Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Transmission eigenvalue distribution in disordered media from radiant field theory

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A matrix transport equation derived from a replicated field theory yields the transmission eigenvalue distribution in disordered media, unifying the quasiballistic and diffusive regimes and reproducing the bimodal law in the diffusive…

desk verdict A serious, novel field theory for transmission eigenvalue statistics with real numerical benchmarks, but the single-replica reduction is a genuine gap that needs tightening before I'd fully trust the quasiballistic predictions. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.10355 v3 pith:N37THSU2 submitted 2024-11-15 math-ph cond-mat.dis-nnmath.MPphysics.optics

David Gaspard , Arthur Goetschy This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phcond-mat.dis-nnmath.MPphysics.optics
keywords transmissioneigenvaluesdisorderedmediafieldtheorymatrixradianceradiativetransferquasiballistictransportreplicamethodwavefrontshaping
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to compute the full distribution of transmission eigenvalues—the weights of the open channels of coherent transmission through a disordered medium—starting only from the statistics of the random potential, without the isotropy or slice-stacking assumptions of standard random-matrix transport theory. The proposed framework, radiant field theory, expresses the disorder-averaged generating function through the solution of a self-consistent transport equation for a $2\times 2$ matrix radiance $g(\Omega,\mathbf{r})$. Solving this equation yields the density $\rho(T)$ for quasiballistic waveguides, where random-matrix theory fails, and for infinite slabs, an open geometry inaccessible to direct wave-equation solvers; in the diffusive limit it returns the universal bimodal law. A sympathetic reader would care because this is a first microscopic route to transmission statistics and, potentially, to wavefront-shaping observables in realistic disordered samples.

What carries the argument

The central object is the matrix radiance $g(\Omega,\mathbf{r})$, a $2\times 2$ matrix defined as a direction-resolved integral of the Wigner transform of the retarded Green's function over the momentum shell at $k$. It generalizes the scalar specific intensity of radiative transfer: like a radiance it depends on position and propagation direction $\Omega$, but its off-diagonal entries carry the phase coherence needed to describe transmission eigenchannels. The load-bearing mechanism is the matrix transport equation (97), a quasiclassical transport equation that combines ballistic streaming with a self-consistent scattering term $\frac{1}{2\ell}[\tilde{Q},g]$ and contact terms at the two coupling surfaces; its self-consistency condition $\tilde{Q}(\mathbf{r}) = \oint d\Omega\, g(\Omega,\mathbf{r})/S_d$ closes the problem. The equation is solved numerically through a parametrization that enforces $g^2=1$ automatically and converts the evolution into linear equations for two-component vectors, integrated with an exponential integrator. This machinery turns the microscopic Gaussian disorder into a tractable transport description valid beyond the diffusion limit.

What would settle it

A practical falsifier: in a wide but finite disordered waveguide with absorbing lateral boundaries, solve the stationary wave equation (2) for many disorder realizations at optical thickness $L/\ell = 0.2$ and compare the measured transmission eigenvalue density to the RFT curves of Fig. 5. The theory predicts a lobe structure near $T=0$ from grazing modes; if these lobes are absent or their locations scale differently with width, the semiclassical treatment of grazing modes is wrong. A more direct check: evaluate the exact replica integral retaining the Jacobian $\Delta(Q_1,\dots,Q_R)$ for a system with dimensionless conductance $A$ of order 1; the discrepancy with the single-replica saddle point marks where the theory breaks down.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the disorder-averaged transmission eigenvalue density can be obtained from the solution of the semiclassical matrix transport equation (97) for the matrix radiance $g(\Omega,\mathbf{r})$. The derivation starts from a replicated Gaussian field theory for the generating function $F(\gamma)$; in the nonlocalized regime (large dimensionless conductance $A\gg 1$) replica interactions are negligible, the saddle point reduces to a single replica, and the saddle-point equations become a self-consistent equation for the $2\times 2$ matrix field $\tilde{Q}(\mathbf{r})$. Wigner transforming this equation in the semiclassical limit gives the transport equation, whose solution $g$ satisfies $g^2=1$ and $\operatorname{tr} g=0$, with boundary conditions that fix only three of four matrix components per direction. Inserting $g$ into the generating function gives $\rho(T) = \pi^{-1} T^{-2} \operatorname{Im} F(1/T+i0^+)$. Numerical solutions reproduce the bimodal law at $L/\ell = 5$, produce shape-dependent distributions in quasiballistic waveguides, and access the infinite-slab limit with a lobe structure near $T=0$ that the paper attributes to grazing modes.

Load-bearing premise

The whole derivation assumes that the disorder average is governed by a single replica of the replicated field theory, i.e. that interactions between replicas are negligible; if that fails—as it does for strongly localized systems—the matrix transport equation and all derived distributions are invalid.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In the quasiballistic regime ($L \lesssim \ell$), the distribution $\rho(T)$ is no longer universal: it depends on the waveguide shape through the direction weights $\mu_n$, and the accompanying analytical approximation (D14)–(D16) is accurate near the peak at $T=1$.
  • The same matrix transport equation describes an infinite slab, a geometry inaccessible to direct simulation of the wave equation; the resulting density extends down to $T=0$ and acquires a lobe structure from grazing modes as the waveguide width grows.
  • In the diffusive limit the framework recovers the bimodal law $\rho(T) = \bar{T}/(2T\sqrt{1-T})$, showing that the microscopic theory contains the universal random-matrix result as a special case.
  • The derivation supplies a route to observables beyond the eigenvalue distribution, such as interior eigenchannel profiles and energy-deposition statistics, and to physical effects including absorption and incomplete channel control.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves implicit that the same matrix radiance $g(\Omega,\mathbf{r})$ could be evaluated at interior positions to compute the spatial intensity profile of an optimized wavefront—an observable that the current theory, unlike random-matrix approaches, has the microscopic machinery to address directly.
  • A quantitative test that the paper does not run: because the quasiballistic solution depends on the direction weights $\mu_n$ only through the directional means (E9), two waveguides with different cross-section shapes but the same set of weights should exhibit identical quasiballistic transmission eigenvalue densities.
  • The grazing-mode lobes near $T=0$ are a prediction that could be probed in wide finite waveguides with absorbing lateral boundaries; if localization suppresses or shifts these lobes, the single-replica approximation would be the likely culprit, exactly as the paper warns.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents a field-theoretic framework, radiant field theory (RFT), for the statistics of transmission eigenvalues in disordered waveguides and slabs. Starting from a Gaussian disorder model and the Fisher-Lee formula, the authors represent the generating function as a functional integral, apply the replica trick, and approximate the replicated functional integral by a single replica in the nonlocalized regime. The saddle point of the resulting action is a self-consistent Gorkov-type equation, which is then converted by a Wigner transform into a semiclassical matrix transport equation for a 2x2 matrix radiance g(Omega,r), Eq. (97). The central claim is that this equation, together with the boundary conditions Eqs. (116)-(117) and the generating-function relation Eq. (76), yields rho(T) in both quasiballistic and diffusive regimes and for infinite-slab geometries. Numerical solutions are presented for waveguides and slabs; the diffusive limit recovers the bimodal law, while the quasiballistic regime shows shape-dependent, non-universal features.

Significance. The paper is ambitious and potentially important. If the derivation is valid, RFT provides a microscopic transport theory that goes beyond the diffusive DMPK universality class while retaining no fitted parameters; the reported predictions are quantitative and falsifiable by wave-equation simulations, and the companion Letter [31] provides part of that comparison. Strengths include a fully written derivation with multiple internal checks: the reduction to the nonlinear sigma model in the diffusive limit, the recovery of the bimodal law, and the agreement between the modal transport equation and the direct saddle-point solution in Fig. 3. The transport-equation solver Ebsolve is made publicly available. The main risk is the single-replica approximation and the convergence of the iterative solution in the very regimes (quasiballistic, grazing modes) where the new predictions live; these are not controlled in the manuscript.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. II.E, Eq. (53)] The single-replica approximation is asserted, not proved. The Jacobian Delta(Q_1,...,Q_R) in Eq. (47) is a Vandermonde-type factor whose logarithm contains a sum over log|Q_i-Q_j|, and it vanishes at the replica-symmetric point Q_1=...=Q_R that the saddle-point argument selects. Through the replica derivative in Eq. (33), this factor can contribute to <ln Z> and hence to F(gamma) in Eq. (76), but the paper never bounds this contribution or shows that it is gamma-independent. Since Eq. (97) and all derived rho(T) rest on Eq. (53), this is a load-bearing gap.
  2. [Appendix C] The convergence and stability proof for the self-consistent iteration is explicitly limited to the diffusive regime. The text states that the key Green's function expression (C8) holds exactly only for a constant field Q(0) and that the authors assume it also holds for a spatially varying field in the diffusive regime (ell << L). The numerical results in Secs. IV A and IV B include quasiballistic optical thicknesses L/ell = 0.05 and 0.2, so the convergence of the iterative algorithm in the regime of the new predictions is not covered by the proof. A numerical or analytical demonstration of convergence for quasiballistic parameters is needed.
  3. [Sec. IV B, Fig. 4] The T -> 0 region of the infinite-slab distribution is dominated by grazing modes (mu -> 0), and the paper itself warns that these modes may be affected by localization, which is outside the theory. Because the single-replica approximation is least controlled for exactly these near-grazing trajectories, the quantitative T -> 0 tail should be clearly marked as outside the domain of validity, or supported by an additional estimate that addresses the replica-interaction contribution in this limit.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Appendix F, text below Eq. (F9)] The sentence 'a+ and b- must be integrated in the forward direction and a+ and b- in the backward direction' contains a typo; the second pair should be a- and b+.
  2. [Appendix D, Eq. (D14)] The notation <f>_0^+ is used without reminding the reader of the directional-average definition in Eq. (94); a brief reminder would improve readability.
  3. [Sec. II.E] The sentence 'It is clear from the above calculation that...' relies on an order-of-magnitude argument; please state more precisely the domain of validity in terms of L, ell, and N_p, and in what sense Eq. (53) is expected to hold.
  4. [Fig. 6] The caption does not define the color code or line styles for the matrix elements Re Q11, Im Q11, Re Q12, Im Q12, Re Q21, and Im Q21; please add a legend or explicit statement in the caption.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the RFT equations are solved from the stated disorder model with no fitted parameters and are checked against external benchmarks; the uncontrolled replica reduction is a validity risk, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The central derivation chain (Fisher-Lee formula (18) into the replicated generating function (32)/(45), single-replica saddle point (55), semiclassical matrix transport equation (97), generating function (76), and density (24)) is self-contained: the inputs are the Gaussian disorder statistics (3), the mean free path relation (5), and the geometry, with no parameter fitted to the target transmission eigenvalue distribution. The diffusive-limit agreement with the bimodal law (Sec. IV A, L/l=5) is an external benchmark, and the companion Letter [31] is cited for independent wave-equation comparison rather than to define Eqs. (97) or (76). The discard of the replica Jacobian in Eq. (53) is justified by the A>>1 estimate of Eqs. (50)-(51); whether that estimate is controlled in the quasiballistic or grazing-mode regimes is a correctness and approximation-validity question, not a circular one, and the paper explicitly flags the infinite-slab T near 0 region as localization-sensitive in Sec. IV B. No equation is defined in terms of the predicted rho(T), no fitted quantity is relabeled as a prediction, and no load-bearing claim reduces to a self-citation. Consequently, no circular step is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The derivation rests on several background assumptions: the replica method, the single-replica reduction, the semiclassical smoothness of Q, the neglect of evanescent modes, and the white-noise disorder model. No free parameters are fitted to the output distribution; the mean free path is an input. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Replica method and analytic continuation R to 0 are valid for this disorder average (Eq. 33).
    Used in Sec. II.D to compute <ln Z>; replica tricks are not rigorously justified for all regimes, and the paper relies on them before the single-replica reduction.
  • ad hoc to paper Single-replica approximation: replica interactions are negligible when A ~ Np l/L >> 1 (Eq. 53 in Sec. II.E).
    This reduction is central to deriving the saddle-point equation (58) and the transport equation (97). It excludes the strongly localized regime, which the paper acknowledges.
  • domain assumption The saddle-point field Q(r) varies slowly at the wavelength scale, justifying the semiclassical/Wigner expansion (Eq. 82).
    Invoked in Sec. III.A and verified numerically in Appendix B only for smooth disorder edges; sharp obstacles produce oscillations that are smoothed out by assumption.
  • domain assumption Evanescent transverse modes can be neglected in the waveguide (Sec. IV.A and Appendix E).
    The modal transport equation (E3) sums only propagating modes; evanescent modes are 'outside the scope of the semiclassical theory' and this may affect quasiballistic predictions.
  • domain assumption Delta-correlated Gaussian white-noise disorder with local variance alpha(r), Eqs. (3)-(4), is an accurate model for the medium.
    This microscopic model is the basis of the field theory; it sets scattering isotropy and the relation l = 1/(pi nu k alpha).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Transmission eigenvalue distribution in disordered media from radiant field theory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/N37THSU2

@misc{pith2026241110355,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Transmission eigenvalue distribution in disordered media from radiant field theory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/N37THSU2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.10355}
}
abstract

We develop a field-theoretic framework, called radiant field theory, to calculate the distribution of transmission eigenvalues for coherent wave propagation in disordered media. At its core is a self-consistent transport equation for a $2\times 2$ matrix radiance, reminiscent of the radiative transfer equation but capable of capturing coherent interference effects. This framework goes beyond the limitations of the Dorokhov-Mello-Pereyra-Kumar theory by accounting for both quasiballistic and diffusive regimes. It also handles open geometries inaccessible to standard wave-equation solvers such as infinite slabs. Analytical and numerical solutions are provided for these geometries, highlighting in particular the impact of the waveguide shape and the grazing modes on the transmission eigenvalue distribution in the quasiballistic regime. By removing the macroscopic assumptions of random matrix models, this microscopic theory enables the calculation of transmission statistics in regimes previously out of reach. It also provides a foundation for exploring more complex observables and physical effects relevant to wavefront shaping in realistic disordered systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.10355 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic representation of the two geometries con [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Boundary conditions on the matrix radiance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Transmission eigenvalue distribution in a two [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Transmission eigenvalue distribution through a 2D [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Normalized field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Behavior of the Schopohl parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Radiant Field Theory: A Transport Approach to Shaped Wave Transmission through Disordered Media

    math-ph 2024-11 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    A new radiant field theory derives the transmission eigenvalue distribution for waves through disordered waveguides beyond the diffusive regime.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [31]

    Goetschy and A

    A. Goetschy and A. D. Stone, Filtering Random Matri- ces: The Effect of Incomplete Channel Control in Multi- ple Scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 063901 (2013)

    2013

  2. [1]

    Set γ = T −1 + i0+ and initialize ˜Q(x) = 0

  3. [2]

    See Appendix F for more details on this step

    Iterate until ˜Q(x) converges: (a) Solve the matrix transport equation (E3) for g± n (x) along x, using the fixed field ˜Q(x). See Appendix F for more details on this step. (b) Update ˜Q(x) according to Eq. (E7)

  4. [3]

    (24), (76), and (E8)

    Compute ρ(T ) using Eqs. (24), (76), and (E8). The convergence of this iterative process is discussed in Appendix C. This algorithm produces the solid curves in Fig. 3. For comparison, the dots represent numeri- cal solutions of the saddle-point equation (60)–(61), with ρ(T ) computed using Eqs. (24), (71), (75), and (76). The agreement with the solid cur...

    work page

  5. [4]

    Investissements d’Avenir

    The main difference with the distributions for the waveguide in Fig. 3 is the absence of a minimum cut- off. Transmission eigenvalues are thus allowed to reach the point T = 0. It should be noted, however, that the density in the region T = 0 is likely to be influenced by strong localization effects because it comes from grazing modes (which propagate in ...

    work page

  6. [5]

    Kubby, S

    J. Kubby, S. Gigan, and M. Cui, Wavefront Shaping for Biomedical Imaging, Advances in Microscopy and Micro- analysis (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [6]

    Smart Radio Environments Empowered by Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces: How it Works, State of Research, and Road Ahead

    M. Di Renzo, A. Zappone, M. Debbah, et al., Smart Ra- dio Environments Empowered by Reconfigurable Intelli- gent Surfaces: How It Works, State of Research, and The Road Ahead, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 38, 2450 (2020), arXiv:2004.09352 [cs.IT]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2020

  8. [7]

    I. M. Vellekoop and A. P. Mosk, Focusing coherent light through opaque strongly scattering media , Opt. Lett. 32, 2309 (2007)

    work page 2007

Show all 82 references
  1. [8]

    A. P. Mosk, A. Lagendijk, G. Lerosey, and M. Fink, Con- trolling waves in space and time for imaging and focusing in complex media , Nat. Photon. 6, 283 (2012)

    2012

  2. [9]

    Rotter and S

    S. Rotter and S. Gigan, Light fields in complex media: Mesoscopic scattering meets wave control , Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 015005 (2017)

    2017

  3. [10]

    H. Cao, A. P. Mosk, and S. Rotter, Shaping the propaga- tion of light in complex media , Nat. Phys. 18, 994 (2022)

    2022

  4. [11]

    M. Kim, Y. Choi, C. Yoon, et al., Maximal energy trans- port through disordered media with the implementation of transmission eigenchannels, Nat. Photon. 6, 581 (2012)

    2012

  5. [12]

    In order to shorten the expressions, it is appropriate to redefine the unknowns: g+ 21(µ) = −2iγb 1 − γaγb f (µ) , g − 12(µ) = 2iγag(µ) . (D11) Using in addition the relation (31), the system becomes    g(µ) = 1 + 1 − ⟨g⟩− 0 tanh(βσ) σ 1 − 1 + γ 1−γ ⟨f ⟩+ 0 ta...

  6. [13]

    Lerosey and M

    G. Lerosey and M. Fink, Wavefront Shaping for Wire- less Communications in Complex Media: From Time Re- versal to Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces , Proc. IEEE 110, 1210 (2022)

    2022

  7. [14]

    C.-P. Yu, F. Vega Iba˜ nez, A. B´ ech´ e, and J. Ver- beeck, Quantum wavefront shaping with a 48-element programmable phase plate for electrons, SciPost Phys. 15, 223 (2023)

    2023

  8. [15]

    Gigan, O

    S. Gigan, O. Katz, H. B. de Aguiar, et al. , Roadmap on wavefront shaping and deep imaging in complex media , J. Phys. Photon. 4, 042501 (2022). 26

    2022

  9. [16]

    K. Y. Bliokh, E. Karimi, M. J. Padgett, et al., Roadmap on structured waves , J. Opt. 25, 103001 (2023)

    2023

  10. [17]

    Yılmaz, C

    H. Yılmaz, C. W. Hsu, A. Yamilov, and H. Cao, Trans- verse localization of transmission eigenchannels , Nat. Photonics 13, 352 (2019)

    2019

  11. [18]

    S. M. Popoff, A. Goetschy, S. F. Liew, et al. , Coherent Control of Total Transmission of Light through Disor- dered Media, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 133903 (2014)

    2014

  12. [19]

    O. N. Dorokhov, On the coexistence of localized and ex- tended electronic states in the metallic phase , Solid State Commun. 51, 381 (1984)

    1984

  13. [20]

    C. W. J. Beenakker, Random-matrix theory of quantum transport, Rev. Mod. Phys. 69, 731 (1997)

    1997

  14. [21]

    W. Choi, A. P. Mosk, Q.-H. Park, and W. Choi, Trans- mission eigenchannels in a disordered medium , Phys. Rev. B 83, 134207 (2011)

    2011

  15. [22]

    M. Davy, Z. Shi, J. Park, et al. , Universal structure of transmission eigenchannels inside opaque media , Nat. Commun. 6, 6893 (2015)

    2015

  16. [23]

    O. N. Dorokhov, Transmission coefficient and the lo- calization length of an electron in N bound disordered chains, Pis’ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 36, 259 (1982), [JETP Lett. 36, 318 (1982)]

    1982

  17. [24]

    Yılmaz, C

    H. Yılmaz, C. W. Hsu, A. Goetschy, et al., Angular Mem- ory Effect of Transmission Eigenchannels , Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 203901 (2019)

    2019

  18. [25]

    Bender, A

    N. Bender, A. Yamilov, H. Yılmaz, and H. Cao, Fluctua- tions and Correlations of Transmission Eigenchannels in Diffusive Media, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 165901 (2020)

    2020

  19. [26]

    P. Hong, M. Yi, L. Zhang, et al. , Long-range correlation of transmitted light through transmission eigenchannels in disordered media, Phys. Rev. B 111, 024202 (2025)

    2025

  20. [27]

    Shi and A

    Z. Shi and A. Z. Genack, Dynamic and spectral properties of transmission eigenchannels in random media , Phys. Rev. B 92, 184202 (2015)

    2015

  21. [28]

    R. E. McIntosh, A. Goetschy, N. Bender, et al. , Spectral width of maximum deposition eigenchannels in diffusive media, Phys. Rev. B 111, 144202 (2025)

    2025

  22. [29]

    C. W. Hsu, A. Goetschy, Y. Bromberg, et al. , Broad- band Coherent Enhancement of Transmission and Ab- sorption in Disordered Media , Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 223901 (2015)

    2015

  23. [30]

    P. A. Mello, P. Pereyra, and N. Kumar, Macroscopic ap- proach to multichannel disordered conductors, Ann. Phys. (NY) 181, 290 (1988)

    1988

  24. [32]

    C. W. Hsu, S. F. Liew, A. Goetschy, et al. , Correlation- enhanced control of wave focusing in disordered media , Nat. Phys. 13, 497 (2017)

    2017

  25. [33]

    D. V. Voiculescu, K. J. Dykema, and A. Nica, Free Ran- dom Variables , CRM Monograph Series, Vol. 1 (Amer- ican Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island, USA, 1992)

    1992

  26. [34]

    A. M. Tulino and S. Verd´ u,Random Matrix Theory and Wireless Communications, Found. Trends Commun. Inf. Theory 1, 1 (2004)

    2004

  27. [35]

    P. W. Brouwer, Transmission through a many-channel random waveguide with absorption , Phys. Rev. B 57, 10526 (1998)

    1998

  28. [36]

    Chandrasekhar, Radiative Transfer , Dover Books on Intermediate and Advanced Mathematics (Dover, 1960) reprint of the Oxford University Press (1950)

    S. Chandrasekhar, Radiative Transfer , Dover Books on Intermediate and Advanced Mathematics (Dover, 1960) reprint of the Oxford University Press (1950)

    1950

  29. [37]

    Gaspard and A

    D. Gaspard and A. Goetschy, Radiant Field Theory: A Transport Approach to Shaped Wave Transmission through Disordered Media , arXiv:2411.10360 [math-ph] (2024), accepted in Phys. Rev. Lett. (2025)

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    P. A. Mello and S. Tomsovic, Scattering approach to quantum transport: Toward a consistent physical picture , Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 342 (1991)

    1991

  31. [39]

    P. A. Mello and S. Tomsovic, Scattering approach to quantum electronic transport , Phys. Rev. B 46, 15963 (1992)

    1992

  32. [40]

    T. S. Misirpashaev, J. C. J. Paasschens, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Localization in a disordered multi-mode waveguide with absorption or amplification , Physica A 236, 189 (1997)

    1997

  33. [41]

    S. F. Edwards and P. W. Anderson, Theory of spin glasses, J. Phys. F: Met. Phys. 5, 965 (1975)

    1975

  34. [42]

    K. A. Muttalib and J. R. Klauder, Generalized Fokker- Planck Equation for Multichannel Disordered Quantum Conductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4272 (1999)

    1999

  35. [43]

    Douglas, P

    A. Douglas, P. Markoˇ s, and K. A. Muttalib, The gen- eralized DMPK equation revisited: towards a systematic derivation, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 47, 125103 (2014)

    2014

  36. [44]

    I. M. Suslov, General form of DMPK Equation , J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 127, 131 (2018)

    2018

  37. [45]

    Wegner, The mobility edge problem: Continuous sym- metry and a conjecture , Z

    F. Wegner, The mobility edge problem: Continuous sym- metry and a conjecture , Z. Phys. B 35, 207 (1979)

    1979

  38. [46]

    Sch¨ afer and F

    L. Sch¨ afer and F. Wegner,Disordered System with n Or- bitals per Site: Lagrange Formulation, Hyperbolic Sym- metry, and Goldstone Modes , Z. Phys. B 38, 113 (1980)

    1980

  39. [47]

    K. B. Efetov, Supersymmetry in Disorder and Chaos (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997)

    1997

  40. [48]

    D. J. Thouless, Phase transitions for the one-dimensional Landau-Ginzburg system and their relation to the theory of polymers and of electrons in a random potential , J. Phys. C 8, 1803 (1975)

    1975

  41. [49]

    Nitzan, K

    A. Nitzan, K. F. Freed, and M. H. Cohen, Renormal- ization group and critical localization , Phys. Rev. B 15, 4476 (1977)

    1977

  42. [50]

    Aharony and Y

    A. Aharony and Y. Imry, The mobility edge as a spin- glass problem, J. Phys. C 10, L487 (1977)

    1977

  43. [51]

    K. B. Efetov, Supersymmetry method in localization the- ory, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 82, 872 (1982), [Sov. Phys. JETP 55, 514 (1982)]

    1982

  44. [52]

    K. B. Efetov, Supersymmetry and theory of disordered metals, Adv. Phys. 32, 53 (1983)

    1983

  45. [53]

    Y. V. Nazarov, Limits of universality in disordered con- ductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 134 (1994)

    1994

  46. [54]

    K. B. Efetov, A. I. Larkin, and D. E. Khmelnitskii, In- teraction of diffusion modes in the theory of localization , Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 79, 1120 (1980), [Sov. Phys. JETP 52, 568 (1980)]

    1980

  47. [55]

    L. P. Gor’kov, Microscopic derivation of the Ginzburg- Landau equations in the theory of superconductivity , Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 36, 1918 (1959), [Sov. Phys. JETP 9, 1364 (1959)]

    1959

  48. [56]

    Eilenberger, Transformation of Gorkov’s equation for type II superconductors into transport-like equations , Z

    G. Eilenberger, Transformation of Gorkov’s equation for type II superconductors into transport-like equations , Z. Phys. A 214, 195 (1968)

    1968

  49. [57]

    K. D. Usadel, Generalized Diffusion Equation for Super- conducting Alloys, Phys. Rev. Lett. 25, 507 (1970)

    1970

  50. [58]

    A. I. Larkin and Y. N. Ovchinnikov, Quasiclassical method in the theory of superconductivity, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 55, 2262 (1968), [Sov. Phys. JETP 28, 1200 (1969)]. 27

    1968

  51. [59]

    Akkermans and G

    E. Akkermans and G. Montambaux, Mesoscopic Physics of Electrons and Photons , 1st ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2007)

    2007

  52. [60]

    Y. V. Nazarov and Y. M. Blanter, Quantum Trans- port: Introduction to Nanoscience (Cambridge Univer- sity Press, Cambridge, 2009)

    2009

  53. [61]

    Enrico Fermi

    I. V. Lerner, Nonlinear Sigma Model for Normal and Su- perconducting Systems: A Pedestrian Approach, in Quan- tum Phenomena in Mesoscopic Systems , Proceedings of the International School of Physics “Enrico Fermi”, Vol. 151, edited by B. Altshuler, A. Tagliacozzo, and V. Togne...

    2003 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Kamenev, Field Theory of Non-Equilibrium Systems , 2nd ed

    A. Kamenev, Field Theory of Non-Equilibrium Systems , 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2023)

    2023

  55. [63]

    Kopnin, Theory of Nonequilibrium Superconductivity, International Series of Monographs on Physics No

    N. Kopnin, Theory of Nonequilibrium Superconductivity, International Series of Monographs on Physics No. 110 (Oxford University Press, 2001)

    2001

  56. [64]

    F. W. J. Olver, D. W. Lozier, R. F. Boisvert, and C. W. Clark, NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions , 1st ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2010)

    2010

  57. [65]

    Y. V. Nazarov, Novel circuit theory of Andreev reflection, Superlattices Microstruct. 25, 1221 (1999)

    1999

  58. [66]

    D. S. Fisher and P. A. Lee, Relation between conductivity and transmission matrix , Phys. Rev. B 23, 6851 (1981)

    1981

  59. [67]

    Bender, A

    N. Bender, A. Yamilov, A. Goetschy, et al. , Depth- targeted energy delivery deep inside scattering media , Nat. Phys. 18, 309 (2022)

    2022

  60. [68]

    McIntosh, A

    R. McIntosh, A. Goetschy, N. Bender, et al. , Delivering broadband light deep inside diffusive media , Nat. Photon. 18, 744 (2024)

    2024

  61. [69]

    Altland, A

    A. Altland, A. Kamenev, and C. Tian, Anderson Local- ization from the Replica Formalism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 206601 (2005)

    2005

  62. [70]

    A. V. Zaitsev, Quasiclassical equations of the theory of superconductivity for contiguous metals and the proper- ties of constricted microcontacts, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 86, 1742 (1984), [Sov. Phys. JETP 59, 1015 (1984)]

    1984

  63. [71]

    Vynck, R

    K. Vynck, R. Pierrat, R. Carminati, et al. , Light in cor- related disordered media , Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 045003 (2023)

    2023

  64. [72]

    W. B. Case, Wigner functions and Weyl transforms for pedestrians, Am. J. Phys. 76, 937 (2008)

    2008

  65. [73]

    Cohen-Tannoudji, B

    C. Cohen-Tannoudji, B. Diu, and F. Lalo¨ e,Quantum Me- chanics, Volume 3: Fermions, Bosons, Photons, Cor- relations, and Entanglement , 1st ed. (Wiley, Weinheim, 2020)

    2020

  66. [74]

    D. Gaspard, Ebsolve - Solving the matrix transport equa- tion for the transmission eigenvalue distribution in a dis- ordered waveguide, Zenodo (2025), https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.15090497

    2025 doi

  67. [75]

    The codes to solve the saddle-point equation in one- and two-dimensional waveguides are available upon request from the authors

  68. [76]

    Indeed, it can be shown that the exact solution of Eq

    to solve numerically Riccati-type equations. Indeed, it can be shown that the exact solution of Eq. (F3) for piecewise-constant P can be expressed as a succession of M¨ obius transformations forα and β. The matrix repre- sentation of these transformations is precisely given by...

  69. [77]

    W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Com- puting, 3rd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2007)

    2007

  70. [78]

    Schopohl and K

    N. Schopohl and K. Maki, Quasiparticle spectrum around a vortex line in a d-wave superconductor, Phys. Rev. B 52, 490 (1995)

    1995

  71. [79]

    Schopohl, Transformation of the Eilenberger Equa- tions of Superconductivity to a Scalar Riccati Equation , arXiv:cond-mat/9804064 [cond-mat.supr-con] (1998), unpublished notes

    N. Schopohl, Transformation of the Eilenberger Equa- tions of Superconductivity to a Scalar Riccati Equation , arXiv:cond-mat/9804064 [cond-mat.supr-con] (1998), unpublished notes

    1998 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Belzig, F

    W. Belzig, F. K. Wilhelm, C. Bruder, et al. , Quasiclas- sical Green ’s function approach to mesoscopic supercon- ductivity, Superlattices Microstruct. 25, 1251 (1999)

    1999

  73. [81]

    Nagai, K

    Y. Nagai, K. Tanaka, and N. Hayashi, Quasiclassical nu- merical method for mesoscopic superconductors: Bound states in a circular d-wave island with a single vortex , Phys. Rev. B 86, 094526 (2012)

    2012

  74. [82]

    Schiff and S

    J. Schiff and S. Shnider, A Natural Approach to the Numerical Integration of Riccati Differential Equations , SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 36, 1392 (1999)

    1999

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.