Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 77 references

Third-order Orbital Corner State and its Realization in Acoustic Crystals

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper shows that transverse (π-type) orbital hopping, not just longitudinal σ-type hopping, opens the band gap in a three-dimensional breathing pyrochlore lattice and creates twelve degenerate topological corner states at the corners…

desk verdict A solid tight-binding extension of orbital HOTIs into 3D, but the acoustic 'realization' is really a fitted FEM simulation; the theory deserves review, the experiment claim needs softening. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.13128 v2 pith:QJIQ3JQI submitted 2024-11-20 physics.app-ph cond-mat.mes-hall

Jiyu Wang , Ying Chen , Xiancong Lu This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.app-phcond-mat.mes-hall
keywords higher-ordertopologicalinsulatorp-orbitalbandsbreathingpyrochlorelatticeorbitalcornerstatesZ4Berryphaseacousticmetamaterialtight-bindingmodelthird-ordertopology
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that in three-dimensional p-orbital lattices — where each site carries lobed orbital states that can couple head-on or sideways — the transverse ($\pi$-type) hopping channels are not a correction but the active ingredient: on a breathing pyrochlore lattice (a 3D network of corner-sharing tetrahedra with alternating strong and weak bonds), the two orthogonal $\pi$ projections are what open a band gap around zero energy and make higher-order topological corner states appear. It constructs a 12-band tight-binding Hamiltonian with $\sigma$ and $\pi$ hoppings, defines a quantized $Z_4$ Berry phase, and maps two phase diagrams (one for constant $\pi/\sigma$ ratio, one for the acoustic case). A four-layer tetrahedral cluster then shows twelve degenerate zero-energy states localized at the four corners, with three distinct orbital configurations per corner. The same count and field patterns are recovered in a finite-element acoustic simulation of coupled spherical resonators, giving a concrete acoustic realization of third-order orbital corner states.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the $12\times 12$ $k$-space Hamiltonian of Eq. (7), obtained by projecting the three p orbitals onto six bond directions and their orthogonal transverse directions. For each bond direction $e_i$, the $\sigma$ channel is $p^\sigma_i = e_i\cdot p$, and the two transverse channels are $p^{\pi 1}_i = m_i\cdot p$ and $p^{\pi 2}_i = n_i\cdot p$ with $e_i$, $m_i$, $n_i$ mutually orthogonal; the six $D$ matrices in the Hamiltonian combine the $\sigma$ and $\pi$ contributions with amplitudes $t_{1\sigma}/t_{2\sigma}$ and $t_{1\pi}/t_{2\pi}$. The $Z_4$ Berry phase, computed by Wilson-loop integrals along four equivalent paths $W\to\Gamma\to W$, labels the nontrivial phases and is quantized in units of $2\pi/4$. In the acoustic realization, the role of the $\pi$ channel is carried by the coupling of two spherical resonators through a cylinder, with the hopping amplitudes extracted as half the frequency splitting of even/odd hybrid modes; the cylinder radius tunes the $t_\pi/t_\sigma$ ratio and thereby opens or closes the corner-state gap.

What would settle it

A decisive check is to measure the actual intercell $\pi/\sigma$ hopping ratio in the acoustic structure, for example by fitting the simulated or measured band structure, and compare it with the red-dot parameters $t_{1\sigma} = -0.19$, $t_{2\sigma} = -1$, $t_{1\pi} = 0$, $t_{2\pi} = 0.18$. If the true ratio is significantly lower, the 3700-4300 Hz gap closes and the twelve modes mix with bulk states; alternatively, directly probing the $L=4$ tetrahedron and finding fewer than twelve well-localized corner pressure modes would refute the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the two orthogonal $\pi$-type (transverse) hoppings are the key to obtain higher-order topological corner states in a 3D p-orbital system. In the tight-binding model of Eqs. (6)-(13), each nearest-neighbor bond carries one $\sigma$ projection and two mutually orthogonal $\pi$ projections, so the Hamiltonian contains both $t_{1\pi}$ and $t_{2\pi}$ terms alongside the usual $\sigma$ hoppings. Choosing the acoustic-relevant parameters $t_{1\sigma} = -0.19$, $t_{2\sigma} = -1$, $t_{1\pi} = 0$, $t_{2\pi} = 0.18$ opens a gap that hosts 12 degenerate zero-energy corner states in a four-layer ($L=4$) regular tetrahedron, and the associated $Z_4$ Berry phase takes the value $\theta_6/(2\pi) = 0.5$ across the occupied six bands. The acoustic finite-element simulation with spherical resonators and cylindrical connectors reproduces the same qualitative gap (about 3700-4300 Hz) and the same 12 degenerate pressure-field corner states, with orbital configurations matching the tight-binding predictions.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the tight-binding hopping parameters fitted from a two-resonator acoustic model, especially the ratio $t_{2\pi}/t_{2\sigma} = 0.18$, remain valid in the full three-dimensional lattice; the paper itself concedes that the coupling strength in the 3D lattice differs from the double-resonator model.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the $\pi$-type hoppings are turned off ($t_{2\pi}\to 0$), the gap harboring the corner states closes and the zero-energy modes mix with bulk and other localized states, so the transverse channel is necessary for the third-order topology.
  • The $Z_4$ Berry phase separates two nontrivial regimes: $\theta_3/(2\pi) = 0.25$ with three occupied bands in the $\alpha$-$\beta$ diagram, and $\theta_6/(2\pi) = 0.5$ with six occupied bands in the acoustic $t_{1\sigma}$-$t_{2\pi}$ plane.
  • In the acoustic design, increasing the intercell cylinder radius $r_2$ raises $t_{2\pi}/t_{2\sigma}$ and opens the gap, while decreasing $r_2$ or pushing $r_2$ toward the sphere radius destroys the corner-state gap, giving a direct experimental tuning rule.
  • The finite tetrahedral structure hosts additional surface, edge, and type-II corner states (states with corner-like profiles that decay exponentially away from the corner) near the gap, so identifying the topological corner states requires resolving the twelve degenerate modes from these nearby localized states.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This suggests a platform-independent design rule: to realize p-orbital higher-order topology in any wave system, engineer the transverse hopping between orbitals rather than only the longitudinal hopping.
  • The three corner orbital configurations (radial, parallel, and staggered) could be exploited as a multi-valued local degree of freedom if the twelve-fold degeneracy is controllably split, an application the paper does not discuss.
  • A natural robustness test would scan $t_{1\pi}$ away from zero in the tight-binding model while keeping the acoustic parameters fixed, since the paper only treats $t_{1\pi}=0$ in the acoustic phase diagram.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript constructs a 12-band tight-binding model for p orbitals on a breathing pyrochlore lattice, retaining both σ-type and two orthogonal π-type hoppings. It computes a Z4 Berry phase, presents phase diagrams in the (α, β) and (t1σ, t2π) planes, and shows 12 zero-energy corner states in a tetrahedral finite cluster with L = 4. The paper then reports finite-element acoustic simulations of a spherical-resonator breathing pyrochlore structure whose pressure fields are interpreted as orbital corner states. The central assertion is that the two transverse (π) hopping channels are essential for opening the band gap and obtaining third-order orbital corner states in three dimensions.

Significance. If the acoustic interpretation is accepted, this is a valuable extension of orbital higher-order topology from two to three dimensions. The paper gives an explicit Slater-Koster-type construction of the p-orbital hopping Hamiltonian, an independent bulk Z4 invariant, and full-wave finite-element simulations whose field patterns are compared with the tight-binding orbital configurations (Fig. 5 vs. Fig. 7). The tight-binding derivation appears internally consistent, and the Z4 quantization argument follows the standard Wilson-loop reasoning. The main weakness is that the acoustic operating point is justified by a two-resonator fit whose transfer to the full three-dimensional lattice is not independently established; this limits confidence in the claim that the simulated modes are the predicted topological corner states.

major comments (3)
  1. [V; Fig. 6(e), Fig. 3(c), Fig. 4(b)] The acoustic parameter point t1σ = −0.19, t2σ = −1, t1π = 0, t2π = 0.18 is chosen from the two-resonator extraction in Fig. 6(e), yet Sec. V itself states that the coupling strength in the three-dimensional acoustic lattice differs from that in the double-resonator model. Because the inset of Fig. 4(b) shows the gap harboring the corner states closing as t2π → 0, a modest reduction of the in-lattice π hopping would move the working point toward or outside the predicted nontrivial region. The full-lattice FEM spectra in Figs. 6(c,d) are the only direct evidence, but their interpretation as the predicted orbital corner states depends on the extracted ratio remaining in the blue phase. Please extract t2π/t2σ directly from the full-lattice FEM band structure or from the finite-tetrahedron mode splittings, or alternatively show that the 12 corner modes persist over a range of t2π/t2σ around 0.18; without this, the acoustic realization claim is not independently validated.
  2. [IV.2; Fig. 4(b)] The claim of 12 degenerate corner states in the L = 4 tetrahedron would be strengthened by a quantitative localization diagnostic. The spectrum alone does not distinguish corner states from edge, surface, or Type-II corner states, and the text indeed identifies all of these types in Fig. 4(b). Please report an inverse participation ratio or a corner-site weight for each zero-energy state, and show how the number of corner-localized modes behaves as L is increased, to confirm that exactly 12 states are true corner states rather than near-zero-energy non-corner modes.
  3. [III; Fig. 3(c), Sec. V] The acoustic realization and the topological phase diagram are connected by the red dot in Fig. 3(c), but the diagram is computed with the additional condition that zero-energy states must lie inside a band gap. Please state explicitly whether this condition is evaluated from the bulk band structure or from the finite tetrahedron, and overlay the bulk gap-closing boundaries on Fig. 3(c). This would let the reader separate the Z4-invariant regions from the finite-size visibility regions and would clarify how much robustness the acoustic design has against the parameter-transfer uncertainty discussed above.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. III heading] The term 'Z4 berry phase' should be capitalized as 'Z4 Berry phase' throughout.
  2. [Abstract] The phrase 'analysis the phase diagram' should read 'analyze the phase diagram'.
  3. [Sec. V] The duplicated word in 'discussed in in Sec. V' should be removed.
  4. [Abstract, Sec. V, Sec. VI] The words 'observe' and 'successfully observe' refer to finite-element simulations, not to measurements on a fabricated sample; please use 'numerically realize' or otherwise clearly state that the results are simulations.
  5. [Eqs. (1)-(5)] The vectors e_i, m_i, and n_i are not unit vectors; please state explicitly that their normalization is absorbed into the hopping amplitudes tσ and tπ so that the projection conventions are unambiguous.
  6. [Fig. 6(e)] The caption of Fig. 6(e) should specify that the plotted ratio is t2π/t2σ for the intercell connector and should mark the r2 value used in the final acoustic design.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation; the tight-binding prediction and acoustic realization are independently computed, with parameter extraction and phase-diagram trimming disclosed explicitly.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation begins with a Slater–Koster tight-binding Hamiltonian for p orbitals on the breathing pyrochlore lattice, with independent parameters t1σ, t2σ, t1π, and t2π. The Z4 Berry phase is computed as a genuinely separate bulk invariant (Eqs. 14–18), and the phase diagrams are obtained by combining this invariant with an explicitly stated in-gap-zero-energy condition, not by fitting the corner-state spectrum. The acoustic section extracts t2π/t2σ from a two-resonator FEM calculation and then compares the resulting tight-binding spectra with a full three-dimensional acoustic-lattice FEM calculation; the paper explicitly concedes that the three-dimensional coupling strength differs from the double-resonator model, which is a robustness caveat rather than a circular construction. The self-citations (Refs. 44 and 49) supply methodological context—2D π-hopping counting and the even/odd mode-splitting relation—but are not load-bearing uniqueness theorems and do not substitute for the independent bulk invariant or full FEM simulation. No equation is defined in terms of its own output, no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and the corner-state claim is not forced by the construction of the model.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on five axioms and three effective hopping parameters. No new physical entities are introduced. The Z4 Berry phase is computed within the same tight-binding Hamiltonian, so the invariant is not an independent external benchmark.

free parameters (3)
  • t1σ/t2σ (intracell-to-intercell sigma hopping ratio) = -0.19 / -1 for the acoustic simulation
    Set by the acoustic geometry (r1=7.6 mm, h1=15.8 mm); controls the phase and gap width and is not derived analytically from the resonator parameters.
  • t2π/t2σ (intercell pi-to-sigma hopping ratio) = 0.18 / -1
    Extracted from the two-resonator FEM mode splitting in Fig. 6(e). The acoustic corner states exist only for a window of this ratio, so it is the central fitted quantity.
  • t1π/t1σ (intracell pi-to-sigma hopping ratio) = 0
    Assumed negligible because the intracell cylinder radius is small. A nonzero value would move the phase boundary in Fig. 3(c) and could close the corner-state gap.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The pyrochlore lattice is described by a nearest-neighbor tight-binding model with only sigma and two orthogonal pi hopping channels; longer-range hoppings and orbital mixing beyond Slater-Koster projections are neglected.
    Invoked in Sec. II, Eqs. (2)-(6). The acoustic realization depends on this truncation; the paper notes deviations from the double-resonator model but does not quantify neglected terms.
  • domain assumption The S4 symmetry of the breathing pyrochlore lattice makes the four W-plane integration paths equivalent, so the Z4 Berry phase is quantized as 2πn/4.
    Used in Sec. III, Eqs. (16)-(18). If the symmetry is broken in the acoustic sample or the finite tetrahedron, the quantization argument fails.
  • domain assumption Topology changes only at bulk band-gap closings, and the t1=0 limit is adiabatically connected to the finite-t1 regions used.
    Sec. III states "the origin of topology is the adiabatic connection...". No gap-closing check across each phase region is shown.
  • domain assumption The two-resonator FEM extraction of tπ/tσ remains valid for the full 3D acoustic lattice, and t1π=0 for the small intracell connector.
    Sec. V and Fig. 6(e). The paper itself says the 3D lattice coupling differs from the double-resonator model, so this premise is load-bearing for the acoustic claim.
  • standard math The Wilson-loop and Berry-connection formalism in Eqs. (14)-(18) correctly gives Z4 invariants for degenerate band groups.
    Borrowed from Refs. [61-68]; standard background in the field, not re-derived in this paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Third-order Orbital Corner State and its Realization in Acoustic Crystals." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QJIQ3JQI

@misc{pith2026241113128,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Third-order Orbital Corner State and its Realization in Acoustic Crystals},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QJIQ3JQI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.13128}
}
abstract

Three dimensional (3D) third-order topological insulators (TIs) have zero-dimensional (0D) corner states, which are three dimensions lower than bulk. Here we investigate the third-order TIs on breathing pyrochlore lattices with p-orbital freedom. The tight-binding Hamiltonian is derived for the p-orbital model, in which we find that the two orthogonal ${\pi}$-type (transverse) hoppings are the key to open a band gap and obtain higher-order topological corner states. We introduce the Z4 berry phase to characterize the bulk topology and analysis the phase diagram. The corner states, demonstrated in a finite structure of a regular tetrahedron, exhibit rich 3D orbital configurations. Furthermore, we design an acoustic system to introduce the necessary ${\pi}$-type hopping and successfully observe the orbital corner states. Our work extends topological orbital corner states to third-order, which enriches the contents of orbital physics and may lead to applications in novel topological acoustic devices.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.13128 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) The structure of breathing pyrochlore lattices in real space. Gray solid spheres represent four sites in a unit cell, which make [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a), (d) Band structures of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Bulk topological properties of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Band structures of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The orbital configurations of corner states for a four-layer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) Schematic diagram for the unit cell of acoustic breathing pyrochlore lattices where [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a)-(f). We can see that the fields are highly localized on the four corners with different orbital configurations. In detail, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Z2 topological order and the quantum spin Hall effect, Physical review letters 95, 146802 (2005)

    work page 2005

  2. [2]

    C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Quantum spin Hall effect in graphene, Physical review letters 95, 226801 (2005)

    work page 2005

  3. [3]

    B. A. Bernevig, T. L. Hughes, and S.-C. Zhang, Quantum spin Hall effect and topological phase transition in HgTe quantum wells, Science 314, 1757 (2006). 9

    work page 2006

  4. [4]

    Konig, S

    M. Konig, S. Wiedmann, C. Brune, A. Roth, H. Buhmann, L. W. Molenkamp, X.-L. Qi, and S.-C. Zhang, Quantum spin Hall insulator state in HgTe quantum wells, Science 318, 766 (2007)

    work page 2007

  5. [5]

    L. Fu, C. L. Kane, and E. J. Mele, Topological insulators in three dimensions, Physical review letters 98, 106803 (2007)

    work page 2007

  6. [6]

    J. E. Moore, The birth of topological insulators, Nature 464, 194 (2010)

    2010

  7. [7]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: topological insula- tors, Reviews of modern physics 82, 3045 (2010)

    2010

  8. [8]

    Qi and S.-C

    X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and super- conductors, Reviews of Modern Physics 83, 1057 (2011)

    work page 2011

Show all 77 references
  1. [9]

    W. A. Benalcazar, B. A. Bernevig, and T. L. Hughes, Quan- tized electric multipole insulators, Science 357, 61 (2017)

    2017

  2. [10]

    W. A. Benalcazar, B. A. Bernevig, and T. L. Hughes, Electric multipole moments, topological multipole moment pumping, and chiral hinge states in crystalline insulators, Physical Re- view B 96, 245115 (2017)

    2017

  3. [11]

    Z. Song, Z. Fang, and C. Fang, (d−2)-dimensional edge states of rotation symmetry protected topological states, Physical re- view letters 119, 246402 (2017)

    2017

  4. [12]

    Langbehn, Y

    J. Langbehn, Y . Peng, L. Trifunovic, F. von Oppen, and P. W. Brouwer, Reflection-symmetric second-order topological in- sulators and superconductors, Physical review letters 119, 246401 (2017)

    2017

  5. [13]

    Geier, L

    M. Geier, L. Trifunovic, M. Hoskam, and P. W. Brouwer, Second-order topological insulators and superconductors with an order-two crystalline symmetry, Physical Review B 97, 205135 (2018)

    2018

  6. [14]

    Schindler, A

    F. Schindler, A. M. Cook, M. G. Vergniory, Z. Wang, S. S. Parkin, B. A. Bernevig, and T. Neupert, Higher-order topolog- ical insulators, Science advances 4, eaat0346 (2018)

    2018

  7. [15]

    Xie, H.-X

    B. Xie, H.-X. Wang, X. Zhang, P. Zhan, J.-H. Jiang, M. Lu, and Y . Chen, Higher-order band topology, Nature Reviews Physics 3, 520 (2021)

    2021

  8. [16]

    Yang, J.-H

    Y .-B. Yang, J.-H. Wang, K. Li, and Y . Xu, Higher-order topo- logical phases in crystalline and non-crystalline systems: a re- view, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter (2024)

    2024

  9. [17]

    M. Kim, Z. Jacob, and J. Rho, Recent advances in 2D, 3D and higher-order topological photonics, Light: Science & Appli- cations 9, 130 (2020)

    2020

  10. [18]

    Zhang, X

    W. Zhang, X. Xie, H. Hao, J. Dang, S. Xiao, S. Shi, H. Ni, Z. Niu, C. Wang, K. Jin, et al. , Low-threshold topological nanolasers based on the second-order corner state, Light: Sci- ence & Applications 9, 109 (2020)

    2020

  11. [19]

    Kim, M.-S

    H.-R. Kim, M.-S. Hwang, D. Smirnova, K.-Y . Jeong, Y . Kivshar, and H.-G. Park, Multipolar lasing modes from topological corner states, Nature communications 11, 5758 (2020)

    2020

  12. [20]

    J. Wu, S. Ghosh, Y . Gan, Y . Shi, S. Mandal, H. Sun, B. Zhang, T. C. Liew, R. Su, and Q. Xiong, Higher-order topological polariton corner state lasing, Science Advances 9, eadg4322 (2023)

    2023

  13. [21]

    Okamoto, G

    Y . Okamoto, G. J. Nilsen, J. P. Attfield, and Z. Hiroi, Breath- ing pyrochlore lattice realized in A-site ordered spinel ox- ides LiGaCr4O8 and LiInCr4O8, Physical review letters 110, 097203 (2013)

    2013

  14. [22]

    Tanaka, M

    Y . Tanaka, M. Yoshida, M. Takigawa, Y . Okamoto, and Z. Hi- roi, Novel Phase Transitions in the Breathing Pyrochlore Lat- tice: 7Li- NMR on LiInCr 4O8 and LiGaCr4O8, Physical Re- view Letters 113, 227204 (2014)

    2014

  15. [23]

    J. Rau, L. Wu, A. May, L. Poudel, B. Winn, V . Garlea, A. Huq, P. Whitfield, A. Taylor, M. Lumsden, et al. , Anisotropic ex- change within decoupled tetrahedra in the quantum breath- ing pyrochlore Ba3Yb2Zn5O11, Physical Review Letters 116, 257204 (2016)

    2016

  16. [24]

    Pokharel, H

    G. Pokharel, H. S. Arachchige, T. J. Williams, A. F. May, R. S. Fishman, G. Sala, S. Calder, G. Ehlers, D. S. Parker, T. Hong, et al. , Cluster frustration in the breathing pyrochlore magnet LiGaCr4S8, Physical Review Letters 125, 167201 (2020)

    2020

  17. [25]

    Z. He, Y . Gu, H. Wo, Y . Feng, D. Hu, Y . Hao, Y . Gu, H. C. Walker, D. T. Adroja, and J. Zhao, Neutron Scattering Stud- ies of the Breathing Pyrochlore Antiferromagnet LiGaCr 4O8, Physical Review Letters 127, 147205 (2021)

    2021

  18. [26]

    Li, Y .-D

    F.-Y . Li, Y .-D. Li, Y . B. Kim, L. Balents, Y . Yu, and G. Chen, Weyl magnons in breathing pyrochlore antiferromagnets, Na- ture communications 7, 12691 (2016)

    2016

  19. [27]

    Iqbal, T

    Y . Iqbal, T. M¨uller, P. Ghosh, M. J. Gingras, H. O. Jeschke, S. Rachel, J. Reuther, and R. Thomale, Quantum and classical phases of the pyrochlore Heisenberg model with competing interactions, Physical Review X 9, 011005 (2019)

    2019

  20. [28]

    H. Yan, O. Benton, L. D. Jaubert, N. Shannon, et al., Rank–2 U (1) spin liquid on the breathing pyrochlore lattice, Physical Review Letters 124, 127203 (2020)

    2020

  21. [29]

    Ezawa, Higher-order topological insulators and semimet- als on the breathing kagome and pyrochlore lattices, Physical review letters 120, 026801 (2018)

    M. Ezawa, Higher-order topological insulators and semimet- als on the breathing kagome and pyrochlore lattices, Physical review letters 120, 026801 (2018)

    2018

  22. [30]

    Ezawa, Higher-order topological electric circuits and topo- logical corner resonance on the breathing kagome and py- rochlore lattices, Physical Review B 98, 201402 (2018)

    M. Ezawa, Higher-order topological electric circuits and topo- logical corner resonance on the breathing kagome and py- rochlore lattices, Physical Review B 98, 201402 (2018)

    2018

  23. [31]

    F. K. Kunst, G. van Miert, and E. J. Bergholtz, Lattice mod- els with exactly solvable topological hinge and corner states, Physical Review B 97, 241405 (2018)

    2018

  24. [32]

    Weiner, X

    M. Weiner, X. Ni, M. Li, A. Al `u, and A. B. Khanikaev, Demonstration of a third-order hierarchy of topological states in a three-dimensional acoustic metamaterial, Science Ad- vances 6, eaay4166 (2020)

    2020

  25. [33]

    Tokura and N

    Y . Tokura and N. Nagaosa, Orbital physics in transition-metal oxides, science 288, 462 (2000)

    2000

  26. [34]

    Khomskii, Orbital physics: glorious past, bright future, ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology 11, 054004 (2022)

    D. Khomskii, Orbital physics: glorious past, bright future, ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology 11, 054004 (2022)

    2022

  27. [35]

    Lewenstein and W

    M. Lewenstein and W. V . Liu, Orbital dance, Nature Physics 7, 101 (2011)

    2011

  28. [36]

    Li and W

    X. Li and W. V . Liu, Physics of higher orbital bands in optical lattices: a review, Reports on Progress in Physics 79, 116401 (2016)

    2016

  29. [37]

    Zhao and W

    E. Zhao and W. V . Liu, Orbital Order in Mott Insulators of Spinless p-Band Fermions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 160403 (2008)

    2008

  30. [38]

    Lu and E

    X. Lu and E. Arrigoni, Dispersive spectrum and orbital order of spinless p-band fermions in an optical lattice, Physical Re- view B 79, 245109 (2009)

    2009

  31. [39]

    Wirth, M

    G. Wirth, M. ¨Olschl¨ager, and A. Hemmerich, Evidence for orbital superfluidity in the P-band of a bipartite optical square lattice, Nature Physics 7, 147 (2011)

    2011

  32. [40]

    Soltan-Panahi, D.-S

    P. Soltan-Panahi, D.-S. L¨uhmann, J. Struck, P. Windpassinger, and K. Sengstock, Quantum phase transition to unconven- tional multi-orbital superfluidity in optical lattices, Nature Physics 8, 71 (2012)

    2012

  33. [41]

    Mili ´cevi´c, T

    M. Mili ´cevi´c, T. Ozawa, G. Montambaux, I. Carusotto, E. Ga- lopin, A. Lema ˆıtre, L. Le Gratiet, I. Sagnes, J. Bloch, and A. Amo, Orbital edge states in a photonic honeycomb lattice, Physical review letters 118, 107403 (2017)

    2017

  34. [42]

    F. Gao, X. Xiang, Y .-G. Peng, X. Ni, Q.-L. Sun, S. Yves, X.- F. Zhu, and A. Al`u, Orbital topological edge states and phase transitions in one-dimensional acoustic resonator chains, Na- ture Communications 14, 8162 (2023)

    2023

  35. [43]

    Schulz, J

    J. Schulz, J. Noh, W. A. Benalcazar, G. Bahl, and G. von Freymann, Photonic quadrupole topological insulator using orbital-induced synthetic flux, Nature communications 13, 6597 (2022). 10

    2022

  36. [44]

    X. Lu, Y . Chen, and H. Chen, Orbital corner states on breath- ing kagome lattices, Physical Review B 101, 195143 (2020)

    2020

  37. [45]

    Zhang, D

    Y . Zhang, D. Bongiovanni, Z. Wang, X. Wang, S. Xia, Z. Hu, D. Song, D. Juki´c, J. Xu, R. Morandotti, et al., Realization of photonic p-orbital higher-order topological insulators, eLight 3, 5 (2023)

    2023

  38. [46]

    Gao, Y .-G

    F. Gao, Y .-G. Peng, X. Xiang, X. Ni, C. Zheng, S. Yves, X.-F. Zhu, and A. Al `u, Acoustic Higher-Order Topological Insula- tors Induced by Orbital-Interactions, Advanced Materials 36, 2312421 (2024)

    2024

  39. [47]

    Wu, Z.-K

    B.-Q. Wu, Z.-K. Lin, L.-W. Wang, and J.-H. Jiang, Obser- vation of a p-orbital higher-order topological insulator phase in puckered lattice acoustic metamaterials, Phys. Rev. B 109, 205136 (2024)

    2024

  40. [48]

    Bongiovanni, Z

    D. Bongiovanni, Z. Hu, Z. Wang, X. Wang, D. Juki ´c, Y . Hu, D. Song, R. Morandotti, Z. Chen, and H. Buljan, p- Orbital Higher-Order Topological Corner States in 2D Pho- tonic Su–Schrieffer–Heeger Lattices, Laser & Photonics Re- views 18, 2400638 (2024)

    2024

  41. [49]

    Y . Chen, Y . Yin, Z.-K. Lin, Z.-H. Zheng, Y . Liu, J. Li, J.- H. Jiang, and H. Chen, Observation of topological p-orbital disclination states in non-Euclidean acoustic metamaterials, Physical Review Letters 129, 154301 (2022)

    2022

  42. [50]

    Y . Wang, C. Niu, B. Huang, Y . Dai, and W. Wei, Valley- contrasting physics in a two-dimensional px,y-orbital honey- comb lattice, Phys. Rev. B 105, 075421 (2022)

    2022

  43. [51]

    G. Liu, V . Workman, J. Noh, Y . Ma, T. L. Hughes, W. A. Benalcazar, and G. Bahl, Monoatomic orbital-based one- dimensional topological crystalline insulator, Phys. Rev. B 110, 214110 (2024)

    2024

  44. [52]

    J. Li, H. Wang, S. Jia, P. Zhan, M. Lu, Z. Wang, Y . Chen, and B. Xie, Disentangled Higher-Orbital Bands and Chiral Sym- metric Topology in Confined Mie Resonance Photonic Crys- tals, Laser & Photonics Reviews 18, 2300543 (2024)

    2024

  45. [53]

    Chen, Simulating the Palmer-Chalker state in an orbital su- perfluid, Physical Review A 101, 063601 (2020)

    H. Chen, Simulating the Palmer-Chalker state in an orbital su- perfluid, Physical Review A 101, 063601 (2020)

    2020

  46. [54]

    H. Chen, C. Wu, and X. Xie, Emergent Weyl fermions in an orbital multipolar ordered phase, Physical Review B 105, 205132 (2022)

    2022

  47. [55]

    Kłosi ´nski, W

    A. Kłosi ´nski, W. Brzezicki, A. Lau, C. E. Agrapidis, A. M. Ole´s, J. van Wezel, and K. Wohlfeld, Topology of chalcogen chains, Physical Review B 107, 125123 (2023)

    2023

  48. [56]

    Luo, G.-H

    G.-Q. Luo, G.-H. Huang, and Z.-F. Xu, Bosonic Weyl excita- tions induced by p-orbital interactions in a cubic optical lat- tice, Physical Review A 108, 013303 (2023)

    2023

  49. [57]

    W. V . Liu and C. Wu, Atomic matter of nonzero-momentum Bose-Einstein condensation and orbital current order, Physi- cal Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics 74, 013607 (2006)

    2006

  50. [58]

    Wu and S

    C. Wu and S. D. Sarma, px,y-orbital counterpart of graphene: Cold atoms in the honeycomb optical lattice, Physical Review B 77, 235107 (2008)

    2008

  51. [59]

    Mili ´cevi´c, G

    M. Mili ´cevi´c, G. Montambaux, T. Ozawa, O. Jamadi, B. Real, I. Sagnes, A. Lema ˆıtre, L. Le Gratiet, A. Harouri, J. Bloch, et al., Type-III and tilted Dirac cones emerging from flat bands in photonic orbital graphene, Physical Review X 9, 031010 (2019)

    2019

  52. [60]

    Sun, Y .-G

    Q.-L. Sun, Y .-G. Peng, F. Gao, B. Li, and X.-F. Zhu, Montage Operation of Plaquette States in Acoustic Orbital Lattices with Type-III Dirac Points, Physical Review Applied 20, 024025 (2023)

    2023

  53. [61]

    Hatsugai and I

    Y . Hatsugai and I. Maruyama, ZQ topological invariants for Polyacetylene, Kagome and Pyrochlore lattices, Europhysics Letters 95, 20003 (2011)

    2011

  54. [62]

    Kariyado, T

    T. Kariyado, T. Morimoto, and Y . Hatsugai,ZN Berry Phases in Symmetry Protected Topological Phases, Physical review letters 120, 247202 (2018)

    2018

  55. [63]

    Araki, T

    H. Araki, T. Mizoguchi, and Y . Hatsugai,ZQ Berry phase for higher-order symmetry-protected topological phases, Physical Review Research 2, 012009 (2020)

    2020

  56. [64]

    Wakao, T

    H. Wakao, T. Yoshida, H. Araki, T. Mizoguchi, and Y . Hat- sugai, Higher-order topological phases in a spring-mass model on a breathing kagome lattice, Physical Review B101, 094107 (2020)

    2020

  57. [65]

    Z.-X. Li, Y . Cao, X. Wang, and P. Yan, Second-order topologi- cal solitonic insulator in a breathing square lattice of magnetic vortices, Physical Review B 101, 184404 (2020)

    2020

  58. [66]

    Jiang, T

    Y .-C. Jiang, T. Kariyado, and X. Hu, Higher-Order Topology in Honeycomb Lattice with Y-Kekul ´e Distortions, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 93, 033703 (2024)

    2024

  59. [67]

    Fukui, Y

    T. Fukui, Y . Hatsugai, and H. Suzuki, Chern numbers in dis- cretized Brillouin zone: efficient method of computing (spin) Hall conductances, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 74, 1674 (2005)

    2005

  60. [68]

    R. Yu, X. L. Qi, A. Bernevig, Z. Fang, and X. Dai, Equivalent expression of Z2 topological invariant for band insulators us- ing the non-Abelian Berry connection, Physical Review B 84, 075119 (2011)

    2011

  61. [69]

    Otsuka, T

    Y . Otsuka, T. Yoshida, K. Kudo, S. Yunoki, and Y . Hatsugai, Higher-order topological Mott insulator on the pyrochlore lat- tice, Scientific reports 11, 20270 (2021)

    2021

  62. [70]

    M. Li, D. Zhirihin, M. Gorlach, X. Ni, D. Filonov, A. Slobozhanyuk, A. Al`u, and A. B. Khanikaev, Higher-order topological states in photonic kagome crystals with long-range interactions, Nature Photonics 14, 89 (2020)

    2020

  63. [71]

    Z. Yang, F. Gao, X. Shi, X. Lin, Z. Gao, Y . Chong, and B. Zhang, Topological acoustics, Physical review letters 114, 114301 (2015)

    2015

  64. [72]

    G. Ma, M. Xiao, and C. T. Chan, Topological phases in acous- tic and mechanical systems, Nature Reviews Physics 1, 281 (2019)

    2019

  65. [73]

    B. Hu, Z. Zhang, H. Zhang, L. Zheng, W. Xiong, Z. Yue, X. Wang, J. Xu, Y . Cheng, X. Liu,et al., Non-Hermitian topo- logical whispering gallery, Nature 597, 655 (2021)

    2021

  66. [74]

    H. Xue, Y . Yang, and B. Zhang, Topological acoustics, Nature Reviews Materials 7, 974 (2022)

    2022

  67. [75]

    W. Zhu, W. Deng, Y . Liu, J. Lu, H.-X. Wang, Z.-K. Lin, X. Huang, J. Jiang, and Z. Liu, Topological phononic meta- materials, Reports on Progress in Physics (2023)

    2023

  68. [76]

    H. Xue, Y . Yang, G. Liu, F. Gao, Y . Chong, and B. Zhang, Re- alization of an acoustic third-order topological insulator, Phys- ical review letters 122, 244301 (2019)

    2019

  69. [77]

    Cheng, Y .-J

    Z. Cheng, Y .-J. Guan, H. Xue, Y . Ge, D. Jia, Y . Long, S.-Q. Yuan, H.-X. Sun, Y . Chong, and B. Zhang, Three-dimensional flat Landau levels in an inhomogeneous acoustic crystal, Na- ture communications 15, 2174 (2024)

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.