Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

How quantum computing can enhance biomarker discovery

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This perspective paper argues that quantum computing, especially quantum machine learning, is most promising for biomarker discovery in small, high-dimensional, longitudinal, or noisy healthcare datasets, and maps algorithms to those data…

desk verdict A well-organized QC-for-biomarker perspective whose central few-sample QML advantage claim overreaches its cited source; worth reviewing after modest revisions. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.10511 v4 pith:VT2XEZ5J submitted 2024-11-15 q-bio.OT quant-ph

Frederik F. Flöther , Daniel Blankenberg , Maria Demidik , Karl Jansen , Raga Krishnakumar , Rajiv Krishnakumar , Nouamane Laanait , Laxmi Parida
show 2 more authors
Carl Saab Filippo Utro
This is my paper · ORCID
classification q-bio.OTquant-ph
keywords quantummachinelearningbiomarkerdiscoveryelectronichealthrecordsomicsdatamedicalimagingtimeseriessmall-sampleloading
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This perspective paper maps quantum algorithms, especially quantum machine learning, to biomarker-discovery problems they might plausibly help with. It argues the best fit is not big-data medicine but the difficult corners: datasets with many features and few samples, time series with missing or irregular measurements, and data whose labels are unreliable. The paper organizes opportunities by data type — multi-dimensional, time series, and erroneous — and examines EHRs, omics, and medical images under each. It does not claim a proven quantum advantage; it identifies where advantage could arise and what must be solved first.

What carries the argument

The organizing device is a three-way classification of biomarker data by structure — multi-dimensional, time series, and erroneous — crossed with three healthcare modalities (EHRs, omics, medical images). Within that grid, the load-bearing algorithmic idea is the hybrid variational quantum algorithm: a parametrized quantum circuit whose parameters are optimized by a classical computer, together with an embedding that maps classical data into Hilbert space. The paper treats generalization from few training samples as the specific mechanism by which quantum machine learning could beat classical methods, and treats data loading as the mechanism that could erase that advantage.

What would settle it

Run a head-to-head benchmark on a fixed realistic biomarker cohort (for example, a thousand-patient EHR or omics dataset) in which quantum and classical models receive identical preprocessing, encoding, and compute budget, and compare generalization across repeated train/test splits; if the quantum model's generalization gap is not smaller than the best classical baseline, the paper's few-sample advantage premise is not supported.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that quantum computing can enhance biomarker discovery for healthcare data that is multi-dimensional, time-series, or erroneous, and that the most credible near-term opportunities lie in small-sample, high-dimensional settings where quantum models are expected to generalize from few data points. It maps specific quantum algorithms to specific problems: dimensionality reduction (QPCA and variants), classification (QNNs and quantum kernels), regression, clustering, generative models, time-series forecasting (quantum reservoir computing), and error handling. It argues that data loading into quantum computers is the central bottleneck and can erase claimed advantages, and that near-term practical gains are therefore more likely in small data than in big data.

Load-bearing premise

The argument stands on the claim that quantum machine-learning models trained on very few patient samples can generalize better than classical models on realistic biomarker data, and that this advantage survives data encoding and hardware noise.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If quantum models genuinely generalize from fewer samples, small-cohort studies — rare disease cohorts and clinical trial subgroups — are the most plausible earliest adopters of quantum-enhanced biomarker discovery.
  • For multi-dimensional omics and imaging data, quantum dimensionality reduction and clustering could become practical only after data-loading bottlenecks and fault-tolerance issues are resolved.
  • Quantum reservoir computing could address longitudinal EHR and wearable data, but only if the encoding of that data does not erase the quantum advantage.
  • Quantum generative models could support synthetic data or imputation for missing and erroneous biomarker data, improving downstream classical analysis.
  • Near-term practical wins are more likely on small data than on big data, which runs against the usual big-data framing of quantum computing in healthcare.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves implicit that its data-type grid could serve as an algorithm-selection checklist: match quantum methods to settings where classical models overfit, extrapolate poorly, or cannot encode long-range correlations.
  • A testable extension of the roadmap is to apply quantum reservoir computing not only to EHR time series but to multi-omics longitudinal data such as cell-free DNA fragmentomics, where small-sample extrapolation is the stated failure mode.
  • The roadmap implies that benchmarks for quantum biomarker discovery should include noisy-label and missing-data settings rather than clean curated data, because that is where the paper locates the strongest opportunity.
  • If few-sample generalization holds, the highest-value demonstration would be a clinical dataset with fewer than a few hundred samples, comparing quantum kernels and quantum neural networks against well-tuned classical baselines with identical preprocessing.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This perspective paper maps gate-based quantum computing algorithms, particularly quantum machine learning, to problems in biomarker discovery. The authors organize the analysis by data type (multi-dimensional, time series, erroneous) and cover three healthcare data modalities (EHRs, omics, and medical images). For each combination, they describe classical limitations, proposed quantum algorithms, and open challenges such as data loading, barren plateaus, and the need for benchmarks. The paper is explicitly framed as a perspective, not as a new technical result, and it repeatedly acknowledges that most computational steps remain classical and that quantum advantage is not yet established for most applications.

Significance. The paper provides a useful, clearly structured taxonomy that connects quantum algorithm families to concrete biomarker discovery problems, which can help orient researchers in both fields. Its main virtue is honesty: it flags data loading as a potential showstopper, discusses barren plateaus and classical simulability, and emphasizes the need for use-case-specific algorithm design. The roadmap is plausible as a research agenda. However, the central motivation for the small-sample opportunity rests on a claim about few-sample generalization that is not supported by the cited literature, and at least one specific application claim (QTDA for early cancer differentiation) is made without evidence. If these issues are corrected, the perspective would be a solid contribution; as written, the central enabling premise is overstated.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 2.1] The sentence "quantum models are expected to show better generalization than classical models, leveraging fewer data points [29]" is not supported by the cited reference. Caro et al. (Nat. Commun. 2022) prove generalization bounds for quantum models trained on few data, but these are absolute bounds that do not establish superiority over classical models; classical regularized models or kernel methods can also generalize well in high-dimensional low-sample regimes. This claim is load-bearing because it is invoked to motivate the small-sample opportunities in Sections 3.1.1 (EHR small-cohort studies), 3.1.2 (omics), and 3.3.1 (small datasets generally). The cited empirical studies [166,167] show QSVM competitiveness, not superiority. Please rephrase the claim to state that quantum models can have favorable generalization properties in certain settings, with no proven comparative advantage, and add a reference that explicitly discusses the relative quantum-vs-classical question (e.g., the benchmarking study [25]).
  2. [Section 3.2.2] The statement that QTDA "could be used to differentiate with high accuracy between healthy individuals and cancer patients in early stages of diseases" is unsupported: no citation is given, and QTDA per se is a topological data analysis tool, not a classifier. In a perspective, speculative statements are acceptable if clearly labeled, but this sentence presents a substantial empirical claim as a foreseeable outcome. Either remove the clause or explicitly frame it as a speculative hypothesis requiring empirical validation.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 3.3] The citation "[12, 154–157] [157]" contains a duplicate reference; it should be "[12, 154–157]".
  2. [References] References [93] and [170] are the same paper (Nalecz-Charkiewicz et al., "Quantum computing in bioinformatics: a systematic review mapping"). They should be consolidated into a single reference.
  3. [Section 3.1] Typographical errors: "GW AS" should be "GWAS", and "underling modality" should be "underlying modality". In Figure 1, "strati/f_ication" appears to be a LaTeX rendering artifact and should be corrected.
  4. [Section 2] The phrase "in analogy to central (CPUs) and graphics processing units (GPUs)" should be "central processing units (CPUs) and graphics processing units (GPUs)".
  5. [Figure 1] The figure caption uses many abbreviations (QML, QGAN, QVAE, QTDA, QGNNs, etc.) without defining them. Please expand the caption or refer the reader to the table and text where these are defined.
  6. [Section 3.2.3] The phrase "QRC techniques are relevant techniques" is redundant; consider rewording to "QRC is a relevant technique".

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper is a perspective that maps existing quantum algorithms to biomarker problems, with no fitted parameters, no derivations, and no load-bearing self-citation chain.

full rationale

This is a perspective/review paper, not a derivation. It makes no mathematical predictions, fits no parameters to data, and does not define any quantity in terms of another. The central claim—that quantum computing, especially QML, may benefit biomarker discovery for small-sample, high-dimensional, time-series, or noisy data—is supported by citations to external literature (e.g., Caro et al. [29] for few-sample generalization, Bowles et al. [25] for benchmarking, and a range of application studies). The self-citations present in the reference list (e.g., [16], [60], [167], [48], [142], [143]) are prior works cited as background or as examples of quantum applications in healthcare and genomics; they do not constitute the load-bearing argument of the paper. Even the most optimistic premise, that quantum models generalize better from fewer data points, is attributed to an external source and is not derived from the paper's own claims. The paper explicitly acknowledges the opposing risk, stating in Section 3.1 that 'for classical big data, data loading may erase computational quantum advantages,' and in Section 2.1 that 'the predictive advantage of QML models for practically relevant problems remains an open question.' These caveats show the authors are not forcing a conclusion by definition or by self-citation. A skeptical reader could question the strength of the evidence behind the few-sample advantage, but that is a correctness or evidential-support concern, not a circularity concern. No step in the paper reduces, by construction or by self-citation, to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no free parameters or invented entities. Its central claim rests on contested domain assumptions about few-sample QML generalization, near-term utility of VQAs, and future data-access hardware.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Quantum machine learning models can generalize from fewer training samples than classical models on realistic biomedical data.
    Invoked in Section 2.1 via citation [29] (Caro et al.) to support the claim that small healthcare datasets could benefit; this is a theoretical result under idealized settings, not established for practical biomarker data.
  • domain assumption Variational quantum algorithms can produce meaningful results on near-term noisy quantum devices.
    Stated in Section 2 as the basis for many QML applications; the paper itself later notes barren plateaus and noise sensitivity, so this is an active research premise.
  • domain assumption Access to classical data via QRAM or similar will eventually be available, or small data will avoid the data-loading bottleneck.
    In Section 3.1 the paper says 'for classical big data, data loading may erase computational quantum advantages' and points to QRAM/coresets as ongoing efforts, so the usefulness of the mapped algorithms depends on this unresolved problem.
  • domain assumption Quantum speedups proven in computational complexity theory (e.g., for PCA or linear regression) translate to practical speedups on real hardware.
    The paper lists quantum PCA, quantum linear regression etc. as opportunities, but these algorithms often assume quantum data access and fault-tolerance, which the paper acknowledges are not yet available.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of How quantum computing can enhance biomarker discovery." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VT2XEZ5J

@misc{pith2026241110511,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: How quantum computing can enhance biomarker discovery},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VT2XEZ5J}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.10511}
}
read the original abstract

Biomarkers play a central role in medicine's gradual progress towards proactive, personalized precision diagnostics and interventions. However, finding biomarkers that provide very early indicators of a change in health status, for example for multi-factorial diseases, has been challenging. Discovery of such biomarkers stands to benefit significantly from advanced information processing and means to detect complex correlations, which quantum computing offers. In this perspective paper, quantum algorithms, particularly in machine learning, are mapped to key applications in biomarker discovery. The opportunities and challenges associated with the algorithms and applications are discussed. The analysis is structured according to different data types - multi-dimensional, time series, and erroneous data - and covers key data modalities in healthcare - electronic health records (EHRs), omics, and medical images. An outlook is provided concerning open research challenges.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Quantum Reservoir for Neurodynamical Forecasting

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A transverse-field Ising quantum reservoir is more robust than a classical echo-state network on a simple oscillator benchmark, but less accurate on simulated EEG.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

186 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [29]

    Nature communications 13(1), 4919 (2022)

    Caro, M.C., Huang, H.-Y., Cerezo, M., Sharma, K., Sornborger, A., Cincio, L., Coles, P.J.: Generalization in quantum machine learning from few training data. Nature communications 13(1), 4919 (2022)

    2022

  2. [25]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.07059 (2024)

    Bowles, J., Ahmed, S., Schuld, M.: Better than classical? the subtle art of bench- marking quantum machine learning models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.07059 (2024)

    arXiv 2024

  3. [1]

    Clin Pharmacol Ther 69(3), 89–95 (2001)

    Working, G.B.D.: Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework. Clin Pharmacol Ther 69(3), 89–95 (2001)

    2001

  4. [2]

    Molecular oncology 6(2), 140–146 (2012)

    Henry, N.L., Hayes, D.F.: Cancer biomarkers. Molecular oncology 6(2), 140–146 (2012)

    2012

  5. [3]

    Strimbu, K., Tavel, J.A.: What are biomarkers? Current Opinion in HIV and AIDS 5(6), 463 (2010)

    2010

  6. [4]

    Current protocols in pharmacology 76(1), 9–23 (2017)

    Aronson, J.K., Ferner, R.E.: Biomarkers—a general review. Current protocols in pharmacology 76(1), 9–23 (2017)

    2017

  7. [5]

    In: BEST (Biomarkers, EndpointS, and Other Tools) Resource [Internet]

    Group, F.-N.B.W.: Glossary. In: BEST (Biomarkers, EndpointS, and Other Tools) Resource [Internet]. Food and Drug Administration (US). https://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK338448/ Accessed 2024-02-09

    2024

  8. [6]

    BIO Industry Anal

    Thomas, D.W.: Clinical development success rates 2006–2015. BIO Industry Anal. 1, 16 (2016)

    2016

Show all 186 references
  1. [7]

    Nature Reviews Neurology 16(7), 381–400 (2020)

    Davis, K.D., Aghaeepour, N., Ahn, A.H., Angst, M.S., Borsook, D., Brenton, A., Burczynski, M.E., Crean, C., Edwards, R., Gaudilliere, B., et al.: Discovery and validation of biomarkers to aid the development of safe and effective pain therapeutics: challenges and opportunities...

    2020

  2. [8]

    Horowitz, M., Grumbling, E.: Quantum computing: progress and prospects (2019)

    2019

  3. [9]

    https://www.bcg

    Langione, M., Bobier, J.-F., Cui, Z., Naudet-Baulieu, C., Kumar, A., Gour´ evitch, A.: Quantum Computing Is Becoming Business Ready (2023). https://www.bcg. com/publications/2023/enterprise-grade-quantum-computing-almost-ready

    2023

  4. [10]

    Computer Science Review 51, 100619 (2024) 19

    Peral-Garc ´ ıa, D., Cruz-Benito, J., Garc ´ ıa-Pe˜ nalvo, F.J.: Systematic literature review: Quantum machine learning and its applications. Computer Science Review 51, 100619 (2024) 19

    2024

  5. [11]

    Quantum Science and Technology 8(2), 025001 (2023)

    Jaschke, D., Montangero, S.: Is quantum computing green? an estimate for an energy-efficiency quantum advantage. Quantum Science and Technology 8(2), 025001 (2023)

    2023

  6. [12]

    npj Quantum Information 7(1), 161 (2021)

    Peters, E., Caldeira, J., Ho, A., Leichenauer, S., Mohseni, M., Neven, H., Spent- zouris, P., Strain, D., Perdue, G.N.: Machine learning of high dimensional data on a noisy quantum processor. npj Quantum Information 7(1), 161 (2021)

    2021

  7. [13]

    Quantum 7, 1078 (2023)

    Marshall, S.C., Gyurik, C., Dunjko, V.: High dimensional quantum machine learning with small quantum computers. Quantum 7, 1078 (2023)

    2023

  8. [14]

    Journal of Digital Imaging 36(6), 2335–2346 (2023)

    Felefly, T., Roukoz, C., Fares, G., Achkar, S., Yazbeck, S., Meyer, P., Kor- dahi, M., Azoury, F., Nasr, D.N., Nasr, E., et al.: An explainable mri-radiomic quantum neural network to differentiate between large brain metastases and high-grade glioma using quantum annealing for...

    2023

  9. [15]

    Advanced Quantum Technologies 5(9), 2100139 (2022)

    Mauranyapin, N.P., Terrasson, A., Bowen, W.P.: Quantum biotechnology. Advanced Quantum Technologies 5(9), 2100139 (2022)

    2022

  10. [16]

    Fl¨ other, F.F., Griffin, P.F.: How can quantum technologies be applied in health- care, medicine and the life sciences? Research Directions: Quantum Technologies 1, 7 (2023)

    2023

  11. [17]

    Cureus 15(10) (2023)

    Shams, M., Choudhari, J., Reyes, K., Prentzas, S., Gapizov, A., Shehryar, A., Affaf, M., Grezenko, H., Gasim, R.W., Mohsin, S.N., et al.: The quantum- medical nexus: Understanding the impact of quantum technologies on health- care. Cureus 15(10) (2023)

    2023

  12. [18]

    Schuld, M., Petruccione, F.: Supervised Learning with Quantum Computers vol

  13. [19]

    Nature 567(7747), 209–212 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-019-0980-2

    Havl ´ ıˇ cek, V., C´ orcoles, A.D., Temme, K., Harrow, A.W., Kandala, A., Chow, J.M., Gambetta, J.M.: Supervised learning with quantum-enhanced feature spaces. Nature 567(7747), 209–212 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-019-0980-2 . Number: 7747 Publisher: Nature Publish...

    2019

  14. [20]

    Physical Review Research 4(2), 023136 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevResearch.4.023136

    Nakaji, K., Uno, S., Suzuki, Y., Raymond, R., Onodera, T., Tanaka, T., Tezuka, H., Mitsuda, N., Yamamoto, N.: Approximate amplitude encoding in shallow parameterized quantum circuits and its application to financial market indica- tors. Physical Review Research 4(2), 023136 (2...

    2022

  15. [21]

    Nature Reviews Physics 3(9), 625–644 (2021) https://doi.org/ 20 10.1038/s42254-021-00348-9

    Cerezo, M., Arrasmith, A., Babbush, R., Benjamin, S.C., Endo, S., Fujii, K., McClean, J.R., Mitarai, K., Yuan, X., Cincio, L., Coles, P.J.: Variational quan- tum algorithms. Nature Reviews Physics 3(9), 625–644 (2021) https://doi.org/ 20 10.1038/s42254-021-00348-9 . Publisher:...

    2021 doi

  16. [22]

    Reviews of Modern Physics 95(4), 045005 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.95.045005

    Cai, Z., Babbush, R., Benjamin, S.C., Endo, S., Huggins, W.J., Li, Y., McClean, J.R., O’Brien, T.E.: Quantum error mitigation. Reviews of Modern Physics 95(4), 045005 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.95.045005 . Publisher: American Physical Society. Accessed 2024-11-14

    2023 doi

  17. [23]

    Luongo, A.: Quantum algorithms for data analysis (2020)

    2020

  18. [24]

    EPJ Quantum Technology 8(1) (2021) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjqt/s40507-021-00114-x

    Bayerstadler, A., Becquin, G., Binder, J., Botter, T., Ehm, H., Ehmer, T., Erd- mann, M., Gaus, N., Harbach, P., Hess, M., Klepsch, J., Leib, M., Luber, S., Luckow, A., Mansky, M., Mauerer, W., Neukart, F., Niedermeier, C., Palackal, L., Pfeiffer, R., Polenz, C., Sepulveda, J....

    2021 doi

  19. [26]

    Physical Review A 101(3), 032308 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevA.101.032308

    Schuld, M., Bocharov, A., Svore, K., Wiebe, N.: Circuit-centric quantum classifiers. Physical Review A 101(3), 032308 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevA.101.032308 . arXiv:1804.00633 [quant-ph]. Accessed 2024-02-20

    2020 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Quantum 4, 226 (2020) https: //doi.org/10.22331/q-2020-02-06-226

    P´ erez-Salinas, A., Cervera-Lierta, A., Gil-Fuster, E., Latorre, J.I.: Data re- uploading for a universal quantum classifier. Quantum 4, 226 (2020) https: //doi.org/10.22331/q-2020-02-06-226 . Publisher: Verein zur F¨ orderung des Open Access Publizierens in den Quantenwissen...

    2020 doi

  21. [28]

    Nature Com- munications 12(1), 2631 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22539-9

    Huang, H.-Y., Broughton, M., Mohseni, M., Babbush, R., Boixo, S., Neven, H., McClean, J.R.: Power of data in quantum machine learning. Nature Com- munications 12(1), 2631 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22539-9 . Publisher: Nature Publishing Group. Accessed 2024-07-09

    2021 doi

  22. [30]

    Cerezo, M., Larocca, M., Garc ´ ıa-Mart ´ ın, D., Diaz, N.L., Braccia, P., Fontana, E., Rudolph, M.S., Bermejo, P., Ijaz, A., Thanasilp, S., Anschuetz, E.R., Holmes, Z.: Does provable absence of barren plateaus imply classical simulability? Or, why we need to rethink variation...

    2024 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Larocca, M., Thanasilp, S., Wang, S., Sharma, K., Biamonte, J., Coles, P.J., 21 Cincio, L., McClean, J.R., Holmes, Z., Cerezo, M.: A Review of Barren Plateaus in Variational Quantum Computing. arXiv. arXiv:2405.00781 version: 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.00781...

    2024 doi arXiv

  24. [32]

    Nature Physics 10(9), 631–633 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3029

    Lloyd, S., Mohseni, M., Rebentrost, P.: Quantum principal component analy- sis. Nature Physics 10(9), 631–633 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3029 . Number: 9 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group. Accessed 2024-02-20

    2014 doi

  25. [33]

    PRX Quantum 3(3), 030334 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.3.030334

    Gordon, M.H., Cerezo, M., Cincio, L., Coles, P.J.: Covariance Matrix Prepara- tion for Quantum Principal Component Analysis. PRX Quantum 3(3), 030334 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.3.030334 . Publisher: American Physical Society. Accessed 2024-03-04

    2022 doi

  26. [34]

    Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications614, 128554 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2023.128554

    Yu, K., Lin, S., Guo, G.-D.: Quantum dimensionality reduction by linear discrim- inant analysis. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications614, 128554 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2023.128554 . Accessed 2024-08-13

    2023

  27. [35]

    Physical Review A 101(6), 062327 (2020) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevA.101.062327

    Kerenidis, I., Luongo, A.: Classification of the MNIST data set with quantum slow feature analysis. Physical Review A 101(6), 062327 (2020) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevA.101.062327 . Publisher: American Physical Society. Accessed 2024-08-13

    2020 doi

  28. [36]

    Physical Review Applied 22(1), 014049 (2024) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.22.014049

    Feng, W., Guo, G., Lin, S., Xu, Y.: Quantum Isomap algorithm for mani- fold learning. Physical Review Applied 22(1), 014049 (2024) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.22.014049 . Publisher: American Physical Society. Accessed 2024-08-13

    2024 doi

  29. [37]

    Nature Physics 15(12), 1273–1278 (2019)

    Cong, I., Choi, S., Lukin, M.D.: Quantum convolutional neural networks. Nature Physics 15(12), 1273–1278 (2019)

    2019

  30. [38]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.11353 (2023)

    Ray, A., Madan, D., Patil, S., Rapsomaniki, M.A., Pati, P.: Hybrid quantum- classical graph neural networks for tumor classification in digital pathology. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.11353 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Physi- cal Review Letters 109(5), 050505 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett

    Wiebe, N., Braun, D., Lloyd, S.: Quantum Algorithm for Data Fitting. Physi- cal Review Letters 109(5), 050505 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 109.050505 . Publisher: American Physical Society. Accessed 2024-08-13

    2012 doi

  32. [40]

    Physical Review A 96(1), 012335 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.96.012335

    Wang, G.: Quantum algorithm for linear regression. Physical Review A 96(1), 012335 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.96.012335 . Publisher: Amer- ican Physical Society. Accessed 2024-08-13

    2017 doi

  33. [41]

    Physical Review A 99(5), 052331 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevA.99.052331

    Zhao, Z., Fitzsimons, J.K., Fitzsimons, J.F.: Quantum-assisted Gaussian process regression. Physical Review A 99(5), 052331 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevA.99.052331 . Publisher: American Physical Society. Accessed 2024-08- 13 22

    2019

  34. [42]

    Scientific Reports 11(1), 21905 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01445-6

    Date, P., Potok, T.: Adiabatic quantum linear regression. Scientific Reports 11(1), 21905 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01445-6 . Publisher: Nature Publishing Group. Accessed 2024-08-13

    2021 doi

  35. [43]

    Khan, S.U., Awan, A.J., Vall-Llosera, G.: K-Means Clustering on Noisy Inter- mediate Scale Quantum Computers. arXiv. arXiv:1909.12183 [quant-ph] (2019). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1909.12183 . http://arxiv.org/abs/1909.12183 Accessed 2024-08-13

    2019 doi arXiv

  36. [44]

    Quantum Information Processing 20(9), 294 (2021) https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11128-021-03240-8

    Arthur, D., Date, P.: Balanced k-means clustering on an adiabatic quantum computer. Quantum Information Processing 20(9), 294 (2021) https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11128-021-03240-8 . Accessed 2024-08-13

    2021 doi

  37. [45]

    Physical Review A 103(4), 042415 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.103.042415

    Kerenidis, I., Landman, J.: Quantum spectral clustering. Physical Review A 103(4), 042415 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.103.042415 . Pub- lisher: American Physical Society. Accessed 2024-08-13

    2021 doi

  38. [46]

    IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 45(10), 12321–12340 (2023)

    Tian, J., Sun, X., Du, Y., Zhao, S., Liu, Q., Zhang, K., Yi, W., Huang, W., Wang, C., Wu, X.,et al.: Recent advances for quantum neural networks in gener- ative learning. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 45(10), 12321–12340 (2023)

    2023

  39. [47]

    Physical Review X 8(2), 021050 (2018) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevX.8.021050

    Amin, M.H., Andriyash, E., Rolfe, J., Kulchytskyy, B., Melko, R.: Quantum Boltzmann Machine. Physical Review X 8(2), 021050 (2018) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevX.8.021050 . Publisher: American Physical Society. Accessed 2024-08-13

    2018 doi

  40. [48]

    arXiv (2024)

    T¨ uys¨ uz, C., Demidik, M., Coopmans, L., Rinaldi, E., Croft, V., Haddad, Y., Rosenkranz, M., Jansen, K.: Learning to generate high-dimensional distributions with low-dimensional quantum Boltzmann machines. arXiv (2024). https://doi. org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.16363

    2024 doi arXiv

  41. [49]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.04401 (2024)

    Baglio, J.: Data augmentation experiments with style-based quantum generative adversarial networks on trapped-ion and superconducting-qubit technologies. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.04401 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Scientific reports 12(1), 1353 (2022)

    Suzuki, Y., Gao, Q., Pradel, K.C., Yasuoka, K., Yamamoto, N.: Natural quan- tum reservoir computing for temporal information processing. Scientific reports 12(1), 1353 (2022)

    2022

  43. [51]

    In: ICASSP 2022-2022 IEEE Interna- tional Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp

    Di Sipio, R., Huang, J.-H., Chen, S.Y.-C., Mangini, S., Worring, M.: The dawn of quantum natural language processing. In: ICASSP 2022-2022 IEEE Interna- tional Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 8612–8616 (2022). IEEE

    2022

  44. [52]

    In: 2019 International Conference on 23 Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC), pp

    Choi, J., Kim, J.: A tutorial on quantum approximate optimization algorithm (qaoa): Fundamentals and applications. In: 2019 International Conference on 23 Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC), pp. 138–142 (2019). IEEE

    2019

  45. [53]

    Computational Optimiza- tion and Applications 82(2), 525–559 (2022)

    Flori, A., Oulhadj, H., Siarry, P.: Quantum particle swarm optimization: An auto-adaptive pso for local and global optimization. Computational Optimiza- tion and Applications 82(2), 525–559 (2022)

    2022

  46. [54]

    Physics Reports 986, 1–128 (2022)

    Tilly, J., Chen, H., Cao, S., Picozzi, D., Setia, K., Li, Y., Grant, E., Wossnig, L., Rungger, I., Booth, G.H., et al.: The variational quantum eigensolver: a review of methods and best practices. Physics Reports 986, 1–128 (2022)

    2022

  47. [55]

    Applied sciences 12(11), 5651 (2022)

    Guarasci, R., De Pietro, G., Esposito, M.: Quantum natural language processing: Challenges and opportunities. Applied sciences 12(11), 5651 (2022)

    2022

  48. [56]

    Nature Methods18(7), 701–709 (2021)

    Emani, P.S., Warrell, J., Anticevic, A., Bekiranov, S., Gandal, M., McConnell, M.J., Sapiro, G., Aspuru-Guzik, A., Baker, J.T., Bastiani, M., et al.: Quantum computing at the frontiers of biological sciences. Nature Methods18(7), 701–709 (2021)

    2021

  49. [57]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.05734 (2023)

    Basu, S., Born, J., Bose, A., Capponi, S., Chalkia, D., Chan, T.A., Doga, H., Goldsmith, M., Gujarati, T., Guzman-Saenz, A., et al.: Towards quantum- enabled cell-centric therapeutics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.05734 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Doga, H., Bose, A., Sahin, M.E., Bettencourt-Silva, J., Pham, A., Kim, E., Andress, A., Saxena, S., Parida, L., Robertus, J.L., et al.: How can quan- tum computing be applied in clinical trial design and optimization? Trends in Pharmacological Sciences (2024)

    2024

  51. [59]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.02446 (2024)

    Gupta, R.S., Wood, C.E., Engstrom, T., Pole, J.D., Shrapnel, S.: Quan- tum machine learning for digital health? a systematic review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.02446 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Research Directions: Quantum Technologies 1, 10 (2023) https://doi

    Fl¨ other, F.F.: The state of quantum computing applications in health and medicine. Research Directions: Quantum Technologies 1, 10 (2023) https://doi. org/10.1017/qut.2023.4

    2023 doi

  53. [61]

    International Journal of Data Mining and Bioinformatics 24(2), 97–120 (2020)

    Sorkhabi, L.B., Gharehchopogh, F.S., Shahamfar, J.: A systematic approach for pre-processing electronic health records for mining: Case study of heart disease. International Journal of Data Mining and Bioinformatics 24(2), 97–120 (2020)

    2020

  54. [62]

    Genes 14(2), 248 (2023)

    Torres-Martos, ´A., Bustos-Aibar, M., Ram ´ ırez-Mena, A., C´ amara-S´ anchez, S., Anguita-Ruiz, A., Alcal´ a, R., Aguilera, C.M., Alcal´ a-Fdez, J.: Omics data pre- processing for machine learning: A case study in childhood obesity. Genes 14(2), 248 (2023)

    2023

  55. [63]

    https://ch.mathworks.com/help/ medical-imaging/ug/overview-medical-image-preprocessing.html Accessed 24 2024-11-01

    Medical Image Preprocessing (2024). https://ch.mathworks.com/help/ medical-imaging/ug/overview-medical-image-preprocessing.html Accessed 24 2024-11-01

    2024

  56. [64]

    Physical review letters 122(4), 040504 (2019)

    Schuld, M., Killoran, N.: Quantum machine learning in feature hilbert spaces. Physical review letters 122(4), 040504 (2019)

    2019

  57. [65]

    Nature medicine 26(1), 29–38 (2020)

    Shilo, S., Rossman, H., Segal, E.: Axes of a revolution: challenges and promises of big data in healthcare. Nature medicine 26(1), 29–38 (2020)

    2020

  58. [66]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.12405 (2022)

    Maniscalco, S., Borrelli, E.-M., Cavalcanti, D., Foti, C., Glos, A., Goldsmith, M., Knecht, S., Korhonen, K., Malmi, J., Nyk¨ anen, A., et al.: Quantum network medicine: rethinking medicine with network science and quantum algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.12405 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Cancers 15(10), 2705 (2023)

    Sagingalieva, A., Kordzanganeh, M., Kenbayev, N., Kosichkina, D., Tomashuk, T., Melnikov, A.: Hybrid quantum neural network for drug response prediction. Cancers 15(10), 2705 (2023)

    2023

  60. [68]

    Scientific reports 7(1), 11008 (2017)

    Prins, B.P., Kuchenbaecker, K.B., Bao, Y., Smart, M., Zabaneh, D., Fatemifar, G., Luan, J., Wareham, N.J., Scott, R.A., Perry, J.R., et al.: Genome-wide anal- ysis of health-related biomarkers in the uk household longitudinal study reveals novel associations. Scientific report...

    2017

  61. [69]

    CoRR abs/2105.12806 (2021) 2105.12806

    Bubeck, S., Sellke, M.: A universal law of robustness via isoperimetry. CoRR abs/2105.12806 (2021) 2105.12806

    2021 arXiv

  62. [70]

    CoRR (2020) arXiv:2001.08361 [cs.LG]

    Kaplan, J., McCandlish, S., Henighan, T., Brown, T.B., Chess, B., Child, R., Gray, S., Radford, A., Wu, J., Amodei, D.: Scaling laws for neural language models. CoRR (2020) arXiv:2001.08361 [cs.LG]

    2020 arXiv

  63. [71]

    CoRR (2022) arXiv:2203.15556 [cs.CL]

    Hoffmann, J., Borgeaud, S., Mensch, A., Buchatskaya, E., Cai, T., Rutherford, E., Las Casas, D., Hendricks, L.A., Welbl, J., Clark, A., Hennigan, T., Noland, E., Millican, K., Driessche, G., Damoc, B., Guy, A., Osindero, S., Simonyan, K., Elsen, E., Rae, J.W., Vinyals, O., Sif...

    2022 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Tang, E.: Quantum principal component analysis only achieves an exponential speedup because of its state preparation assumptions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 060503 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.060503

    2021 doi

  65. [73]

    Sensors 23(17), 7462 (2023)

    Phalak, K., Chatterjee, A., Ghosh, S.: Quantum random access memory for dummies. Sensors 23(17), 7462 (2023)

    2023

  66. [74]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.00026 (2020)

    Harrow, A.W.: Small quantum computers and large classical data sets. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.00026 (2020)

    2020 arXiv

  67. [75]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.01529 25 (2024)

    Yogendran, B., Charlton, D., Beddig, M., Kolotouros, I., Wallden, P.: Big data applications on small quantum computers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.01529 25 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  68. [76]

    https://www.cdc.gov/public-health-gateway/php/about/ social-determinants-of-health.html

    Disease Control, C.U.S.C., Prevention: Social Determinants of Health (2024). https://www.cdc.gov/public-health-gateway/php/about/ social-determinants-of-health.html

    2024

  69. [77]

    Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 27(11), 1764– 1773 (2020)

    Chen, M., Tan, X., Padman, R.: Social determinants of health in electronic health records and their impact on analysis and risk prediction: a systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 27(11), 1764– 1773 (2020)

    2020

  70. [78]

    Nature medicine 25(1), 57–59 (2019)

    Ravizza, S., Huschto, T., Adamov, A., B¨ ohm, L., B¨ usser, A., Fl¨ other, F.F., Hinzmann, R., K¨ onig, H., McAhren, S.M., Robertson, D.H., et al.: Predicting the early risk of chronic kidney disease in patients with diabetes using real-world data. Nature medicine 25(1), 57–59 (2019)

    2019

  71. [79]

    Scientific reports 10(1), 7155 (2020)

    Li, Y., Rao, S., Solares, J.R.A., Hassaine, A., Ramakrishnan, R., Canoy, D., Zhu, Y., Rahimi, K., Salimi-Khorshidi, G.: Behrt: transformer for electronic health records. Scientific reports 10(1), 7155 (2020)

    2020

  72. [80]

    Frontiers in Pharmacology 14, 1180962 (2023)

    Adamson, B., Waskom, M., Blarre, A., Krismer, K., Gippetti, J., Ritten, J., Harrison, K., Ho, G., Linzmayer, R., Bansal, T., et al.: Approach to machine learning for extraction of real-world data variables from electronic health records. Frontiers in Pharmacology 14, 1180962 (2023)

    2023

  73. [81]

    Trends in Molecular Medicine (2023)

    Singhal, P., Tan, A., Drivas, T., Johnson, K., Ritchie, M., Beaulieu-Jones, B.: Opportunities and challenges for biomarker discovery using electronic health record data. Trends in Molecular Medicine (2023)

    2023

  74. [82]

    Nature communications9(1), 3522 (2018)

    Mosley, J.D., Feng, Q., Wells, Q.S., Van Driest, S.L., Shaffer, C.M., Edwards, T.L., Bastarache, L., Wei, W.-Q., Davis, L.K., McCarty, C.A., et al.: A study paradigm integrating prospective epidemiologic cohorts and electronic health records to identify disease biomarkers. Nat...

    2018

  75. [83]

    Scientific Reports12(1), 17981 (2022)

    Mohsen, F., Ali, H., El Hajj, N., Shah, Z.: Artificial intelligence-based methods for fusion of electronic health records and imaging data. Scientific Reports12(1), 17981 (2022)

    2022

  76. [84]

    Nature machine intelligence 5(4), 351–362 (2023)

    Steyaert, S., Pizurica, M., Nagaraj, D., Khandelwal, P., Hernandez-Boussard, T., Gentles, A.J., Gevaert, O.: Multimodal data fusion for cancer biomarker discovery with deep learning. Nature machine intelligence 5(4), 351–362 (2023)

    2023

  77. [85]

    Frontiers in medicine 6, 66 (2019)

    Assale, M., Dui, L.G., Cina, A., Seveso, A., Cabitza, F.: The revival of the notes field: leveraging the unstructured content in electronic health records. Frontiers in medicine 6, 66 (2019)

    2019

  78. [86]

    Nature Reviews Genetics 20(8), 467–484 (2019)

    Tam, V., Patel, N., Turcotte, M., Boss´ e, Y., Par´ e, G., Meyre, D.: Benefits and 26 limitations of genome-wide association studies. Nature Reviews Genetics 20(8), 467–484 (2019)

    2019

  79. [87]

    Nat Rev Methods Primers (1), 59 (2021)

    Uffelmann, E., Huang, Q., Munung, N., et al.: Genome-wide association studies. Nat Rev Methods Primers (1), 59 (2021)

    2021

  80. [88]

    AMS math challenges lecture 1(2000), 32 (2000)

    Donoho, D.L., et al.: High-dimensional data analysis: The curses and blessings of dimensionality. AMS math challenges lecture 1(2000), 32 (2000)

    2000

  81. [89]

    Frontiers in Bioinformatics 2, 927312 (2022)

    Pudjihartono, N., Fadason, T., Kempa-Liehr, A.W., O’Sullivan, J.M.: A review of feature selection methods for machine learning-based disease risk prediction. Frontiers in Bioinformatics 2, 927312 (2022)

    2022

  82. [90]

    BMC bioinformatics 25(1), 149 (2024)

    Nguyen, P.-N.: Biomarker discovery with quantum neural networks: a case-study in ctla4-activation pathways. BMC bioinformatics 25(1), 149 (2024)

    2024

  83. [91]

    https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.02085

    Saggi, M.K., Bhatia, A.S., Isaiah, M., Gowher, H., Kais, S.: Multi-Omic and Quantum Machine Learning Integration for Lung Subtypes Classification (2024). https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.02085

    2024 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Nature Reviews Genetics 16(4), 197–212 (2015)

    Albert, F.W., Kruglyak, L.: The role of regulatory variation in complex traits and disease. Nature Reviews Genetics 16(4), 197–212 (2015)

    2015

  85. [93]

    Briefings in Bioinformatics 25(5), 391 (2024)

    Nalecz-Charkiewicz, K., Charkiewicz, K., Nowak, R.M.: Quantum computing in bioinformatics: a systematic review mapping. Briefings in Bioinformatics 25(5), 391 (2024)

    2024

  86. [94]

    Nature genetics 38(8), 904–909 (2006)

    Price, A.L., Patterson, N.J., Plenge, R.M., Weinblatt, M.E., Shadick, N.A., Reich, D.: Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome- wide association studies. Nature genetics 38(8), 904–909 (2006)

    2006

  87. [95]

    Science Advances 7(34), 2589 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abg2589

    Li, Z., Chai, Z., Guo, Y., Ji, W., Wang, M., Shi, F., Wang, Y., Lloyd, S., Du, J.: Resonant quantum principal component analysis. Science Advances 7(34), 2589 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abg2589 . Publisher: American Associa- tion for the Advancement of Science. Acce...

    2021 doi

  88. [96]

    Biological Psychiatry 89(1), 41–53 (2021)

    Uffelmann, E., Posthuma, D.: Emerging methods and resources for biological interrogation of neuropsychiatric polygenic signal. Biological Psychiatry 89(1), 41–53 (2021)

    2021

  89. [97]

    PLoS Genetics 16(5), 1008612 (2020)

    Holland, D., Frei, O., Desikan, R., Fan, C.-C., Shadrin, A.A., Smeland, O.B., Sundar, V.S., Thompson, P., Andreassen, O.A., Dale, A.M.: Beyond snp heritability: Polygenicity and discoverability of phenotypes estimated with a univariate gaussian mixture model. PLoS Genetics 16(...

    2020

  90. [98]

    Nature Reviews Genetics 9(6), 477–485 (2008) 27

    Slatkin, M.: Linkage disequilibrium—understanding the evolutionary past and mapping the medical future. Nature Reviews Genetics 9(6), 477–485 (2008) 27

    2008

  91. [99]

    Journal of Causal Inference 8(1), 70–91 (2020) https: //doi.org/10.1515/jci-2018-0008

    Navascu´ es, M., Wolfe, E.: The inflation technique completely solves the causal compatibility problem. Journal of Causal Inference 8(1), 70–91 (2020) https: //doi.org/10.1515/jci-2018-0008

    2020 doi

  92. [100]

    Nature communications 10(1), 1472 (2019)

    Chiribella, G., Ebler, D.: Quantum speedup in the identification of cause–effect relations. Nature communications 10(1), 1472 (2019)

    2019

  93. [101]

    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 368(1620), 20120362 (2013)

    Nica, A.C., Dermitzakis, E.T.: Expression quantitative trait loci: present and future. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 368(1620), 20120362 (2013)

    2013

  94. [102]

    IEEE Access 10, 27522–27534 (2022)

    Khalsan, M., Machado, L.R., Al-Shamery, E.S., Ajit, S., Anthony, K., Mu, M., Agyeman, M.O.: A survey of machine learning approaches applied to gene expression analysis for cancer prediction. IEEE Access 10, 27522–27534 (2022)

    2022

  95. [103]

    Frontiers in Bioinformatics 2 (2022)

    Chen, Z., Chen, S., Qiang, X.: Identification of Biomarker in Brain-specific Gene Regulatory Network Using Structural Controllability Analysis. Frontiers in Bioinformatics 2 (2022). Accessed 2024-02-13

    2022

  96. [104]

    Journal of Computational Science 65, 101881 (2022) https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2022.101881

    Zhang, Z., Sun, C., Liu, Z.-P.: Discovering biomarkers of hepatocellular car- cinoma from single-cell RNA sequencing data by cooperative games on gene regulatory network. Journal of Computational Science 65, 101881 (2022) https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2022.101881 . Accessed ...

    2022

  97. [105]

    npj Quan- tum Information 9(1), 1–8 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-023-00740-6

    Roman-Vicharra, C., Cai, J.J.: Quantum gene regulatory networks. npj Quan- tum Information 9(1), 1–8 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-023-00740-6 . Number: 1 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group. Accessed 2024-02-12

    2023 doi

  98. [106]

    Scientific Data 6(1) (2019) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0116-4

    Osorio, D., Yu, X., Yu, P., Serpedin, E., Cai, J.J.: Single-cell rna sequencing of a european and an african lymphoblastoid cell line. Scientific Data 6(1) (2019) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0116-4

    2019 doi

  99. [107]

    eLife 10 (2021) https://doi.org/10.7554/elife

    SoRelle, E.D., Dai, J., Bonglack, E.N., Heckenberg, E.M., Zhou, J.Y., Giamber- ardino, S.N., Bailey, J.A., Gregory, S.G., Chan, C., Luftig, M.A.: Single-cell rna-seq reveals transcriptomic heterogeneity mediated by host–pathogen dynam- ics in lymphoblastoid cell lines. eLife 1...

    2021 doi

  100. [108]

    In: AIP Conference Proceedings, vol

    Al-Janabee, O., Al-Sarray, B.: Review of clustering for gene expression data. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 2516, p. 070019 (2023)

    2023

  101. [109]

    PLoS One 14(1), 0210236 (2019)

    Rodriguez, M.Z., Comin, C.H., Casanova, D., Bruno, O.M., Amancio, D.R., Costa, L.d.F., Rodrigues, F.A.: Clustering algorithms: A comparative approach. PLoS One 14(1), 0210236 (2019)

    2019

  102. [110]

    Soft computing 22(2), 387–408 (2018) 28

    Wang, D., Tan, D., Liu, L.: Particle swarm optimization algorithm: an overview. Soft computing 22(2), 387–408 (2018) 28

    2018

  103. [111]

    In: Proceedings of the 2004 Congress on Evolutionary Computation (IEEE Cat

    Sun, J., Feng, B., Xu, W.: Particle swarm optimization with particles hav- ing quantum behavior. In: Proceedings of the 2004 Congress on Evolutionary Computation (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8753), vol. 1, pp. 325–3311 (2004). https: //doi.org/10.1109/CEC.2004.1330875

    2004 arXiv

  104. [112]

    IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 6(1), 58–73 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.985692

    Clerc, M., Kennedy, J.: The particle swarm - explosion, stability, and conver- gence in a multidimensional complex space. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 6(1), 58–73 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.985692

    2002

  105. [113]

    PhD thesis, ZAF (2002)

    Van Den Bergh, F., Engelbrecht, A.P.: An analysis of particle swarm optimizers. PhD thesis, ZAF (2002). AAI0804353

    2002

  106. [114]

    In: Nguyen, N.T., Borzemski, L., Grzech, A., Ali, M

    Chen, W., Sun, J., Ding, Y., Fang, W., Xu, W.: Clustering of gene expres- sion data with quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization. In: Nguyen, N.T., Borzemski, L., Grzech, A., Ali, M. (eds.) New Frontiers in Applied Artificial Intelligence, pp. 388–396. Springer, Berlin, He...

    2008

  107. [115]

    Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 25(2), 376–391 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2011.09.017

    Sun, J., Chen, W., Fang, W., Wun, X., Xu, W.: Gene expression data analysis with the clustering method based on an improved quantum-behaved par- ticle swarm optimization. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 25(2), 376–391 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engapp...

    2012 doi

  108. [116]

    Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing 12(2), 2731–2750 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-02434-9

    Dabba, A., Tari, A., Meftali, S.: Hybridization of moth flame optimization algo- rithm and quantum computing for gene selection in microarray data. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing 12(2), 2731–2750 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-02434-9

    2020 doi

  109. [117]

    Scientific Reports 12(1) (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41598-022-18351-0

    Fallahi, S., Taghadosi, M.: Quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization based on solitons. Scientific Reports 12(1) (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41598-022-18351-0

    2022

  110. [118]

    IET Quantum Communication 3(4), 201–213 (2022)

    Elaraby, A.: Quantum medical images processing foundations and applications. IET Quantum Communication 3(4), 201–213 (2022)

    2022

  111. [119]

    Neurocomputing 525, 42–53 (2023)

    Wei, L., Liu, H., Xu, J., Shi, L., Shan, Z., Zhao, B., Gao, Y.: Quantum machine learning in medical image analysis: A survey. Neurocomputing 525, 42–53 (2023)

    2023

  112. [120]

    Zack, M.M.: National and state estimates of the numbers of adults and children with active epilepsy—united states, 2015. MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report 66 (2017)

    2017

  113. [121]

    In: 2024 International Conference on Communication, Computer Sciences and Engineering (IC3SE), pp

    Anuradha, R., Vandana, C., Singh, S.V., Singh, N., Emad, R., Nitin, V.: Integrating quantum computing for enhanced image reconstruction in medical diagnostics. In: 2024 International Conference on Communication, Computer Sciences and Engineering (IC3SE), pp. 1294–1298 (2024). IEEE 29

    2024

  114. [122]

    Qiu, L.Y.V.: Volume rendering from three-dimensional medical data using quantum computing (2019)

    2019

  115. [123]

    Artificial Intelligence Review 56(Suppl 2), 1711–1771 (2023)

    Cascarano, A., Mur-Petit, J., Hernandez-Gonzalez, J., Camacho, M., Toro Eadie, N., Gkontra, P., Chadeau-Hyam, M., Vitria, J., Lekadir, K.: Machine and deep learning for longitudinal biomedical data: a review of methods and applications. Artificial Intelligence Review 56(Suppl ...

    2023

  116. [124]

    Science 368(6493), 9553 (2020)

    Snyder-Mackler, N., Burger, J.R., Gaydosh, L., Belsky, D.W., Noppert, G.A., Campos, F.A., Bartolomucci, A., Yang, Y.C., Aiello, A.E., O’Rand, A., et al.: Social determinants of health and survival in humans and other animals. Science 368(6493), 9553 (2020)

    2020

  117. [125]

    npj Quantum Information 9(1), 16 (2023)

    Mujal, P., Mart ´ ınez-Pe˜ na, R., Giorgi, G.L., Soriano, M.C., Zambrini, R.: Time- series quantum reservoir computing with weak and projective measurements. npj Quantum Information 9(1), 16 (2023)

    2023

  118. [126]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.00986 (2022)

    Daskin, A.: A walk through of time series analysis on quantum computers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.00986 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  119. [127]

    Journal of the American Statistical association 98(461), 214–223 (2003)

    Benjamin, M.A., Rigby, R.A., Stasinopoulos, D.M.: Generalized autoregressive moving average models. Journal of the American Statistical association 98(461), 214–223 (2003)

    2003

  120. [128]

    Artificial Intelligence Review 53(8), 5929–5955 (2020)

    Van Houdt, G., Mosquera, C., N´ apoles, G.: A review on the long short-term memory model. Artificial Intelligence Review 53(8), 5929–5955 (2020)

    2020

  121. [129]

    Advanced Quantum Technologies 4(8), 2100027 (2021)

    Mujal, P., Mart ´ ınez-Pe˜ na, R., Nokkala, J., Garc ´ ıa-Beni, J., Giorgi, G.L., Soriano, M.C., Zambrini, R.: Opportunities in quantum reservoir computing and extreme learning machines. Advanced Quantum Technologies 4(8), 2100027 (2021)

    2021

  122. [130]

    Physical Review A 103(5), 052414 (2021)

    Takaki, Y., Mitarai, K., Negoro, M., Fujii, K., Kitagawa, M.: Learning temporal data with a variational quantum recurrent neural network. Physical Review A 103(5), 052414 (2021)

    2021

  123. [131]

    In: Neural Networks: Tricks of the Trade: Second Edition, pp

    Lukoˇ seviˇ cius, M.: A practical guide to applying echo state networks. In: Neural Networks: Tricks of the Trade: Second Edition, pp. 659–686 (2012)

    2012

  124. [132]

    In: European Conference on Artificial Life, pp

    Fernando, C., Sojakka, S.: Pattern recognition in a bucket. In: European Conference on Artificial Life, pp. 588–597 (2003). Springer

    2003

  125. [133]

    Neural Networks 115, 100–123 (2019)

    Tanaka, G., Yamane, T., H´ eroux, J.B., Nakane, R., Kanazawa, N., Takeda, S., Numata, H., Nakano, D., Hirose, A.: Recent advances in physical reservoir computing: A review. Neural Networks 115, 100–123 (2019)

    2019

  126. [134]

    In: 2019 Eleventh International Conference on Ubiquitous 30 and Future Networks (ICUFN), pp

    Komariah, K.S., Sin, B.-K.: Health state modeling and prediction based on hid- den markov models. In: 2019 Eleventh International Conference on Ubiquitous 30 and Future Networks (ICUFN), pp. 245–250 (2019). IEEE

    2019

  127. [135]

    JMIR mHealth and uHealth 7(9), 12861 (2019)

    Dinh-Le, C., Chuang, R., Chokshi, S., Mann, D.: Wearable health technology and electronic health record integration: scoping review and future directions. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 7(9), 12861 (2019)

    2019

  128. [136]

    Nature Reviews Chemistry 6(12), 899–915 (2022)

    Sempionatto, J.R., Lasalde-Ram ´ ırez, J.A., Mahato, K., Wang, J., Gao, W.: Wearable chemical sensors for biomarker discovery in the omics era. Nature Reviews Chemistry 6(12), 899–915 (2022)

    2022

  129. [137]

    NPJ digital medicine 2(1), 9 (2019)

    Kourtis, L.C., Regele, O.B., Wright, J.M., Jones, G.B.: Digital biomarkers for alzheimer’s disease: the mobile/wearable devices opportunity. NPJ digital medicine 2(1), 9 (2019)

    2019

  130. [138]

    Nature Reviews Physics 5(3), 157–169 (2023)

    Aslam, N., Zhou, H., Urbach, E.K., Turner, M.J., Walsworth, R.L., Lukin, M.D., Park, H.: Quantum sensors for biomedical applications. Nature Reviews Physics 5(3), 157–169 (2023)

    2023

  131. [139]

    Brain Commun 5, 251 (2023)

    Hershberger, C., Louis, S., Busch, R., Vegh, D., Najm, I., Bazeley, P., Eng, C., Jehi, L., Rotroff, D.: Molecular subtypes of epilepsy associated with post-surgical seizure recurrence. Brain Commun 5, 251 (2023)

    2023

  132. [140]

    Sci Rep 14, 10983 (2024)

    Mihajlovi´ c, K., Ceddia, G., Malod-Dognin, N., et al: Multi-omics integration of scrna-seq time series data predicts new intervention points for Parkinson’s disease. Sci Rep 14, 10983 (2024)

    2024

  133. [141]

    Nat Med 29, 158–169 (2023)

    Parry, E., Leshchiner, I., Gui` eze, R., et al: Evolutionary history of transformation from chronic lymphocytic leukemia to Richter syndrome. Nat Med 29, 158–169 (2023)

    2023

  134. [142]

    Cancer Research 83(7), 3874–3874 (2023)

    Parsons, H.A., Messer, C., Santos, K., Danysh, B.P., Hughes, M.E., Patel, A., Jacobs, R.A., Slowik, K., Hess, J., Stewart, C., Schlueter-Kuck, K., Rhrissor- rakrai, K., Utro, F., Levovitz, C., Wagle, N., Leone, J.P., Freedman, R., Parida, L., Krop, I.E., Getz, G., Lin, N.U.: A...

    2023

  135. [143]

    Blood 142, 4623 (2023)

    Naeem, A., Li, L., Utro, F., Cha, J., Tsuji, J., Fernandes, S.M., Azevedo, R.S., Morelli, F., Wang, Z., Shupe, S.J., Rhrissorrakrai, K., Levovitz, C., Danysh, B.P., Kluge, A., Davids, M.S., Leshchiner, I., Parida, L., Getz, G., Brown, J.R.: Understanding resistance mechanisms ...

    2023

  136. [144]

    Nat Cancer (2024) 31

    Burr, R., Leshchiner, I., Costantino, C., et al: Developmental mosaicism under- lying EGFR-mutant lung cancer presenting with multiple primary tumors. Nat Cancer (2024) 31

    2024

  137. [145]

    Cancer Discovery 8(10), 1270–1285 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290

    Khan, K.H., Cunningham, D., Werner, B., Vlachogiannis, G., Spiteri, I., Heide, T., Mateos, J.F., Vatsiou, A., Lampis, A., Damavandi, M.D., Lote, H., Hunting- ford, I.S., Hedayat, S., Chau, I., Tunariu, N., Mentrasti, G., Trevisani, F., Rao, S., Anandappa, G., Watkins, D., Star...

    2018

  138. [146]

    Nat Commun

    Mathios, D., Johansen, J., Cristiano, S., Medina, J., Phallen, J., Larsen, K., Bruhm, D., Niknafs, N., Ferreira, L., Adleff, V., Chiao, J., Leal, A., Noe, M., White, J., Arun, A., Hruban, C., Annapragada, A., MW Jensen SO, O., Mad- sen, A., Carvalho, B., Wit, M., Carey, J., Dr...

    2021

  139. [147]

    J Immunother Cancer 9, 006309 (2023)

    Rolfo, C., Russo, A.: Brave new world of cfDNA-omics for early cancer detection. J Immunother Cancer 9, 006309 (2023)

    2023

  140. [148]

    bioRxiv, 2021–06 (2021)

    Shi, M., Mollah, S.: Netoif: A network-based approach for time-series omics data imputation and forecasting. bioRxiv, 2021–06 (2021)

    2021

  141. [149]

    Msystems 6(2), 10–1128 (2021)

    Ruiz-Perez, D., Lugo-Martinez, J., Bourguignon, N., Mathee, K., Lerner, B., Bar-Joseph, Z., Narasimhan, G.: Dynamic bayesian networks for integrating multi-omics time series microbiome data. Msystems 6(2), 10–1128 (2021)

    2021

  142. [150]

    Signal transduction and targeted therapy 7(1), 1–28 (2022)

    Hou, K., Wu, Z.-X., Chen, X.-Y., Wang, J.-Q., Zhang, D., Xiao, C., Zhu, D., Koya, J.B., Wei, L., Li, J., et al.: Microbiota in health and diseases. Signal transduction and targeted therapy 7(1), 1–28 (2022)

    2022

  143. [151]

    Frontiers in Public Health 12, 1467121 (2024)

    Buytaers, F.E., Berger, N., Heyden, J., Roosens, N.H., De Keersmaecker, S.C.: The potential of including the microbiome as biomarker in population-based health studies: methods and benefits. Frontiers in Public Health 12, 1467121 (2024)

    2024

  144. [152]

    https://arxiv

    Gyurik, C., Schmidhuber, A., King, R., Dunjko, V., Hayakawa, R.: Quantum computing and persistence in topological data analysis (2024). https://arxiv. org/abs/2410.21258

    2024 arXiv

  145. [153]

    He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., Sun, J.: Deep residual learning for image recognition (2015) 1512.03385 [cs.CV]

    2015 arXiv

  146. [154]

    Physical Review Research 3(2), 023153 (2021)

    Du, Y., Hsieh, M.-H., Liu, T., Tao, D., Liu, N.: Quantum noise protects quantum 32 classifiers against adversaries. Physical Review Research 3(2), 023153 (2021)

    2021

  147. [155]

    ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 54(7), 1–35 (2021)

    Resch, S., Karpuzcu, U.R.: Benchmarking quantum computers and the impact of quantum noise. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 54(7), 1–35 (2021)

    2021

  148. [156]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.18662 (2024)

    Kiwit, F.J., Wolf, M.A., Marso, M., Ross, P., Lorenz, J.M., Riofr ´ ıo, C.A., Luckow, A.: Benchmarking quantum generative learning: A study on scalability and noise resilience using quark. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.18662 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  149. [157]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.07886 (2024)

    Monzani, F., Ricci, E., Nigro, L., Prati, E.: Leveraging non-unital noise for gate- based quantum reservoir computing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.07886 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  150. [158]

    Nature 616(7955), 50–55 (2023)

    Sivak, V., Eickbusch, A., Royer, B., Singh, S., Tsioutsios, I., Ganjam, S., Miano, A., Brock, B., Ding, A., Frunzio, L., et al.: Real-time quantum error correction beyond break-even. Nature 616(7955), 50–55 (2023)

    2023

  151. [159]

    Medical image analysis 65, 101759 (2020)

    Karimi, D., Dou, H., Warfield, S.K., Gholipour, A.: Deep learning with noisy labels: Exploring techniques and remedies in medical image analysis. Medical image analysis 65, 101759 (2020)

    2020

  152. [160]

    Knowledge-Based Systems 215, 106771 (2021)

    Algan, G., Ulusoy, I.: Image classification with deep learning in the presence of noisy labels: A survey. Knowledge-Based Systems 215, 106771 (2021)

    2021

  153. [161]

    IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems 34(11), 8135–8153 (2022)

    Song, H., Kim, M., Park, D., Shin, Y., Lee, J.-G.: Learning from noisy labels with deep neural networks: A survey. IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems 34(11), 8135–8153 (2022)

    2022

  154. [162]

    Nature Machine Intelligence 4(8), 669–677 (2022)

    Liang, W., Tadesse, G.A., Ho, D., Fei-Fei, L., Zaharia, M., Zhang, C., Zou, J.: Advances, challenges and opportunities in creating data for trustworthy ai. Nature Machine Intelligence 4(8), 669–677 (2022)

    2022

  155. [163]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.13196 (2024)

    Khatun, A., Aydeniz, K.Y., Weinstein, Y.S., Usman, M.: Quantum gener- ative learning for high-resolution medical image generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.13196 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  156. [164]

    In: International Conference on Computer Aided Verification, pp

    Guan, J., Fang, W., Ying, M.: Verifying fairness in quantum machine learn- ing. In: International Conference on Computer Aided Verification, pp. 408–429 (2022). Springer

    2022

  157. [165]

    IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing (2023)

    Otgonbaatar, S., Schwarz, G., Datcu, M., Kranzlm¨ uller, D.: Quantum transfer learning for real-world, small, and high-dimensional remotely sensed datasets. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing (2023)

    2023

  158. [166]

    Hum.-Cent

    Maheshwari, D., Ullah, U., Marulanda, P.A.O., Jurado, A.G.-O., Gonzalez, I.D., Merodio, J.M.O., Garcia-Zapirain, B.: Quantum machine learning applied to electronic healthcare records for ischemic heart disease classification. Hum.-Cent. 33 Comput. Inf. Sci 13(06) (2023)

    2023

  159. [167]

    IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering 3, 1–11 (2022)

    Krunic, Z., Fl¨ other, F.F., Seegan, G., Earnest-Noble, N.D., Shehab, O.: Quan- tum kernels for real-world predictions based on electronic health records. IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering 3, 1–11 (2022)

    2022

  160. [168]

    Communications Physics 7(1), 68 (2024)

    Hibat-Allah, M., Mauri, M., Carrasquilla, J., Perdomo-Ortiz, A.: A framework for demonstrating practical quantum advantage: comparing quantum against classical generative models. Communications Physics 7(1), 68 (2024)

    2024

  161. [169]

    Elife 12, 89947 (2024)

    Kazdaghli, S., Kerenidis, I., Kieckbusch, J., Teare, P.: Improved clinical data imputation via classical and quantum determinantal point processes. Elife 12, 89947 (2024)

    2024

  162. [170]

    Briefings in Bioinformatics 25(5), 391 (2024) https://doi

    Nalecz-Charkiewicz, K., Charkiewicz, K., Nowak, R.M.: Quan- tum computing in bioinformatics: a systematic review map- ping. Briefings in Bioinformatics 25(5), 391 (2024) https://doi. org/10.1093/bib/bbae391 https://academic.oup.com/bib/article- pdf/25/5/bbae391/58817554/bbae391.pdf

    2024 doi

  163. [171]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.11645 (2024)

    Wonga, Y.K., Zhou, Y., Liang, Y.S.: Quantum image denoising with machine learning: A novel approach to improve quantum image processing quality and reliability. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.11645 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  164. [172]

    Iscience 27(5) (2024)

    Wang, L., Liu, Y., Meng, F., Luan, T., Liu, W., Zhang, Z., Yu, X.: A quan- tum synthetic aperture radar image denoising algorithm based on grayscale morphology. Iscience 27(5) (2024)

    2024

  165. [173]

    Scientific Reports13(1), 4129 (2023)

    Haque, M.E., Paul, M., Ulhaq, A., Debnath, T.: Advanced quantum image rep- resentation and compression using a dct-efrqi approach. Scientific Reports13(1), 4129 (2023)

    2023

  166. [174]

    Computers 13(8), 185 (2024)

    Deb, S.K., Pan, W.D.: Quantum image compression: Fundamentals, algorithms, and advances. Computers 13(8), 185 (2024)

    2024

  167. [175]

    Artificial intelligence review 54(1), 215–251 (2021)

    Ben Yedder, H., Cardoen, B., Hamarneh, G.: Deep learning for biomedical image reconstruction: A survey. Artificial intelligence review 54(1), 215–251 (2021)

    2021

  168. [176]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.14398 (2024)

    Li, J., Tong, Y.: Exponential quantum advantage for pathfinding in regular sunflower graphs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.14398 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  169. [177]

    Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy 64(10), 100312 (2021)

    Li, W., Lu, S., Deng, D.-L.: Quantum federated learning through blind quan- tum computing. Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy 64(10), 100312 (2021)

    2021

  170. [178]

    In: ICASSP 2022-2022 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and 34 Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp

    Chehimi, M., Saad, W.: Quantum federated learning with quantum data. In: ICASSP 2022-2022 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and 34 Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 8617–8621 (2022). IEEE

    2022

  171. [179]

    IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics 28(4: Mach

    Huang, R., Tan, X., Xu, Q.: Quantum federated learning with decentralized data. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics 28(4: Mach. Learn. in Photon. Commun. and Meas. Syst.), 1–10 (2022)

    2022

  172. [180]

    Quantum Science and Technology 8(4), 045032 (2023)

    Bhatia, A.S., Kais, S., Alam, M.A.: Federated quanvolutional neural network: a new paradigm for collaborative quantum learning. Quantum Science and Technology 8(4), 045032 (2023)

    2023

  173. [181]

    Scientific reports 10(1), 12598 (2020)

    Sheller, M.J., Edwards, B., Reina, G.A., Martin, J., Pati, S., Kotrotsou, A., Milchenko, M., Xu, W., Marcus, D., Colen, R.R., et al.: Federated learning in medicine: facilitating multi-institutional collaborations without sharing patient data. Scientific reports 10(1), 12598 (2020)

    2020

  174. [182]

    NPJ digital medicine 3(1), 1–7 (2020)

    Rieke, N., Hancox, J., Li, W., Milletari, F., Roth, H.R., Albarqouni, S., Bakas, S., Galtier, M.N., Landman, B.A., Maier-Hein, K., et al.: The future of digital health with federated learning. NPJ digital medicine 3(1), 1–7 (2020)

    2020

  175. [183]

    Mathematics 11(1), 151 (2022)

    Prasad, V.K., Bhattacharya, P., Maru, D., Tanwar, S., Verma, A., Singh, A., Tiwari, A.K., Sharma, R., Alkhayyat, A., T , urcanu, F.-E., et al.: Federated learning for the internet-of-medical-things: A survey. Mathematics 11(1), 151 (2022)

    2022

  176. [184]

    Nature communications 5(1), 4684 (2014)

    Enroth, S., Johansson, ˚A., Enroth, S.B., Gyllensten, U.: Strong effects of genetic and lifestyle factors on biomarker variation and use of personalized cutoffs. Nature communications 5(1), 4684 (2014)

    2014

  177. [185]

    https://www.institute.global/insights/tech-and-digitalisation/ state-of-compute-access-how-to-bridge-the-new-digital-divide

    Boakye, B., Garson, M., Macon-Cooney, B., Westgarth, T., Zander- mann, K.L.: State of Compute Access: How to Bridge the New Digital Divide (2023). https://www.institute.global/insights/tech-and-digitalisation/ state-of-compute-access-how-to-bridge-the-new-digital-divide

    2023

  178. [186]

    Quantum Science and Technology 8(2), 024005 (2023) 35

    Seskir, Z.C., Umbrello, S., Coenen, C., Vermaas, P.E.: Democratization of quantum technologies. Quantum Science and Technology 8(2), 024005 (2023) 35

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.