Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 37 references

Once More, With Feeling: Measuring Emotion of Acting Performances in Contemporary American Film

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Acting performances in American film encode narrative arcs, genre constraints, and historical change in their spoken emotion.

desk verdict New speech–text film corpus and a plausible emotional-range measure, but the classifier's validity is not yet strong enough to support all the case-study claims. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.10018 v1 pith:UK66AHOC submitted 2024-11-15 cs.CL

Naitian Zhou , David Bamman This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CL
keywords actingperformancespeechemotionrecognitioncomputationalfilmanalysisvariationistsociolinguisticsemotionalrangenarrativestructuregenrediachronic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that acting performance in popular contemporary American film is a measurable semiotic layer, distinct from the script and analyzable at scale. It aligns spoken utterances with the words being spoken, uses speech emotion recognition to assign each utterance an emotion profile, and then examines how those profiles vary over narrative time, across release years, by genre, and across semantically similar lines. The reported results include rising emotionality over a film's runtime, a U-shaped trajectory for joy with an anger peak near the climax, a mild decline in emotionality across decades that persists even within matched phrase groups, and clear genre- and phrase-based constraints on emotional range. If these findings hold, film scholarship can treat the actor's delivery as a quantitative object rather than a text-derived byproduct.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is a parallel dataset in which every spoken utterance is time-aligned to the script text being spoken, built by speaker segmentation, transcription, and word-level alignment. A contextual speech emotion recognition model, using pretrained speech representations passed through a bidirectional LSTM and trained on acted TV dialogue, outputs a seven-category emotion probability vector for each utterance. Semantically similar lines are clustered into dialogue phrase groups using sentence embeddings and Leiden community detection, which lets the analysis hold the words constant and examine variation in delivery. Emotional range is measured as the Shannon entropy of a Dirichlet distribution fitted to the emotion probability vectors of a set of utterances, so that a set of performances with highly variable emotion profiles has high range and a tightly constrained set has low range. This combination operationalizes a variationist sociolinguistic view in which the scripted line is a linguistic variable and the performance is a choice among emotional variants.

What would settle it

Use trained human annotators to label a held-out sample of the same corpus with the same seven emotion categories, then check whether each of the three case-study patterns—rising emotionality over runtime, decline by release year within matched phrase groups, and genre ordering of emotional range—reproduces in the human labels; failure to reproduce would show that the model's predictions, not the performances, are carrying the findings.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that acted emotion in film speech is structured rather than idiosyncratic. Across 2,283 contemporary American films, the average probability that an utterance is non-neutral rises over narrative time; joy follows a U-shaped arc with a steep final upswing, sadness and anger fall toward the end, and anger peaks around 85 percent of runtime. Earlier films have higher emotionality than later ones, and this diachronic decline survives when the comparison is restricted to the same semantically matched phrase groups, suggesting a shift in performance style rather than only a shift in writing. Genre constrains emotional range, with thrillers, biographies, and mysteries at the low end and family films, musicals, and fantasy at the high end; dialogue phrases that are functional, such as yes/no questions and their answers, have narrow emotional range, while open-ended evaluative phrases such as “You're alive” admit wide emotional latitude. The paper interprets the spoken-performance channel as one that carries meaning in concert with, and sometimes in compensation for, the visual and textual channels of film.

Load-bearing premise

The findings rest on the model's predicted emotion labels being a valid measure of acted emotion in film; the model is correct on only 48.8 percent of the movie evaluation set and two human annotators agreed only weakly with each other, so if the predictions are tracking acoustic or conversational patterns rather than acting choices, the narrative, diachronic, and genre results do not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Narrative arcs in film can be studied from how lines are delivered rather than only from what is written; the rise in emotionality over runtime provides performance-based evidence for climax-resolution structure.
  • Historical studies of emotion in culture must separate writing from performance: the within-phrase-group decline implies the spoken channel has cooled over recent decades even with written content held fixed.
  • Genre functions as a prior on emotional delivery, so analyses of acting range or emotional intensity should control for genre; low-range genres like thrillers cannot be compared directly with family films.
  • The negative diachronic trend and the visual-intensification thesis are compatible: if close-ups increasingly carry expressive nuance, the spoken channel can bear less emotional load, which the paper reads as a performance-side counterpart to that visual shift.
  • The aligned utterance-to-phrase dataset makes “how they say it” a queryable unit, enabling variationist studies of emotional range for specific lines across speakers, films, or decades.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extension: because each performance vector is tied to a script line, the same data could in principle measure actor-level contribution by comparing performances of the same line across different films or remakes; the paper explicitly leaves the division of authorial labor among actor, director, and editor unaddressed.
  • Extension: the paper's low inter-annotator agreement suggests that a seven-category emotion space may be too coarse; a natural next test is whether continuous or fine-grained emotion labels sharpen the narrative and genre effects, which the paper discusses but does not carry out.
  • Extension: emotional range as Dirichlet entropy is text-agnostic, so it could be applied to non-film speech such as news, podcasts, or courtroom testimony to test whether functional dialogue is universally low-range across genres of spoken interaction.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper proposes a computational pipeline for measuring acted emotion in contemporary American film. The pipeline segments audio into utterances, transcribes and aligns dialogue, trains a wav2vec2-based speech emotion recognition (SER) model on MELD, and evaluates it on MELD and a newly annotated 35-film corpus. Using the model's predictions, the authors run three analyses: (1) trajectories of emotionality and specific emotions over narrative time, (2) diachronic trends in emotionality with a within-phrase-group fixed-effects regression, and (3) a Dirichlet-entropy measure of emotional range across genres and across semantically grouped phrases. The central claim is that these analyses reveal narrative structure, diachronic shifts, and genre- and dialogue-based constraints located in spoken performances.

Significance. Demonstrating that acted emotion in film can be measured reliably from speech and separated from script would be a substantial methodological contribution to computational film and performance studies. The paper has notable strengths: a reproducible pipeline with publicly available components, an in-domain evaluation set with a transparent annotation protocol, a phrase-group control for lexical content, and a candid limitations section. If the measurement-validity issues are resolved, the findings on narrative arcs and genre differences would be of broad interest. As it stands, however, the central claim is contingent on the SER output being a valid measure of acted delivery, and that premise is not yet established.

major comments (4)
  1. [2.2.2, 2.2.3, 3] The contextual SER model predicts each utterance's emotion through a biLSTM over neighboring utterances, and the paper uses its outputs for all analyses in Section 3. Consequently, the reported patterns (e.g., emotionality increasing over narrative time in Fig. 1a, genre ordering in Fig. 3) could be driven by the lexical and conversational content of surrounding dialogue rather than by how the target utterance is performed. The claim that the findings are 'located in spoken performances' requires either using the utterance-level model as the primary outcome or demonstrating that contextual information is not responsible for the observed patterns; for example, by re-running the analyses with the utterance-level model and showing qualitatively identical results.
  2. [2.2.3, Table 1, Figs. 1–3] The models obtain 0.488 accuracy and 0.450 weighted F1 on the Movies evaluation set, and the human inter-annotator agreement on the new evaluation set is low (Krippendorff's alpha = 0.334, Fleiss' kappa = 0.333). The 95% bootstrap confidence intervals in Figures 1–3 reflect only resampling of the predicted values across movies or utterances, not the substantial classifier and label noise. This means the statistical precision of the reported trends, such as the ordering of genres in Figure 3, is overestimated. A sensitivity analysis that resamples labels according to the model's confusion matrix, or that varies the classification threshold, would be needed to support the claimed patterns.
  3. [3.2] The within-phrase-group regression is the key control for separating script from performance, but it explains only R2 = 0.048 (F(1, 21461), p < 0.001). While the coefficient is statistically significant, the tiny effect size leaves ample room for residual confounding from imperfect phrase clustering, acoustic conditions, or other covariates. The text accurately describes the coefficient as slightly negative and significant, but it should also discuss the practical significance of this effect size and report robustness checks such as controlling for film-level random effects or utterance duration.
  4. [3.3] The emotional range measure is defined as the entropy of a Dirichlet fitted to the model's predicted probability vectors. Because the SER model is far from perfectly calibrated and its predicted distributions are known to be noisy (Table 1), this entropy may reflect model uncertainty or label distribution rather than the actor's emotional range. The qualitative examples in Table 3 are suggestive, but no quantitative validation (e.g., correlation with human ratings of range) is provided. Without such validation, the genre and phrase-level conclusions in Section 3.3 should be framed as exploratory.
minor comments (6)
  1. [2.2.2] The sentence 'We also train an contextual model' contains a typo; it should read 'We also train a contextual model.'
  2. [4] The section heading 'Embodied erformance' is a typo and should read 'Embodied Performance.'
  3. [3.2 and Figure 2] The caption says 'Emotionality is higher in older films,' which is consistent with the text, but the text also notes a minimum around 2010; it would help to reconcile the shape of the trajectory (e.g., flat then rising before 1980, declining to 2010, then rising) in both the text and the figure.
  4. [3.1 and Figure 1b] The description says 'joyful performances follow a U-shaped curve, with a steep increase towards the end,' but the plotted trajectory appears to decline in the first half and then rise steeply near the end; the narrative description should match the figure's shape more precisely.
  5. [References] In reference [22] the name is spelled 'Panovsky'; the standard spelling is 'Panofsky' (Erwin Panofsky), both in the reference and in the text of Section 3.2.
  6. [2.3] The sentence 'We expect the phrases in each group to have similar prior distributions of emotion' is an untested assumption; a short evaluation of phrase-group homogeneity (e.g., measuring within-group variance of predicted emotion probabilities) would strengthen the control.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the emotion model is trained on external MELD data, and the reported analyses are post-hoc aggregations rather than fitted predictions.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The speech emotion recognition model is trained on MELD, an external dataset of acted dialogue from Friends, evaluated on an independently labeled held-out set of 333 movie clips, and only then applied to the film corpus; none of the paper's analytic outcomes (narrative-time emotionality, diachronic trends, genre or phrase-group emotional range) is used to fit the model or the Dirichlet entropy estimator. The within-phrase-group diachronic regression in Section 3.2 is a proper control: phrase groups are constructed from text embeddings via semantic clustering, and the year effect is estimated on model emotion predictions, so the finding inside groups is not an artifact of fitting to the conclusions. The emotional-range measure is a post-hoc entropy of predicted emotion distributions, not a parameter fitted to genre or phrase outcomes. The only self-citation, to the corpus paper [14], supplies the film list and does not carry the argument. The paper's own limitations—48.8% accuracy on the Movies evaluation set, low inter-annotator agreement, and the contextual model's access to neighboring utterances—are genuine construct-validity and confounding concerns about whether the model isolates acted emotion from lexical and conversational content, but they are measurement issues rather than cases where a 'prediction' reduces to its inputs by construction. No specific reduction of a claimed result to a fitted input or to a self-citation chain can be exhibited, so the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central analyses rest on the validity of the emotion classifier, the transfer from MELD to film, the contextual model as a measure of performance, and the phrase-group clustering as a text control. The model's own evaluation shows low accuracy and low annotator agreement. The chosen analysis thresholds (conversation grouping, genre minimums, phrase frequency) are additional hand-set choices. No invented entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • Conversation grouping threshold = 3 seconds
    Utterances within 3 seconds of each other are grouped into conversations for the contextual model and for the evaluation set (Section 2.2.2).
  • Narrative time bin width = 5% of run time
    Emotion trajectories are averaged over 5% intervals of film length (Section 3.1).
  • Minimum phrase-group frequency = 50 utterances
    Only phrase groups uttered at least 50 times are used for emotional range estimates (Section 3.3).
  • Minimum genre frequency = 30 films
    Genres with fewer than 30 films are excluded from the genre analysis (Section 3.3).
  • Dirichlet concentration parameters = Maximum likelihood estimates per movie and phrase group
    Emotional range is defined as entropy of a Dirichlet distribution fitted to the model's predicted emotion probabilities (Section 3.3).
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Ekman's seven-category emotion model (six basic emotions plus neutral) is an adequate representation of acted emotion.
    Used throughout; the paper cites validity criticisms in Section 4 but still relies on the model for all measurements.
  • domain assumption A speech emotion recognition model trained on MELD (Friends) transfers to contemporary American film.
    The model is evaluated on 35 films with weak agreement, but all downstream analyses assume this transfer (Section 2.2.3).
  • domain assumption Predictions from the contextual model reflect actor performance rather than conversational context.
    The selected model includes surrounding utterances as input (Section 2.2.2), yet the limitation section does not discuss this confound for the narrative-time results.
  • domain assumption Sentence-embedding clustering into phrase groups approximates the same line of dialogue for the within-group diachronic control.
    Section 2.3 clusters semantically similar phrases, but the groups are not exact sentence matches, so they are an imperfect control for textual content.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Once More, With Feeling: Measuring Emotion of Acting Performances in Contemporary American Film." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UK66AHOC

@misc{pith2026241110018,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Once More, With Feeling: Measuring Emotion of Acting Performances in Contemporary American Film},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UK66AHOC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.10018}
}
read the original abstract

Narrative film is a composition of writing, cinematography, editing, and performance. While much computational work has focused on the writing or visual style in film, we conduct in this paper a computational exploration of acting performance. Applying speech emotion recognition models and a variationist sociolinguistic analytical framework to a corpus of popular, contemporary American film, we find narrative structure, diachronic shifts, and genre- and dialogue-based constraints located in spoken performances.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.10018 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Emotionality increases, but specific emotions show non-linear trajectories over narrative time (95% bootstrap confidence interval). before looking more closely at how specific emotions are distributed temporally. We plot the average probability of an emotion label for an utterance in intervals of 5 percent, expressed as a percentage of the full run-time of the film. Specific emotions are measured as proportions of t… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Emotionality is higher in older films (95% bootstrap confidence interval). as the proportion of utterances with any emotion label.5 We measure how emotionality has changed historically over the decades spanned by our corpus. Emotional shifts have been identified in English fiction books: Morin and Acerbi [20] find that the content of those stories have experienced a decline in emotional expression. Within cinema, Da… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Relative emotional range for different film genres (95% bootstrap confidence intervals). difficult to attribute these results to a particular property of specific genres, these findings show that some genres have more constrained or consistent emotional registers than others. Functional phrases have less capacity for emotional range. Naremore [6] references Goffman when theorizing about performance: actors draw on a… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Y. Yu, Y. Hao, P. Dhillon, Unpacking Gender Stereotypes in Film Dialogue, in: F. Hopfgart- ner, K. Jaidka, P. Mayr, J. Jose, J. Breitsohl (Eds.), Social Informatics, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2022, pp. 398–405. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-19097-1_26

    doi:10.1007/978-3-031-19097-1_26 2022

  2. [2]

    B. M. Schmidt, Plot arceology: A vector-space model of narrative structure, in: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), 2015, pp. 1667–1672. doi:10.1109/ BigData.2015.7363937

    work page arXiv 2015

  3. [3]

    A. K. Kayhani, F. Meziane, R. Chiky, Movies Emotional Analysis Using Textual Contents, in: E. Métais, F. Meziane, H. Horacek, P. Cimiano (Eds.), Natural Language Processing and Information Systems, volume 12089, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2020, pp. 205–212. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-51310-8_19

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-51310-8_19 2020

  4. [4]

    Rasheed, Y

    Z. Rasheed, Y. Sheikh, M. Shah, On the use of computable features for film classification, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 15 (2005) 52–64. doi:10. 1109/TCSVT.2004.839993

    work page arXiv 2005

  5. [5]

    T. Guha, N. Kumar, S. S. Narayanan, S. L. Smith, Computationally deconstructing movie narratives: An informatics approach, in: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Acous- tics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2015, pp. 2264–2268. doi:10.1109/ICASSP. 2015.7178374

    arXiv 2015

  6. [6]

    Naremore, Acting in the Cinema, University of California Press, 1988

    J. Naremore, Acting in the Cinema, University of California Press, 1988

    work page 1988

  7. [7]

    E. Kim, S. Padó, R. Klinger, Investigating the Relationship between Literary Genres and Emotional Plot Development, in: Proceedings of the Joint SIGHUM Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Cultural Heritage, Social Sciences, Humanities and Liter- ature, Association for Computational Linguistics, Vancouver, Canada, 2017, pp. 17–26. doi:10.18653/v1/W17-2203

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/w17-2203 2017

  8. [8]

    Bordwell, Intensified Continuity Visual Style in Contemporary American Film, Film Quarterly 55 (2002) 16–28

    D. Bordwell, Intensified Continuity Visual Style in Contemporary American Film, Film Quarterly 55 (2002) 16–28. doi:10.1525/fq.2002.55.3.16

    work page doi:10.1525/fq.2002.55.3.16 2002

Show all 37 references
  1. [9]

    Ekman, An argument for basic emotions, Cognition and Emotion 6 (1992) 169–200

    P. Ekman, An argument for basic emotions, Cognition and Emotion 6 (1992) 169–200. doi:10.1080/02699939208411068

    1992 doi

  2. [10]

    Poria, D

    S. Poria, D. Hazarika, N. Majumder, G. Naik, E. Cambria, R. Mihalcea, MELD: A Multimodal Multi-Party Dataset for Emotion Recognition in Conversations, 2019. arXiv:1810.02508

    2019 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Pepino, P

    L. Pepino, P. Riera, L. Ferrer, Emotion Recognition from Speech Using Wav2vec 2.0 Em- beddings, 2021. arXiv:2104.03502

    2021 arXiv

  4. [12]

    J. Shor, S. Venugopalan, TRILLsson: Distilled Universal Paralinguistic Speech Representa- tions, in: Interspeech 2022, 2022, pp. 356–360. doi: 10.21437/Interspeech.2022-118. arXiv:2203.00236

    2022 arXiv

  5. [13]

    V. A. Traag, L. Waltman, N. J. van Eck, From Louvain to Leiden: Guarantee- ing well-connected communities, Scientific Reports 9 (2019) 5233. doi: 10.1038/ s41598-019-41695-z

    2019

  6. [14]

    Bamman, R

    D. Bamman, R. Samberg, R. J. So, N. Zhou, Measuring diversity in hollywood through the large-scale computational analysis of film, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2024)

    2024

  7. [15]

    C. R. Plantinga, Moving Viewers: American Film and the Spectator’s Experience, University of California Press, Berkeley, 2009

    2009

  8. [16]

    M. L. Jockers, Syuzhet: Extract sentiment and plot arcs from text (2015)

    2015

  9. [17]

    A. J. Reagan, L. Mitchell, D. Kiley, C. M. Danforth, P. S. Dodds, The emotional arcs of stories are dominated by six basic shapes, EPJ Data Science 5 (2016) 1–12. doi: 10.1140/ epjds/s13688-016-0093-1

    2016

  10. [18]

    W. E. Hipson, S. M. Mohammad, Emotion dynamics in movie dialogues, PLOS ONE 16 (2021) e0256153. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0256153

    2021 doi

  11. [19]

    Vishnubhotla, A

    K. Vishnubhotla, A. Hammond, G. Hirst, S. M. Mohammad, The Emotion Dynamics of Literary Novels, 2024. arXiv:2403.02474

    2024 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Morin, A

    O. Morin, A. Acerbi, Birth of the cool: A two-centuries decline in emotional expression in Anglophone fiction, Cognition & Emotion 31 (2017) 1663–1675. doi: 10.1080/02699931. 2016.1260528

    2017

  13. [21]

    cine choreography

    K. Pendlebury, Cutting across the century: An investigation of the close up and the long-shot in “cine choreography” since the invention of the camera, The International Journal of Screendance 4 (2014). doi:10.18061/ijsd.v4i0.4527

    2014 doi

  14. [22]

    Panovsky, Style and medium in the moving pictures, in: Film, an Anthology / Compiled and Edited by Daniel Talbot., Simon and Schuster, New York, 1959

    E. Panovsky, Style and medium in the moving pictures, in: Film, an Anthology / Compiled and Edited by Daniel Talbot., Simon and Schuster, New York, 1959

    1959

  15. [23]

    L. V. Kuleshov, Kuleshov on Film: Writings, Berkeley : University of California Press, 1974

    1974

  16. [24]

    G. B. Wilson, Levels of Achievement in Acting, Educational Theatre Journal 3 (1951) 230–236. doi:10.2307/3204063. arXiv:3204063

    1951 doi

  17. [25]

    Samothrakis, M

    S. Samothrakis, M. Fasli, Emotional Sentence Annotation Helps Predict Fiction Genre, PLOS ONE 10 (2015) e0141922. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0141922

    2015 doi

  18. [26]

    J. Zhao, T. Zhang, J. Hu, Y. Liu, Q. Jin, X. Wang, H. Li, M3ED: Multi-modal Multi-scene Multi-label Emotional Dialogue Database, in: S. Muresan, P. Nakov, A. Villavicencio (Eds.), Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1...

    2022 doi

  19. [27]

    S. M. Zahiri, J. D. Choi, Emotion Detection on TV Show Transcripts with Sequence- based Convolutional Neural Networks, 2017. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1708.04299. arXiv:1708.04299

    2017 doi arXiv

  20. [28]

    Busso, M

    C. Busso, M. Bulut, C.-C. Lee, A. Kazemzadeh, E. Mower, S. Kim, J. N. Chang, S. Lee, S. S. Narayanan, IEMOCAP: Interactive emotional dyadic motion capture database, Language Resources and Evaluation 42 (2008) 335–359. doi:10.1007/s10579-008-9076-6

    2008 doi

  21. [29]

    H. Cao, D. G. Cooper, M. K. Keutmann, R. C. Gur, A. Nenkova, R. Verma, CREMA-D: Crowd-sourced Emotional Multimodal Actors Dataset, IEEE transactions on affective computing 5 (2014) 377–390. doi:10.1109/TAFFC.2014.2336244

    2014

  22. [30]

    Barros, P

    L. Barros, P. Rodriguez, A. Ortigosa, Automatic Classification of Literature Pieces by Emotion Detection: A Study on Quevedo’s Poetry, in: 2013 Humaine Associa- tion Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction, 2013, pp. 141–146. doi:10.1109/ACII.2013.30

    2013 doi

  23. [31]

    F. M. Plaza-del-Arco, A. Curry, A. C. Curry, D. Hovy, Emotion Analysis in NLP: Trends, Gaps and Roadmap for Future Directions, 2024. arXiv:2403.01222

    2024 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Demszky, D

    D. Demszky, D. Movshovitz-Attias, J. Ko, A. Cowen, G. Nemade, S. Ravi, GoEmotions: A Dataset of Fine-Grained Emotions, 2020. arXiv:2005.00547

    2020 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Cowen, D

    A. Cowen, D. Sauter, J. L. Tracy, D. Keltner, Mapping the Passions: Toward a High- Dimensional Taxonomy of Emotional Experience and Expression, Psychological Science in the Public Interest 20 (2019) 69–90. doi:10.1177/1529100619850176

    2019 doi

  26. [34]

    J. A. Russell, A circumplex model of affect., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39 (1980) 1161–1178. doi:10.1037/h0077714

    1980 doi

  27. [35]

    Baron, S

    C. Baron, S. Carnicke, Reframing Screen Performance, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI, 2008. doi:10.3998/mpub.104480

    2008 doi

  28. [36]

    F. Zhou, F. Pianzola, Evaluation and alignment of movie events extracted via machine learning from a narratological perspective, in: 2023 Computational Humanities Research Conference, CHR 2023, CEUR Workshop Proceedings (CEUR-WS. org), 2023, pp. 49–62

    2023

  29. [37]

    Escobar Varela, G

    M. Escobar Varela, G. O. F. Parikesit, A quantitative close analysis of a theatre video recording, Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 32 (2017) 276–283. doi:10.1093/llc/ fqv069

    2017 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.