Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 85 references

Universal non-equilibrium scaling of cumulants across a critical point

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that universal Kibble–Zurek scaling functions, fitted here with Padé approximants, completely describe the non-equilibrium evolution of the order parameter and its first four cumulants in linear magnetic quenches through…

desk verdict Solid numerical extraction of universal cumulant scaling functions for Model A; the claims are slightly ahead of the evidence, but the central result holds and deserves a referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.10266 v1 pith:A3J2OXBK submitted 2024-11-15 hep-ph

Leon J. Sieke , Mattis Harhoff , Sören Schlichting , Lorenz von Smekal This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-ph
keywords dynamiccriticalphenomenanon-equilibriumphasetransitionsclassical-statisticalsimulationsKibble-ZurekscalingModelAuniversalityclasscumulantsfinite-sizelatticefieldtheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to establish that the full out-of-equilibrium response of a $\mathbb{Z}_2$-symmetric scalar field theory driven linearly through its critical point is a universal function of a single scaling variable. Using classical-statistical lattice simulations of Model A dynamics in $d=2$ and $d=3$, the authors show that the magnetization, susceptibility, skewness, and kurtosis all collapse onto rate-independent curves $f_M(x)$, $f_\chi(x)$, $f_{\kappa_3}(x)$, $f_{\kappa_4}(x)$ when plotted against $x = J/J_{\mathrm{KZ}}$, where $J_{\mathrm{KZ}}$ is the Kibble–Zurek field scale set by the quench rate. The claim matters because searches for the QCD critical point in heavy-ion collisions need quantitative predictions for how critical fluctuations evolve out of equilibrium; these functions, together with the static exponents and the dynamic exponent $z$, would supply such predictions without further dynamical simulation. The paper further claims that adding a second scaling variable, the Kibble–Zurek length divided by the system size $\xi_{\mathrm{KZ}}/L$, extends the description to finite systems and yields two-dimensional universal scaling functions.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Kibble–Zurek finite-time scaling ansatz, Eq. (19): every observable $A$ with scaling dimension $\Delta_A$ obeys $A(J,r_J) = A_0\, s^{\Delta_A} f_A(s^{1/\nu_c} J,\, s^{z+1/\nu_c} r_J)$, where $s$ is a length-rescaling parameter and $r_J$ is the dimensionless quench rate. Choosing $s = r_J^{-\nu_c/(1+\nu_c z)}$ eliminates the quench-rate argument and leaves a function of the single variable $x = J/J_{\mathrm{KZ}}$ with $J_{\mathrm{KZ}} \sim r_J^{1/(1+\nu_c z)}$. The cumulants enter only through their equilibrium scaling dimensions $\Delta_n = -\beta/\nu + (n-1)/\nu_c$, with $\nu_c=\nu/(\beta\delta)$, which sets how each observable is rescaled before the collapse is tested. The finite-size extension, Eq. (31), adds a third argument $s L^{-1}$ and produces the two-variable functions $f_A(x,\xi_{\mathrm{KZ}}/L)$ that govern the crossover from quench-limited to system-size-limited behavior.

What would settle it

One decisive test is to run the same Model A dynamics at a quench rate inside the identified dynamic scaling region but with a different lattice coupling or dissipation strength, and check whether the rescaled curves still collapse onto the Padé fits of Tables A.3 and A.4; systematic deviation would show the functions are not fully universal. Alternatively, measure the local slope of the magnetization zero-crossing over a wider range of quench rates and verify that it plateaus at $1/(1+\nu_c z)$ with the same value used to extract $z$ in this paper.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For a scalar field theory with $\mathbb{Z}_2$ symmetry in the relaxational Model A universality class, a constant-rate quench of the symmetry-breaking external field through the critical point produces non-equilibrium evolution of the order parameter and its cumulants that is described by universal Kibble–Zurek scaling functions. In $d=2$ and $d=3$, the rescaled data for the average magnetization, susceptibility, skewness, and kurtosis collapse onto single curves $f_M(x)$, $f_\chi(x)$, $f_{\kappa_3}(x)$, and $f_{\kappa_4}(x)$ with $x=J/J_{\mathrm{KZ}}$, and the paper provides closed-form Padé fits for these functions in Tables A.3 and A.4. The same scaling framework yields an independent estimate of the dynamic critical exponent from the quench-rate scaling of the magnetization zero-crossing, namely $z=2.142(49)$ in $d=2$ and $z=1.949(54)$ in $d=3$, consistent with Monte Carlo values in $d=2$ and slightly lower in $d=3$. With the system size included as an additional scaling variable, the data collapse onto two-variable functions that interpolate between infinite-volume non-equilibrium scaling and equilibrium finite-size scaling, confirming that the description remains valid when $\xi_{\mathrm{KZ}}/L$ is no longer small.

Load-bearing premise

The central assumption is that in the chosen window of quench rates and lattice sizes the Kibble–Zurek scaling form holds with negligible corrections, so that every observable depends on the quench rate only through the combination $J/J_{\mathrm{KZ}}$ (and, for finite systems, through $\xi_{\mathrm{KZ}}/L$); the paper's Appendix B documents how very slow and very fast quenches break this behavior.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Given the static critical exponents and the dynamic exponent $z$, the published Padé fits predict the time evolution of the magnetization, susceptibility, skewness and kurtosis for any linear magnetic quench through the critical point in $d=2$ and $d=3$ Model A dynamics, with no further simulation needed.
  • For finite systems, the two-variable scaling functions show that corrections become visible once $\xi_{\mathrm{KZ}}/L \gtrsim 0.5$: the transition softens, cumulant peaks shrink, and the crossing shifts toward $J=0$, eventually reproducing equilibrium finite-size scaling in the adiabatic limit.
  • The Kibble–Zurek-based estimates of the dynamic exponent provide an independent cross-check of $z$ that is consistent with Monte Carlo results in $d=2$ and slightly lower in $d=3$, signaling the systematic limitations of finite-size and fast-quench simulations.
  • Because the scaling functions are universal, they provide a concrete benchmark for comparing more realistic dynamical frameworks, such as Model H stochastic fluid dynamics in heavy-ion phenomenology, against the predicted cumulant evolution.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One could test the universality claim more stringently by changing the lattice coupling or the dissipation strength and checking whether the same Padé fits describe the rescaled data; the paper reports only a brief check of the coupling and found no improvement.
  • The same finite-time scaling machinery should apply to other control-parameter paths, such as temperature quenches or cis-critical protocols, and comparing the extracted functions across paths would show which features of the universal curves are genuinely universality-class properties rather than artifacts of the linear-field protocol.
  • The marked asymmetry of the susceptibility during the quench—a gradual departure from equilibrium before the critical point and a sharp return after—is a dynamical signature that an effective kinetic description would have to reproduce; it is not fixed by equilibrium critical exponents alone.
  • Mapping the 3D Ising scaling functions onto QCD phase-diagram trajectories would give concrete predictions for skewness and kurtosis at finite beam energies; if the QCD critical point is in Model H rather than Model A, the two sets of functions would differ in ways that could be used to identify the correct dynamical universality class.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports classical-statistical lattice simulations of a Z2-symmetric scalar field theory with Langevin dynamics (Model A) in d=2 and d=3, driven through the critical point by a linearly varying external field J(t) = -r_J t at T = T_c. Using Kibble-Zurek scaling, the authors rescale the magnetization, susceptibility, skewness, and kurtosis and observe data collapse onto universal scaling functions f_M, f_chi, f_kappa3, f_kappa4, which are parametrized by Padé approximants given in Tables A.3 and A.4. The analysis is extended to a two-variable scaling function f_A(x, xi_KZ/L) for finite system sizes in Sec. 4.3, and the dynamic critical exponent z is extracted from the scaling of the zero crossing of the magnetization in Appendix B. The abstract claims that, together with the static and dynamic critical exponents, these scaling functions fully describe the universal non-equilibrium evolution of the system near the critical point.

Significance. If the extracted scaling functions are truly universal, the paper is a valuable contribution: it provides closed-form expressions for the out-of-equilibrium evolution of order-parameter cumulants up to fourth order in a canonical dynamic universality class, with direct relevance to phenomenological modeling near the QCD critical point. The dataset is substantial (about 10^4 and 5 x 10^3 independent runs per quench rate in 2D and 3D), statistical uncertainties are bootstrap-estimated, and the Padé parametrizations make the results usable by other groups. The paper also usefully catalogs regimes where Kibble-Zurek scaling breaks down. However, the central universality claim rests on visually assessed collapse; quantitative collapse metrics, a corrections-to-scaling analysis, and a full propagation of the z uncertainty are missing. The finite-size extension is presented only as a spline wireframe without quantitative validation. These gaps currently limit the claim to effective scaling functions valid in the probed window rather than fully established universal functions.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 4.1, Figs. 3 and 4, Tables A.3 and A.4] The collapse of the rescaled data is assessed visually only; no chi-square, residual analysis, or other quantitative metric is reported for the quality of the collapse or for the Padé fits. Given the central claim that the Padé functions in Tables A.3 and A.4 fully describe the universal non-equilibrium evolution, please add a quantitative goodness-of-fit measure (e.g., chi^2 per degree of freedom against the collapsed data), report the exact x-intervals used for each fit, and test the stability of the fits when the fitting range or the Padé order is varied. Without this, the reported functions may be effective, window-dependent fits that absorb corrections to scaling and systematics from the input exponent z.
  2. [Appendix B and Sec. 4.1] The rescaling in Sec. 4.1 uses the literature values z = 2.1667(5) (d=2) and z = 2.0245(15) (d=3), while the authors' own estimates from the same data are z = 2.142(49) and z = 1.949(54), with the d=3 value about 1.4 sigma below the literature value. Since the scaling variable x = r_J^{-1/(1+nu_c z)} J depends on z, the extracted f_A inherit this uncertainty. Please quantify how the collapsed curves and Padé coefficients change when z is varied within the literature uncertainty, for example by recomputing the collapse at the 1-sigma bounds of z. Alternatively, treat z as a free parameter in a joint fit of the collapse and report the resulting f_A and confidence intervals. This is essential for assessing whether the reported functions are universal rather than specific to the chosen input z.
  3. [Sec. 4.3 and Fig. 5] The two-variable finite-size scaling function f_A(x, xi_KZ/L) is presented only as a polyharmonic spline wireframe, with no quantitative test that the rescaled data for different lattice sizes and quench rates collapse onto a single surface. Please provide a collapse metric for fixed values of xi_KZ/L (e.g., overlay slices obtained from different (L, r_J) combinations that yield the same xi_KZ/L and report the spread), and specify the reference scale L0 that defines the dimensionless size L = L/L0 in Eq. (31), including how L0 is determined from equilibrium finite-size scaling and its numerical value. Without this, the claim of a universal finite-size scaling function is not quantitatively established.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. 5] The statement that the scaling functions 'fully describe the universal non-equilibrium evolution' is stronger than what is demonstrated, given the documented breakdowns in Appendix B and the absence of a corrections-to-scaling analysis; please soften the wording or explicitly restrict the claim to the dynamic scaling region and the fitted range of x.
  2. [Sec. 3.1, Eqs. (14)-(15)] The expression for the time derivative of the relaxation time appears garbled: '(-t)^{-1}nu_c z' is likely intended in Eq. (15); please correct the typography.
  3. [Sec. 4.1, Eq. (20)] The normalization condition f_A(1,0) = f_A(0,1) = 1 is stated in Eq. (20), but only f_M(0) = 1 is actually used to fix r_J0; please clarify whether the normalization conditions for chi, kappa3, and kappa4 are also enforced or whether their overall amplitudes are fixed solely by the literature amplitudes A0.
  4. [Appendix B, Fig. B.7] The dynamic scaling region is identified 'by eye' from local slope plateaus; please state an objective criterion for the plateau selection and list the data points and quench-rate ranges used in the fit.
  5. [Sec. 5] The conclusions refer to '2+1D' and '3+1D' while the simulations are in two and three spatial dimensions; please use consistent notation throughout the paper.
  6. [Appendix C] The code and data are described but no repository or data availability statement is provided; please consider making the code and data publicly available to facilitate reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the universal scaling functions are measured via data collapse using externally supplied static and dynamic exponents; the only fitted amplitude sets normalization and does not constrain shape.

full rationale

The paper's chain is: (i) a Model A lattice action with Langevin dynamics; (ii) the standard Kibble-Zurek scaling ansatz (Eq. 19), with static exponents from Onsager/conformal bootstrap and the dynamic exponent z taken from independent Monte Carlo estimates (Nightingale–Blöte and Hasenbusch); (iii) rescaling of simulation data by those exponents and by static amplitudes taken from ref. [41]; (iv) observation of collapse and Padé fits. No step reduces to its own input: the shape of f_A(x) is not contained in the critical exponents or amplitudes, and the single fitted constant r_J0 is fixed only by the normalization f_M(0)=1, which does not determine the functional form of the scaled curves. The authors' own z estimate (Appendix B) is not used for the main collapse; literature z is, so the collapse is a genuine consistency test rather than an imposed fit. The use of static amplitudes from [41] is a self-citation, but [41] is an earlier, independently published lattice measurement of the same model and cannot force the out-of-equilibrium shape. Appendix B's admission that the dynamic scaling region is 'somewhat arbitrary' and that the d=3 z value is slightly below other theoretical estimates is a robustness limitation, not circularity. The finite-size scaling surface (Sec. 4.3) is presented as spline interpolation with observed collapse; even if no quantitative collapse metric is given, presenting a measured surface is not equivalent to assuming it. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no equation is used to define what it claims to derive, and no load-bearing uniqueness claim is imported from the authors' prior work. Therefore no circular step, Eq. X = Eq. Y by construction, or fitted-input-as-prediction was found; score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities. The central scaling functions are extracted from simulations, so the main load is carried by the standard KZM scaling ansatz and by the literature values of exponents and amplitudes. The free parameters are the non-universal amplitude r_J0 (one per dimension) and the Pade/interpolation coefficients used to represent the measured functions; these are fit parameters, not predictions.

free parameters (5)
  • r_J0 (d=2) = 3040(410)
    Non-universal amplitude of the quench rate determined by imposing f_M(0)=1; it sets the overall scale for the scaling variable x and is fitted to the data.
  • r_J0 (d=3) = 110(26)
    Same normalization condition in three dimensions.
  • Pade coefficients (d=2) = Tables A.3
    Empirical coefficients of the [4/4], [6/6], [7/7] Pade fits to the collapsed scaling functions; they are smooth interpolations of the measured universal functions.
  • Pade coefficients (d=3) = Tables A.4
    Same for three dimensions.
  • Dynamic scaling region boundaries = chosen by eye from Fig. B.7
    The range of quench rates used for the power-law fit in Appendix B is selected visually from the local-slope plateau; this is a human choice that affects the z estimate.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Scaling ansatz Eq. (19): A(J,r_J)=A0 s^{Delta_A} f_A(s^{1/nu_c} J, s^{z+1/nu_c} r_J)
    Assumes the system's critical behavior is fully described by the order parameter scaling dimension and the combination of exponents in the KZM variable; this is the central hypothesis tested by data collapse.
  • domain assumption Static critical exponents and non-universal amplitudes from literature (Tables 1, 2, refs [41,55,56,57])
    Used to rescale data and construct scaling variables. The amplitudes come from the same group's previous work [41].
  • domain assumption Dynamic critical exponent z from literature (z=2.1667(5) in d=2 [60], z=2.0245(15) in d=3 [61])
    Used to compute the scaling variables x and xi_KZ/L; the extracted z in Appendix B is then compared to these values.
  • domain assumption Classical-statistical approximation
    The fields are treated as classical variables with Langevin noise; this is valid for high occupation numbers and is standard for the critical dynamics studied here.
  • domain assumption The lattice model is in the Model A dynamic universality class
    Because order parameter and energy are not conserved by the equations of motion, the system is classified as Model A following Hohenberg and Halperin.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Universal non-equilibrium scaling of cumulants across a critical point." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/A3J2OXBK

@misc{pith2026241110266,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Universal non-equilibrium scaling of cumulants across a critical point},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/A3J2OXBK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.10266}
}
abstract

We study the critical dynamics of a scalar field theory with $Z_2$ symmetry in the dynamic universality class of Model A in two and three spatial dimensions with classical-statistical lattice simulations. In particular, we measure the non-equilibrium behavior of the system under a quench protocol in which the symmetry-breaking external field is changed at a constant rate through the critical point. Using the well-established Kibble-Zurek scaling theory we compute non-equilibrium scaling functions of cumulants of the order parameter up to fourth order. Together with the static critical exponents and the dynamic critical exponent, these fully describe the universal non-equilibrium evolution of the system near the critical point. We further extend the analysis to include finite-size effects and observe good collapse of our data onto two-dimensional universal non-equilibrium and finite-size scaling functions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.10266 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Qualitative depiction of the phase diagram of the model and the trajectory of the quench protocol in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Average magnetization M (top) and susceptibility χ (bottom) as functions of J at T = Tc for different quench rates rJ . The dashed black lines correspond to the equilibrium equations of state (8) and (9), which are approached in the limit rJ → 0. Statistical uncertainties are presented as shaded areas around the curves, however, except for the smallest quench rates in case of the susceptibility, they are too small t… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Order parameter M (top) and susceptibility χ (bottom) as functions of the external field J at T = Tc for different quench rates rJ , scaled according to the dynamic scaling relations. All curves for different quench rates collapse rather well onto a single universal scaling function which was fit using a Padé approximant of order [4/4] shown as a solid red line. normalization condition fM(0) = 1. The numerical value… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Skewness κ3 (top) and kurtosis κ4 (bottom) as functions of the external field J at T = Tc for different quench rates rJ , scaled according to the dynamic scaling relations. Universal scaling functions were fit using Padé approximants of order [n/n], which are again sho…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Finite size scaling collapse of the average magnetization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M. A. Stephanov, K. Rajagopal, E. V . Shuryak, Event-by-event fluctuations in heavy ion collisions and the QCD critical point, Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 114028. arXiv:hep-ph/9903292, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.60.114028

    arXiv 1999

  2. [2]

    Berdnikov, K

    B. Berdnikov, K. Rajagopal, Slowing out-of-equilibrium near the QCD critical point, Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 105017. arXiv:hep-ph/ 9912274, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.61.105017

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.61.105017 2000

  3. [3]

    P. C. Hohenberg, B. I. Halperin, Theory of Dynamic Critical Phenomena, Rev. Mod. Phys. 49 (1977) 435–479. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys. 49.435

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys 1977

  4. [4]

    D. T. Son, M. A. Stephanov, Dynamic universality class of the QCD critical point, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 056001.arXiv:hep-ph/0401052, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.70.056001

    arXiv 2004

  5. [5]

    J. B. Bell, A. L. Garcia, S. A. Williams, Numerical methods for the stochastic landau-lifshitz navier-stokes equations, Phys. Rev. E 76 (2007) 016708. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.76.016708

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.76.016708 2007

  6. [6]

    Donev, J

    A. Donev, J. B. Bell, A. de la Fuente, A. L. Garcia, Diffusive transport by thermal velocity fluctuations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 204501. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.204501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.204501 2011

  7. [7]

    BalboaUsabiaga, J

    F. BalboaUsabiaga, J. B. Bell, R. Delgado-Buscalioni, A. Donev, T. G. Fai, B. E. Gri ffith, C. S. Peskin, Staggered schemes for fluctuating hydrodynamics, Multiscale Modeling & Simulation 10 (4) (2012) 1369–1408. doi:10.1137/120864520

    doi:10.1137/120864520 2012

  8. [8]

    Hydrodynamic fluctuations and dissipation in an integrated dynamical model

    K. Murase, T. Hirano, Hydrodynamic fluctuations and dissipation in an integrated dynamical model, Nucl. Phys. A 956 (2016) 276–279. arXiv:1601.02260, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2016.01.011

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

Show all 85 references
  1. [9]

    Hirano, R

    T. Hirano, R. Kurita, K. Murase, Hydrodynamic fluctuations of entropy in one-dimensionally expanding system, Nucl. Phys. A 984 (2019) 44–67. arXiv:1809.04773, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2019.01.010

    2019 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Nahrgang, M

    M. Nahrgang, M. Bluhm, T. Schäfer, S. Bass, Toward the description of fluid dynamical fluctuations in heavy-ion collisions, Acta Phys. Polon. Supp. 10 (2017) 687. arXiv:1704.03553, doi:10.5506/APhysPolBSupp.10.687

    2017 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Bluhm, M

    M. Bluhm, M. Nahrgang, T. Schäfer, S. A. Bass, Fluctuating fluid dynamics for the QGP in the LHC and BES era, EPJ Web Conf. 171 (2018) 16004. arXiv:1804.03493, doi:10.1051/epjconf/201817116004

    2018 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Singh, C

    M. Singh, C. Shen, S. McDonald, S. Jeon, C. Gale, Hydrodynamic Fluctuations in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions, Nucl. Phys. A 982 (2019) 319–322. arXiv:1807.05451, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2018.10.061

    2019 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Chattopadhyay, J

    C. Chattopadhyay, J. Ott, T. Schaefer, V . V . Skokov, Simulations of Stochastic Fluid Dynamics near a Critical Point in the Phase Diagram, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (3) (2024) 032301. arXiv:2403.10608, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.032301

    2024 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Akamatsu, A

    Y . Akamatsu, A. Mazeliauskas, D. Teaney, A kinetic regime of hydrodynamic fluctuations and long time tails for a Bjorken expansion, Phys. Rev. C 95 (1) (2017) 014909. arXiv:1606.07742, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.95.014909

    2017 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Akamatsu, D

    Y . Akamatsu, D. Teaney, F. Yan, Y . Yin, Transits of the QCD critical point, Phys. Rev. C 100 (4) (2019) 044901. arXiv:1811.05081, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.100.044901

    2019 arXiv

  8. [16]

    X. An, G. Basar, M. Stephanov, H.-U. Yee, Relativistic Hydrodynamic Fluctuations, Phys. Rev. C 100 (2) (2019) 024910. arXiv: 1902.09517, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.100.024910

    2019 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Paech, H

    K. Paech, H. Stoecker, A. Dumitru, Hydrodynamics near a chiral critical point, Phys. Rev. C 68 (2003) 044907. arXiv:nucl-th/0302013, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.68.044907

    2003 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Nahrgang, S

    M. Nahrgang, S. Leupold, C. Herold, M. Bleicher, Nonequilibrium chiral fluid dynamics including dissipation and noise, Phys. Rev. C 84 (2011) 024912. arXiv:1105.0622, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.84.024912

    2011 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Nahrgang, C

    M. Nahrgang, C. Herold, S. Leupold, I. Mishustin, M. Bleicher, The impact of dissipation and noise on fluctuations in chiral fluid dynamics, J. Phys. G 40 (2013) 055108. arXiv:1105.1962, doi:10.1088/0954-3899/40/5/055108

    2013 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Herold, M

    C. Herold, M. Nahrgang, I. Mishustin, M. Bleicher, Chiral fluid dynamics with explicit propagation of the Polyakov loop, Phys. Rev. C 87 (1) (2013) 014907. arXiv:1301.1214, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.87.014907

    2013 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Herold, M

    C. Herold, M. Nahrgang, Y . Yan, C. Kobdaj, Net-baryon number variance and kurtosis within nonequilibrium chiral fluid dynamics, J. Phys. G 41 (11) (2014) 115106. arXiv:1407.8277, doi:10.1088/0954-3899/41/11/115106

    2014 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Stephanov, Y

    M. Stephanov, Y . Yin, Hydrodynamics with parametric slowing down and fluctuations near the critical point, Phys. Rev. D 98 (3) (2018) 036006. arXiv:1712.10305, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.036006

    2018 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Rajagopal, G

    K. Rajagopal, G. Ridgway, R. Weller, Y . Yin, Understanding the out-of-equilibrium dynamics near a critical point in the QCD phase diagram, Phys. Rev. D 102 (9) (2020) 094025. arXiv:1908.08539, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.094025. 16

    2020 arXiv

  16. [24]

    L. Du, U. Heinz, K. Rajagopal, Y . Yin, Fluctuation dynamics near the QCD critical point, Phys. Rev. C 102 (5) (2020) 054911. arXiv: 2004.02719, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.102.054911

    2020 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Bluhm, et al., Dynamics of critical fluctuations: Theory – phenomenology – heavy-ion collisions, Nucl

    M. Bluhm, et al., Dynamics of critical fluctuations: Theory – phenomenology – heavy-ion collisions, Nucl. Phys. A 1003 (2020) 122016. arXiv:2001.08831, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2020.122016

    2020 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Jiang, S

    L. Jiang, S. Wu, H. Song, Dynamical fluctuations in critical regime and across the 1st order phase transition, Nucl. Phys. A 967 (2017) 441–444. arXiv:1704.04765, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2017.06.047

    2017 arXiv

  19. [27]

    S. Wu, Z. Wu, H. Song, Universal scaling of the σ field and net-protons from Langevin dynamics of model A, Phys. Rev. C 99 (6) (2019) 064902. arXiv:1811.09466, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.99.064902

    2019 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Jiang, J

    L. Jiang, J. Chao, Non-equilibrium cumulants within model A from crossover to first-order phase transition side, Eur. Phys. J. A 59 (2) (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    Sakaida, M

    M. Sakaida, M. Asakawa, H. Fujii, M. Kitazawa, Dynamical evolution of critical fluctuations and its observation in heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C 95 (6) (2017) 064905. arXiv:1703.08008, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.95.064905

    2017 arXiv

  22. [30]

    arXiv:2112.04667, doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-023-00949-1

    arXiv

  23. [31]

    Nahrgang, M

    M. Nahrgang, M. Bluhm, T. Schaefer, S. A. Bass, Diffusive dynamics of critical fluctuations near the QCD critical point, Phys. Rev. D 99 (11) (2019) 116015. arXiv:1804.05728, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.116015

    2019 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Nahrgang, M

    M. Nahrgang, M. Bluhm, Modeling the diffusive dynamics of critical fluctuations near the QCD critical point, Phys. Rev. D 102 (9) (2020) 094017. arXiv:2007.10371, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.094017

    2020

  25. [33]

    Rougemont, R

    R. Rougemont, R. Critelli, J. Noronha, Nonhydrodynamic quasinormal modes and equilibration of a baryon dense holographic QGP with a critical point, Phys. Rev. D 98 (3) (2018) 034028. arXiv:1804.00189, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.034028

    2018 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Mukherjee, R

    S. Mukherjee, R. Venugopalan, Y . Yin, Real time evolution of non-Gaussian cumulants in the QCD critical regime, Phys. Rev. C 92 (3) (2015) 034912. arXiv:1506.00645, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.92.034912

    2015 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Mukherjee, R

    S. Mukherjee, R. Venugopalan, Y . Yin, Universal off-equilibrium scaling of critical cumulants in the QCD phase diagram, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (22) (2016) 222301. arXiv:1605.09341, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.222301

    2016 arXiv

  28. [36]

    M. A. Stephanov, Non-Gaussian fluctuations near the QCD critical point, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 032301. arXiv:0809.3450, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.032301

    2009 arXiv

  29. [37]

    M. A. Stephanov, On the sign of kurtosis near the QCD critical point, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 052301. arXiv:1104.1627, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.052301

    2011 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Nahrgang, The QCD Critical Point and Related Observables, Nucl

    M. Nahrgang, The QCD Critical Point and Related Observables, Nucl. Phys. A 956 (2016) 83–90. arXiv:1601.07437, doi:10.1016/j. nuclphysa.2016.02.074

    2016 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Aarts, Spectral function at high temperature in the classical approximation, Phys

    G. Aarts, Spectral function at high temperature in the classical approximation, Phys. Lett. B 518 (2001) 315–322. arXiv:hep-ph/0108125, doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(01)01081-4

    2001 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Berges, S

    J. Berges, S. Schlichting, D. Sexty, Dynamic critical phenomena from spectral functions on the lattice, Nucl. Phys. B 832 (2010) 228–240. arXiv:0912.3135, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2010.02.007

    2010 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Schlichting, D

    S. Schlichting, D. Smith, L. von Smekal, Spectral functions and critical dynamics of theO(4) model from classical-statistical lattice simulations, Nucl. Phys. B 950 (2020) 114868. arXiv:1908.00912, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2019.114868

    2020 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Schweitzer, S

    D. Schweitzer, S. Schlichting, L. von Smekal, Spectral functions and dynamic critical behavior of relativistic Z2 theories, Nucl. Phys. B 960 (2020) 115165. arXiv:2007.03374, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2020.115165

    2020 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Schweitzer, S

    D. Schweitzer, S. Schlichting, L. von Smekal, Critical dynamics of relativistic di ffusion, Nucl. Phys. B 984 (2022) 115944. arXiv: 2110.01696, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2022.115944

    2022 arXiv

  36. [44]

    T. W. B. Kibble, Topology of Cosmic Domains and Strings, J. Phys. A 9 (1976) 1387–1398. doi:10.1088/0305-4470/9/8/029

    1976 doi

  37. [45]

    W. H. Zurek, Cosmological Experiments in Superfluid Helium?, Nature 317 (1985) 505–508. doi:10.1038/317505a0

    1985 doi

  38. [46]

    W. H. Zurek, Cosmological experiments in condensed matter systems, Phys. Rept. 276 (1996) 177–221. arXiv:cond-mat/9607135, doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(96)00009-9

    1996 arXiv

  39. [47]

    S. Gong, F. Zhong, X. Huang, S. Fan, Finite-time scaling via linear driving, New Journal of Physics 12 (4) (2010) 043036. doi:10.1088/ 1367-2630/12/4/043036

    2010

  40. [48]

    Huang, S

    Y . Huang, S. Yin, B. Feng, F. Zhong, Kibble-Zurek mechanism and finite-time scaling, Phys. Rev. B 90 (13) (2014) 134108. arXiv: 1407.6612, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.90.134108

    2014 arXiv

  41. [49]

    B. Feng, S. Yin, F. Zhong, Theory of driven nonequilibrium critical phenomena, Phys. Rev. B 94 (14) (2016) 144103. arXiv:1604.04345, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.94.144103

    2016 arXiv

  42. [50]

    del Campo, W

    A. del Campo, W. H. Zurek, Universality of phase transition dynamics: Topological Defects from Symmetry Breaking, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 29 (8) (2014) 1430018. arXiv:1310.1600, doi:10.1142/S0217751X1430018X

    2014 arXiv

  43. [51]

    C.-W. Liu, A. Polkovnikov, A. W. Sandvik, Dynamic scaling at classical phase transitions approached through non-equilibrium quenching, Phys. Rev. B 89 (5) (2014) 054307. arXiv:1310.6327, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.89.054307

    2014 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Dziarmaga, Dynamics of a quantum phase transition and relaxation to a steady state, Advances In Physics 59 (12 2009)

    J. Dziarmaga, Dynamics of a quantum phase transition and relaxation to a steady state, Advances In Physics 59 (12 2009). doi:10.1080/ 00018732.2010.514702

    2009

  45. [53]

    S. Yin, P. Mai, F. Zhong, Nonequilibrium quantum criticality in open systems: The dissipation rate as an additional indispensable scaling variable, Phys. Rev. B 89 (2014) 094108. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.89.094108

    2014 doi

  46. [54]

    Chandran, A

    A. Chandran, A. Erez, S. S. Gubser, S. L. Sondhi, Kibble-Zurek problem: Universality and the scaling limit, Phys. Rev. B 86 (6) (2012) 064304. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.86.064304

    2012 doi

  47. [55]

    Schweitzer, Dynamic Critical Phenomena in the Classical Approximation on a Lattice, Doctoral dissertation, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen (2021)

    D. Schweitzer, Dynamic Critical Phenomena in the Classical Approximation on a Lattice, Doctoral dissertation, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen (2021). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.22029/jlupub-79

    2021 doi

  48. [56]

    Onsager, Crystal statistics

    L. Onsager, Crystal statistics. 1. A Two-dimensional model with an order disorder transition, Phys. Rev. 65 (1944) 117–149. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.65.117

    1944 doi

  49. [57]

    F. Kos, D. Poland, D. Simmons-Duffin, A. Vichi, Precision Islands in the Ising and O(N) Models, JHEP 08 (2016) 036. arXiv:1603.04436, doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2016)036

    2016 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Komargodski, D

    Z. Komargodski, D. Simmons-Du ffin, The Random-Bond Ising Model in 2.01 and 3 Dimensions, J. Phys. A 50 (15) (2017) 154001. 17 arXiv:1603.04444, doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aa6087

    2017 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Pelissetto, E

    A. Pelissetto, E. Vicari, Critical phenomena and renormalization group theory, Phys. Rept. 368 (2002) 549–727.arXiv:cond-mat/0012164, doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(02)00219-3

    2002 arXiv

  52. [60]

    B. I. Halperin, P. C. Hohenberg, S.-k. Ma, Calculation of Dynamic Critical Properties Using Wilson’s Expansion Methods, Phys. Rev. Lett. 29 (23) (1972) 1548. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.29.1548

    1972 doi

  53. [61]

    M. P. Nightingale, H. W. J. Blöte, Monte carlo computation of correlation times of independent relaxation modes at criticality, Phys. Rev. B 62 (2000) 1089–1101. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.62.1089

    2000 doi

  54. [62]

    Hasenbusch, Dynamic critical exponent z of the three-dimensional ising universality class: Monte carlo simulations of the improved blume-capel model, Phys

    M. Hasenbusch, Dynamic critical exponent z of the three-dimensional ising universality class: Monte carlo simulations of the improved blume-capel model, Phys. Rev. E 101 (2020) 022126. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.101.022126

    2020 doi

  55. [63]

    Huang, Statistical Mechanics, 2nd Ed, Wiley India Pvt

    K. Huang, Statistical Mechanics, 2nd Ed, Wiley India Pvt. Limited, 2008

    2008

  56. [64]

    Panagopoulos, E

    H. Panagopoulos, E. Vicari, O ff-equilibrium scaling behaviors across first-order transitions, Phys. Rev. E 92 (2015) 062107. arXiv: 1508.02503, doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.92.062107

    2015 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Pelissetto, E

    A. Pelissetto, E. Vicari, Dynamic Off-Equilibrium Transition in Systems Slowly Driven across Thermal First-Order Phase Transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (3) (2017) 030602. arXiv:1607.01547, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.030602

    2017 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Panagopoulos, A

    H. Panagopoulos, A. Pelissetto, E. Vicari, Dynamic scaling behavior at thermal first-order transitions in systems with disordered boundary conditions, Phys. Rev. D 98 (7) (2018) 074507. arXiv:1805.04241, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.074507

    2018 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Scopa, S

    S. Scopa, S. Wald, Dynamical off-equilibrium scaling across magnetic first-order phase transitions, J. Stat. Mech. 1811 (11) (2018) 113205. arXiv:1806.00866, doi:10.1088/1742-5468/aaeb46

    2018 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Zhong, Universal scaling in first-order phase transitions mixed with nucleation and growth, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 30 (44) (2018) 445401

    F. Zhong, Universal scaling in first-order phase transitions mixed with nucleation and growth, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 30 (44) (2018) 445401. doi:10.1088/1361-648X/aae3cc

    2018 doi

  61. [69]

    Fontana, Scaling behavior of Ising systems at first-order transitions, J

    P. Fontana, Scaling behavior of Ising systems at first-order transitions, J. Stat. Mech. 1906 (6) (2019) 063206. arXiv:1903.01513, doi:10.1088/1742-5468/ab16c7

    2019 arXiv

  62. [70]

    J. J. Rehr, N. D. Mermin, Revised Scaling Equation of State at the Liquid-Vapor Critical Point, Phys. Rev. A 8 (1973) 472–480. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.8.472

    1973 doi

  63. [71]

    Nonaka, M

    C. Nonaka, M. Asakawa, Hydrodynamical evolution near the QCD critical end point, Phys. Rev. C 71 (2005) 044904. arXiv:nucl-th/ 0410078, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.71.044904

    2005 doi

  64. [72]

    Parotto, M

    P. Parotto, M. Bluhm, D. Mroczek, M. Nahrgang, J. Noronha-Hostler, K. Rajagopal, C. Ratti, T. Schäfer, M. Stephanov, QCD equation of state matched to lattice data and exhibiting a critical point singularity, Phys. Rev. C 101 (3) (2020) 034901. arXiv:1805.05249, doi:10.1103/Phy...

    2020 arXiv

  65. [73]

    M. S. Pradeep, M. Stephanov, Universality of the critical point mapping between Ising model and QCD at small quark mass, Phys. Rev. D 100 (5) (2019) 056003. arXiv:1905.13247, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.056003

    2019 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Mroczek, A

    D. Mroczek, A. R. Nava Acuna, J. Noronha-Hostler, P. Parotto, C. Ratti, M. A. Stephanov, Quartic cumulant of baryon number in the presence of a QCD critical point, Phys. Rev. C 103 (3) (2021) 034901. arXiv:2008.04022, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.103.034901

    2021 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Zeng, C.-Y

    H.-B. Zeng, C.-Y . Xia, A. del Campo, Universal Breakdown of Kibble-Zurek Scaling in Fast Quenches across a Phase Transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (6) (2023) 060402. arXiv:2204.13529, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.060402

    2023 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Hasenbusch, A monte carlo study of leading order scaling corrections of 4 theory on a three-dimensional lattice, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 32 (26) (1999) 4851

    M. Hasenbusch, A monte carlo study of leading order scaling corrections of 4 theory on a three-dimensional lattice, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 32 (26) (1999) 4851. doi:10.1088/0305-4470/32/26/304

    1999 doi

  69. [77]

    L. T. Adzhemyan, D. A. Evdokimov, M. Hnati ˇc, E. V . Ivanova, M. V . Kompaniets, A. Kudlis, D. V . Zakharov, The dynamic critical exponent z for 2d and 3d Ising models from five-loopε expansion, Phys. Lett. A 425 (2022) 127870. arXiv:2111.04719, doi:10.1016/ j.physleta.2021.127870

    2022 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Duclut, B

    C. Duclut, B. Delamotte, Frequency regulators for the nonperturbative renormalization group: A general study and the model a as a benchmark, Phys. Rev. E 95 (2017) 012107. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.95.012107

    2017 doi

  71. [79]

    M. J. Dunlavy, D. Venus, Critical slowing down in the two-dimensional ising model measured using ferromagnetic ultrathin films, Phys. Rev. B 71 (2005) 144406. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.71.144406

    2005 doi

  72. [80]

    Livet, M

    F. Livet, M. Fèvre, G. Beutier, F. Zontone, Y . Chushkin, M. Sutton, Measuring the dynamical critical exponent of an ordering alloy using x-ray photon correlation spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. B 98 (2018) 014202. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.98.014202

    2018 doi

  73. [81]

    Bezanson, A

    J. Bezanson, A. Edelman, S. Karpinski, V . B. Shah, Julia: A fresh approach to numerical computing, SIAM Review 59 (1) (2017) 65–98. doi:10.1137/141000671

    2017 doi

  74. [82]

    Omlin, L

    S. Omlin, L. Räss, High-performance xpu stencil computations in julia (2022). arXiv:2211.15634

    2022

  75. [83]

    Danisch, J

    S. Danisch, J. Krumbiegel, Makie.jl: Flexible high-performance data visualization for Julia, Journal of Open Source Software 6 (65) (2021)

    2021

  76. [85]

    Besard, C

    T. Besard, C. Foket, B. De Sutter, Effective extensible programming: Unleashing Julia on GPUs, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems (2018). arXiv:1712.03112, doi:10.1109/TPDS.2018.2872064. 18

    2018 arXiv

  77. [3349]

    doi:10.21105/joss.03349

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.