Giant Heat Flux Effect in Non-Chiral Transmission Lines

Alioune Gadiaga; Eugene V. Sukhorukov; Florian St\"abler

Giant Heat Flux Effect in Non-Chiral Transmission Lines

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Equilibrium heat flow along a quantum Hall edge channel can exceed the quantum unit by a factor that grows linearly with the number of contacts.

desk verdict Striking analytic prediction of an O(N) heat-flux enhancement in non-chiral quantum Hall transmission lines, but the effect rides on the unverified independent-source model of the Ohmic contacts. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.11495 v3 pith:NCNWXU6Z submitted 2024-11-18 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.str-el

Florian Stäbler , Alioune Gadiaga , Eugene V. Sukhorukov This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.str-el PACS 73.43.-f72.70.+m73.23.-b

keywords heatCoulombblockadequantumHalledgechannelsOhmiccontactstransmissionlinefluctuation-dissipationrelationgiantfluxLorenznumberchiralcurrents

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Equilibrium heat transport in a chain of quantum Hall edge channels coupled through floating Ohmic contacts is not necessarily quantized: this paper predicts a 'giant heat flux effect' in which a single chiral current component carries substantially more than the quantum unit $J_q = \pi T^2/12$. The mechanism is dynamical charge accumulation on the contacts in the heat Coulomb blockade regime, which modifies the equilibrium current-noise spectrum through a non-trivial fluctuation-dissipation relation. For an open chain of $N$ contacts, the central formula is $J_n^\sigma/J_q = 1 + 2n(N-n)/(N+1)$, so the heat flux measured near the middle grows linearly with $N$. The paper also derives modified Lorenz numbers and finite-frequency crossovers that serve as experimental fingerprints. If correct, the result overturns the expectation that equilibrium heat flow per edge channel is bounded by the quantum limit.

What carries the argument

The central object is the discrete Green's function $G_{nm}(\omega)$ of the operator $(2 - i\omega\tau_C)G_{nm} - G_{n+1,m} - G_{n-1,m} = \delta_{nm}$, defined on a chain of $N$ Ohmic contacts with open, semi-closed, closed, or periodic boundary conditions. It solves the Kirchhoff-law equation for the charge fluctuations $\Delta Q_n(\omega)$ driven by the Langevin source currents, and its zero-frequency value enters linearly in the modified fluctuation-dissipation relation $S_{nn}^{\sigma\sigma}(\omega) = S_c(\omega)\left(1 + 2 \mathrm{Re}\, G_{n+s(\sigma),n}(\omega)\right)$. For open boundary conditions the zero-frequency kernel is the piecewise-quadratic function $G_{nm} = n(N+1-m)/(N+1)$ for $n \le m$, which converts the local equilibrium noise into a position-dependent heat flux peaked at the chain center. The other load-bearing element is the Langevin equation $\delta I_n^\sigma = \Delta Q_n/\tau_C + \delta I_n^{\sigma,c}$, where $\tau_C = R_q C$ is the single-channel RC time, together with the assumption that the source noise $\delta I^{\sigma,c}$ has the local equilibrium spectrum $S_c(\omega) = (\omega/R_q)/(1 - e^{-\omega/T})$.

What would settle it

Measure the equilibrium heat flux through a single chiral component of the edge current in an open chain of $N$ Ohmic contacts in the regime $\tau_C T \ll 1$ and $\tau_{\mathrm{th}} T \ll 1$, at a position $n$ and at several chain lengths $N$. If the ratio $J_n^\sigma/J_q$ does not follow the parabolic form $1 + 2n(N-n)/(N+1)$, with a central maximum growing as $\sim N/2$ for large $N$, the central prediction (13) is ruled out.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that in a non-chiral transmission line—a chain of $N$ floating Ohmic contacts connected to quantum Hall edge channels—the equilibrium heat flux carried by a chiral current is $J_n^\sigma = (1 + 2G_{n+s(\sigma),n}(0)) J_q$ in the heat Coulomb blockade regime, where $G$ is the discrete Green's function of the transmission-line equation and $s(\sigma) = \pm 1$ encodes the current's direction. With open boundary conditions the Green's function at zero frequency is $G_{nm}(0) = n(N+1-m)/(N+1)$ for $n \le m$, giving $J_n^\sigma/J_q = 1 + 2n(N-n)/(N+1)$. For a long chain near its center this is $\sim N/2$, a large enhancement that arises because the noise power of a chiral current is not the local equilibrium noise $S_c(\omega)$ but $S_c(\omega)[1 + 2 \mathrm{Re}\, G_{n+s(\sigma),n}(\omega)]$. The same modified fluctuation-dissipation relation produces a Lorenz number that can reach $3L_0$, and the finite-frequency analysis shows a universal high-frequency crossover to $J/J_q \simeq 0.9952 (\tau_C T)^{-1/2}$. These results apply in the regime $\tau_C T \ll 1$ with $\tau_{\mathrm{th}} T \ll 1$, where the zero-frequency Green's function is a valid approximation.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation treats each Ohmic contact as a single RC element whose current noise remains in local thermal equilibrium with spectrum $S_c(\omega) = (\omega/R_q)/(1 - e^{-\omega/T})$, and ignores all other internal degrees of freedom of the island.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For an open chain, the heat flux at the center grows as $J_{N/2}^\sigma/J_q \approx 1 + N^2/[2(N+1)]$, so a chain of a few dozen contacts already yields an order-of-magnitude enhancement over the quantum limit.
The Lorenz number $L_n^\sigma/L_0 = 3(N+1+2Nn-2n^2)/(3-2n^2+N(3+2n))$ reaches $3$ away from the boundaries in the heat Coulomb blockade regime and crosses over to $1$ at high temperature, providing a second observable signature.
Once the Thouless time $\tau_{\mathrm{th}} = N^2\tau_C$ becomes comparable to the thermal time, the heat flux at the center converges to a universal, boundary-independent asymptotic form $J/J_q \simeq 0.9952(\tau_C T)^{-1/2}$, showing a crossover from giant amplification to conventional diffusive scaling.
Because individual chiral current components can be probed separately, the position-dependent profile (13) is directly measurable in a single device, rather than being hidden in a net current.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same modified FDR should govern the non-equilibrium (shot) noise of a voltage-biased non-chiral chain; if the factor $(1 + 2\mathrm{Re}\,G)$ appears there too, noise measurements would give a direct spectroscopic read-out of the discrete Green's function.
The predicted parabolic heat-flux profile offers a clean falsification test: deviations from $1 + 2n(N-n)/(N+1)$ at fixed $N$ would signal that the contacts are not equivalent or that additional relaxation channels exist.
In the continuum limit the discrete Green's function produces a diverging central heat flux, so conventional diffusive descriptions that coarse-grain away the contacts miss the giant effect entirely; this suggests the effect is a genuine probe of the granularity of ohmic contacts.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Read the Stäbler-Gadiaga-Sukhorukov paper on giant heat flux in non-chiral transmission lines. The headline result is Eq. (13): in the heat Coulomb blockade regime, the equilibrium heat flux carried by a chiral current in an open chain of N Ohmic contacts is Jq[1+2n(N-n)/(N+1)], so the enhancement grows linearly with N. That's a clean, striking prediction, and I don't see it in the earlier chiral TL literature; the paper genuinely extends their prior framework to non-chiral geometries and provides explicit Green's functions for four boundary conditions, plus a universal finite-frequency asymptote that could be checked in a frequency-resolved measurement.

What's good: the derivation is self-contained, the Green's functions solve the stated difference equations, and there are no fitted parameters. The Lorenz-number table and the finite-frequency crossover are concrete experimental signatures. The paper is honest that the machinery is inherited from their earlier chiral work; that's fine because the new physics is in the non-chiral boundary conditions and the O(N) enhancement.

The soft spot is the one the stress-test flags, and it's a real fragility. The entire enhancement enters through Eq. (8), the assumption that each OC's two outgoing chiral currents are independent local-equilibrium Nyquist sources with the same RC time constant, and no cross-correlation between the L and R channels of one island. If island relaxation isn't fast on the scale 1/T, or if the two outgoing channels share the island's charge fluctuations, the source correlator gets extra terms. Those enter linearly in Eq. (10), so the (1+2 Re G) factor and the O(N) growth in Eq. (13) would change. The paper cites Ref. [56] for fast relaxation but does not derive it. This isn't an internal inconsistency—the algebra from the assumed Langevin model is coherent—but it is load-bearing. A more microscopic treatment of the OC island would settle it.

There's also a minor point: the "vacuum subtraction" in Eq. (11) is taken from earlier work, and the reader who wants to check the finite-frequency asymptote will have to dig into the supplement. But that's fine.

Who this is for: theorists working on heat transport in quantum Hall edges and Coulomb-blockade circuits. It deserves a serious referee: the prediction is sharp, the derivation is checkable, and the fragility is identifiable rather than hidden. I'd send it to review with a request for the authors to address the OC relaxation assumption more explicitly.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a Langevin theory of heat transport in non-chiral transmission lines made of quantum Hall edge channels coupled to a chain of N floating Ohmic contacts. In the heat Coulomb blockade regime (τ_C T ≪ 1), charge fluctuations in the reservoirs are treated dynamically and are solved through discrete Green's functions for open, semi-closed, closed, and periodic boundary conditions. The central result is the equilibrium fluctuation-dissipation relation for the noise power of individual chiral current components, Eq. (10), from which the heat flux J_σ_n(N) is obtained. For open boundary conditions this yields the 'giant heat flux' formula Eq. (13), J_σ_n/J_q = 1 + 2n(N−n)/(N+1), which grows linearly with N near the middle of a long chain. The paper also derives modified Lorenz numbers, Eq. (14), and analyzes finite-frequency corrections that cross over to a universal τ_C T^{-1/2} asymptote in the large-N limit.

Significance. If the model assumptions hold, this is a striking and falsifiable prediction: an equilibrium chiral edge segment can carry heat-flux fluctuations exceeding the single-channel quantum limit by a factor that grows with the number of Ohmic contacts. The derivation is internally coherent, the Green's functions are obtained in closed form for all four boundary conditions, and the only free inputs are τ_C, N, and T. The finite-frequency analysis provides a concrete crossover prediction that can be tested experimentally, and the Lorenz-number signatures are distinctive. The central enhancement is an analytic consequence of the stated Langevin model rather than an adjustable fit, which is a definite strength. The main caveat is that the effect enters exclusively through the assumed local-equilibrium, independent-noise model of each Ohmic contact; this is acknowledged in the text but deserves more explicit discussion.

minor comments (5)

[Eq. (3) and Supplemental Eq. (20)] There is a dimensional inconsistency in the formal solution: with s_m defined as a combination of current fluctuations, the equation of motion should read 2ΔQ_n − ΔQ_{n+1} − ΔQ_{n−1} = τ_C s_n, and the formal solution should be ΔQ_n = τ_C Σ_m G_nm s_m (equivalently, G is the response of ΔQ_n/τ_C to s). As written, Eq. (3) and Eq. (20) omit the factor τ_C. All subsequent formulas use the dimensionless G convention, so this is a fixable notational error, but it should be corrected for the derivation to be followed by readers.
[Eq. (8) and Eq. (10)] The O(N) enhancement in Eq. (13) is entirely determined by the assumption that each outgoing Langevin source is an independent local-equilibrium Nyquist source with no L/R cross-correlations and no memory beyond τ_C. The text states 'assuming fast relaxation in the OCs [56]' and cites Ref. [56], but it would improve the paper to state explicitly that this is a modeling assumption and to comment briefly on how finite relaxation rates or L/R source correlations would enter Eq. (10).
[Eq. (14) and Table I] The Lorenz-number formula L_σ_n(N)/L_0 = 3 − 6/(3 + 2G_{n+s(σ)}(0)) is presented without derivation. Since this is one of the paper's key experimental signatures, a brief derivation or a pointer to the relevant part of the supplementary material would be helpful.
[Table I, semi-closed boundary condition] The entry J_σ_n/J_q = 2n + σ uses σ = ±1 for right- and left-moving chiralities, but this is not explained in the table caption. For the open boundary condition the entry is independent of σ; the reader should be told which Green's function index is used for each chirality so that the distinction is clear.
[Supplemental Material, Eq. (34)] The notation a = |m−n| is introduced with the symbol '!='; this is easy to misread as a factorial. Please write it as a = |m−n| and avoid the nonstandard notation. Minor typos also appear in the Table II header ('F unction') and in the phrase 'we assume both the heat blockade regime' in the main text, which should be 'heat Coulomb blockade regime'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Eq. (13) is a closed-form consequence of the stated Langevin model and equilibrium source noise, not a restatement of the inputs.

full rationale

The derivation chain is explicit: Kirchhoff's law (1), the Langevin decomposition (2), the discrete Green's function solution (3)-(7), the equilibrium source noise (8), the noise-power identities (9)-(10), the heat-flux integral (11), the zero-frequency evaluation (12), and insertion of the open-boundary Green's function (7) to produce Eq. (13). Equation (13) is an analytic consequence of solving this linear system, not an input. The only non-algebraic input is the physical assumption that each Ohmic contact is in local thermal equilibrium with independent left/right Langevin sources, quoted as 'Assuming fast relaxation in the OCs [56], the Langevin sources can be modeled by local thermal equilibrium noise power'; this is a stated, testable assumption and is standard equilibrium Nyquist noise, not a hidden restatement of the giant heat flux. The self-citations (Refs. 38, 42, 45, 56) supply prior analytic relations and contextual results, but none of them is equivalent to the claimed amplification, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The fast-relaxation assumption is a genuine physical fragility: if source correlations or finite-frequency memory were added, the factor (1+2 Re G) in Eq. (10) and hence Eq. (13) could change. That is a validity concern, not a circular-logic defect, and the algebraic derivation from the stated model is self-contained.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The ledger contains only physical model inputs (C, N, T) and the local-equilibrium noise assumption; there are no invented particles or forces and no parameters fitted to data. The predictive content is the dependence of heat flux and Lorenz number on these inputs and on boundary conditions.

free parameters (3)

OC charging time tau_C = R_q C = model input (not fitted)
Defines the heat Coulomb blockade regime tau_C T << 1 and enters the finite-frequency asymptote; it is a physical property of the Ohmic contact, not adjusted to reproduce the result.
Number of Ohmic contacts N = model input (not fitted)
Controls the size of the enhancement, e.g., J/Jq about N/2 in the open chain; it is the system size.
Temperature T = model input (not fitted)
Set uniform across all OCs; sets Jq = pi T^2/12 and the dimensionless ratios.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption Ohmic contacts are floating RC islands: dQ_n/dt follows Kirchhoff's law and delta I_n^sigma = Delta Q_n/tau_C + delta I_n^{sigma,c}.
Main text Eqs. (1)-(2); this is the physical model of the OC.
domain assumption Langevin sources are delta-correlated in space and follow local equilibrium Bose noise Sc(omega) = omega/R_q/(1-exp(-omega/T)).
Main text after Eq. (8), stated as assuming fast relaxation in the OCs.
domain assumption Heat flux is extracted from current noise via J = R_q/(4 pi) integral [S minus zero-point contribution].
Main text Eq. (11), taken from Ref. [38]; not re-derived in this paper.
domain assumption The heat Coulomb blockade and low-frequency limits tau_C T << 1 and tau_th T << 1 allow setting omega = 0 in the Green's functions.
Main text around Eqs. (4) and (12).
domain assumption All OCs have a uniform temperature T_n = T.
Stated after Eq. (8) in the main text.
standard math The spectral decomposition of the finite-difference operator with the stated boundary conditions is valid.
Supplemental Eqs. (20)-(22) and Table II.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Giant Heat Flux Effect in Non-Chiral Transmission Lines." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NCNWXU6Z

@misc{pith2026241111495,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Giant Heat Flux Effect in Non-Chiral Transmission Lines},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NCNWXU6Z}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.11495}
}

read the original abstract

We develop a theory of heat transport in non-chiral transmission lines (TLs) of quantum Hall edge channels coupled to Ohmic contacts (OCs) that accounts for a dynamical accumulation of charge in the reservoirs. As a consequence, heat transport is driven by charge fluctuations in the heat Coulomb blockade regime. This framework challenges conventional paradigms by revealing a giant heat flux effect-a significant amplification in heat transport arising from non-trivial fluctuation-dissipation relations. Through a Langevin-based approach, we derive the effective noise power in the chiral currents, which underlies this enhanced heat flux. Our findings predict clear experimental signatures unique to non-chiral TLs, as well as provide insights into finite-frequency effects, showing crossovers to more conventional diffusive behavior. This work offers a perspective on feedback mechanisms in quasi-1D heat transport with implications for dissipation control in low-dimensional quantum systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.11495 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Log-log plot of the heat flux at the TL center [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

[56]

Sp ˚ ansl¨ att, F

C. Sp ˚ ansl¨ att, F. St¨ abler, E. V. Sukhorukov, and J. Splettstoesser, Impact of potential and temperature fluctuations on charge and heat transport in quantum hall edges in the heat coulomb blockade regime, Phys. Rev. B 110, 075431 (2024)

work page 2024
[1]

von Klitzing, The quantized hall effect, Rev

K. von Klitzing, The quantized hall effect, Rev. Mod. Phys. 58, 519 (1986)

work page 1986
[2]

J. B. Pendry, Quantum limits to the flow of information and entropy, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 16, 2161 (1983)

work page 1983
[3]

J. P. Pekola and B. Karimi, Colloquium: Quantum heat transport in condensed matter systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 041001 (2021)

2021
[4]

C. L. Kane and M. P. A. Fisher, Quantized thermal trans- port in the fractional quantum hall effect, Phys. Rev. B 55, 15832 (1997)

1997
[5]

le Sueur, C

H. le Sueur, C. Altimiras, U. Gennser, A. Cavanna, D. Mailly, and F. Pierre, Energy Relaxation in the Inte- ger Quantum Hall Regime, Physical Review Letters 105, 056803 (2010)

work page 2010
[6]

Granger, J

G. Granger, J. P. Eisenstein, and J. L. Reno, Observation of chiral heat transport in the quantum hall regime, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 086803 (2009)

work page 2009
[7]

Venkatachalam, S

V. Venkatachalam, S. Hart, L. Pfeiffer, K. West, and A. Yacoby, Local thermometry of neutral modes on the quantum Hall edge, Nature Physics 8, 676 (2012)

work page 2012

Show all 57 references

[8]

Banerjee, M

M. Banerjee, M. Heiblum, A. Rosenblatt, Y. Oreg, D. E. Feldman, A. Stern, and V. Umansky, Observed quanti- zation of anyonic heat flow, Nature 545, 75 (2017)

2017
[9]

Jezouin, F

S. Jezouin, F. D. Parmentier, A. Anthore, U. Gennser, A. Cavanna, Y. Jin, and F. Pierre, Quantum Limit of Heat Flow Across a Single Electronic Channel, Science 342, 601 (2013)

2013
[10]

B. I. Halperin, Quantized Hall conductance, current- carrying edge states, and the existence of extended states in a two-dimensional disordered potential, Phys. Rev. B 25, 2185 (1982)

1982
[11]

X. G. Wen, Chiral Luttinger liquid and the edge excita- tions in the fractional quantum Hall states, Phys. Rev. B 41, 12838 (1990)

1990
[12]

B¨ uttiker, Absence of backscattering in the quantum Hall effect in multiprobe conductors, Phys

M. B¨ uttiker, Absence of backscattering in the quantum Hall effect in multiprobe conductors, Phys. Rev. B 38, 9375 (1988)

1988
[13]

Buttiker, Coherent and sequential tunneling in series barriers, IBM J

M. Buttiker, Coherent and sequential tunneling in series barriers, IBM J. Res. Dev. 32, 63 (1988)

1988
[14]

Battista, M

F. Battista, M. Moskalets, M. Albert, and P. Samuelsson, Quantum Heat Fluctuations of Single-Particle Sources, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 126602 (2013)

2013
[15]

Utsumi, O

Y. Utsumi, O. Entin-Wohlman, A. Aharony, T. Kubo, and Y. Tokura, Fluctuation theorem for heat transport probed by a thermal probe electrode, Phys. Rev. B 89, 205314 (2014)

2014
[16]

T. L. van den Berg, F. Brange, and P. Samuelsson, En- ergy and temperature fluctuations in the single electron box, New J. Phys. 17, 075012 (2015)

2015
[17]

Dashti, M

N. Dashti, M. Misiorny, P. Samuelsson, and J. Splettstoesser, Probing charge- and heat-current noise by frequency-dependent fluctuations in temper- ature and potential, Phys. Rev. Appl. 10, 024007 (2018)

2018
[18]

Furusaki and K

A. Furusaki and K. A. Matveev, Theory of strong inelas- tic cotunneling, Physical Review B 52, 16676 (1995)

1995
[19]

Furusaki, Resonant tunneling through a quantum dot weakly coupled to quantum wires or quantum Hall edge states, Phys

A. Furusaki, Resonant tunneling through a quantum dot weakly coupled to quantum wires or quantum Hall edge states, Phys. Rev. B 57, 7141 (1998)

1998
[20]

K. A. Matveev, Coulomb blockade at almost perfect transmission, Physical Review B 51, 1743 (1995)

1995
[21]

A. O. Slobodeniuk, I. P. Levkivskyi, and E. V. Sukho- rukov, Equilibration of quantum Hall edge states by an Ohmic contact, Physical Review B 88, 165307 (2013)

2013
[22]

D. V. Averin and K. K. Likharev, Coulomb blockade of single-electron tunneling, and coherent oscillations in small tunnel junctions, Journal of Low Temperature Physics 62, 345 (1986)

1986
[23]

Duprez, F

H. Duprez, F. Pierre, E. Sivre, A. Aassime, F. D. Par- mentier, A. Cavanna, A. Ouerghi, U. Gennser, I. Safi, C. Mora, and A. Anthore, Dynamical Coulomb block- ade under a temperature bias, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 023122 (2021)

2021
[24]

Altimiras, O

C. Altimiras, O. Parlavecchio, P. Joyez, D. Vion, P. Roche, D. Esteve, and F. Portier, Dynamical Coulomb blockade of shot noise, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 236803 (2014)

2014
[25]

Sivre, A

E. Sivre, A. Anthore, F. D. Parmentier, A. Cavanna, U. Gennser, A. Ouerghi, Y. Jin, and F. Pierre, Heat Coulomb blockade of one ballistic channel, Nat. Phys. 14, 145 (2018)

2018
[26]

Sivre, H

E. Sivre, H. Duprez, A. Anthore, A. Aassime, F. D. Parmentier, A. Cavanna, A. Ouerghi, U. Gennser, and F. Pierre, Electronic heat flow and thermal shot noise in quantum circuits, Nature Communications 10, 5638 (2019)

2019
[27]

E. G. Idrisov, I. P. Levkivskyi, and E. V. Sukhorukov, De- phasing in a Mach-Zehnder Interferometer by an Ohmic Contact, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 026802 (2018)

2018
[28]

Duprez, E

H. Duprez, E. Sivre, A. Anthore, A. Aassime, A. Ca- vanna, U. Gennser, and F. Pierre, Transmitting the quantum state of electrons across a metallic island with Coulomb interaction, Science 366, 1243 (2019)

2019
[29]

Anthore, Z

A. Anthore, Z. Iftikhar, E. Boulat, F. D. Parmentier, A. Cavanna, A. Ouerghi, U. Gennser, and F. Pierre, Cir- cuit quantum simulation of a Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid with an impurity, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031075 (2018)

2018
[30]

Jezouin, M

S. Jezouin, M. Albert, F. D. Parmentier, A. Anthore, U. Gennser, A. Cavanna, I. Safi, and F. Pierre, Tomon- aga–Luttinger physics in electronic quantum circuits, Na- ture Communications 4, 1802 (2013)

2013
[31]

Iftikhar, S

Z. Iftikhar, S. Jezouin, A. Anthore, U. Gennser, F. D. Parmentier, A. Cavanna, and F. Pierre, Two-channel Kondo effect and renormalization flow with macroscopic quantum charge states, Nature 526, 233 (2015)

2015
[32]

Iftikhar, A

Z. Iftikhar, A. Anthore, A. K. Mitchell, F. D. Parmentier, U. Gennser, A. Ouerghi, A. Cavanna, C. Mora, P. Simon, and F. Pierre, Tunable quantum criticality and super- ballistic transport in a “charge” Kondo circuit, Science 360, 1315 (2018)

2018
[33]

E. G. Idrisov, I. P. Levkivskyi, and E. V. Sukhorukov, Quantum ammeter: Measuring full counting statistics of electron currents at quantum timescales, Physical Review B 101, 245426 (2020)

2020
[34]

Morel, J.-Y

T. Morel, J.-Y. M. Lee, H.-S. Sim, and C. Mora, Fraction- alization and anyonic statistics in the integer quantum Hall collider, Physical Review B 105, 075433 (2022)

2022
[35]

D. B. Karki, E. Boulat, and C. Mora, Double-charge quantum island in the quasiballistic regime, Phys. Rev. B 105, 245418 (2022)

2022
[36]

D. B. Karki, E. Boulat, W. Pouse, D. Goldhaber-Gordon, A. K. Mitchell, and C. Mora, z3 parafermion in the dou- ble charge kondo model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 146201 (2023). 13

2023
[37]

E. G. Idrisov, I. P. Levkivskyi, and E. V. Sukhorukov, Thermal drag effect in quantum hall circuits, Phys. Rev. B 106, L121405 (2022)

2022
[38]

St¨ abler and E

F. St¨ abler and E. Sukhorukov, Transmission line ap- proach to transport of heat in chiral systems with dis- sipation, Phys. Rev. B 105, 235417 (2022)

2022
[39]

Shamim, P

S. Shamim, P. Shekhar, W. Beugeling, J. B¨ ottcher, A. Budewitz, J.-B. Mayer, L. Lunczer, E. M. Hankiewicz, H. Buhmann, and L. W. Molenkamp, Counterpropagat- ing topological and quantum Hall edge channels, Nature Communications 13, 2682 (2022)

2022
[40]

Y. Hu, J. Wang, and B. Lian, Resistance distribution of decoherent quantum hall-superconductor edges (2024), arXiv:2405.17550 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

2024 arXiv
[41]

E. G. Idrisov, I. P. Levkivskyi, and E. V. Sukhorukov, Charge-conserving equilibration of quantum hall edge states (2023), arXiv:2312.07189 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

2023 arXiv
[42]

St¨ abler and E

F. St¨ abler and E. Sukhorukov, Nonlocal transport of heat in equilibrium drift-diffusion systems, Phys. Rev. B 107, 045403 (2023)

2023
[43]

Goremykina, A

A. Goremykina, A. Borin, and E. Sukhorukov, Heat current in a dissipative quantum Hall edge, arXiv:1908.01213 [cond-mat] (2019)

2019 arXiv
[44]

M. N. Kiselev, Generalized wiedemann-franz law in a two-site charge kondo circuit: Lorenz ratio as a mani- festation of the orthogonality catastrophe, Phys. Rev. B 108, L081108 (2023)

2023
[45]

St¨ abler and E

F. St¨ abler and E. Sukhorukov, Mesoscopic heat multiplier and fractionalizer, Phys. Rev. B 108, 235405 (2023)

2023
[46]

J. Park, A. D. Mirlin, B. Rosenow, and Y. Gefen, Noise on complex quantum hall edges: Chiral anomaly and heat diffusion, Phys. Rev. B 99, 161302 (2019)

2019
[47]

Sp ˚ ansl¨ att, J

C. Sp ˚ ansl¨ att, J. Park, Y. Gefen, and A. D. Mirlin, Con- ductance plateaus and shot noise in fractional quantum hall point contacts, Phys. Rev. B 101, 075308 (2020)

2020
[48]

Hein and C

M. Hein and C. Sp ˚ ansl¨ att, Thermal conductance and noise of majorana modes along interfaced ν = 5 2 frac- tional quantum hall states, Phys. Rev. B 107, 245301 (2023)

2023
[49]

D. C. Glattli, C. Boudet, A. De, and P. Roulleau, A toy model for the 2/3 fractional quantum hall edge channel (2024), arXiv:2407.07208 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

2024 arXiv
[50]

Nosiglia, J

C. Nosiglia, J. Park, B. Rosenow, and Y. Gefen, Incoher- ent transport on the ν = 2/3 quantum hall edge, Phys. Rev. B 98, 115408 (2018)

2018
[51]

Sp ˚ ansl¨ att, J

C. Sp ˚ ansl¨ att, J. Park, Y. Gefen, and A. D. Mirlin, Topo- logical classification of shot noise on fractional quantum hall edges, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 137701 (2019)

2019
[52]

Chung and S.-T

F. Chung and S.-T. Yau, Discrete green’s functions, Jour- nal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A 91, 191 (1973)

1973
[53]

R. B. Ellis, Discrete green’s functions for products of reg- ular graphs (2003), arXiv:math/0309080 [math.CO]

2003 arXiv
[54]

Maximon, Differential and Difference Equations, A Comparison of Methods of Solution (2016)

L. Maximon, Differential and Difference Equations, A Comparison of Methods of Solution (2016)

2016
[55]

For closed boundary conditions (configurations d and e), the zero eigenvalue is excluded, resulting in a generalized Green’s function as detailed in the supplemental mate- rial
[57]

This approximation defines the Thouless time in terms of the effective diffu- sion constant D = ξ2τ −1 C , yielding τth ∼ L2/D ∼ N 2τC

For large N , the discrete difference equation for Qn approximates its continuous form as τ −1 C (2Qn − Qn+1 − Qn−1) ≈ τ −1 C ξ2 ∂2 xQ(x), where ξ = L/N is the inter-node spacing. This approximation defines the Thouless time in terms of the effective diffu- sion constant D = ξ...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [56]

Sp ˚ ansl¨ att, F

C. Sp ˚ ansl¨ att, F. St¨ abler, E. V. Sukhorukov, and J. Splettstoesser, Impact of potential and temperature fluctuations on charge and heat transport in quantum hall edges in the heat coulomb blockade regime, Phys. Rev. B 110, 075431 (2024)

work page 2024

[2] [1]

von Klitzing, The quantized hall effect, Rev

K. von Klitzing, The quantized hall effect, Rev. Mod. Phys. 58, 519 (1986)

work page 1986

[3] [2]

J. B. Pendry, Quantum limits to the flow of information and entropy, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 16, 2161 (1983)

work page 1983

[4] [3]

J. P. Pekola and B. Karimi, Colloquium: Quantum heat transport in condensed matter systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 041001 (2021)

2021

[5] [4]

C. L. Kane and M. P. A. Fisher, Quantized thermal trans- port in the fractional quantum hall effect, Phys. Rev. B 55, 15832 (1997)

1997

[6] [5]

le Sueur, C

H. le Sueur, C. Altimiras, U. Gennser, A. Cavanna, D. Mailly, and F. Pierre, Energy Relaxation in the Inte- ger Quantum Hall Regime, Physical Review Letters 105, 056803 (2010)

work page 2010

[7] [6]

Granger, J

G. Granger, J. P. Eisenstein, and J. L. Reno, Observation of chiral heat transport in the quantum hall regime, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 086803 (2009)

work page 2009

[8] [7]

Venkatachalam, S

V. Venkatachalam, S. Hart, L. Pfeiffer, K. West, and A. Yacoby, Local thermometry of neutral modes on the quantum Hall edge, Nature Physics 8, 676 (2012)

work page 2012