Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 7 minor 41 references

Motion Diffusion-Guided 3D Global HMR from a Dynamic Camera

T0 review · 5 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read DiffOpt shows that a pretrained motion diffusion model, used as a score-distillation prior inside a multi-stage optimization, recovers globally coherent human motion from monocular moving-camera video, substantially outperforming prior…

desk verdict A promising combination of diffusion priors and neural motion fields for global HMR, but the evaluation as reported doesn't fully support the 'superior over SOTA' claim. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.10582 v1 pith:4WYEWJEF submitted 2024-11-15 cs.CV

Jaewoo Heo , Kuan-Chieh Wang , Karen Liu , Serena Yeung-Levy This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords globalhumanmeshrecoverymotiondiffusionmodelscoredistillationsamplingdynamiccameraneuralfieldsmonocularvideopriortrajectoryoptimization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

DiffOpt is a method for recovering global 3D human motion from monocular video shot with a moving camera. The paper's central claim is that a pretrained motion diffusion model, used as a score-distillation prior, can push an initial pose-and-trajectory estimate toward temporally coherent human motion, while a learnable camera update keeps the reprojection error low. On the EMDB and Egobody benchmarks, DiffOpt reports the best global trajectory metrics among compared state-of-the-art methods, with the largest gains on long, untrimmed sequences where competitor optimization often collapses. If true, this makes markerless motion capture more practical for long in-the-wild footage, because the method does not need multi-view setups or static cameras.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the motion diffusion model (MDM) used as a prior through score distillation sampling (SDS) loss, jointly with a reprojection loss. The human motion is parameterized by neural motion fields (three MLPs for pose, root orientation, and translation), and camera motion is parameterized by learnable rotation bias, translation scale and bias, and focal length scale on top of DROID-SLAM estimates. A three-stage optimization first warms up the fields to an off-the-shelf HMR estimate, then alternates human-motion updates (MDM-SDS plus pose loss) and camera updates (2D reprojection), then fine-tunes all parameters together.

What would settle it

Run DiffOpt on a lengthy dynamic-camera sequence where the subject climbs or pushes against objects (external forces), and check whether the recovered global trajectory stays close to ground truth; the paper's claimed limitation predicts a measurable degradation in G-MPJPE on such sequences compared to flat-ground locomotion, so a sequence where the method fails to beat GLAMR would contradict the primary claim of superior robustness.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper discovers that a motion diffusion model (MDM) trained on AMASS provides a strong enough prior over coherent human motion to guide global human mesh recovery: by representing the human motion with neural motion fields and optimizing them with the MDM score distillation sampling (SDS) loss against a reprojection loss, DiffOpt correctly disentangles human root translation from camera motion. The result is that the global root trajectory, not just per-frame pose, is recovered accurately, and this advantage grows with sequence length. On untrimmed EMDB sequences, DiffOpt achieves a G-MPJPE of 1776.2 mm versus 2113.5 mm for GLAMR and 5595.8 mm for SLAHMR, a margin the paper attributes to the diffusion prior's temporal coherence.

Load-bearing premise

The pretrained motion diffusion prior, trained on ground-contact motions in AMASS, accurately represents the kinds of motion in the test videos; if the true motion involves static legs or external forces beyond gravity, the SDS loss can pull the trajectory toward plausible but wrong paths, and the paper's own limitations section says performance drops in exactly those cases.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Long untrimmed videos become tractable: DiffOpt's global trajectory error on EMDB untrimmed sequences is 1776.2 mm versus 2113.5 mm for GLAMR, so applications that need full-length motion capture no longer require splitting videos into short segments.
  • The multi-stage optimization scheme is essential: ablations show single-stage optimization degrades G-MPJPE by 625 mm, meaning the staged warm-up, MDM, and camera alternation is what makes the diffusion prior effective.
  • Better camera estimation can plug in: replacing DROID-SLAM with TRAM's masked-SLAM keeps DiffOpt competitive, so future improvements in camera parameter estimation should directly improve global human motion recovery.
  • The method inherits biases from its components: HMR2.0, ViTPose, and SLAM failures propagate into the final motion, and the motion prior limits the diversity of recoverable motions.
  • The reported gains are largest on sequences with significant global root translation, suggesting the diffusion prior primarily corrects trajectory-level drift rather than per-frame pose.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same MDM-SDS recipe could serve as a generic temporal regularizer for other optimization-based reconstruction tasks, such as multi-person or object-interaction scenes, where the prior is replaced with a scene-aware motion model.
  • Because the prior is what supplies long-range temporal coherence, swapping in a diffusion model trained on more diverse data (including external forces and static poses) should directly extend DiffOpt to the failure cases the paper names.
  • The camera-motion parameterization (bias, scale, focal length) suggests an implicit calibration step; DiffOpt might also be used to refine camera estimates from SLAM in human-centric video.
  • The paper's limitation that static legs and external-force interactions degrade performance implies that the current prior is too narrow for full in-the-wild deployment, and a prior conditioned on scene or contact information would be a natural next step.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper proposes DiffOpt, an optimization-based global 3D human mesh recovery (GHMR) method for monocular videos captured by dynamic cameras. The method represents human motion with neural motion fields, initializes from off-the-shelf HMR2.0 pose estimates and DROID-SLAM camera parameters, and uses a pretrained motion diffusion model (MDM) as a score-distillation prior in a three-stage optimization. Experiments on trimmed and untrimmed EMDB and on Egobody compare against GLAMR, SLAHMR, WHAM, and TRACE, with a focus on global metrics (G-MPJPE and G-MPVPE). The paper reports improved global motion recovery on long sequences and includes ablations showing the importance of the neural motion field and the multi-stage optimization scheme.

Significance. If the central claim holds, DiffOpt would be a meaningful contribution to global HMR, demonstrating that a generative motion prior can regularize root trajectory estimation and camera-human disentanglement. The paper has clear strengths: it leverages a strong pretrained motion prior (MDM) through score distillation, uses an implicit neural motion representation for temporal consistency, evaluates on two established benchmarks, and provides ablations that isolate the motion representation and optimization scheme. However, the headline claim of 'superior global human motion recovery over other state-of-the-art' is only partly supported because the long-video experiments compare against an incomplete baseline set and because the handling of WHAM's failure on one trimmed sequence skews the reported averages. The results are promising but require additional comparisons and more careful statistical reporting before the central claim is fully established.

major comments (5)
  1. [Tables 3 and 4, Sections 4.1.2 and 4.2] The SDS objective in Eq. (3) is written as E[ w(t) || eps_phi(alpha_t x + sigma_t epsilon, t) - epsilon ||^2 ], which is the standard noise-prediction form of score distillation. However, Eq. (2) defines eps_phi as an x0-prediction network trained with || x0 - eps_phi(x_t, t) ||^2, as in MDM. If eps_phi outputs x0 rather than the noise epsilon, then subtracting the sampled noise epsilon from the network output is not a valid score-distillation target; for an x0-predictor, the SDS target should be the implied noise (x_t - alpha_t x0)/sigma_t or an x0-based objective. This discrepancy is load-bearing because stage 2 and stage 3 both use L_Diff as the motion prior. Please clarify which network is actually used and provide the exact gradient expression that is implemented.
  2. [Tables 3 and 4, Sections 4.1.2 and 4.2] The long-video claim is supported only against a partial baseline set. Table 3 compares DiffOpt to GLAMR and SLAHMR but omits WHAM and TRACE, both of which are named in the introduction and evaluated in Table 2. Table 4 compares DiffOpt only to WHAM and SLAHMR, omitting GLAMR and TRACE. Thus no experiment establishes superiority over all four baselines in the long-video regime where the headline claim is strongest. Given WHAM's strong trimmed global metrics (mean G-MPJPE 216.5 mm after exclusion), the untrimmed comparison with WHAM is essential. The paper should either run the missing baselines on both benchmarks or restrict the claim to the methods actually compared in each setting.
  3. [Table 2 and Section 4.1.1] The mean G-MPJPE and G-MPVPE for WHAM are computed after excluding the 'soccer warmup' sequence because WHAM fails completely on that sequence. This exclusion is not neutral: it raises WHAM's mean and makes the statement that DiffOpt is 'marginally trailing behind WHAM' more favorable to the paper's narrative. For a fair comparison, report the mean including all seven sequences, with an explicit failure handling policy (e.g., NaN or a large penalty), and report per-sequence values in the main text. Without this, the claim that DiffOpt 'consistently outperforms most other methods' is not supported by the table as presented.
  4. [Tables 2-4] No per-sequence variance, confidence intervals, or significance tests are reported anywhere in the quantitative evaluation. With only seven trimmed EMDB sequences and a single untrimmed mean per method, the claimed improvements (16% on untrimmed EMDB, 24.6% on Egobody) could be driven by one or two outlier sequences, notably SLAHMR's numerical breakdown on untrimmed EMDB. Please report per-sequence errors or at least standard deviations/confidence intervals, and identify which sequences drive the average improvement.
  5. [Section 5 and Section 4.1.1] The paper's own limitations state that DiffOpt degrades on static-leg postures and on motions with external forces beyond ground contact, and the 'outdoor warmup' performance drop is attributed to contact with rigid objects being out-of-distribution for the AMASS-trained MDM. These are in-the-wild scenarios that the abstract explicitly invokes, so the superiority claim should be scoped to motions consistent with the MDM training distribution, or the method should be evaluated on a broader set of such interactions. This is a scope issue rather than an internal inconsistency, but it should be acknowledged in the abstract and conclusion.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Section 2.1] There is a typo: 'the the Skinned Multi-Person Linear' should read 'the Skinned Multi-Person Linear'.
  2. [Table 2 caption] The caption says 'comparing its performance against GLAMR and SLAHMR' but the table actually includes WHAM, TRACE, and DiffOpt as well; please update the caption to reflect the full set of methods.
  3. [Section 3.2 and Section 3.3.2] The symbol t is used both for the diffusion timestep in Eq. (3) and for the frame index in Eqs. (8)-(10), which is confusing; please use distinct symbols, for example s for the diffusion step and i for the frame index.
  4. [References] The reference 'Mahmood et al.' is incomplete; the full author list should be given, and the in-text citation 'et al. (2019)' should be replaced with a proper citation key such as 'Mahmood et al. (2019)'.
  5. [Section 3.3.1] The initial translation heuristic is said to be described in the Supplementary Material, but no supplementary material is included with the arXiv version; please provide the details or a reference to a public supplement.
  6. [Section 6] The conclusion says 'including GLAMR and SLAHMR' when the paper actually compares against four baselines; please update the wording to reflect the full set of methods evaluated.
  7. [Figure 2] The qualitative example shows the 'soccer warmup' sequence; consider also showing a known failure case such as 'outdoor warmup' to give readers a balanced view of the method's limitations.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the pipeline optimizes pretrained priors against held-out ground truth with no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained relative to its claimed contribution. DiffOpt takes as input a video, an off-the-shelf HMR2.0 pose estimate, ViTPose 2D keypoints, and DROID-SLAM camera parameters, then optimizes a neural motion field against three losses: L_warmup (fit to HMR2.0), L_Diff (SDS loss from a pretrained MDM on AMASS), and L_2D (reprojection against detected keypoints). None of these losses is defined in terms of the EMDB/Egobody ground-truth global metrics that are used for evaluation, and the final global trajectory is not a refit of those metrics. The MDM prior is an external pretrained model, not a parameter fitted to the test set. The camera correction parameters (b_R, s_t, b_t, s_f) are optimized per-sequence from SLAM initializations, but they are not fitted to the ground-truth global trajectory and the prediction is not equivalent to the fit by construction. Self-citation of NeMo (Wang et al. 2022) is present for the neural motion field representation, but the contribution does not rest on an unverified theorem or a forbidden alternative; the ablation in Table 5 independently tests the effect of removing the neural field and the multi-stage scheme. The limitation statements in Section 5 about static-leg postures and external-force interactions further show that the method's behavior is not forced by any circular construction. The concerns about missing baselines in the long-video tables (WHAM/TRACE absent on untrimmed EMDB, GLAMR/TRACE absent on Egobody) and the WHAM NaN exclusion are evidence-completeness issues for the empirical claim, not circularity of the derivation; they do not make any equation reduce to its own input. Therefore the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim relies on three unverified premises: the alignment of the MDM prior with the test motion distribution, the sufficiency of the DROID-SLAM initialization plus learned residuals for the camera, and the usefulness of the frustum-based translation initialization. No free constants are fitted to the test data in the paper, but the undisclosed loss weights and per-stage optimization schedules are de facto free parameters. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Stage loss weights and per-stage optimization hyperparameters
    The weighting of L_Diff, L_warmup, and L_2D in stages 2 and 3, plus per-stage iteration counts, learning rates, and the SDS weighting function w(t), are not reported; the final trajectory quality depends on these settings, making them de facto free parameters chosen by the authors.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The pretrained MDM provides a strong prior of coherent human motion for the test videos from EMDB and Egobody.
    The central mechanism is the SDS loss from MDM; Section 5 admits degradation on static-leg postures and external-force interactions, so this assumption is load-bearing and potentially false for some test sequences.
  • domain assumption DROID-SLAM camera predictions are a reasonable initialization for the dynamic camera trajectory, and the learned residual terms can correct its errors.
    Section 3.2 notes SLAM is less robust in dynamic human-centric videos; the camera refinement is limited to a per-frame rotation bias, translation scale and bias, and focal scale, which may not capture all error modes.
  • domain assumption The initial root translation heuristic (keeping the human in the camera frustum) provides a useful starting point for global trajectory optimization.
    Section 3.3.1 states x_init is estimated with a frustum heuristic described in the missing supplementary material; a poor initialization could lead to a plausible but incorrect global path.
  • domain assumption The SMPL body model is an adequate parametric representation of the human body for these videos.
    SMPL is used as the body model, a standard assumption in the field; no check for shape or identity coverage is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Motion Diffusion-Guided 3D Global HMR from a Dynamic Camera." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4WYEWJEF

@misc{pith2026241110582,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Motion Diffusion-Guided 3D Global HMR from a Dynamic Camera},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4WYEWJEF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.10582}
}
read the original abstract

Motion capture technologies have transformed numerous fields, from the film and gaming industries to sports science and healthcare, by providing a tool to capture and analyze human movement in great detail. The holy grail in the topic of monocular global human mesh and motion reconstruction (GHMR) is to achieve accuracy on par with traditional multi-view capture on any monocular videos captured with a dynamic camera, in-the-wild. This is a challenging task as the monocular input has inherent depth ambiguity, and the moving camera adds additional complexity as the rendered human motion is now a product of both human and camera movement. Not accounting for this confusion, existing GHMR methods often output motions that are unrealistic, e.g. unaccounted root translation of the human causes foot sliding. We present DiffOpt, a novel 3D global HMR method using Diffusion Optimization. Our key insight is that recent advances in human motion generation, such as the motion diffusion model (MDM), contain a strong prior of coherent human motion. The core of our method is to optimize the initial motion reconstruction using the MDM prior. This step can lead to more globally coherent human motion. Our optimization jointly optimizes the motion prior loss and reprojection loss to correctly disentangle the human and camera motions. We validate DiffOpt with video sequences from the Electromagnetic Database of Global 3D Human Pose and Shape in the Wild (EMDB) and Egobody, and demonstrate superior global human motion recovery capability over other state-of-the-art global HMR methods most prominently in long video settings.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.10582 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (top) DiffOpt system architecture. Given an input video with T(n) frames, DiffOpt uses neural motion fields to predict the pose, root orientation, and global root translation for each frame. We regress these parameters using the SMPL Loper et al. (2015) body model to get the 3D joint and vertex positions. Our predicted motion is then constrained by 3D loss against initial predictions from off-the-shelf HMR models Go… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Qualitative results on a trimmed segment in the ‘soccer warmup’ EMDB sequence Kaufmann et al. (2023). This is a challenging motion sequence, as the human subject continuously twists his hips while making quick side-steps. 3D human meshes have been rendered on the original video sequences for GLAMR Yuan et al. (2022) on the top row, SLAHMR Ye et al. (2023) on the middle row and DiffOpt on the bottom row. Moreover, th… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Exploiting temporal context for 3d human pose estimation in the wild

    Anurag Arnab, Carl Doersch, and Andrew Zisserman. Exploiting temporal context for 3d human pose estimation in the wild. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.\ 3395--3404, 2019

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    Jonathan T. Barron. A general and adaptive robust loss function, 2019

    2019

  3. [3]

    Cross-attention of disentangled modalities for 3d human mesh recovery with transformers

    Junhyeong Cho, Kim Youwang, and Tae-Hyun Oh. Cross-attention of disentangled modalities for 3d human mesh recovery with transformers. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pp.\ 342--359. Springer, 2022

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    A review of the evolution of vision-based motion analysis and the integration of advanced computer vision methods towards developing a markerless system

    Steffi L Colyer, Murray Evans, Darren P Cosker, and Aki IT Salo. A review of the evolution of vision-based motion analysis and the integration of advanced computer vision methods towards developing a markerless system. Sports medicine-open, 4 0 (1): 0 1--15, 2018

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Amass: Archive of motion capture as surface shapes

    Mahmood et al. Amass: Archive of motion capture as surface shapes. In ICCV, 2019

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    Humans in 4d: Reconstructing and tracking humans with transformers, 2023

    Shubham Goel, Georgios Pavlakos, Jathushan Rajasegaran, Angjoo Kanazawa, and Jitendra Malik. Humans in 4d: Reconstructing and tracking humans with transformers, 2023

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Bilevel online adaptation for out-of-domain human mesh reconstruction

    Shanyan Guan, Jingwei Xu, Yunbo Wang, Bingbing Ni, and Xiaokang Yang. Bilevel online adaptation for out-of-domain human mesh reconstruction. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.\ 10472--10481, 2021

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Biomechanics: 40 years on

    Joseph Hamill, Kathleen M Knutzen, and Timothy R Derrick. Biomechanics: 40 years on. Kinesiology Review, 10 0 (3): 0 228--237, 2021

    work page 2021

Show all 41 references
  1. [9]

    Kama: 3d keypoint aware body mesh articulation

    Umar Iqbal, Kevin Xie, Yunrong Guo, Jan Kautz, and Pavlo Molchanov. Kama: 3d keypoint aware body mesh articulation. In 2021 International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV), pp.\ 689--699. IEEE, 2021

    2021

  2. [10]

    End-to-end recovery of human shape and pose

    Angjoo Kanazawa, Michael J Black, David W Jacobs, and Jitendra Malik. End-to-end recovery of human shape and pose. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp.\ 7122--7131, 2018 a

    2018

  3. [11]

    Learning category-specific mesh reconstruction from image collections

    Angjoo Kanazawa, Shubham Tulsiani, Alexei A Efros, and Jitendra Malik. Learning category-specific mesh reconstruction from image collections. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), pp.\ 371--386, 2018 b

    2018

  4. [12]

    Learning 3d human dynamics from video

    Angjoo Kanazawa, Jason Y Zhang, Panna Felsen, and Jitendra Malik. Learning 3d human dynamics from video. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.\ 5614--5623, 2019

    2019

  5. [13]

    Emdb: The electromagnetic database of global 3d human pose and shape in the wild, 2023

    Manuel Kaufmann, Jie Song, Chen Guo, Kaiyue Shen, Tianjian Jiang, Chengcheng Tang, Juan Zarate, and Otmar Hilliges. Emdb: The electromagnetic database of global 3d human pose and shape in the wild, 2023

    2023

  6. [14]

    Vibe: Video inference for human body pose and shape estimation

    Muhammed Kocabas, Nikos Athanasiou, and Michael J Black. Vibe: Video inference for human body pose and shape estimation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.\ 5253--5263, 2020

    2020

  7. [15]

    Hybrik: A hybrid analytical-neural inverse kinematics solution for 3d human pose and shape estimation

    Jiefeng Li, Chao Xu, Zhicun Chen, Siyuan Bian, Lixin Yang, and Cewu Lu. Hybrik: A hybrid analytical-neural inverse kinematics solution for 3d human pose and shape estimation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.\ 3383--3393, 2021

    2021

  8. [16]

    D&d: Learning human dynamics from dynamic camera, 2022

    Jiefeng Li, Siyuan Bian, Chao Xu, Gang Liu, Gang Yu, and Cewu Lu. D&d: Learning human dynamics from dynamic camera, 2022

    2022

  9. [17]

    Hybrik-x: Hybrid analytical-neural inverse kinematics for whole-body mesh recovery, 2023

    Jiefeng Li, Siyuan Bian, Chao Xu, Zhicun Chen, Lixin Yang, and Cewu Lu. Hybrik-x: Hybrid analytical-neural inverse kinematics for whole-body mesh recovery, 2023

    2023

  10. [18]

    Smpl: A skinned multi-person linear model

    Matthew Loper, Naureen Mahmood, Javier Romero, Gerard Pons-Moll, and Michael J Black. Smpl: A skinned multi-person linear model. ACM transactions on graphics (TOG), 34 0 (6): 0 1--16, 2015

    2015

  11. [19]

    The evolution of methods for the capture of human movement leading to markerless motion capture for biomechanical applications

    Lars M \"u ndermann, Stefano Corazza, and Thomas P Andriacchi. The evolution of methods for the capture of human movement leading to markerless motion capture for biomechanical applications. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 3 0 (1): 0 1--11, 2006

    2006

  12. [20]

    Application of optitrack motion capture systems in human movement analysis: A systematic literature review

    Gergely Nagym \'a t \'e and Rita M Kiss. Application of optitrack motion capture systems in human movement analysis: A systematic literature review. Recent Innovations in Mechatronics, 5 0 (1.): 0 1--9, 2018

    2018

  13. [21]

    Georgios Pavlakos, Vasileios Choutas, Nima Ghorbani, Timo Bolkart, Ahmed A. A. Osman, Dimitrios Tzionas, and Michael J. Black. Expressive body capture: 3d hands, face, and body from a single image. In Proceedings IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2019 a

    2019

  14. [22]

    Expressive body capture: 3d hands, face, and body from a single image

    Georgios Pavlakos, Vasileios Choutas, Nima Ghorbani, Timo Bolkart, Ahmed AA Osman, Dimitrios Tzionas, and Michael J Black. Expressive body capture: 3d hands, face, and body from a single image. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognitio...

    2019

  15. [23]

    Deepcut: Joint subset partition and labeling for multi person pose estimation

    Leonid Pishchulin, Eldar Insafutdinov, Siyu Tang, Bjoern Andres, Mykhaylo Andriluka, Peter Gehler, and Bernt Schiele. Deepcut: Joint subset partition and labeling for multi person pose estimation. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), June 2016

    2016

  16. [24]

    Barron, and Ben Mildenhall

    Ben Poole, Ajay Jain, Jonathan T. Barron, and Ben Mildenhall. Dreamfusion: Text-to-3d using 2d diffusion, 2022

    2022

  17. [25]

    Tracking people by predicting 3d appearance, location & pose

    Jathushan Rajasegaran, Georgios Pavlakos, Angjoo Kanazawa, and Jitendra Malik. Tracking people by predicting 3d appearance, location & pose. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.04477, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Guibas, Aaron Hertzmann, Bryan Russell, Ruben Villegas, and Jimei Yang

    Davis Rempe, Leonidas J. Guibas, Aaron Hertzmann, Bryan Russell, Ruben Villegas, and Jimei Yang. Contact and human dynamics from monocular video, 2020

    2020

  19. [27]

    Humor: 3d human motion model for robust pose estimation

    Davis Rempe, Tolga Birdal, Aaron Hertzmann, Jimei Yang, Srinath Sridhar, and Leonidas J Guibas. Humor: 3d human motion model for robust pose estimation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp.\ 11488--11499, 2021

    2021

  20. [28]

    Hierarchical kinematic probability distributions for 3d human shape and pose estimation from images in the wild

    Akash Sengupta, Ignas Budvytis, and Roberto Cipolla. Hierarchical kinematic probability distributions for 3d human shape and pose estimation from images in the wild. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp.\ 11219--11229, 2021

    2021

  21. [29]

    Soyong Shin, Juyong Kim, Eni Halilaj, and Michael J. Black. WHAM : Reconstructing world-grounded humans with accurate 3D motion. In IEEE/CVF Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), June 2024

    2024

  22. [30]

    Yu Sun, Qian Bao, Wu Liu, Tao Mei, and Michael J. Black. TRACE: 5D Temporal Regression of Avatars with Dynamic Cameras in 3D Environments . In IEEE/CVF Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), June 2023

    2023

  23. [31]

    Droid-slam: Deep visual slam for monocular, stereo, and rgb-d cameras, 2022

    Zachary Teed and Jia Deng. Droid-slam: Deep visual slam for monocular, stereo, and rgb-d cameras, 2022

    2022

  24. [32]

    Guy Tevet, Sigal Raab, Brian Gordon, Yonatan Shafir, Daniel Cohen-Or, and Amit H. Bermano. Human motion diffusion model, 2022

    2022

  25. [33]

    Karen Liu, and Serena Yeung

    Kuan-Chieh Wang, Zhenzhen Weng, Maria Xenochristou, Joao Pedro Araujo, Jeffrey Gu, C. Karen Liu, and Serena Yeung. Nemo: 3d neural motion fields from multiple video instances of the same action, 2022

    2022

  26. [34]

    Tram: Global trajectory and motion of 3d humans from in-the-wild videos, 2024

    Yufu Wang, Ziyun Wang, Lingjie Liu, and Kostas Daniilidis. Tram: Global trajectory and motion of 3d humans from in-the-wild videos, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.17346

    2024 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Vitpose: Simple vision transformer baselines for human pose estimation, 2022

    Yufei Xu, Jing Zhang, Qiming Zhang, and Dacheng Tao. Vitpose: Simple vision transformer baselines for human pose estimation, 2022

    2022

  28. [36]

    Decoupling human and camera motion from videos in the wild, 2023

    Vickie Ye, Georgios Pavlakos, Jitendra Malik, and Angjoo Kanazawa. Decoupling human and camera motion from videos in the wild, 2023

    2023

  29. [37]

    Glamr: Global occlusion-aware human mesh recovery with dynamic cameras

    Ye Yuan, Umar Iqbal, Pavlo Molchanov, Kris Kitani, and Jan Kautz. Glamr: Global occlusion-aware human mesh recovery with dynamic cameras. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2022

    2022

  30. [38]

    Pymaf-x: Towards well-aligned full-body model regression from monocular images

    Hongwen Zhang, Yating Tian, Yuxiang Zhang, Mengcheng Li, Liang An, Zhenan Sun, and Yebin Liu. Pymaf-x: Towards well-aligned full-body model regression from monocular images. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.06400, 2022 a

    2022

  31. [39]

    Egobody: Human body shape and motion of interacting people from head-mounted devices

    Siwei Zhang, Qianli Ma, Yan Zhang, Zhiyin Qian, Taein Kwon, Marc Pollefeys, Federica Bogo, and Siyu Tang. Egobody: Human body shape and motion of interacting people from head-mounted devices. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pp.\ 180--200. Springer, 2022 b

    2022

  32. [40]

    Learning causal representation for training cross-domain pose estimator via generative interventions

    Xiheng Zhang, Yongkang Wong, Xiaofei Wu, Juwei Lu, Mohan Kankanhalli, Xiangdong Li, and Weidong Geng. Learning causal representation for training cross-domain pose estimator via generative interventions. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Visio...

    2021

  33. [41]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.