranucleotides studied by 1 µs explicit-solvent molecular dynamics simulations. Journal of chemical theory and computation, 11(12):5906–5917, 2015

    2015

  78. [86]

    Can we ever develop an ideal rna force field? lessons learned from simulations of the uucg rna tetraloop and other systems

    V ojtech Mlynsky, Petra Kührová, Martin Pykal, Miroslav Krepl, Petr Stadlbauer, Michal Otyepka, Pavel Banas, and Jiri Sponer. Can we ever develop an ideal rna force field? lessons learned from simulations of the uucg rna tetraloop and other systems. Journal of Chemical Theory ...

    2024

  79. [87]

    Applications of crispr technologies in research and beyond

    Rodolphe Barrangou and Jennifer A Doudna. Applications of crispr technologies in research and beyond. Nature biotechnology, 34(9):933–941, 2016

    2016

  80. [88]

    Self-assembly of genetically encoded dna-protein hybrid nanoscale shapes

    Florian Praetorius and Hendrik Dietz. Self-assembly of genetically encoded dna-protein hybrid nanoscale shapes. Science, 355(6331):eaam5488, 2017

    2017

  81. [89]

    Recent developments in oligonucleotide conjugation.Chemical Society Reviews, 39(6):2054–2070, 2010

    Yashveer Singh, Pierre Murat, and Eric Defrancq. Recent developments in oligonucleotide conjugation.Chemical Society Reviews, 39(6):2054–2070, 2010

    2010

  82. [90]

    Rna 3d structure prediction using coarse-grained models

    Jun Li and Shi-Jie Chen. Rna 3d structure prediction using coarse-grained models. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, 8:720937, 2021

    2021

  83. [91]

    Rna structural dynamics as captured by molecular simulations: a comprehensive overview

    Jiˇrí Šponer, Giovanni Bussi, Miroslav Krepl, Pavel Banáš, Sandro Bottaro, Richard A Cunha, Alejandro Gil-Ley, Giovanni Pinamonti, Simón Poblete, Petr Jure ˇcka, et al. Rna structural dynamics as captured by molecular simulations: a comprehensive overview. Chemical Reviews, 11...

    2018

  84. [92]

    Coarse- grained double-stranded rna model from quantum-mechanical calculations

    Sergio Cruz-León, Alvaro Vázquez-Mayagoitia, Simone Melchionna, Nadine Schwierz, and Maria Fyta. Coarse- grained double-stranded rna model from quantum-mechanical calculations. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 122(32):7915–7928, 2018

    2018

  85. [93]

    Martini coarse-grained force field: extension to rna

    Jaakko J Uusitalo, Helgi I Ingólfsson, Siewert J Marrink, and Ignacio Faustino. Martini coarse-grained force field: extension to rna. Biophysical journal, 113(2):246–256, 2017

    2017

  86. [94]

    Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic-level protein structure with a language model

    Zeming Lin, Halil Akin, Roshan Rao, Brian Hie, Zhongkai Zhu, Wenting Lu, Nikita Smetanin, Robert Verkuil, Ori Kabeli, Yaniv Shmueli, et al. Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic-level protein structure with a language model. Science, 379(6637):1123–1130, 2023

    2023

  87. [95]

    Design and simulation of dna, rna and hybrid protein–nucleic acid nanostructures with oxview

    Joakim Bohlin, Michael Matthies, Erik Poppleton, Jonah Procyk, Aatmik Mallya, Hao Yan, and Petr Šulc. Design and simulation of dna, rna and hybrid protein–nucleic acid nanostructures with oxview. Nature protocols, 17(8):1762–1788, 2022

    2022

  88. [96]

    A multiscale coarse-graining method for biomolecular systems.The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 109(7):2469–2473, 2005

    Sergei Izvekov and Gregory A V oth. A multiscale coarse-graining method for biomolecular systems.The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 109(7):2469–2473, 2005

    2005

  89. [97]

    Using the maximum entropy principle to combine simulations and solution experiments

    Andrea Cesari, Sabine Reißer, and Giovanni Bussi. Using the maximum entropy principle to combine simulations and solution experiments. Computation, 6(1):15, 2018

    2018

  90. [98]

    Chemtrain: Learning Deep Potential Models via Automatic Differentiation and Statistical Physics, August 2024

    Paul Fuchs, Stephan Thaler, Sebastien Röcken, and Julija Zavadlav. Chemtrain: Learning Deep Potential Models via Automatic Differentiation and Statistical Physics, August 2024

    2024

  91. [99]

    Jarzynski

    C. Jarzynski. Nonequilibrium Equality for Free Energy Differences. Physical Review Letters, 78(14):2690–2693, April 1997. Publisher: American Physical Society

    1997

  92. [100]

    Randomized automatic differentiation

    Deniz Oktay, Nick McGreivy, Joshua Aduol, Alex Beatson, and Ryan P Adams. Randomized automatic differentiation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.10412, 2020

    2007 arXiv

  93. [101]

    Generalized design of sequence-ensemble-function relationships for intrinsically disordered proteins

    Ryan Krueger, Michael P Brenner, and Krishna Shrinivas. Generalized design of sequence-ensemble-function relationships for intrinsically disordered proteins. bioRxiv, pages 2024–10, 2024

    2024

  94. [102]

    Ouldridge, Ard A

    Majid Mosayebi, Flavio Romano, Thomas E. Ouldridge, Ard A. Louis, and Jonathan P. K. Doye. The Role of Loop Stacking in the Dynamics of DNA Hairpin Formation. J. Phys. Chem. B, 118(49):14326–14335, December 2014

    2014

  95. [103]

    Schreck, Thomas E

    John S. Schreck, Thomas E. Ouldridge, Flavio Romano, Petr Šulc, Liam P. Shaw, Ard A. Louis, and Jonathan P.K. Doye. DNA hairpins destabilize duplexes primarily by promoting melting rather than by inhibiting hybridization. Nucleic Acids Res., 43(13):6181–6190, July 2015

    2015

  96. [104]

    Nomidis, Enrico Skoruppa, Enrico Carlon, and John F

    Stefanos K. Nomidis, Enrico Skoruppa, Enrico Carlon, and John F. Marko. Twist-bend coupling and the statistical mechanics of the twistable wormlike-chain model of dna: Perturbation theory and beyond. Phys. Rev. E, 99:032414, Mar 2019

    2019

  97. [105]

    Dna nanotechnology: understanding and optimisation through simulation

    Thomas E Ouldridge. Dna nanotechnology: understanding and optimisation through simulation. Molecular Physics, 113(1):1–15, 2015

    2015

  98. [106]

    Programmable energy landscapes for kinetic control of dna strand displacement

    Robert RF Machinek, Thomas E Ouldridge, Natalie EC Haley, Jonathan Bath, and Andrew J Turberfield. Programmable energy landscapes for kinetic control of dna strand displacement. Nature communications, 5(1):5324, 2014

    2014

  99. [107]

    Design of hidden thermodynamic driving for non-equilibrium systems via mismatch elimination during dna strand displacement

    Natalie EC Haley, Thomas E Ouldridge, Ismael Mullor Ruiz, Alessandro Geraldini, Ard A Louis, Jonathan Bath, and Andrew J Turberfield. Design of hidden thermodynamic driving for non-equilibrium systems via mismatch elimination during dna strand displacement. Nature communicatio...

    2020

  100. [108]

    Inverse design of a pyrochlore lattice of dna origami through model-driven experiments

    Hao Liu, Michael Matthies, John Russo, Lorenzo Rovigatti, Raghu Pradeep Narayanan, Thong Diep, Daniel McKeen, Oleg Gang, Nicholas Stephanopoulos, Francesco Sciortino, et al. Inverse design of a pyrochlore lattice of dna origami through model-driven experiments. Science, 384(66...

    2024

  101. [109]

    A rhythmically pulsing leaf-spring dna-origami nanoengine that drives a passive follower

    Mathias Centola, Erik Poppleton, Sujay Ray, Martin Centola, Robb Welty, Julián Valero, Nils G Walter, Petr Šulc, and Michael Famulok. A rhythmically pulsing leaf-spring dna-origami nanoengine that drives a passive follower. Nature nanotechnology, 19(2):226–236, 2024

    2024

  102. [110]

    Modelling toehold- mediated rna strand displacement

    Petr Šulc, Thomas E Ouldridge, Flavio Romano, Jonathan PK Doye, and Ard A Louis. Modelling toehold- mediated rna strand displacement. Biophysical journal, 108(5):1238–1247, 2015

    2015

  103. [111]

    Coarse-grained modelling of supercoiled rna

    Christian Matek, Petr Šulc, Ferdinando Randisi, Jonathan PK Doye, and Ard A Louis. Coarse-grained modelling of supercoiled rna. The Journal of chemical physics, 143(24), 2015

    2015

  104. [112]

    Molecular dynamics characterization of the free and encapsidated rna2 of ccmv with the oxrna model

    Giovanni Mattiotti, Manuel Micheloni, Lorenzo Petrolli, Lorenzo Rovigatti, Luca Tubiana, Samuela Pasquali, and Raffaello Potestio. Molecular dynamics characterization of the free and encapsidated rna2 of ccmv with the oxrna model. Macromolecular Rapid Communications, 45(24):24...

    2024

  105. [113]

    Learning to learn without forgetting by maximizing transfer and minimizing interference.arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.11910, 2018

    Matthew Riemer, Ignacio Cases, Robert Ajemian, Miao Liu, Irina Rish, Yuhai Tu, and Gerald Tesauro. Learning to learn without forgetting by maximizing transfer and minimizing interference.arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.11910, 2018

    2018 arXiv

  106. [114]

    Adapting auxiliary losses using gradient similarity

    Yunshu Du, Wojciech M Czarnecki, Siddhant M Jayakumar, Mehrdad Farajtabar, Razvan Pascanu, and Balaji Lakshminarayanan. Adapting auxiliary losses using gradient similarity. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.02224, 2018

    2018 arXiv

  107. [115]

    Optimal control of nonequilibrium systems through automatic differentiation

    Megan C Engel, Jamie A Smith, and Michael P Brenner. Optimal control of nonequilibrium systems through automatic differentiation. Physical Review X, 13(4):041032, 2023

    2023

  108. [116]

    New langevin and gradient thermostats for rigid body dynamics

    Ruslan L Davidchack, TE Ouldridge, and MV Tretyakov. New langevin and gradient thermostats for rigid body dynamics. The Journal of chemical physics, 142(14), 2015

    2015

  109. [117]

    Rational construction of stochastic numerical methods for molecular sampling

    Benedict Leimkuhler and Charles Matthews. Rational construction of stochastic numerical methods for molecular sampling. Applied Mathematics Research eXpress, 2013(1):34–56, 2013

    2013

  110. [118]

    Design, optimization and analysis of large dna and rna nanostructures through interactive visualization, editing and molecular simulation

    Erik Poppleton, Joakim Bohlin, Michael Matthies, Shuchi Sharma, Fei Zhang, and Petr Šulc. Design, optimization and analysis of large dna and rna nanostructures through interactive visualization, editing and molecular simulation. Nucleic acids research, 48(12):e72–e72, 2020

    2020

  111. [119]

    Stretching dna

    John F Marko and Eric D Siggia. Stretching dna. Macromolecules, 28(26):8759–8770, 1995

    1995

  112. [120]

    Ray: A distributed framework for emerging {AI} applications

    Philipp Moritz, Robert Nishihara, Stephanie Wang, Alexey Tumanov, Richard Liaw, Eric Liang, Melih Elibol, Zongheng Yang, William Paul, Michael I Jordan, et al. Ray: A distributed framework for emerging {AI} applications. In 13th USENIX symposium on operating systems design and...

    2018

  113. [121]

    Stone, Jeff Gore, Steven B

    Zev Bryant, Michael D. Stone, Jeff Gore, Steven B. Smith, Nicholas R. Cozzarelli, and Carlos Bustamante. Structural transitions and elasticity from torque measurements on DNA. Nature, 424(6946):338–341, July 2003

    2003

  114. [122]

    Stretch–Torsion Simulations

    Jeff Gore, Zev Bryant, Marcelo Nöllmann, Mai U. Le, Nicholas R. Cozzarelli, and Carlos Bustamante. DNA overwinds when stretched. Nature, 442(7104):836–839, August 2006. 20 Fitting Coarse-Grained Models to Macroscopic Experimental Data via Automatic Differentiation A Preliminar...

    2006

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.