A Survey of Machine Learning-based Physical-Layer Authentication in Wireless Communications

Bingxuan Xu; Bizhu Wang; Mengying Sun; Ping Zhang; Rui Meng; Shujun Han; Suyu Lv; Xiaodong Xu

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 278 references

A Survey of Machine Learning-based Physical-Layer Authentication in Wireless Communications

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This survey maps the growing field of machine-learning-based physical-layer authentication into two main families—multi-device identification and attack detection—and catalogs the fingerprints, model architectures, datasets, and open…

desk verdict Useful survey, sloppy tables: the mapping errors are concentrated exactly where the paper's value is, so referee it but require a full table audit. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.09906 v2 pith:NCMOSUIE submitted 2024-11-15 cs.CR cs.SYeess.SY

Rui Meng , Bingxuan Xu , Xiaodong Xu , Mengying Sun , Bizhu Wang , Shujun Han , Suyu Lv , Ping Zhang This is my paper · ORCID

classification cs.CRcs.SYeess.SY

keywords physical-layerauthenticationmachinelearningRFfingerprintingchannelfingerprintdeviceidentificationattackdetectiondeepwirelesssecurity

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper organizes the field of machine-learning-based physical-layer authentication (PLA) into a structured taxonomy, arguing that existing schemes can be split into two main tasks: identifying which device transmitted a signal (multi-device identification) and detecting whether a signal is a spoofing or replay attack (attack detection). It then sorts the methods within each task by model family—CNNs dominating identification, and supervised, unsupervised, and reinforcement learning covering detection—and compiles the open-source RF and channel fingerprint datasets that researchers actually use. A sympathetic reader would take this as the first comprehensive reference that connects fingerprint types, machine-learning architectures, datasets, and representative results in one place.

What carries the argument

The organizing device is a two-branch taxonomy: fingerprints (RF fingerprints versus channel fingerprints) and authentication tasks (multi-device identification versus attack detection). Within identification, the survey further splits deep-learning models into FCNN, CNN, RNN, attention/Transformer, data augmentation, CVNN, GAN, and AE families, with CNN subcategorized by architectural lineage (LeNet-like, AlexNet-like, VGG-like, GoogLeNet-like, ResNet-like). Within attack detection, it splits machine-learning methods into supervised, unsupervised, and reinforcement learning. This taxonomy is the machinery that carries the survey's argument, because it lets the authors map every surveyed scheme onto a cell and then derive comparative lessons about where the field is concentrated and where gaps remain.

What would settle it

Spot-check a sample of the survey's table entries against the original papers: for instance, verify whether the LDA row in Table 9 is describing [144] or [145], and whether each CNN-family entry in Tables 6–8 matches the architecture and dataset claimed. If misattributions beyond Table 9 surface in more than a small fraction of checked entries, the survey's reliability as a reference collapses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that ML-based PLA can be systematically categorized by authentication task and learning paradigm, and that doing so reveals clear patterns in how the field has developed. For multi-device identification, the survey finds that deep learning—especially convolutional neural networks—has become the de facto approach, replacing hand-crafted feature transformations and enabling end-to-end identification from raw I/Q samples. For attack detection, it finds that machine learning replaces manual threshold setting, with supervised methods offering high accuracy when labeled attack data exist, unsupervised methods removing the need for attacker fingerprints, and reinforcement learning framing detection as a game between receiver and spoofer. The paper also asserts that the availability of open-source datasets is now a critical bottleneck and catalogs those datasets alongside the hardware, frequencies, and environments used to collect them.

Load-bearing premise

The survey's usefulness as a trusted reference depends on its tables and summaries accurately attributing each described contribution to the right cited paper, and the LDA row in Table 9 already shows one misattribution where the text describes [144]'s cluster-head safeguarding mechanism but cites [145].

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Researchers entering the field get a ready-made map of which model families to try for a given authentication task, with representative results and datasets attached to each cell.
The dominance of CNNs for identification suggests that architectural progress in that branch is less about new model families than about robustness, scalability, and interpretability of existing ones.
The split between supervised, unsupervised, and reinforcement learning for attack detection clarifies that the choice of method is largely driven by what information about attackers is available in the target scenario.
The dataset catalog highlights that reproducibility in this field depends on a handful of public corpora, and that many comparisons are made on different datasets with different device counts and channel conditions.
The enumerated future directions—CVNNs for CSI, RIS-aided authentication, multi-attacker games, cross-layer schemes, and generative large models—form a concrete research agenda for the next phase of the field.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The taxonomy likely underplays the growing importance of open-set and few-shot identification, where the number of devices exceeds labeled tuples or where unknown devices must be rejected; these appear only implicitly under attention-based and data-augmentation methods.
The survey's comparative lessons (e.g., 'CVNNs beat RVNNs on several datasets') may not generalize across protocols and SNRs, because the underlying studies vary widely in hardware, sample size, and channel model—a caution a reader should carry when citing any single performance number.
A testable extension would be to build a benchmark that re-evaluates representative schemes from each taxonomy cell on a common multi-dataset protocol, which would convert the survey's qualitative comparisons into quantitative rankings.
The game-theoretic framing used in reinforcement-learning attack detection could be extended beyond receiver-versus-spoofer to include legitimate transmitters as strategic actors, a direction the paper itself flags as open.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

I read this survey knowing the reader's take, and I largely agree. The paper is worth publishing once the tables are cleaned up. Its real contribution is organizational: a taxonomy that splits ML-based PLA into multi-device identification and attack detection, with sensible subcategories for CNN architectures and for SL/UL/RL detection, plus a useful compilation of open-source RF and channel fingerprint datasets. For a newcomer, this is a decent map of the field, and the 'Lesson' boxes are a nice touch.

The soft spots are in the tables, which are precisely where the survey's value lives. I confirmed several reference-description mismatches. Table 9's LDA row cites [145] but describes [144]; the text correctly attributes that work to [144], so the table is just wrong. Table 7 cites [198] twice with different years and different descriptions—once for a 'data-and-knowledge dual-driven architecture' that actually belongs to [190], and once for the few-shot ADS-B data augmentation that is [198]. Table 6 says 'PAST-AE' where the text and the paper title say 'PAST-AI.' These are not one-off typos; they form a pattern in the summary tables. That pattern is a real problem for a paper whose main promise is a reliable structured mapping of the literature. The good news is that the body text is generally accurate; the errors are concentrated in the tables, so they are correctable by an audit, not a rewrite.

Also, the survey has no stated search methodology—no databases, inclusion criteria, or screening process. That limits its reproducibility and makes it hard to judge whether coverage is comprehensive or biased. I'd call that a minor-to-moderate weakness; many niche surveys do the same, but given the emphasis on comprehensiveness, a short methodology paragraph would strengthen it.

The self-citations are minor and not determinative; they cite the authors' own prior PLA work as examples, which is reasonable. The taxonomy is a reorganization of categories in earlier surveys, as the reader noted—that is not a fatal flaw for a survey, but it means the novelty is modest.

Bottom line: this paper deserves a serious referee. It is useful, mostly solid, and the fixes are mechanical. I would send it to review with a request that the authors verify every table entry against its reference and add a brief methodology section. For readers entering the area, it will be a handy starting point.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript surveys machine-learning-based physical-layer authentication (PLA), organizing the field into two main branches: multi-device identification (radio-frequency fingerprinting) and attack detection (spoofing/replay defense). It further subdivides deep-learning identification methods into FCNN, CNN, RNN, attention/Transformer, data augmentation, CVNN, GAN, and AE families; divides attack detection into supervised, unsupervised, and reinforcement learning; and summarizes open-source RF and channel fingerprint datasets plus future research directions. The paper's stated contribution is a comprehensive, structured reference for ML-based PLA, with tables mapping each cited work to a model family and contribution.

Significance. If the table-to-reference mapping is reliable, the survey would provide a useful entry point for researchers: it aggregates a large body of recent work, offers a clear two-branch taxonomy, includes comparative lessons per model family, and collects open-source fingerprint datasets in one place. The dataset tables and the separation of identification from attack-detection tasks are practical strengths. However, the survey's value as a trusted reference rests precisely on the accuracy and consistency of its citation tables, and the manuscript contains multiple concrete mismatches of the kind that undermine that function. No derivations or experimental claims are made, so the contribution is entirely organizational and bibliographic.

major comments (5)

[Table 9 and §4.1.2] The LDA row of Table 9 cites [145] with the description 'Present a CF safeguarding mechanism achieved by EI for UAVs swarm travels,' but §4.1.2 attributes that contribution to [144] (Wang et al., 'Safeguarding cluster heads in UAV swarm using edge intelligence'), while [145] is Enad and Younis on ML decision strategies for OFDM systems. This is a direct reference-description mismatch in a table that is the paper's primary indexing vehicle.
[Table 7 and §3.4.1/§3.5.2] Reference [198] is used twice in Table 7 with inconsistent metadata: the 'Attention Partly' row lists [198] (2023) as proposing a 'data-and-knowledge dual-driven architecture,' but §3.4.1 assigns that contribution to Zhang et al. [190], and §3.5.2 together with the 'Generated Samples-based' row of Table 7 identify [198] as Zhang et al. (2022) on data augmentation for few-shot ADS-B identification. The same reference number cannot denote two different works, and the dual-driven description belongs to [190], not [198].
[Table 6 and §3.2.5/§3.2.3] The ResNet-like row for [15] says 'Propose PAST-AE,' but §3.2.5 and the reference list give the title as 'PAST-AI: Physical-layer authentication of satellite transmitters via deep learning.' In addition, the VGG-like rows for [153] and [174] are inverted relative to §3.2.3: [174] (2020) proposes TP-Net, and [153] (2022) combines transfer learning with TP-Net, whereas Table 6 credits [153] with proposing TP-Net and [174] with the transfer-learning combination. These are not merely cosmetic typos; they misdirect readers who rely on the tables.
[§1.4 and §2.2.2] The claimed taxonomy is internally incomplete: §2.2.2 lists Graph Neural Networks [128] among the DL techniques for multi-device identification, but Section 3 contains no GNN subsection and Table 4 omits GNN, attention/Transformer, and CVNN from its model-family enumeration. Since the paper's central claim is a comprehensive taxonomy of DL-based identification schemes, this structural omission needs to be resolved either by adding the missing coverage or by explicitly removing GNN from the listed families.
[§1 (contributions) and §5] The paper asserts that it provides 'a comprehensive survey' but does not state its search methodology: no databases, search terms, inclusion/exclusion criteria, screening procedure, or coverage window are given, and the dataset summaries in Section 5 do not report how the listed datasets were selected. Without this information, the comprehensiveness claim is not reproducible or auditable, and the reader cannot distinguish deliberate selection from accidental omission. This is a load-bearing issue for a survey whose primary product is a structured reference list.

minor comments (5)

[§1.4] The text 'RseNet-like models' should read 'ResNet-like models.'
[§3.3 and Fig. 8] The caption 'Figure 8: Organization of Section IV' appears in Section 3.3; the section number should be 'III' (or the figure should be renumbered consistently).
[§3.2.1] The bullet on Merchant et al. [166] says fingerprints were collected from ZigBee Pro devices 'with the 204 GHz band,' which is presumably 2.4 GHz; Table 6 additionally labels these as 'IEEE 802.15.1' while the text says IEEE 802.15.4. These values should be corrected.
[§3.2.1] The sentence 'The simulation results reveal that the simulation experiments verify that the CNN model can realize...' is redundant and should be rewritten.
[Table 4] The DL-based rows of Table 4 omit attention/Transformer and GNN even though these families are discussed in §3.4 and listed in §2.2.2; the table should either be expanded or reconciled with Section 3.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Survey contains minor non-load-bearing self-citations; no circular derivation or fitted prediction found.

full rationale

This is a survey and taxonomy paper, not a derivation. The central claims—that ML-based PLA schemes divide into multi-device identification and attack detection, that CNN-based models dominate identification, and that SL/UL/RL cover attack detection—are organizational classifications of the cited literature rather than quantities computed from fitted parameters, theorems imported from prior work, or definitions that presuppose the conclusion. The paper does cite several works by the same authors (e.g., [120], [157], [161], [162], [277]) as examples of ML-based PLA schemes and as items in future-research discussions, but none of these citations is load-bearing: the taxonomy and survey structure would be unchanged if those self-citations were removed, and the descriptions in Tables 6-11 are presented as literature summaries, not as consequences of the authors' own results. No uniqueness theorem or model ansatz is invoked from self-cited work to force a choice. The reference-to-description mismatches noted by the reader (e.g., Table 9's LDA row citing [145] for [144]'s CF safeguarding mechanism, and Table 7's Attention row citing [198] for [190]'s data-and-knowledge dual-driven architecture) are accuracy and reproducibility concerns about the survey's usefulness as a trusted reference, not circularity. Similarly, the lack of an explicit search protocol affects the completeness claim but does not make any stated result equivalent to its input. Under the evidentiary standard required for a circularity finding, no specific equation, fitted parameter, or self-citation chain can be exhibited that reduces the survey's conclusions to its own inputs; the score reflects only minor, non-load-bearing self-citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented entities appear because the paper is a literature survey. The only underlying premise is that the summarized papers are faithfully represented.

assumptions (1)

domain assumption The cited papers exist and report results as described in the survey.
The survey does not re-derive or independently verify any cited result; the whole taxonomy rests on the accuracy of secondary reporting.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Survey of Machine Learning-based Physical-Layer Authentication in Wireless Communications." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NCMOSUIE

@misc{pith2026241109906,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Survey of Machine Learning-based Physical-Layer Authentication in Wireless Communications},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NCMOSUIE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.09906}
}

read the original abstract

To ensure secure and reliable communication in wireless systems, authenticating the identities of numerous nodes is imperative. Traditional cryptography-based authentication methods suffer from issues such as low compatibility, reliability, and high complexity. Physical-Layer Authentication (PLA) is emerging as a promising complement due to its exploitation of unique properties in wireless environments. Recently, Machine Learning (ML)-based PLA has gained attention for its intelligence, adaptability, universality, and scalability compared to non-ML approaches. However, a comprehensive overview of state-of-the-art ML-based PLA and its foundational aspects is lacking. This paper presents a comprehensive survey of characteristics and technologies that can be used in the ML-based PLA. We categorize existing ML-based PLA schemes into two main types: multi-device identification and attack detection schemes. In deep learning-based multi-device identification schemes, Deep Neural Networks are employed to train models, avoiding complex processing and expert feature transformation. Deep learning-based multi-device identification schemes are further subdivided, with schemes based on Convolutional Neural Networks being extensively researched. In ML-based attack detection schemes, receivers utilize intelligent ML techniques to set detection thresholds automatically, eliminating the need for manual calculation or knowledge of channel models. ML-based attack detection schemes are categorized into three sub-types: Supervised Learning, Unsupervised Learning, and Reinforcement Learning. Additionally, we summarize open-source datasets used for PLA, encompassing Radio Frequency fingerprints and channel fingerprints. Finally, this paper outlines future research directions to guide researchers in related fields.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.09906 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Organization of Section II. 2.1. Taxonomy of Fingerprints We divide the fingerprints used for PLA into two categories: RF fingerprints and channel fingerprints. The RF fingerprints are extracted based on the hardware differences of transmitters, including Digital-to-Analog Converter (DAC), I/Q modulator, filter, and power amplifier. Such dissimilarities make the radiation sources of the same model and batch have … view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Illustration of the non-DL-based and DL-based multi-device identification meth [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (6 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Illustration of the non-ML-based and ML-based attack detection methods. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Organization of Section III. 3.1. FCNN-based Multi-Device Identification DL is a kind of ML techniques and is usually realized through neural networks, which are composed of one input layer, multiple hidden layers (also called latent layers), and one output layer. As i…

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Illustration of typical DL techniques, including FCNN, CNN, RNN, GAN, AE, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Illustration of the evolutions of CNN models. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_7.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Organization of Section IV. As illustrated in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_8.png]

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Illustration of SL, UL, and RL techniques. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p054_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

278 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages

[145]

E. H. Enad, S. Younis, Machine learning based decision stratigies for physical layer authentication in wireless systems, in: 2020 2nd Annual International Conference on Information and Sciences (AiCIS), IEEE, 2020, pp. 114–118

2020
[144]

H. Wang, H. Fang, X. Wang, Safeguarding cluster heads in uav swarm using edge intelligence: Linear discriminant analysis-based cross-layer authentication, IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society 2 (2021) 1298–1309

2021
[198]

Zhang, Y

X. Zhang, Y. Wang, Y. Zhang, Y. Lin, G. Gui, O. Tomoaki, H. Sari, Data augmentation aided few-shot learning for specific emitter iden- tification, in: 2022 IEEE 96th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2022-Fall), IEEE, 2022, pp. 1–5

2022
[190]

Zhang, L

Z. Zhang, L. Yuan, F. Zhou, Q. Wu, Data-and-knowledge dual-driven radio frequency fingerprint identification, IEEE Internet of Things Journal (2023)

2023
[15]

Oligeri, S

G. Oligeri, S. Sciancalepore, S. Raponi, R. Di Pietro, Past-ai: Physical- layer authentication of satellite transmitters via deep learning, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 18 (2022) 274–289

2022
[153]

Chen, P.-H

Y. Chen, P.-H. Ho, H. Wen, S. Y. Chang, S. Real, On physical-layer authentication via online transfer learning, IEEE Internet of Things Journal 9 (2) (2021) 1374–1385

2021
[174]

Y. Chen, S. Real, H. Wen, B. Cheng, W. Wang, P.-H. Ho, S. Y. Chang, On physical-layer authentication via triple pool convolutional neural network, in: 2020 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps, IEEE, 2020, pp. 1–6

2020
[128]

H. Li, Y. Liao, W. Wang, J. Hui, J. Liu, X. Liu, A novel time-domain graph tensor attention network for specific emitter identification, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 72 (2023) 1–14

2023

Show all 278 references

[1]

C.-X. Wang, X. You, X. Gao, X. Zhu, Z. Li, C. Zhang, H. Wang, Y. Huang, Y. Chen, H. Haas, et al., On the road to 6g: Visions, requirements, key technologies and testbeds, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 25 (2) (2023) 905–974

2023
[2]

L. Jin, X. Hu, Y. Lou, Z. Zhong, X. Sun, H. Wang, J. Wu, Introduc- tion to wireless endogenous security and safety: Problems, attributes, structures and functions, China Communications 18 (9) (2021) 88–99

2021
[3]

J. Moon, S. H. Lee, H. Lee, I. Lee, Proactive eavesdropping with jam- ming and eavesdropping mode selection, IEEE Transactions on Wire- less Communications 18 (7) (2019) 3726–3738

2019
[4]

N. Li, S. Xia, X. Tao, Z. Zhang, X. Wang, An area based physical layer authentication framework to detect spoofing attacks, Science China Information Sciences 63 (2020) 1–14

2020
[5]

H. Tan, Z. Li, N. Xie, J. Lu, D. Niyato, Detection of jamming attacks for the physical-layer authentication, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 22 (12) (2023) 9579–9594

2023
[6]

S. Chen, Z. Pang, H. Wen, K. Yu, T. Zhang, Y. Lu, Automated labeling and learning for physical layer authentication against clone node and sybil attacks in industrial wireless edge networks, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 17 (3) (2020) 2041–2051

2020
[7]

M. H. Junejo, A. A.-H. Ab Rahman, R. A. Shaikh, K. Mohamad Yusof, I. Memon, H. Fazal, D. Kumar, A privacy-preserving attack-resistant trust model for internet of vehicles ad hoc networks, Scientific Pro- gramming 2020 (1) (2020) 8831611

2020
[8]

M. H. Junejo, A. A.-H. Ab Rahman, R. A. Shaikh, K. M. Yusof, D. Ku- mar, I. Memon, Lightweight trust model with machine learning scheme for secure privacy in vanet, Procedia Computer Science 194 (2021) 45– 59

2021
[9]

Memon, A secure and efficient communication scheme with authenti- cated key establishment protocol for road networks, Wireless Personal Communications 85 (3) (2015) 1167–1191

I. Memon, A secure and efficient communication scheme with authenti- cated key establishment protocol for road networks, Wireless Personal Communications 85 (3) (2015) 1167–1191. 81

2015
[10]

A. A. Ahmed, M. K. Hasan, I. Memon, A. H. M. Aman, S. Islam, T. R. Gadekallu, S. A. Memon, Secure ai for 6g mobile devices: Deep learning optimization against side-channel attacks, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics (2024)

2024
[11]

3GPP, Security architecture and procedures for 5g system, version 17.0.0 (2020)

2020
[12]

N. Xie, W. Xiong, J. Chen, P. Zhang, L. Huang, J. Su, Multiple phase noises physical-layer authentication, IEEE Transactions on Communi- cations 70 (9) (2022) 6196–6211

2022
[13]

N. Xie, J. Zhang, Q. Zhang, Security provided by the physical layer in wireless communications, IEEE Network 37 (5) (2023) 42–48

2023
[14]

Sharma, B

S. Sharma, B. Kaushik, A survey on internet of vehicles: Applica- tions, security issues & solutions, Vehicular Communications 20 (2019) 100182

2019
[16]

H. Fang, X. Wang, N. Zhao, N. Al-Dhahir, Lightweight continuous au- thentication via intelligently arranged pseudo-random access in 5g-and- beyond, IEEE Transactions on Communications 69 (6) (2021) 4011– 4023

2021
[17]

H. Fang, X. Wang, L. Hanzo, Learning-aided physical layer authentica- tion as an intelligent process, IEEE Transactions on Communications 67 (3) (2018) 2260–2273

2018
[18]

S. Tian, W. Yang, J. M. Le Grange, P. Wang, W. Huang, Z. Ye, Global Health Journal 3 (3) (2019) 62–65

2019
[19]

S. Yin, J. J. Rodriguez-Andina, Y. Jiang, Real-time monitoring and control of industrial cyberphysical systems: With integrated plant-wide monitoring and control framework, IEEE Industrial Electronics Maga- zine 13 (4) (2019) 38–47. 82

2019
[20]

S. Xia, X. Tao, N. Li, S. Wang, T. Sui, H. Wu, J. Xu, Z. Han, Multiple correlated attributes based physical layer authentication in wireless networks, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 70 (2) (2021) 1673–1687

2021
[21]

D. Li, X. Yang, F. Zhou, D. Wang, N. Al-Dhahir, Blind physical-layer authentication based on composite radio sample characteristics, IEEE Transactions on Communications 70 (10) (2022) 6790–6803

2022
[22]

X. Wang, P. Hao, L. Hanzo, Physical-layer authentication for wireless security enhancement: Current challenges and future developments, IEEE Communications Magazine 54 (6) (2016) 152–158

2016
[23]

N. Xie, H. Tan, L. Huang, A. X. Liu, Physical-layer authentication in wirelessly powered communication networks, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 29 (4) (2021) 1827–1840

2021
[24]

Forssell, R

H. Forssell, R. Thobaben, Worst-case detection performance for dis- tributed simo physical layer authentication, IEEE Transactions on Communications 70 (1) (2021) 485–499

2021
[25]

N. Xie, J. Chen, L. Huang, Physical-layer authentication using multiple channel-based features, IEEE transactions on information forensics and security 16 (2021) 2356–2366

2021
[26]

L. Xiao, L. J. Greenstein, N. B. Mandayam, W. Trappe, Using the physical layer for wireless authentication in time-variant channels, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 7 (7) (2008) 2571– 2579

2008
[27]

L. Xiao, Y. Li, G. Han, G. Liu, W. Zhuang, Phy-layer spoofing detec- tion with reinforcement learning in wireless networks, IEEE Transac- tions on Vehicular Technology 65 (12) (2016) 10037–10047

2016
[28]

H. Fang, X. Wang, S. Tomasin, Machine learning for intelligent au- thentication in 5g and beyond wireless networks, IEEE Wireless Com- munications 26 (5) (2019) 55–61

2019
[29]

Riyaz, K

S. Riyaz, K. Sankhe, S. Ioannidis, K. Chowdhury, Deep learning convo- lutional neural networks for radio identification, IEEE Communications Magazine 56 (9) (2018) 146–152. 83

2018
[30]

G. Shen, J. Zhang, A. Marshall, L. Peng, X. Wang, Radio frequency fingerprint identification for lora using deep learning, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 39 (8) (2021) 2604–2616

2021
[31]

N. Yang, B. Zhang, G. Ding, Y. Wei, G. Wei, J. Wang, D. Guo, Specific emitter identification with limited samples: A model-agnostic meta- learning approach, IEEE Communications Letters 26 (2) (2021) 345– 349

2021
[32]

Xiang, W

C. Xiang, W. Liandong, X. Xiong, S. Xujian, F. Yuntian, A review of radio frequency fingerprinting methods based on raw i/q and deep learning, Journal of Radars 12 (1) (2022) 214–234

2022
[33]

S. Chen, S. Zheng, L. Yang, X. Yang, Deep learning for large-scale real-world acars and ads-b radio signal classification, IEEE Access 7 (2019) 89256–89264

2019
[34]

T. Jian, B. C. Rendon, E. Ojuba, N. Soltani, Z. Wang, K. Sankhe, A. Gritsenko, J. Dy, K. Chowdhury, S. Ioannidis, Deep learning for rf fingerprinting: A massive experimental study, IEEE Internet of Things Magazine 3 (1) (2020) 50–57

2020
[35]

T. D. Vo-Huu, T. D. Vo-Huu, G. Noubir, Fingerprinting wi-fi devices using software defined radios, in: Proceedings of the 9th ACM Con- ference on Security & Privacy in Wireless and Mobile Networks, 2016, pp. 3–14

2016
[36]

L. Xiao, T. Chen, G. Han, W. Zhuang, L. Sun, Game theoretic study on channel-based authentication in mimo systems, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 66 (8) (2017) 7474–7484

2017
[37]

Mukherjee, S

A. Mukherjee, S. A. A. Fakoorian, J. Huang, A. L. Swindlehurst, Prin- ciples of physical layer security in multiuser wireless networks: A sur- vey, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 16 (3) (2014) 1550– 1573

2014
[38]

Liu, H.-H

Y. Liu, H.-H. Chen, L. Wang, Physical layer security for next gener- ation wireless networks: Theories, technologies, and challenges, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 19 (1) (2016) 347–376. 84

2016
[39]

L. Bai, L. Zhu, J. Liu, J. Choi, W. Zhang, Physical layer authentication in wireless communication networks: A survey, Journal of Communi- cations and Information Networks 5 (3) (2020) 237–264

2020
[40]

N. Xie, Z. Li, H. Tan, A survey of physical-layer authentication in wireless communications, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 23 (1) (2020) 282–310

2020
[41]

Angueira, I

P. Angueira, I. Val, J. Montalban, ´O. Seijo, E. Iradier, P. S. Fontaneda, L. Fanari, A. Arriola, A survey of physical layer techniques for secure wireless communications in industry, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 24 (2) (2022) 810–838

2022
[42]

Q. Xu, R. Zheng, W. Saad, Z. Han, Device fingerprinting in wireless networks: Challenges and opportunities, IEEE Communications Sur- veys & Tutorials 18 (1) (2015) 94–104

2015
[43]

X. Fan, F. Wang, F. Wang, W. Gong, J. Liu, When rfid meets deep learning: Exploring cognitive intelligence for activity identification, IEEE wireless Communications 26 (3) (2019) 19–25

2019
[44]

Soltani, K

N. Soltani, K. Sankhe, J. Dy, S. Ioannidis, K. Chowdhury, More is better: Data augmentation for channel-resilient rf fingerprinting, IEEE Communications Magazine 58 (10) (2020) 66–72

2020
[45]

W. Lee, S. Y. Baek, S. H. Kim, Deep-learning-aided rf fingerprinting for nfc security, IEEE Communications Magazine 59 (5) (2021) 96–101

2021
[46]

Jagannath, J

A. Jagannath, J. Jagannath, P. S. P. V. Kumar, A comprehensive survey on radio frequency (rf) fingerprinting: Traditional approaches, deep learning, and open challenges, Computer Networks 219 (2022) 109455

2022
[47]

Y. Liu, J. Wang, J. Li, S. Niu, H. Song, Machine learning for the detection and identification of internet of things devices: A survey, IEEE Internet of Things Journal 9 (1) (2021) 298–320

2021
[48]

Hamdaoui, A

B. Hamdaoui, A. Elmaghbub, Deep-learning-based device fingerprint- ing for increased lora-iot security: Sensitivity to network deployment changes, IEEE network 36 (3) (2022) 204–210. 85

2022
[49]

H. C. Choe, C. E. Poole, M. Y. Andrea, H. H. Szu, Novel identification of intercepted signals from unknown radio transmitters, in: Wavelet Applications II, Vol. 2491, SPIE, 1995, pp. 504–517

1995
[50]

Toonstra, W

J. Toonstra, W. Kinsner, A radio transmitter fingerprinting system odo-1, in: Proceedings of 1996 Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vol. 1, IEEE, 1996, pp. 60–63

1996
[51]

J. Hall, M. Barbeau, E. Kranakis, et al., Enhancing intrusion detection in wireless networks using radio frequency fingerprinting., Communi- cations, internet, and information technology 1 (2004)

2004
[52]

Tekba¸ s, O.¨Ureten, N

¨O. Tekba¸ s, O.¨Ureten, N. Serinken, Improvement of transmitter identi- fication system for low snr transients, Electronics Letters 40 (3) (2004) 182–183

2004
[53]

W. C. Suski II, M. A. Temple, M. J. Mendenhall, R. F. Mills, Using spectral fingerprints to improve wireless network security, in: IEEE GLOBECOM 2008-2008 IEEE Global Telecommunications Confer- ence, IEEE, 2008, pp. 1–5

2008
[54]

W. Hou, X. Wang, J.-Y. Chouinard, A. Refaey, Physical layer authen- tication for mobile systems with time-varying carrier frequency offsets, IEEE Transactions on Communications 62 (5) (2014) 1658–1667

2014
[55]

D. B. Faria, D. R. Cheriton, Detecting identity-based attacks in wireless networks using signalprints, in: Proceedings of the 5th ACM workshop on Wireless security, 2006, pp. 43–52

2006
[56]

C. K. Dubendorfer, B. W. Ramsey, M. A. Temple, An rf-dna veri- fication process for zigbee networks, in: MILCOM 2012-2012 IEEE Military Communications Conference, IEEE, 2012, pp. 1–6

2012
[57]

D. R. Reising, M. A. Temple, Wimax mobile subscriber verification us- ing gabor-based rf-dna fingerprints, in: 2012 IEEE International Con- ference on Communications (ICC), IEEE, 2012, pp. 1005–1010

2012
[58]

Ureten, N

O. Ureten, N. Serinken, Wireless security through rf fingerprinting, Canadian Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 32 (1) (2007) 27–33. 86

2007
[59]

Chatterjee, D

B. Chatterjee, D. Das, S. Maity, S. Sen, Rf-puf: Enhancing iot security through authentication of wireless nodes using in-situ machine learning, IEEE internet of things journal 6 (1) (2018) 388–398

2018
[60]

Zhang, W

W. Zhang, W. Zhao, X. Tan, L. Shao, C. Ran, Adaptive rf fingerprints fusion via dual attention convolutions, IEEE Internet of Things Journal 9 (24) (2022) 25181–25195

2022
[61]

Reus-Muns, K

G. Reus-Muns, K. R. Chowdhury, Classifying uavs with proprietary waveforms via preamble feature extraction and federated learning, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 70 (7) (2021) 6279–6290

2021
[62]

P. Hao, X. Wang, A. Behnad, Performance enhancement of i/q im- balance based wireless device authentication through collaboration of multiple receivers, in: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Com- munications (ICC), IEEE, 2014, pp. 939–944

2014
[63]

P. Hao, X. Wang, A. Behnad, Relay authentication by exploiting i/q imbalance in amplify-and-forward system, in: 2014 IEEE Global Com- munications Conference, IEEE, 2014, pp. 613–618

2014
[64]

Sankhe, M

K. Sankhe, M. Belgiovine, F. Zhou, S. Riyaz, S. Ioannidis, K. Chowd- hury, Oracle: Optimized radio classification through convolutional neu- ral networks, in: IEEE INFOCOM 2019-IEEE Conference on Com- puter Communications, IEEE, 2019, pp. 370–378

2019
[65]

W. Hou, X. Wang, J.-Y. Chouinard, Physical layer authentication in ofdm systems based on hypothesis testing of cfo estimates, in: 2012 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), IEEE, 2012, pp. 3559–3563

2012
[66]

S. Zeng, X. Li, A. Salem, D. Zhao, Physical layer authentication based on cfo and visibility graph, in: 2018 International Conference on Net- working and Network Applications (NaNA), IEEE, 2018, pp. 147–152

2018
[67]

Kohno, A

T. Kohno, A. Broido, K. C. Claffy, Remote physical device fingerprint- ing, IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing 2 (2) (2005) 93–108

2005
[68]

S. Jana, S. K. Kasera, On fast and accurate detection of unauthorized wireless access points using clock skews, in: Proceedings of the 14th 87 ACM international conference on Mobile computing and networking, 2008, pp. 104–115

2008
[69]

Cristea, B

M. Cristea, B. Groza, Fingerprinting smartphones remotely via icmp timestamps, IEEE Communications Letters 17 (6) (2013) 1081–1083

2013
[70]

Pitarokoilis, E

A. Pitarokoilis, E. Bj¨ ornson, E. G. Larsson, Ml detection in phase noise impaired simo channels with uplink training, IEEE Transactions on communications 64 (1) (2015) 223–235

2015
[71]

C. Zhao, M. Huang, L. Huang, X. Du, M. Guizani, A robust authentica- tion scheme based on physical-layer phase noise fingerprint for emerging wireless networks, Computer networks 128 (2017) 164–171

2017
[72]

Dolatshahi, A

S. Dolatshahi, A. Polak, D. L. Goeckel, Identification of wireless users via power amplifier imperfections, in: 2010 Conference Record of the Forty Fourth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, IEEE, 2010, pp. 1553–1557

2010
[73]

A. C. Polak, S. Dolatshahi, D. L. Goeckel, Identifying wireless users via transmitter imperfections, IEEE Journal on selected areas in com- munications 29 (7) (2011) 1469–1479

2011
[74]

A. C. Polak, D. L. Goeckel, Identification of wireless devices of users who actively fake their rf fingerprints with artificial data distortion, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 14 (11) (2015) 5889– 5899

2015
[75]

Varshavsky, A

A. Varshavsky, A. Scannell, A. LaMarca, E. De Lara, Amigo: Proximity-based authentication of mobile devices, in: International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, Springer, 2007, pp. 253–270

2007
[76]

Kalamandeen, A

A. Kalamandeen, A. Scannell, E. de Lara, A. Sheth, A. LaMarca, En- semble: cooperative proximity-based authentication, in: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services, 2010, pp. 331–344

2010
[77]

Zhong, L

S. Zhong, L. Li, Y. G. Liu, Y. R. Yang, Privacy-preserving location- based services for mobile users in wireless networks, Department of Computer Science, Yale University, Technical Report ALEU/DCS/TR- 1297 26 (2004). 88

2004
[78]

Demirbas, Y

M. Demirbas, Y. Song, An rssi-based scheme for sybil attack detection in wireless sensor networks, in: 2006 International symposium on a world of wireless, mobile and multimedia networks (WoWMoM’06), ieee, 2006, pp. 564–570

2006
[79]

D. Xu, P. Ren, J. A. Ritcey, Independence-checking coding for ofdm channel training authentication: Protocol design, security, stability, and tradeoff analysis, IEEE transactions on information forensics and security 14 (2) (2018) 387–402

2018
[80]

Abdelaziz, R

A. Abdelaziz, R. Burton, F. Barickman, J. Martin, J. Weston, C. E. Koksal, Enhanced authentication based on angle of signal arrivals, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 68 (5) (2019) 4602–4614

2019
[81]

C. L. Corbett, R. A. Beyah, J. A. Copeland, Passive classification of wireless nics during rate switching, EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking 2008 (2007) 1–12

2007
[82]

I. O. Kennedy, P. Scanlon, F. J. Mullany, M. M. Buddhikot, K. E. Nolan, T. W. Rondeau, Radio transmitter fingerprinting: A steady state frequency domain approach, in: 2008 IEEE 68th Vehicular Tech- nology Conference, IEEE, 2008, pp. 1–5

2008
[83]

M. D. Williams, S. A. Munns, M. A. Temple, M. J. Mendenhall, Rf-dna fingerprinting for airport wimax communications security, in: 2010 Fourth International Conference on Network and System Security, IEEE, 2010, pp. 32–39

2010
[84]

L. Xiao, L. Greenstein, N. Mandayam, W. Trappe, Mimo-assisted channel-based authentication in wireless networks, in: 2008 42nd An- nual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems, IEEE, 2008, pp. 642–646

2008
[85]

Zhang, J

P. Zhang, J. Zhu, Y. Chen, X. Jiang, End-to-end physical layer authen- tication for dual-hop wireless networks, IEEE Access 7 (2019) 38322– 38336

2019
[86]

F. He, W. Wang, H. Man, Ream: Rake receiver enhanced authenti- cation method, in: 2010-MILCOM 2010 MILITARY COMMUNICA- TIONS CONFERENCE, IEEE, 2010, pp. 2205–2210. 89

2010
[87]

F. He, H. Man, D. Kivanc, B. McNair, Epson: Enhanced physical security in ofdm networks, in: 2009 IEEE International Conference on Communications, IEEE, 2009, pp. 1–5

2009
[88]

F. Pan, Z. Pang, H. Wen, M. Luvisotto, M. Xiao, R.-F. Liao, J. Chen, Threshold-free physical layer authentication based on machine learning for industrial wireless cps, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 15 (12) (2019) 6481–6491

2019
[89]

R.-F. Liao, H. Wen, J. Wu, F. Pan, A. Xu, H. Song, F. Xie, Y. Jiang, M. Cao, Security enhancement for mobile edge computing through physical layer authentication, IEEE Access 7 (2019) 116390–116401

2019
[90]

W. Wang, Y. Chen, Q. Zhang, Privacy-preserving location authentica- tion in wi-fi networks using fine-grained physical layer signatures, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 15 (2) (2015) 1218–1225

2015
[91]

D. Xu, P. Ren, J. A. Ritcey, Phy-layer cover-free coding for wireless pilot authentication in iov communications: Protocol design and ultra- security proof, IEEE Internet of things journal 6 (1) (2018) 171–187

2018
[92]

J. K. Tugnait, H. Kim, A channel-based hypothesis testing approach to enhance user authentication in wireless networks, in: 2010 Second International Conference on COMmunication Systems and NETworks (COMSNETS 2010), IEEE, 2010, pp. 1–9

2010
[93]

F. J. Liu, X. Wang, H. Tang, Robust physical layer authentication using inherent properties of channel impulse response, in: 2011-MILCOM 2011 Military Communications Conference, IEEE, 2011, pp. 538–542

2011
[94]

L. Xiao, L. Greenstein, N. Mandayam, W. Trappe, Fingerprints in the ether: Using the physical layer for wireless authentication, in: 2007 IEEE International conference on communications, IEEE, 2007, pp. 4646–4651

2007
[95]

Toonstra, W

J. Toonstra, W. Kinsner, Transient analysis and genetic algorithms for classification, in: IEEE WESCANEX 95. Communications, Power, and Computing. Conference Proceedings, Vol. 2, IEEE, 1995, pp. 432–437

1995
[96]

Barbeau, J

M. Barbeau, J. Hall, E. Kranakis, Detection of rogue devices in blue- tooth networks using radio frequency fingerprinting, in: proceedings 90 of the 3rd IASTED International Conference on Communications and Computer Networks, CCN, Citeseer, 2006, pp. 4–6

2006
[97]

R. Xie, W. Xu, Y. Chen, J. Yu, A. Hu, D. W. K. Ng, A. L. Swindle- hurst, A generalizable model-and-data driven approach for open-set rff authentication, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Secu- rity 16 (2021) 4435–4450

2021
[98]

C. Wang, X. Fu, Y. Wang, G. Gui, H. Gacanin, H. Sari, F. Adachi, Few-shot specific emitter identification via hybrid data augmentation and deep metric learning, arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.00252 (2022)

2022 arXiv
[99]

L´ opez-Risue˜ no, J

G. L´ opez-Risue˜ no, J. Grajal, A. Sanz-Osorio, Digital channelized re- ceiver based on time-frequency analysis for signal interception, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems 41 (3) (2005) 879– 898

2005
[100]

Bertoncini, K

C. Bertoncini, K. Rudd, B. Nousain, M. Hinders, Wavelet fingerprint- ing of radio-frequency identification (rfid) tags, IEEE transactions on industrial electronics 59 (12) (2011) 4843–4850

2011
[101]

Lund´ en, V

J. Lund´ en, V. Koivunen, Automatic radar waveform recognition, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing 1 (1) (2007) 124–136

2007
[102]

J. K. Tugnait, Detection of non-gaussian signals using integrated polyspectrum, IEEE transactions on signal processing 42 (11) (1994) 3137–3149

1994
[103]

Chandran, S

V. Chandran, S. L. Elgar, Pattern recognition using invariants defined from higher order spectra-one-dimensional inputs, IEEE Transactions on signal processing 41 (1) (1993) 205–212

1993
[104]

Zhang, Y

X.-D. Zhang, Y. Shi, Z. Bao, A new feature vector using selected bispec- tra for signal classification with application in radar target recognition, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 49 (9) (2001) 1875–1885

2001
[105]

Dragomiretskiy, D

K. Dragomiretskiy, D. Zosso, Variational mode decomposition, IEEE transactions on signal processing 62 (3) (2013) 531–544

2013
[106]

Zhang, F

J. Zhang, F. Wang, Z. Zhong, O. Dobre, Novel hilbert spectrum-based specific emitter identification for single-hop and relaying scenarios, in: 91 2015 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), IEEE, 2015, pp. 1–6

2015
[107]

Zhang, F

J. Zhang, F. Wang, O. A. Dobre, Z. Zhong, Specific emitter identifica- tion via hilbert–huang transform in single-hop and relaying scenarios, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 11 (6) (2016) 1192–1205

2016
[108]

D. Roy, T. Mukherjee, M. Chatterjee, E. Pasiliao, Detection of rogue rf transmitters using generative adversarial nets, in: 2019 IEEE wireless communications and networking conference (WCNC), IEEE, 2019, pp. 1–7

2019
[109]

Aneja, N

S. Aneja, N. Aneja, M. S. Islam, Iot device fingerprint using deep learning, in: 2018 IEEE international conference on internet of things and intelligence system (IOTAIS), IEEE, 2018, pp. 174–179

2018
[110]

T. J. O’Shea, J. Corgan, T. C. Clancy, Convolutional radio modulation recognition networks, in: Engineering Applications of Neural Networks: 17th International Conference, EANN 2016, Aberdeen, UK, September 2-5, 2016, Proceedings 17, Springer, 2016, pp. 213–226

2016
[111]

A. P. Hermawan, R. R. Ginanjar, D.-S. Kim, J.-M. Lee, Cnn-based au- tomatic modulation classification for beyond 5g communications, IEEE Communications Letters 24 (5) (2020) 1038–1041

2020
[112]

T. J. O’Shea, T. Roy, T. C. Clancy, Over-the-air deep learning based radio signal classification, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing 12 (1) (2018) 168–179

2018
[113]

G. Shen, J. Zhang, A. Marshall, L. Peng, X. Wang, Radio frequency fin- gerprint identification for lora using spectrogram and cnn, in: IEEE IN- FOCOM 2021-IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, IEEE, 2021, pp. 1–10

2021
[114]

Jafari, O

H. Jafari, O. Omotere, D. Adesina, H.-H. Wu, L. Qian, Iot devices fin- gerprinting using deep learning, in: MILCOM 2018-2018 IEEE Military Communications Conference (MILCOM), IEEE, 2018, pp. 1–9. 92

2018
[115]

Q. Wu, C. Feres, D. Kuzmenko, D. Zhi, Z. Yu, X. Liu, X. ‘Leo’Liu, Deep learning based rf fingerprinting for device identification and wireless security, Electronics Letters 54 (24) (2018) 1405–1407

2018
[116]

B. He, F. Wang, Cooperative specific emitter identification via multiple distorted receivers, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 15 (2020) 3791–3806

2020
[117]

Al-Shawabka, P

A. Al-Shawabka, P. Pietraski, S. B. Pattar, F. Restuccia, T. Melodia, Deeplora: Fingerprinting lora devices at scale through deep learning and data augmentation, in: Proceedings of the Twenty-second Interna- tional Symposium on Theory, Algorithmic Foundations, and Protocol Des...

2021
[118]

G. Shen, J. Zhang, A. Marshall, M. Valkama, J. Cavallaro, Radio fre- quency fingerprint identification for security in low-cost iot devices, in: 2021 55th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers, IEEE, 2021, pp. 309–313

2021
[119]

H. Xu, X. Xu, A transformer based approach for open set specific emit- ter identification, in: 2021 7th International Conference on Computer and Communications (ICCC), IEEE, 2021, pp. 1420–1425

2021
[120]

R. Meng, X. Xu, H. Sun, H. Zhao, B. Wang, S. Han, P. Zhang, Mul- tiuser physical-layer authentication based on latent perturbed neural networks for industrial internet of things, IEEE Internet of Things Journal 10 (1) (2023) 637–652

2023
[121]

Y. Liu, H. Xu, Z. Qi, Y. Shi, Specific emitter identification against un- reliable features interference based on time-series classification network structure, IEEE Access 8 (2020) 200194–200208

2020
[122]

Cekic, S

M. Cekic, S. Gopalakrishnan, U. Madhow, Wireless fingerprinting via deep learning: The impact of confounding factors, in: 2021 55th Asilo- mar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers, IEEE, 2021, pp. 677–684

2021
[123]

O. M. Gul, M. Kulhandjian, B. Kantarci, A. Touazi, C. Ellement, C. D’Amours, Fine-grained augmentation for rf fingerprinting under impaired channels, in: 2022 IEEE 27th International Workshop on 93 Computer Aided Modeling and Design of Communication Links and Networks (CAMAD),...

2022
[124]

Agadakos, N

I. Agadakos, N. Agadakos, J. Polakis, M. R. Amer, Chameleons’ obliv- ion: Complex-valued deep neural networks for protocol-agnostic rf de- vice fingerprinting, in: 2020 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy (EuroS&P), IEEE, 2020, pp. 322–338

2020
[125]

Gopalakrishnan, M

S. Gopalakrishnan, M. Cekic, U. Madhow, Robust wireless fingerprint- ing via complex-valued neural networks, in: 2019 IEEE Global Com- munications Conference (GLOBECOM), IEEE, 2019, pp. 1–6

2019
[126]

Y. Wang, G. Gui, H. Gacanin, T. Ohtsuki, O. A. Dobre, H. V. Poor, An efficient specific emitter identification method based on complex-valued neural networks and network compression, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 39 (8) (2021) 2305–2317

2021
[127]

C. N. Brown, E. Mattei, A. Draganov, Charrnets: Channel ro- bust representation networks for rf fingerprinting, arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.03568 (2021)

2021 arXiv
[129]

C. Zhao, C. Chen, Z. Cai, M. Shi, X. Du, M. Guizani, Classification of small uavs based on auxiliary classifier wasserstein gans, in: 2018 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), IEEE, 2018, pp. 206–212

2018
[130]

Karunaratne, S

S. Karunaratne, S. Hanna, D. Cabric, Open set rf fingerprinting using generative outlier augmentation, in: 2021 IEEE Global Communica- tions Conference (GLOBECOM), IEEE, 2021, pp. 01–07

2021
[131]

J. Yu, A. Hu, F. Zhou, Y. Xing, Y. Yu, G. Li, L. Peng, Radio frequency fingerprint identification based on denoising autoencoders, in: 2019 In- ternational Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob), IEEE, 2019, pp. 1–6. 94

2019
[132]

Bassey, X

J. Bassey, X. Li, L. Qian, Device authentication codes based on rf fingerprinting using deep learning, arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.08742 (2020)

2020 arXiv
[133]

Al-Shawabka, F

A. Al-Shawabka, F. Restuccia, S. D’Oro, T. Jian, B. C. Rendon, N. Soltani, J. Dy, S. Ioannidis, K. Chowdhury, T. Melodia, Expos- ing the fingerprint: Dissecting the impact of the wireless channel on radio fingerprinting, in: IEEE INFOCOM 2020-IEEE Conference on Computer Commun...

2020
[134]

X. Han, S. Chen, M. Chen, J. Yang, Radar specific emitter identifi- cation based on open-selective kernel residual network, Digital Signal Processing 134 (2023) 103913

2023
[135]

Sankhe, M

K. Sankhe, M. Belgiovine, F. Zhou, L. Angioloni, F. Restuccia, S. D’Oro, T. Melodia, S. Ioannidis, K. Chowdhury, No radio left behind: Radio fingerprinting through deep learning of physical-layer hardware impairments, IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networkin...

2019
[136]

Elmaghbub, B

A. Elmaghbub, B. Hamdaoui, Leveraging hardware-impaired out-of- band information through deep neural networks for robust wireless de- vice classification, arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.11126 (2020)

2020 arXiv
[137]

K. Zeng, K. Govindan, P. Mohapatra, Non-cryptographic authentica- tion and identification in wireless networks [security and privacy in emerging wireless networks], IEEE Wireless Communications 17 (5) (2010) 56–62

2010
[138]

L. Xiao, L. Greenstein, N. Mandayam, W. Trappe, A physical-layer technique to enhance authentication for mobile terminals, in: 2008 IEEE International Conference on Communications, IEEE, 2008, pp. 1520–1524

2008
[139]

R. A. Malaney, Securing internal wi-fi networks with position verifica- tion, in: GLOBECOM’05. IEEE Global Telecommunications Confer- ence, 2005., Vol. 3, IEEE, 2005, pp. 5–pp

2005
[140]

F. J. Liu, X. Wang, S. L. Primak, A two dimensional quantization algorithm for cir-based physical layer authentication, in: 2013 IEEE 95 International Conference on Communications (ICC), IEEE, 2013, pp. 4724–4728

2013
[141]

J. Liu, X. Wang, Physical layer authentication enhancement using two-dimensional channel quantization, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 15 (6) (2016) 4171–4182

2016
[142]

L. Xiao, L. J. Greenstein, N. B. Mandayam, W. Trappe, Channel- based spoofing detection in frequency-selective rayleigh channels, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 8 (12) (2009) 5948–5956

2009
[143]

L. Xiao, X. Wan, Z. Han, Phy-layer authentication with multiple land- marks with reduced overhead, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Com- munications 17 (3) (2017) 1676–1687

2017
[146]

Senigagliesi, M

L. Senigagliesi, M. Baldi, E. Gambi, Authentication at the physical layer with cooperative communications and machine learning, in: 2022 Joint European Conference on Networks and Communications & 6G Summit (EuCNC/6G Summit), IEEE, 2022, pp. 71–76

2022
[147]

H. Liu, Y. Wang, J. Liu, J. Yang, Y. Chen, H. V. Poor, Authenticating users through fine-grained channel information, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 17 (2) (2017) 251–264

2017
[148]

Abdrabou, T

M. Abdrabou, T. A. Gulliver, Adaptive physical layer authentication using machine learning with antenna diversity, IEEE Transactions on Communications 70 (10) (2022) 6604–6614

2022
[149]

F. Xie, Z. Pang, H. Wen, W. Lei, X. Xu, Weighted voting in phys- ical layer authentication for industrial wireless edge networks, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 18 (4) (2021) 2796–2806. 96

2021
[150]

N. Wang, T. Jiang, S. Lv, L. Xiao, Physical-layer authentication based on extreme learning machine, IEEE Communications Letters 21 (7) (2017) 1557–1560

2017
[151]

S. Wang, N. Li, S. Xia, X. Tao, H. Lu, Collaborative physical layer authentication in internet of things based on federated learning, in: 2021 IEEE 32nd Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), IEEE, 2021, pp. 714– 719

2021
[152]

R.-F. Liao, H. Wen, J. Wu, F. Pan, A. Xu, Y. Jiang, F. Xie, M. Cao, Deep-learning-based physical layer authentication for industrial wire- less sensor networks, sensors 19 (11) (2019) 2440

2019
[154]

S. Xia, X. Tao, N. Li, S. Wang, J. Xu, Physical layer authentication in uav-enabled relay networks based on manifold learning, Science China Information Sciences 65 (12) (2022) 222302

2022
[155]

Gulati, R

N. Gulati, R. Greenstadt, K. R. Dandekar, J. M. Walsh, Gmm based semi-supervised learning for channel-based authentication scheme, in: 2013 IEEE 78th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Fall), IEEE, 2013, pp. 1–6

2013
[156]

Wang, Q.-Y

H.-M. Wang, Q.-Y. Fu, Channel-prediction-based one-class mobile iot device authentication, IEEE Internet of Things Journal 9 (10) (2021) 7731–7745

2021
[157]

R. Meng, X. Xu, B. Wang, H. Sun, S. Xia, S. Han, P. Zhang, Physical- layer authentication based on hierarchical variational autoencoder for industrial internet of things, IEEE Internet of Things Journal 10 (3) (2023) 2528–2544

2023
[158]

N. Gao, Q. Ni, D. Feng, X. Jing, Y. Cao, Physical layer authentication under intelligent spoofing in wireless sensor networks, Signal Processing 166 (2020) 107272. 97

2020
[159]

X. Lu, L. Xiao, T. Xu, Y. Zhao, Y. Tang, W. Zhuang, Reinforcement learning based phy authentication for vanets, IEEE transactions on vehicular technology 69 (3) (2020) 3068–3079

2020
[160]

Y. Wu, T. Jing, Q. Gao, Y. Wu, Y. Huo, Game-theoretic physical layer authentication for spoofing detection in internet of things, Digital Communications and Networks (2023)

2023
[161]

R. Meng, X. Xu, H. Zhao, B. Wang, G. Li, B. Xu, P. Zhang, Multi- observation-multi-channel-attribute-based multiuser authentication for industrial wireless edge networks, IEEE Transactions on Industrial In- formatics 20 (2) (2024) 2097–2108

2024
[162]

R. Meng, X. Xu, G. Li, B. Xu, F. Zhu, B. Wang, P. Zhang, Multi- dimensional fingerprints-based multi-attacker detection for 6g systems, IEEE Internet of Things Journal 11 (2) (2024) 2665–2683

2024
[163]

Agadakos, N

I. Agadakos, N. Agadakos, J. Polakis, M. R. Amer, Deep complex networks for protocol-agnostic radio frequency device fingerprinting in the wild, arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.08703 (2019)

2019 arXiv
[164]

L. J. Wong, W. C. Headley, S. Andrews, R. M. Gerdes, A. J. Michaels, Clustering learned cnn features from raw i/q data for emitter identifi- cation, in: MILCOM 2018-2018 IEEE Military Communications Con- ference (MILCOM), IEEE, 2018, pp. 26–33

2018
[165]

Ester, H.-P

M. Ester, H.-P. Kriegel, J. Sander, X. Xu, et al., A density-based algo- rithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise, in: kdd, Vol. 96, 1996, pp. 226–231

1996
[166]

Merchant, S

K. Merchant, S. Revay, G. Stantchev, B. Nousain, Deep learning for rf device fingerprinting in cognitive communication networks, IEEE journal of selected topics in signal processing 12 (1) (2018) 160–167

2018
[167]

X. Qi, A. Hu, T. Chen, Lightweight radio frequency fingerprint identi- fication scheme for v2x based on temporal correlation, IEEE Transac- tions on Information Forensics and Security 19 (2024) 1056–1070

2024
[168]

Y. Liu, J. Wang, J. Li, H. Song, T. Yang, S. Niu, Z. Ming, Zero- bias deep learning for accurate identification of internet-of-things (iot) devices, IEEE Internet of Things Journal 8 (4) (2020) 2627–2634. 98

2020
[169]

Gaskin, B

J. Gaskin, B. Hamdaoui, W.-K. Wong, Tweak: Towards portable deep learning models for domain-agnostic lora device authentication, arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.00786 (2022)

2022 arXiv
[170]

G. Shen, J. Zhang, A. Marshall, R. Woods, J. Cavallaro, L. Chen, Towards receiver-agnostic and collaborative radio frequency fingerprint identification, arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.02999 (2022)

2022 arXiv
[171]

Huang, P

Y. Huang, P. Liu, J. Yang, Radio frequency fingerprint identifica- tion method based on ensemble learning, in: IEEE INFOCOM 2022- IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFO- COM WKSHPS), IEEE, 2022, pp. 1–6

2022
[172]

Y. Xing, A. Hu, J. Zhang, L. Peng, X. Wang, Design of a channel robust radio frequency fingerprint identification scheme, IEEE Internet of Things Journal 10 (8) (2022) 6946–6959

2022
[173]

L. Zong, C. Xu, H. Yuan, A rf fingerprint recognition method based on deeply convolutional neural network, in: 2020 IEEE 5th Information Technology and Mechatronics Engineering Conference (ITOEC), IEEE, 2020, pp. 1778–1781

2020
[175]

H. Zha, Q. Tian, Y. Lin, Real-world ads-b signal recognition based on radio frequency fingerprinting, in: 2020 IEEE 28th international conference on network protocols (ICNP), IEEE, 2020, pp. 1–6

2020
[176]

J. Kang, Y. Shin, H. Lee, J. Park, H. Lee, Radio frequency finger- printing for frequency hopping emitter identification, Applied Sciences 11 (22) (2021) 10812

2021
[177]

McMillen, G

J. McMillen, G. Mumcu, Y. Yilmaz, Deep learning-based rf fingerprint authentication with chaotic antenna arrays, in: 2023 IEEE Wireless and Microwave Technology Conference (W AMICON), IEEE, 2023, pp. 121–124. 99

2023
[178]

Zhang, Y

Y. Zhang, Y. Peng, B. Adebisi, G. Gui, H. Gacanin, H. Sari, Specific emitter identification based on radio frequency fingerprint using multi- scale network, in: 2022 IEEE 96th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2022-Fall), IEEE, 2022, pp. 1–5

2022
[179]

Gritsenko, Z

A. Gritsenko, Z. Wang, T. Jian, J. Dy, K. Chowdhury, S. Ioannidis, Finding a ‘new’needle in the haystack: Unseen radio detection in large populations using deep learning, in: 2019 IEEE International Sympo- sium on Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks (DySPAN), IEEE, 2019, pp. 1–10

2019
[180]

Zhang, P

T. Zhang, P. Ren, Z. Ren, Deep radio fingerprint resnet for reliable lightweight device identification, in: 2021 IEEE 94th Vehicular Tech- nology Conference (VTC2021-Fall), IEEE, 2021, pp. 1–6

2021
[181]

P. Tang, Y. Xu, G. Wei, Y. Yang, C. Yue, Specific emitter identifica- tion for iot devices based on deep residual shrinkage networks, China Communications 18 (12) (2021) 81–93

2021
[182]

J. Yu, A. Hu, G. Li, L. Peng, A robust rf fingerprinting approach using multisampling convolutional neural network, IEEE internet of things journal 6 (4) (2019) 6786–6799

2019
[183]

Y. Pan, S. Yang, H. Peng, T. Li, W. Wang, Specific emitter identifi- cation based on deep residual networks, IEEE Access 7 (2019) 54425– 54434

2019
[184]

T. Jian, Y. Gong, Z. Zhan, R. Shi, N. Soltani, Z. Wang, J. Dy, K. Chowdhury, Y. Wang, S. Ioannidis, Radio frequency fingerprinting on the edge, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 21 (11) (2021) 4078–4093

2021
[185]

Zhang, S

T. Zhang, S. Ye, K. Zhang, J. Tang, W. Wen, M. Fardad, Y. Wang, A systematic dnn weight pruning framework using alternating direction method of multipliers, in: Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV), 2018, pp. 184–199

2018
[186]

A. Ren, T. Zhang, S. Ye, J. Li, W. Xu, X. Qian, X. Lin, Y. Wang, Admm-nn: An algorithm-hardware co-design framework of dnns using alternating direction methods of multipliers, in: Proceedings of the 100 Twenty-Fourth International Conference on Architectural Support for Progra...

2019
[187]

D. Roy, T. Mukherjee, M. Chatterjee, E. Pasiliao, Rf transmitter fin- gerprinting exploiting spatio-temporal properties in raw signal data, in: 2019 18th IEEE International Conference On Machine Learning And Applications (ICMLA), IEEE, 2019, pp. 89–96

2019
[188]

Y. Peng, Y. Zhou, Specific emitter identification via squeeze-and- excitation neural network in frequency domain, in: 2021 40th Chinese Control Conference (CCC), IEEE, 2021, pp. 8310–8314

2021
[189]

L. Weng, J. Peng, J. Li, Y. Zhu, Message structure aided attentional convolution network for rf device fingerprinting, in: 2020 IEEE/CIC International Conference on Communications in China (ICCC), IEEE, 2020, pp. 495–500

2020
[191]

Hanna, S

S. Hanna, S. Karunaratne, D. Cabric, Open set wireless transmit- ter authorization: Deep learning approaches and dataset considera- tions, IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Network- ing 7 (1) (2020) 59–72

2020
[192]

Y. Xu, X. Qin, X. Xu, J. Chen, Open-set interference signal recogni- tion using boundary samples: A hybrid approach, in: 2020 Interna- tional Conference on Wireless Communications and Signal Processing (WCSP), IEEE, 2020, pp. 269–274

2020
[193]

P. Oza, V. M. Patel, Deep cnn-based multi-task learning for open-set recognition, arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.03161 (2019)

2019 arXiv
[194]

Yoshihashi, W

R. Yoshihashi, W. Shao, R. Kawakami, S. You, M. Iida, T. Naemura, Classification-reconstruction learning for open-set recognition, in: Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pat- tern Recognition, 2019, pp. 4016–4025. 101

2019
[195]

G. Shen, J. Zhang, A. Marshall, J. R. Cavallaro, Towards scalable and channel-robust radio frequency fingerprint identification for lora, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 17 (2022) 774–787

2022
[196]

Zhang, M

X. Zhang, M. Lin, Y. Tian, Y. Huang, J. An, T. Cui, Data enhance- ment aided protocol-agnostic transmitter recognition for open-set in iot, IEEE Internet of Things Journal 10 (10) (2023) 8630–8644

2023
[197]

Huang, W

L. Huang, W. Pan, Y. Zhang, L. Qian, N. Gao, Y. Wu, Data augmen- tation for deep learning-based radio modulation classification, IEEE access 8 (2019) 1498–1506

2019
[199]

F. Xie, H. Wen, J. Wu, W. Hou, H. Song, T. Zhang, R. Liao, Y. Jiang, Data augmentation for radio frequency fingerprinting via pseudo-random integration, IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence 4 (3) (2019) 276–286

2019
[200]

M. Piva, G. Maselli, F. Restuccia, The tags are alright: Robust large- scale rfid clone detection through federated data-augmented radio fin- gerprinting, in: Proceedings of the Twenty-second International Sym- posium on Theory, Algorithmic Foundations, and Protocol Design for...

2021
[201]

C. Liu, X. Fu, Y. Wang, L. Guo, Y. Liu, Y. Lin, H. Zhao, G. Gui, Overcoming data limitations: a few-shot specific emitter identification method using self-supervised learning and adversarial augmentation, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 19 (2024) 500–513

2024
[202]

R.-F. Liao, H. Wen, S. Chen, F. Xie, F. Pan, J. Tang, H. Song, Mul- tiuser physical layer authentication in internet of things with data aug- mentation, IEEE internet of things journal 7 (3) (2019) 2077–2088

2019
[203]

Chen, W.-K

J. Chen, W.-K. Wong, B. Hamdaoui, A. Elmaghbub, K. Sivanesan, R. Dorrance, L. L. Yang, An analysis of complex-valued cnns for rf 102 data-driven wireless device classification, in: ICC 2022-IEEE Interna- tional Conference on Communications, IEEE, 2022, pp. 4318–4323

2022
[204]

Stankowicz, J

J. Stankowicz, J. Robinson, J. M. Carmack, S. Kuzdeba, Complex neu- ral networks for radio frequency fingerprinting, in: 2019 IEEE Western New York Image and Signal Processing Workshop (WNYISPW), IEEE, 2019, pp. 1–5

2019
[205]

H. Gu, G. Gui, S. Hong, J. Yang, M. Liu, J. Sun, et al., Radio fre- quency fingerprinting driven drone identification based on complex- valued cnn, in: Proceedings of the 13th EAI International Conference on Mobile Multimedia Communications, Mobimedia 2020, 27-28 Au- gust 2020...

2020
[206]

S. Wang, H. Jiang, X. Fang, Y. Ying, J. Li, B. Zhang, Radio fre- quency fingerprint identification based on deep complex residual net- work, IEEE access 8 (2020) 204417–204424

2020
[207]

X. Fu, Y. Peng, Y. Liu, Y. Lin, G. Gui, H. Gacanin, F. Adachi, Semi-supervised specific emitter identification method using metric- adversarial training, IEEE Internet of Things Journal 10 (12) (2023) 10778–10789

2023
[208]

Y. Wang, G. Gui, H. Gacanin, T. Ohtsuki, H. Sari, F. Adachi, Trans- fer learning for semi-supervised automatic modulation classification in zf-mimo systems, IEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems 10 (2) (2020) 231–239

2020
[209]

Y. Dong, X. Jiang, L. Cheng, Q. Shi, Ssrcnn: A semi-supervised learn- ing framework for signal recognition, IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking 7 (3) (2021) 780–789

2021
[210]

J. Gong, X. Xu, Y. Qin, W. Dong, A generative adversarial network based framework for specific emitter characterization and identifica- tion, in: 2019 11th International Conference on Wireless Communica- tions and Signal Processing (WCSP), IEEE, 2019, pp. 1–6

2019
[211]

C. Li, T. Xu, J. Zhu, B. Zhang, Triple generative adversarial nets, Advances in neural information processing systems 30 (2017). 103

2017
[212]

Z. Xie, Z. Zhang, Y. Cao, Y. Lin, J. Bao, Z. Yao, Q. Dai, H. Hu, Sim- mim: A simple framework for masked image modeling, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recog- nition, 2022, pp. 9653–9663

2022
[213]

Jiang, J

Q. Jiang, J. Sha, Rf fingerprinting identification in low snr scenarios for automatic identification system, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 23 (3) (2024) 2070–2081

2024
[214]

M. Zeng, Z. Liu, Z. Wang, H. Liu, Y. Li, H. Yang, An adaptive specific emitter identification system for dynamic noise domain, IEEE Internet of Things Journal 9 (24) (2022) 25117–25135

2022
[215]

Y. Lin, Y. Tu, Z. Dou, L. Chen, S. Mao, Contour stella image and deep learning for signal recognition in the physical layer, IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking 7 (1) (2020) 34–46

2020
[216]

Y. Tu, Y. Lin, J. Wang, J.-U. Kim, Semi-supervised learning with gen- erative adversarial networks on digital signal modulation classification., Computers, Materials & Continua 55 (2) (2018)

2018
[217]

D. Roy, T. Mukherjee, M. Chatterjee, E. Blasch, E. Pasiliao, Rfal: Adversarial learning for rf transmitter identification and classifica- tion, IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Network- ing 6 (2) (2019) 783–801

2019
[218]

J. Gong, X. Xu, Y. Lei, Unsupervised specific emitter identification method using radio-frequency fingerprint embedded infogan, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 15 (2020) 2898– 2913

2020
[219]

Huang, H

K. Huang, H. Liu, P. Hu, et al., Deep learning of radio frequency finger- prints from limited samples by masked autoencoding, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters (2022)

2022
[220]

C. Xie, L. Zhang, Z. Zhong, Few-shot unsupervised specific emitter identification based on density peak clustering algorithm and meta- learning, IEEE Sensors Journal 22 (18) (2022) 18008–18020

2022
[221]

P. Hao, X. Wang, A. Refaey, An enhanced cross-layer authentication mechanism for wireless communications based on per and rssi, in: 2013 104 13th Canadian Workshop on Information Theory, IEEE, 2013, pp. 44– 48

2013
[222]

Zhang, N

Z. Zhang, N. Li, S. Xia, X. Tao, Fast cross layer authentication scheme for dynamic wireless network, in: 2020 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), IEEE, 2020, pp. 1–6

2020
[223]

C. Pei, N. Zhang, X. S. Shen, J. W. Mark, Channel-based physical layer authentication, in: 2014 IEEE Global Communications Conference, IEEE, 2014, pp. 4114–4119

2014
[224]

R. Du, L. Zhen, Y. Liu, Physical layer authentication based on inte- grated semi-supervised learning in wireless networks for dynamic in- dustrial scenarios, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 72 (5) (2023) 6154–6164

2023
[225]

Y. Liu, P. Zhang, Y. Shen, L. Peng, X. Jiang, Online machine learning- based physical layer authentication for mmwave mimo systems, Ad Hoc Networks 131 (2022) 102864

2022
[226]

H. Fang, X. Wang, L. Xu, Fuzzy learning for multi-dimensional adap- tive physical layer authentication: A compact and robust approach, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 19 (8) (2020) 5420– 5432

2020
[227]

K. S. Germain, F. Kragh, Multi-transmitter physical layer authenti- cation using channel state information and deep learning, in: 2020 14th International Conference on Signal Processing and Communica- tion Systems (ICSPCS), pp. 1–8

2020
[228]

R. M. Valdovinos, J. S. Sanchez, Combining multiple classifiers with dynamic weighted voting, in: Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Systems: 4th International Conference, HAIS 2009, Salamanca, Spain, June 10- 12, 2009. Proceedings 4, Springer, 2009, pp. 510–516

2009
[229]

B. P. L. Lau, A. K. Singh, T. P. L. Tan, Weighted voting game based algorithm for joining a microscopic coalition, in: 2013 IEEE Interna- tional Conference of IEEE Region 10 (TENCON 2013), IEEE, 2013, pp. 1–4. 105

2013
[230]

Y. Zhou, Y. Huo, Q. Gao, Y. Wu, T. Jing, J. Mao, Securing collabora- tive authentication: A weighted voting strategy to counter unreliable cooperators, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 19 (2024) 5798–5813

2024
[231]

F. Pan, X. Li, H. Pu, Y. Guo, J. Liu, Physical layer authentication based on residual network for industrial wireless cpss, in: IECON 2020 The 46th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, IEEE, 2020, pp. 4368–4373

2020
[232]

F. Pan, H. Wen, X. Gao, H. Pu, Z. Pang, Clone detection based on bpnn and physical layer reputation for industrial wireless cps, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 17 (5) (2020) 3693–3702

2020
[233]

S. Wang, K. Huang, X. Xu, Z. Zhong, Y. Zhou, Csi-based physical layer authentication via deep learning, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters 11 (8) (2022) 1748–1752

2022
[234]

N. Wang, L. Jiao, P. Wang, W. Li, K. Zeng, Exploiting beam features for spoofing attack detection in mmwave 60-ghz ieee 802.11 ad net- works, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 20 (5) (2021) 3321–3335

2021
[235]

N. Gao, Q. Huang, C. Li, S. Jin, M. Matthaiou, Esanet: Environ- ment semantics enabled physical layer authentication, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters 13 (1) (2024) 178–182

2024
[236]

Q. Wang, Z. Pang, W. Liang, J. Zhang, K. Wang, Y. Yang, Spatiotem- poral gradient-based physical-layer authentication enhanced by csi-to- image transformation for industrial mobile devices, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 20 (3) (2024) 4236–4245

2024
[237]

T. Jing, H. Huang, Q. Gao, Y. Wu, Y. Huo, Y. Wang, Multi-user physical layer authentication based on csi using resnet in mobile iiot, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 19 (2024) 1896–1907

2024
[238]

J. Han, Y. Li, G. Liu, J. Ma, Y. Zhou, H. Fang, X. Wu, Model-driven learning for physical layer authentication in dynamic environments, IEEE Communications Letters 28 (3) (2024) 572–576. 106

2024
[239]

J. Yang, Y. Chen, W. Trappe, J. Cheng, Detection and localization of multiple spoofing attackers in wireless networks, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed systems 24 (1) (2012) 44–58

2012
[240]

Kaijun, Estimating the number of clusters via system evolution for cluster analysis of gene expression data, Ph.D

W. Kaijun, Estimating the number of clusters via system evolution for cluster analysis of gene expression data, Ph.D. thesis, Xi’an: Xidian University (2007)

2007
[241]

K. Wang, J. Zheng, J. Zhang, J. Dong, Estimating the number of clus- ters via system evolution for cluster analysis of gene expression data, IEEE Transactions on information technology in biomedicine 13 (5) (2009) 848–853

2009
[242]

Q. Wang, H. Li, Z. Chen, D. Zhao, S. Ye, J. Cai, Supervised and semi- supervised deep neural networks for csi-based authentication, arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.09469 (2018)

2018 arXiv
[243]

Abdrabou, T

M. Abdrabou, T. A. Gulliver, Leo satellite authentication using physi- cal layer features with support vector machine, in: 2022 IEEE Interna- tional Conference on Communication, Networks and Satellite (COM- NETSAT), IEEE, 2022, pp. 277–282

2022
[244]

T. M. Hoang, T. Q. Duong, H. D. Tuan, S. Lambotharan, L. Hanzo, Physical layer security: Detection of active eavesdropping attacks by support vector machines, IEEE Access 9 (2021) 31595–31607

2021
[245]

Senigagliesi, M

L. Senigagliesi, M. Baldi, E. Gambi, Comparison of statistical and machine learning techniques for physical layer authentication, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 16 (2020) 1506– 1521

2020
[246]

Weinand, M

A. Weinand, M. Karrenbauer, J. Lianghai, H. D. Schotten, Physical layer authentication for mission critical machine type communication using gaussian mixture model based clustering, in: 2017 IEEE 85th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring), IEEE, 2017, pp. 1–5

2017
[247]

X. Qiu, T. Jiang, S. Wu, M. Hayes, Physical layer authentication en- hancement using a gaussian mixture model, IEEE Access 6 (2018) 53583–53592. 107

2018
[248]

Tomasin, Analysis of channel-based user authentication by key-less and key-based approaches, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communi- cations 17 (9) (2018) 5700–5712

S. Tomasin, Analysis of channel-based user authentication by key-less and key-based approaches, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communi- cations 17 (9) (2018) 5700–5712

2018
[249]

S. Yan, R. Malaney, I. Nevat, G. W. Peters, Optimal information- theoretic wireless location verification, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 63 (7) (2014) 3410–3422

2014
[250]

Y. Li, L. Xiao, Q. Li, W. Su, Spoofing detection games in underwater sensor networks, in: OCEANS 2015-MTS/IEEE Washington, IEEE, 2015, pp. 1–5

2015
[251]

Y. Zhou, P. L. Yeoh, K. J. Kim, Z. Ma, Y. Li, B. Vucetic, Game theoretic physical layer authentication for spoofing detection in uav communications, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 71 (6) (2022) 6750–6755

2022
[252]

Zhang, Y

T. Zhang, Y. Huo, Q. Gao, L. Ma, Y. Wu, R. Li, Cooperative physi- cal layer authentication with reputation-inspired collaborator selection, IEEE Internet of Things Journal 10 (24) (2023) 22165–22181

2023
[253]

J. Liu, L. Xiao, G. Liu, Y. Zhao, Active authentication with reinforce- ment learning based on ambient radio signals, Multimedia Tools and Applications 76 (2017) 3979–3998

2017
[254]

X. Lu, X. Wan, L. Xiao, Y. Tang, W. Zhuang, Learning-based rogue edge detection in vanets with ambient radio signals, in: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), IEEE, 2018, pp. 1–6

2018
[255]

L. Xiao, G. Sheng, X. Wan, W. Su, P. Cheng, Learning-based phy-layer authentication for underwater sensor networks, IEEE communications letters 23 (1) (2018) 60–63

2018
[256]

Reus-Muns, D

G. Reus-Muns, D. Jaisinghani, K. Sankhe, K. R. Chowdhury, Trust in 5g open rans through machine learning: Rf fingerprinting on the pow- der pawr platform, in: GLOBECOM 2020-2020 IEEE Global Commu- nications Conference, IEEE, 2020, pp. 1–6

2020
[257]

Uzundurukan, Y

E. Uzundurukan, Y. Dalveren, A. Kara, A database for the radio fre- quency fingerprinting of bluetooth devices, Data 5 (2) (2020) 55. 108

2020
[258]

T. Ya, L. Yun, Z. Haoran, J. Zhang, W. Yu, G. Guan, M. Shiwen, Large-scale real-world radio signal recognition with deep learning, Chi- nese Journal of Aeronautics 35 (9) (2022) 35–48

2022
[259]

Hanna, S

S. Hanna, S. Karunaratne, D. Cabric, Wisig: A large-scale wifi signal dataset for receiver and channel agnostic rf fingerprinting, IEEE Access 10 (2022) 22808–22818

2022
[260]

Elmaghbub, B

A. Elmaghbub, B. Hamdaoui, Lora device fingerprinting in the wild: Disclosing rf data-driven fingerprint sensitivity to deployment variabil- ity, IEEE Access 9 (2021) 142893–142909

2021
[261]

Morin, L

C. Morin, L. S. Cardoso, J. Hoydis, J.-M. Gorce, T. Vial, Trans- mitter classification with supervised deep learning, in: Cognitive Radio-Oriented Wireless Networks: 14th EAI International Confer- ence, CrownCom 2019, Poznan, Poland, June 11–12, 2019, Proceedings 14, Springer,...

2019
[262]

Ezuma, F

M. Ezuma, F. Erden, C. K. Anjinappa, O. Ozdemir, I. Guvenc, Drone remote controller rf signal dataset (2020). doi:10.21227/ss99-8d56. URL https://dx.doi.org/10.21227/ss99-8d56

2020 doi
[263]

Soltani, G

N. Soltani, G. Reus-Muns, B. Salehi, J. Dy, S. Ioannidis, K. Chowd- hury, Rf fingerprinting unmanned aerial vehicles with non-standard transmitter waveforms, IEEE transactions on vehicular technology 69 (12) (2020) 15518–15531

2020
[264]

Candell, C

R. Candell, C. A. Remley, J. T. Quimby, D. R. Novotny, A. Curtin, P. B. Papazian, G. H. Koepke, J. Diener, M. T. Hany, Industrial wire- less systems: Radio propagation measurements (2017)

2017
[265]

C. A. of Information, C. Technology, Mobile communication open dataset. URL https://www.mobileai-dataset.com/html/default/ yingwen/DateSet/index.html?index=1
[266]

Jaeckel, L

S. Jaeckel, L. Raschkowski, K. B¨ orner, L. Thiele, Quadriga: A 3-d multi-cell channel model with time evolution for enabling virtual field trials, IEEE transactions on antennas and propagation 62 (6) (2014) 3242–3256. 109

2014
[267]

Gassner, C

A. Gassner, C. Musat, A. Rusu, A. Burg, Opencsi: An open-source dataset for indoor localization using csi-based fingerprinting, arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.07963 (2021)

2021 arXiv
[268]

L. Liu, C. Oestges, J. Poutanen, K. Haneda, P. Vainikainen, F. Quitin, F. Tufvesson, P. De Doncker, The cost 2100 mimo channel model, IEEE Wireless Communications 19 (6) (2012) 92–99

2012
[269]

Alkhateeb, Deepmimo: A generic deep learning dataset for millimeter wave and massive mimo applications, arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.06435 (2019)

A. Alkhateeb, Deepmimo: A generic deep learning dataset for millimeter wave and massive mimo applications, arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.06435 (2019)

2019 arXiv
[270]

L. Wang, S. Pasricha, A framework for csi-based indoor localization with id convolutional neural networks, in: 2022 IEEE 12th Interna- tional Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN), IEEE, 2022, pp. 1–8

2022
[271]

3GPP, Study on channel model for frequencies from 0.5 to 100 ghz, version 16.1.0 (2020)

2020
[272]

Zhang, J

Y. Zhang, J. Sun, G. Gui, H. Gacanin, H. Sari, A generalized channel dataset generator for 5g new radio systems based on ray-tracing, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters 10 (11) (2021) 2402–2406

2021
[273]

Basar, I

E. Basar, I. Yildirim, F. Kilinc, Indoor and outdoor physical chan- nel modeling and efficient positioning for reconfigurable intelligent sur- faces in mmwave bands, IEEE Transactions on Communications 69 (12) (2021) 8600–8611

2021
[274]

Alrabeiah, A

M. Alrabeiah, A. Hredzak, Z. Liu, A. Alkhateeb, Viwi: A deep learning dataset framework for vision-aided wireless communications, in: 2020 IEEE 91st Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2020-Spring), IEEE, 2020, pp. 1–5

2020
[275]

Qarabaqi, M

P. Qarabaqi, M. Stojanovic, Statistical characterization and computa- tionally efficient modeling of a class of underwater acoustic communi- cation channels, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering 38 (4) (2013) 701–717. 110

2013
[276]

C.-X. Wang, J. Huang, H. Wang, X. Gao, X. You, Y. Hao, 6g wire- less channel measurements and models: Trends and challenges, IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine 15 (4) (2020) 22–32

2020
[277]

R. Meng, F. Zhu, X. Xu, L. Jin, B. Wang, B. Xu, H. Meng, P. Zhang, Efficient gaussian process classification-based physical-layer authenti- cation with configurable fingerprints for 6g-enabled iot, arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.12263 (2023)

2023 arXiv
[278]

Zhang, G

X. Zhang, G. Li, J. Zhang, A. Hu, Z. Hou, B. Xiao, Deep-learning-based physical-layer secret key generation for fdd systems, IEEE Internet of Things Journal 9 (8) (2021) 6081–6094. 111

2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [145]

E. H. Enad, S. Younis, Machine learning based decision stratigies for physical layer authentication in wireless systems, in: 2020 2nd Annual International Conference on Information and Sciences (AiCIS), IEEE, 2020, pp. 114–118

2020

[2] [144]

H. Wang, H. Fang, X. Wang, Safeguarding cluster heads in uav swarm using edge intelligence: Linear discriminant analysis-based cross-layer authentication, IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society 2 (2021) 1298–1309

2021

[3] [198]

Zhang, Y

X. Zhang, Y. Wang, Y. Zhang, Y. Lin, G. Gui, O. Tomoaki, H. Sari, Data augmentation aided few-shot learning for specific emitter iden- tification, in: 2022 IEEE 96th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2022-Fall), IEEE, 2022, pp. 1–5

2022

[4] [190]

Zhang, L

Z. Zhang, L. Yuan, F. Zhou, Q. Wu, Data-and-knowledge dual-driven radio frequency fingerprint identification, IEEE Internet of Things Journal (2023)

2023

[5] [15]

Oligeri, S

G. Oligeri, S. Sciancalepore, S. Raponi, R. Di Pietro, Past-ai: Physical- layer authentication of satellite transmitters via deep learning, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 18 (2022) 274–289

2022

[6] [153]

Chen, P.-H

Y. Chen, P.-H. Ho, H. Wen, S. Y. Chang, S. Real, On physical-layer authentication via online transfer learning, IEEE Internet of Things Journal 9 (2) (2021) 1374–1385

2021

[7] [174]

Y. Chen, S. Real, H. Wen, B. Cheng, W. Wang, P.-H. Ho, S. Y. Chang, On physical-layer authentication via triple pool convolutional neural network, in: 2020 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps, IEEE, 2020, pp. 1–6

2020

[8] [128]

H. Li, Y. Liao, W. Wang, J. Hui, J. Liu, X. Liu, A novel time-domain graph tensor attention network for specific emitter identification, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 72 (2023) 1–14

2023