Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 44 references

Twin Peak Method for Estimating Tissue Viscoelasticity using Shear Wave Elastography

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read By matching twin peaks in the frequency-wavenumber domain, shear wave elastography can estimate both tissue elasticity and viscosity, even from noisy in vivo liver data.

desk verdict Novel twin-peak inversion for SWE viscoelasticity; the core idea is clean and the ex vivo validation is real, but the unexamined push-profile assumption and post hoc range tuning need sensitivity analysis before I'd trust clinical numbers. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.11572 v1 pith:C3VWRBQJ submitted 2024-11-18 physics.bio-ph

Shuvrodeb Adikary , Matthew W. Urban , Murthy N. Guddati This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.bio-ph
keywords shearwaveelastographytissueviscoelasticitytwin-peakmethodfrequency-wavenumberdomainKelvin-Voigtmodelspring-potacousticradiationforceliver
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Tissue viscosity is a useful disease biomarker, but shear wave elastography usually estimates it from attenuation, which is exactly the part of the signal that noise destroys. This paper proposes the twin-peak method (TPM), which instead reads viscosity from the separation between two peak curves in the frequency-wavenumber plane: the $f(k)$ peak, the frequency of maximum response for each wavenumber, and the $k(f)$ peak, the wavenumber of maximum response for each frequency. In a viscoelastic medium these curves diverge, and the paper shows the divergence is controlled by the relaxation time while the curve slope is controlled by the elastic modulus. The method estimates both parameters by matching simulated and measured peaks with a least-squares inversion, and reports accurate reconstructions on noise-free and noisy synthetic data, ex vivo porcine liver, and in vivo human liver.

What carries the argument

The twin peaks are two ridge-location curves extracted from the magnitude of the 2D Fourier transform of the measured particle velocity: the $f(k)$ peak is the frequency of maximum response at each wavenumber, and the $k(f)$ peak is the wavenumber of maximum response at each frequency. Their slope tracks the shear-wave speed, hence elasticity, and their separation tracks the relaxation time, hence viscosity. The inversion carries these peaks through a forward model that solves the 2D viscoelastic wave equation on the same space-time grid as the measurement, using a simulated acoustic-radiation-force push profile obtained from an ultrasound transducer simulation program; simulated and measured peaks are compared with a relative least-squares objective minimized by a quasi-Newton optimizer. Applying identical sampling, truncation, windowing, and padding to simulated and measured data prevents signal-processing artifacts from shifting the peaks.

What would settle it

Run TPM on a tissue-mimicking phantom with a stiff inclusion just off the measurement line, with independent mechanical characterization of both regions; if the estimated elasticity and viscosity change systematically as the inclusion is moved closer to the line or made stiffer, the homogeneous-unbounded assumption fails. Alternatively, insert an attenuating layer between the transducer and the phantom and rerun TPM; if the results shift with layer thickness, the assumption of a known simulated push profile is the weak link.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that viscosity leaves a clean, noise-robust signature in where the response ridge peaks, not just in how wide it is. In the 2D Fourier transform of the shear-wave particle velocity, the frequency $\omega$ that maximizes the response at a fixed wavenumber $k$ defines one peak curve, while the wavenumber that maximizes the response at a fixed frequency defines another; for a purely elastic medium the two curves coincide, and for a Kelvin-Voigt medium they separate by an amount governed by the relaxation time $\tau$. The paper argues that matching both curves through a simulated forward model, rather than fitting the full ridge or its width, yields estimates of both the storage modulus $G_0$ and $\tau$ that are stable under noise. Verification with 3D-simulated data inverted through a 2D forward model, validation against mechanical spectroscopy on ex vivo porcine liver, and an in vivo liver application with a bowl-shaped objective function all support the claim.

Load-bearing premise

The forward model assumes the tissue is homogeneous and unbounded and that the push profile is known from simulation of the ultrasound transducer's acoustic field; if the real tissue is heterogeneous or the real push differs, for example because overlying tissue attenuates the acoustic beam, the simulated peaks will be systematically offset from the measured ones and the inversion will be biased.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single acoustic-radiation-force push can yield point estimates of both storage modulus and viscosity, not just elasticity, making viscoelasticity a more practical clinical biomarker.
  • Because TPM uses ridge locations rather than amplitudes, it stays accurate under the tested noise levels (30 percent multiplicative and 0.7 percent additive noise), where attenuation-based AMUSE and fw2DFT degrade.
  • The 2D forward model is sufficient: inverting 3D-simulated data with the 2D model introduces negligible error and cuts computation time from about 1250 seconds to about 5.5 seconds, or about 0.8 seconds with the time-domain Kelvin-Voigt solver.
  • The method is not tied to one rheology: inversion with the spring-pot model recovered its two parameters to within about 2 percent, supporting flexible model choice for different tissues.
  • The in vivo liver estimate (storage modulus 1.45 kPa, relaxation time 0.63 ms) falls in the range expected for healthy liver, and the objective function retains a clear minimum despite high noise.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: the twin-peak separation is essentially a geometric measure of how far the response ridge departs from a linear dispersion relation, so the same idea could be ported to other wave-based elastography modalities, such as magnetic resonance elastography or transient elastography, wherever two peak definitions are available.
  • Inference: the repeatability of peaks across replicate experiments, which the paper uses informally to set frequency and wavenumber ranges, could be turned into a formal bootstrap uncertainty estimate for the inverted elasticity and viscosity.
  • Inference: because TPM needs only point measurements along a line, it could be applied retrospectively to existing clinical SWE datasets collected with standard transducers, without new hardware or pulse sequences.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces the Twin Peak Method (TPM) for estimating tissue viscoelasticity (storage modulus G0 and relaxation time tau) from shear wave elastography (SWE) data. The method extracts two peak curves in the frequency-wavenumber domain: the f(k) peaks (frequency of maximum response for each wavenumber) and the k(f) peaks (wavenumber of maximum response for each frequency). These peaks diverge with increasing viscosity, and the paper argues that their slopes and separation are sensitive to elasticity and viscosity. TPM inverts for viscoelastic parameters by iteratively matching simulated peaks, obtained from a forward model with a Field II ARF push profile and a homogeneous unbounded medium assumption, to experimental peaks via least-squares minimization (BFGS). The method is tested on noise-free and noise-laden synthetic data, compared to AMUSE and fw2DFT approaches, validated against ex vivo porcine liver mechanical spectroscopy, and applied to in vivo human liver data.

Significance. If TPM performs as claimed, it offers a useful alternative for SWE-based viscoelasticity estimation that is robust to noise because it relies on peak locations rather than amplitude or attenuation measures. The paper provides several concrete strengths: independent ex vivo validation against Rheospectris mechanical spectroscopy, a systematic comparison with AMUSE and fw2DFT, a 2D-versus-3D forward model study that supports computational efficiency, and explicit acknowledgment of the homogeneity limitation in the Summary. The use of consistent forward and experimental processing (same sampling, truncation, and windowing) is methodologically sound. The twin-peak concept is novel and could stimulate further work on peak-based elastography inversion. However, the current evidence for the central accuracy claim is weakened by manual and partly post hoc selection of inversion frequency/wavenumber ranges, the unvalidated ARF push-profile assumption, and an ad hoc noise model.

major comments (4)
  1. [Ex vivo Validation and Choosing the frequency and wavenumber ranges] The ex vivo validation is compromised by post hoc range selection. The paper reports that the initial inversion of the remaining eight datasets overpredicted viscosity, and only after reducing the frequency and wavenumber ranges to 100-200 Hz and 10-1000 m^-1 was an 'improved match' with Rheospectris obtained (Section 'Ex vivo Validation', Figures 10b and 10d). Since the same data were used to choose the ranges that produce the reported agreement, the validation is not independent. The paper acknowledges that automation of range selection is future work, but the present manuscript should at least provide a sensitivity analysis over plausible ranges and a pre-specified range-selection rule to establish that the reported accuracy is not a consequence of tuning.
  2. [Forward modeling for response computation and In silico Verification] The forward model assumes a homogeneous, unbounded medium and a Field II computed ARF push profile. The in silico tests never vary the ARF profile or the medium heterogeneity, so they cannot detect bias from these assumptions. Since the peak locations depend on the spectral shape of the forcing (Eq. 14), an error in the assumed push profile due to overlying tissue attenuation, aberration, or transducer modeling error would shift both twin peaks and bias G0 and tau. The paper needs a sensitivity analysis of the inversion to perturbations of the ARF profile and to heterogeneous inclusions, and should quantify the homogeneity approximation beyond the sentence in the Summary that it 'needs to be investigated.'
  3. [Inversion with Noise-laden Synthetic Data] The noise robustness claim is based on a single ad hoc noise model. Equation (24) with alpha_m=0.30 and alpha_a=0.007 is introduced as 'informed by visual comparisons' with real data, but no quantitative validation is provided. The reported inversion errors (approximately 5% in G0 and 5-10% in tau) are conditional on this specific noise model, and it is unclear whether the noise parameters match the ex vivo or in vivo measurement conditions. The authors should calibrate the noise model against the actual noise statistics of the experimental data, or at least sweep over a range of alpha_m and alpha_a to demonstrate robustness to the noise assumption.
  4. [In silico Verification] The in silico verification is partly circular because the forward model used for inversion is the same wave equation and rheological model used to generate the synthetic data. While this verifies the numerical implementation and the inversion algorithm, it does not validate the physical assumptions of homogeneity, unboundedness, and the Field II ARF profile. The independent test of these assumptions is the ex vivo comparison, but that test is weakened by the post hoc range selection noted above. The paper should distinguish between numerical verification and physical validation, and the ex vivo section should be presented as the primary evidence for the physical assumptions.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Example Inversion with Spring-Pot Model] In Eq. (25), the reference frequency omega_0 is described as arbitrary, but the reported G0 value is then dependent on the chosen omega_0. The paper should state explicitly that G0 is the modulus evaluated at the selected reference frequency, and that changing omega_0 rescales G0 by the factor (omega_0)^alpha.
  2. [Identifying Peaks] The processing details for peak extraction are described qualitatively (padding, windowing, truncation). For reproducibility, the exact parameter values (padding length, window type, any tapering) should be specified, as these affect peak locations and hence the inversion.
  3. [Introduction] The acronym AMUSE is used in Figures 5 and 7 without being defined in the text; please define it at first use (Attenuation Measuring Ultrasound Shearwave Elastography).
  4. [Figure 2] The axis labels and units of the f-k domain plots in Figure 2 are not described in the text or caption; adding them would help readers understand the peak definitions.
  5. [Methods, Equation (1)] The derivation of the scalar wave equation (1) from incompressible elastodynamics is only briefly justified; a sentence explaining why the scalar displacement in the z-direction suffices and why compressibility is neglected would be helpful.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: TPM is a standard forward-model inversion with independent ex vivo validation; the in silico self-consistency test is not a derivation-from-input.

full rationale

The TPM inversion is a conventional least-squares fit of forward-model peaks to measured twin peaks (Eqs. 22-23). The analytical peak equations (11-12) are explicitly not used for inversion; the paper states that the forward model simulates the response on the same x-t grid and applies the same sampling, truncation, windowing, and padding as the experimental data, so the simulated peaks are not defined in terms of the measured peaks by construction. The in silico verification is a closed-loop self-consistency check: synthetic data are generated with the same Field II ARF profile and Kelvin-Voigt/spring-pot model family used in the inversion forward model. This tests the optimizer, noise robustness, and the 3D-to-2D approximation, but it does not independently validate the physical assumptions; the paper does not rely on it as the sole support. Independent ex vivo validation against Rheospectris mechanical spectroscopy (Figures 9d, 10b, 10d) provides an external benchmark not constructed from the fitted parameters. The Summary explicitly acknowledges the homogeneity limitation of the point measurement, which is a modeling caveat rather than a circular step. No load-bearing self-citation chain or uniqueness theorem is invoked: Field II [38,39] is an external simulation code, and the other self-citations are contextual or future-work references. The post-hoc choice of frequency/wavenumber ranges in the ex vivo analysis is a potential correctness or selection-bias concern, but it does not make any predicted quantity equivalent to an input by definition.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on modeling assumptions that the tissue is homogeneous, the ARF source is known, the rheological model is adequate, and the 2D forward model captures the 3D physics. The manually chosen frequency/wavenumber ranges and the synthetic noise model parameters are free inputs that affect the reported accuracy.

free parameters (4)
  • Noise model multiplicative level alpha_m = 0.30
    Chosen by visual comparison with real experimental data (Eq. 24, Section Inversion with Noise-laden Synthetic Data). Used to generate synthetic noisy data for the noise robustness study; affects reported error levels.
  • Noise model additive level alpha_a = 0.007
    Same as above, chosen by visual comparison with real data.
  • Frequency and wavenumber ranges for peak matching = Varies per dataset (e.g., in silico: f 100-500 Hz, k 1000-1500 1/m; ex vivo: f up to 200 Hz, k 10-1200 1/m; in vivo: f…
    Chosen manually based on peak reliability and repeatability. In the ex vivo validation, ranges were reduced to improve agreement with reference measurements, which is a post-hoc selection affecting the estimated parameters.
  • Reference frequency omega_0 in spring-pot model = 2*pi*200 rad/s
    Introduced for dimensional consistency in Eq. 25 and chosen arbitrarily; affects the reported modulus factor G0 for the spring-pot inversion.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The tissue is homogeneous and unbounded, and the ARF push is a known body force profile computed with Field II.
    Used throughout the forward model; acknowledged in the Summary as an approximation that needs investigation when significant heterogeneities are involved.
  • domain assumption The Kelvin-Voigt model (or spring-pot) adequately describes tissue viscoelasticity in the frequency range of interest.
    Inversion is parameterized by this model; the ex vivo model choice is informed by Rheospectris measurements, but the in vivo case assumes it without independent confirmation.
  • domain assumption The 2D forward model, assuming no variation along the z axis, accurately approximates the 3D response at the center of the ARF.
    The 2D approximation is used for computational efficiency; a comparison with 3D synthetic data supports it, but it remains an approximation.
  • domain assumption The incompressible elastodynamics scalar wave equation (Eq. 1) governs the shear wave response.
    Standard model in elastography, invoked in the Methods section; ignores compressional waves and assumes incompressibility.
  • domain assumption Applying identical sampling, truncation, and windowing to simulated and measured data yields simulated peaks that faithfully represent experimental peak locations.
    This is the key to avoiding bias from truncation (as noted by Rouze et al.), but it assumes the forward model captures all relevant signal processing effects.
  • ad hoc to paper The noise model (multiplicative and additive Gaussian) with parameters alpha_m=0.30 and alpha_a=0.007 represents experimental noise.
    Parameters chosen by visual comparison with real data, not from measured noise statistics.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Twin Peak Method for Estimating Tissue Viscoelasticity using Shear Wave Elastography." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/C3VWRBQJ

@misc{pith2026241111572,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Twin Peak Method for Estimating Tissue Viscoelasticity using Shear Wave Elastography},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/C3VWRBQJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.11572}
}
read the original abstract

Tissue viscoelasticity is becoming an increasingly useful biomarker beyond elasticity and can theoretically be estimated using shear wave elastography (SWE), by inverting the propagation and attenuation characteristics of shear waves. Estimating viscosity is often more difficult than elasticity because attenuation, the main effect of viscosity, leads to poor signal-to-noise ratio of the shear wave motion. In the present work, we provide an alternative to existing methods of viscoelasticity estimation that is robust against noise. The method minimizes the difference between simulated and measured versions of two sets of peaks (twin peaks) in the frequency-wavenumber domain, obtained first by traversing through each frequency and then by traversing through each wavenumber. The slopes and deviation of the twin peaks are sensitive to elasticity and viscosity respectively, leading to the effectiveness of the proposed inversion algorithm for characterizing mechanical properties. This expected effectiveness is confirmed through in silico verification, followed by ex vivo validation and in vivo application, indicating that the proposed approach can be effectively used in accurately estimating viscoelasticity, thus potentially contributing to the development of enhanced biomarkers.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.11572 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Experimental setup of SWE, (b) x t  representation of measured particle velocity response [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) Particle velocity in frequency-wavenumber domain, (b) visualization of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Twin peaks from time domain simulation (dashed lines) and frequency domain (solid [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Objective function for noise-free in silico data, (b) twin peaks from the data (dashed) along with inverted peaks (solid) (a) (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison of existing approaches with TPM: (a) storage modulus; (b) loss modulus. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: a presents an example TPM objective function for the noisy data, which has a bowl shape with a clear minimum, indicating the robustness of TPM against noise. This observation on robustness is further reinforced by examining the match between the two peaks with the inve…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparison of existing approaches with TPM: (a) example inverted storage modulus; [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (a) Twin peaks obtained from noisy in silico data (dashed) and final inverted peaks (solid), (b) objective function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Ex vivo validation of TPM: (a) particle velocity data (for a single SWE sample), (b) truncated particle velocity data, (c) twin peaks for three SWE samples (dashed lines) along with inverted peaks (solid lines), (d) estimated moduli (solid lines) along with Rheospectri…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: b shows the comparison with Rheospectris data, indicating somewhat over prediction of viscosity. Noting the larger scatter in the k f ( ) peaks at high frequencies, we refined the inversion by focusing on reduced frequency and wavenumber ranges, i.e. 1 0 1 200 , 000 0…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: In vivo application: (a) unfiltered particle velocity; (b) truncated x-t data; (c) twin peaks (SWE is dashed line and simulated is solid line); (d) objective function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_11.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Viscoelasticity acts as a marker for tumor extracellular matrix characteristics

    Mierke CT. Viscoelasticity acts as a marker for tumor extracellular matrix characteristics. Front Cell Dev Biol 2021;9:785138

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    Viscoelastic biomarker for differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesion in ultra-low frequency range

    Nabavizadeh A, Bayat M, Kumar V, Gregory A, Webb J, Alizad A, et al. Viscoelastic biomarker for differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesion in ultra-low frequency range. Sci Rep 2019;9:5737

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    Assessment of liver viscoelasticity for the diagnosis of early stage fatty liver disease using transient elastography

    Remenieras J-P, Dejobert M, Bastard C, Miette V, Perarnau J-M, Patat F. Assessment of liver viscoelasticity for the diagnosis of early stage fatty liver disease using transient elastography. Phys Procedia 2015;70:1246–9

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    Evaluating the significance of viscoelasticity in diagnosing early-stage liver fibrosis with transient elastography

    Zhao J, Zhai F, Cheng J, He Q, Luo J, Yang X, et al. Evaluating the significance of viscoelasticity in diagnosing early-stage liver fibrosis with transient elastography. PLoS One 2017;12:e0170073

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    Transient elastography: a new noninvasive method for assessment of hepatic fibrosis

    Sandrin L, Fourquet B, Hasquenoph J-M, Yon S, Fournier C, Mal F, et al. Transient elastography: a new noninvasive method for assessment of hepatic fibrosis. Ultrasound Med Amp Biol 2003;29:1705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2003.07.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2003.07.001 2003

  6. [6]

    Hepatic MR Elastography: Clinical Performance in a Series of 1377 Consecutive Examinations

    Yin M, Glaser KJ, Talwalkar JA, Chen J, Manduca A, Ehman RL. Hepatic MR Elastography: Clinical Performance in a Series of 1377 Consecutive Examinations. Radiology 2016;278:114. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2015142141

    work page doi:10.1148/radiol.2015142141 2016

  7. [7]

    Quantitative Viscoelasticity Mapping of Human Liver Using Supersonic Shear Imaging: Preliminary In Vivo Feasability Study

    Muller M, Gennisson J-L, Deffieux T, Tanter M, Fink M. Quantitative Viscoelasticity Mapping of Human Liver Using Supersonic Shear Imaging: Preliminary In Vivo Feasability Study. Ultrasound Med Amp Biol 2009;35:219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.08.018

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.08.018 2009

  8. [8]

    Global tissue stiffness on breast MR elastography: High-risk dense breast patients have higher stiffness compared to average-risk dense breast patients

    Patel BK, Pepin K, Brandt KR, Mazza GL, Pockaj BA, Chen J, et al. Global tissue stiffness on breast MR elastography: High-risk dense breast patients have higher stiffness compared to average-risk dense breast patients. J Clin Oncol 2022;39:10541. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.10541

    work page doi:10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.10541 2022

Show all 44 references
  1. [9]

    2D shear wave elastography in evaluation of prognostic factors in breast cancer

    Ventura C, Baldassarre S, Cerimele F, Pepi L, Marconi E, Ercolani P, et al. 2D shear wave elastography in evaluation of prognostic factors in breast cancer. Radiol Med (Torino) 2022;127:1221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-022-01559-5

    2022 doi

  2. [10]

    Diagnostic accuracy of elastography and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with NAFLD: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Selvaraj EA, Mózes FE, Jayaswal ANA, Zafarmand MH, Vali Y, Lee JA, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of elastography and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with NAFLD: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hepatol 2021;75:770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2021.04.044

    2021 doi

  3. [11]

    Magnetic resonance elastography in staging liver fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a pooled analysis of the diagnostic accuracy

    Liang Y, Li D. Magnetic resonance elastography in staging liver fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a pooled analysis of the diagnostic accuracy. BMC Gastroenterol 2020;20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-020-01234-x

    2020 doi

  4. [12]

    Direct Comparison of US and MR Elastography for Staging Liver Fibrosis in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

    Imajo K, Honda Y, Kobayashi T, Nagai K, Ozaki A, Iwaki M, et al. Direct Comparison of US and MR Elastography for Staging Liver Fibrosis in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022;20:908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2020.12.016

    2022 doi

  5. [13]

    Zhang YN, Fowler KJ, Boehringer AS, Montes V, Schlein AN, Covarrubias Y, et al. Comparative diagnostic performance of ultrasound shear wave elastography and magnetic resonance elastography for classifying fibrosis stage in adults with biopsy-proven nonalcoholic fatty liver dis...

    2021 doi

  6. [14]

    Liver Fibrosis: Point—Ultrasound Elastography Is a Safe, Widely Available, Low-Cost, Noninvasive Biomarker of Liver Fibrosis That Is Suitable for Broad Community Use

    Pierce TT, Samir AE. Liver Fibrosis: Point—Ultrasound Elastography Is a Safe, Widely Available, Low-Cost, Noninvasive Biomarker of Liver Fibrosis That Is Suitable for Broad Community Use. Am J Roentgenol 2022;219:382. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.22.27639

    2022 doi

  7. [15]

    Quantifying elasticity and viscosity from measurement of shear wave speed dispersion

    Chen S, Fatemi M, Greenleaf JF. Quantifying elasticity and viscosity from measurement of shear wave speed dispersion. J Acoust Soc Am 2004;115:2781. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1739480. 17

    2004 doi

  8. [16]

    Material property estimation for tubes and arteries using ultrasound radiation force and analysis of propagating modes n.d

    Bernal M, Nenadic I, Urban MW, Greenleaf JF. Material property estimation for tubes and arteries using ultrasound radiation force and analysis of propagating modes n.d. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3533735]

    doi

  9. [17]

    Shearwave dispersion ultrasound vibrometry (SDUV) for measuring tissue elasticity and viscosity

    Chen S, Urban M, Pislaru C, Kinnick R, Zheng Y, Yao A, et al. Shearwave dispersion ultrasound vibrometry (SDUV) for measuring tissue elasticity and viscosity. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2009;56:55. https://doi.org/10.1109/tuffc.2009.1005

    2009

  10. [18]

    Shear Wave Spectroscopy for In Vivo Quantification of Human Soft Tissues Visco-Elasticity

    Deffieux T, Montaldo G, Tanter M, Fink M. Shear Wave Spectroscopy for In Vivo Quantification of Human Soft Tissues Visco-Elasticity. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2009;28:313. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2008.925077

    2009

  11. [20]

    Evaluation of Robustness of S-Transform Based Phase Velocity Estimation in Viscoelastic Phantoms and Renal Transplants

    Kijanka P, Vasconcelos L, Mandrekar J, Urban MW. Evaluation of Robustness of S-Transform Based Phase Velocity Estimation in Viscoelastic Phantoms and Renal Transplants. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2024;71:954. https://doi.org/10.1109/tbme.2023.3323983

    2024

  12. [21]

    Phase Velocity Estimation With Expanded Bandwidth in Viscoelastic Phantoms and Tissues

    Kijanka P, Urban MW. Phase Velocity Estimation With Expanded Bandwidth in Viscoelastic Phantoms and Tissues. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2021;40:1352. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2021.3054950

    2021

  13. [22]

    Two Point Method For Robust Shear Wave Phase Velocity Dispersion Estimation of Viscoelastic Materials

    Kijanka P, Ambrozinski L, Urban MW. Two Point Method For Robust Shear Wave Phase Velocity Dispersion Estimation of Viscoelastic Materials. Ultrasound Med Amp Biol 2020;45:2540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.04.016

    2020 doi

  14. [23]

    Measurement of viscoelastic properties of homogeneous soft solid using transient elastography: An inverse problem approach

    Catheline S, Gennisson J-L, Delon G, Fink M, Sinkus R, Abouelkaram S, et al. Measurement of viscoelastic properties of homogeneous soft solid using transient elastography: An inverse problem approach. J Acoust Soc Am 2004;116:3734. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1815075

    2004 doi

  15. [24]

    Towards a consensus on rheological models for elastography in soft tissues

    Parker KJ, Szabo T, Holm S. Towards a consensus on rheological models for elastography in soft tissues. Phys Med Amp Biol 2021;64. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ab453d

    2021 doi

  16. [26]

    Characterization of Viscoelastic Materials using Group Shear Wave Speeds n.d

    Rouze NC, Deng Y, Trutna CA, Palmeri ML. Characterization of Viscoelastic Materials using Group Shear Wave Speeds n.d. https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC

    doi

  17. [27]

    A Review of Shearwave Dispersion Ultrasound Vibrometry (SDUV) and its Applications 2013

    Urban MW, Chen S, Fatemi M. A Review of Shearwave Dispersion Ultrasound Vibrometry (SDUV) and its Applications 2013

    2013

  18. [28]

    Attenuation measuring ultrasound shearwave elastography and in vivo application in post-transplant liver patients

    Nenadic IZ, Qiang B, Urban MW, Zhao H, Sanchez W, Greenleaf JF, et al. Attenuation measuring ultrasound shearwave elastography and in vivo application in post-transplant liver patients. Phys Med Biol 2016;62:484

    2016

  19. [29]

    A diffraction correction for storage and loss moduli imaging using radiation force based elastography

    Budelli E, Brum J, Bernal M, Deffieux T, Tanter M, Lema P, et al. A diffraction correction for storage and loss moduli imaging using radiation force based elastography. Phys Med Biol 2016;62:91. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/62/1/91

    2016 doi

  20. [30]

    Accounting for the Spatial Observation Window in the 2-D Fourier Transform Analysis of Shear Wave Attenuation

    Rouze NC, Deng Y, Palmeri ML, Nightingale KR. Accounting for the Spatial Observation Window in the 2-D Fourier Transform Analysis of Shear Wave Attenuation. Ultrasound Med Amp Biol 2017;43:2500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2017.06.006

    2017 doi

  21. [31]

    Two-Point Frequency Shift Method for Shear Wave Attenuation Measurement

    Kijanka P, Urban MW. Two-Point Frequency Shift Method for Shear Wave Attenuation Measurement. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2020;67:483. https://doi.org/10.1109/tuffc.2019.2945620

    2020

  22. [32]

    A Frequency-Shift Method to Measure Shear-Wave Attenuation in Soft Tissues

    Bernard S, Kazemirad S, Cloutier G. A Frequency-Shift Method to Measure Shear-Wave Attenuation in Soft Tissues. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2017;64:514. https://doi.org/10.1109/tuffc.2016.2634329. 18

    2017

  23. [33]

    Improved two-point frequency shift power method for measurement of shear wave attenuation

    Kijanka P, Urban MW. Improved two-point frequency shift power method for measurement of shear wave attenuation. Ultrasonics 2022;124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2022.106735

    2022

  24. [34]

    The Revisited Frequency-Shift Method for Shear Wave Attenuation Computation and Imaging

    Yazdani L, Bhatt M, Rafati I, Tang A, Cloutier G. The Revisited Frequency-Shift Method for Shear Wave Attenuation Computation and Imaging. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2022;69:2061. https://doi.org/10.1109/tuffc.2022.3166448

    2022

  25. [35]

    Viscoelastic parameter estimation using simulated shear wave motion and convolutional neural networks

    Vasconcelos L, Kijanka P, Urban MW. Viscoelastic parameter estimation using simulated shear wave motion and convolutional neural networks. Comput Biol Med 2021;133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104382

    2021

  26. [36]

    Full waveform inversion for arterial viscoelasticity

    Roy T, Guddati MN. Full waveform inversion for arterial viscoelasticity. Phys Med Amp Biol 2023;68. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/acba7a

    2023 doi

  27. [37]

    Multimodal guided wave inversion for arterial stiffness: methodology and validation in phantoms

    Roy T, Urban M, Xu Y, Greenleaf J, Guddati MN. Multimodal guided wave inversion for arterial stiffness: methodology and validation in phantoms. Phys Med Amp Biol 2021;66. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ac01b7

    2021 doi

  28. [38]

    Calculation of pressure fields from arbitrarily shaped, apodized, and excited ultrasound transducers

    Jensen JA, Svendsen NB. Calculation of pressure fields from arbitrarily shaped, apodized, and excited ultrasound transducers. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2024;39:262. https://doi.org/10.1109/58.139123

    2024 doi

  29. [39]

    Field: A program for simulating ultrasound systems

    Jensen JA. Field: A program for simulating ultrasound systems. Med Biol Eng Comput 1997;34:351– 3

    1997

  30. [40]

    Coherent plane-wave compounding for very high frame rate ultrasonography and transient elastography

    Montaldo G, Tanter M, Bercoff J, Benech N, Fink M. Coherent plane-wave compounding for very high frame rate ultrasonography and transient elastography. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2009;56:489–506

    2009

  31. [41]

    Real-time two-dimensional blood flow imaging using an autocorrelation technique

    Kasai C, Namekawa K, Koyano A, Omoto R. Real-time two-dimensional blood flow imaging using an autocorrelation technique. IEEE Trans Sonics Ultrason 1985;32:458–64

    1985

  32. [42]

    Hyper-frequency viscoelastic spectroscopy of biomaterials

    Henni AH, Schmitt C, Tremblay M-É, Hamdine M, Heuzey M-C, Carreau P, et al. Hyper-frequency viscoelastic spectroscopy of biomaterials. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2011;4:1115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.03.020

    2011 doi

  33. [43]

    Improvement of Shear Wave Motion Detection Using Harmonic Imaging in Healthy Human Liver

    Amador C, Song P, Meixner DD, Chen S, Urban MW. Improvement of Shear Wave Motion Detection Using Harmonic Imaging in Healthy Human Liver. Ultrasound Med Amp Biol 2017;42:1031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.12.012

    2017 doi

  34. [44]

    Improved shear wave group velocity estimation method based on spatiotemporal peak and thresholding motion search

    Carrascal CA, Chen S, Manduca A, Greenleaf JF, Urban MW. Improved shear wave group velocity estimation method based on spatiotemporal peak and thresholding motion search. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2017;64:660–8

    2017

  35. [45]

    WFUMB Guideline/Guidance on Liver Multiparametric Ultrasound: Part 1

    Ferraioli G, Barr RG, Berzigotti A, Sporea I, Wong VW, Reiberger T, et al. WFUMB Guideline/Guidance on Liver Multiparametric Ultrasound: Part 1. Update to 2018 Guidelines on Liver Ultrasound Elastography. Ultrasound Med Amp Biol 2024;50:1071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasme...

    2018 doi

  36. [46]

    Correlation-based full-waveform shear wave elastography

    Elmeliegy AM, Guddati MN. Correlation-based full-waveform shear wave elastography. Phys Med Amp Biol 2023;68. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/acc37b

    2023 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.