REVIEW 2 cited by
Sequential Quantum Maximum Confidence Discrimination
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Sequential quantum information processing may lie in the peaceful coexistence of no-go theorems on quantum operations, such as the no-cloning theorem, the monogamy of correlations, and the no-signalling principle. In this work, we investigate a sequential scenario of quantum state discrimination with maximum confidence, called maximum-confidence discrimination, which generalizes other strategies including minimum-error and unambiguous state discrimination. We show that sequential state discrimination with equally high confidence can be realized only when positive-operator-valued measure elements for a maximum-confidence measurement are linearly independent; otherwise, a party will have strictly less confidence in measurement outcomes than the previous one. We establish a tradeoff between the disturbance of states and information gain in sequential state discrimination, namely, that the less a party learn in state discrimination in terms of a guessing probability, the more parties can participate in the sequential scenario.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Contextual advantages across two-state discrimination strategies
Quantum two-state discrimination outperforms noncontextual classical theories for every standard figure of merit, including single-shot outcome confidences.
-
Unbounded entanglement-sustaining sequential local quantum state discrimination
The authors claim an LOCC protocol distinguishes any two orthogonal entangled two-qubit states sequentially with success >1/2 per round while preserving finite entanglement, but the general-case proof uses a false equality.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.