Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 63 references

Lax random matrices from Calogero systems

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The hyperbolic Calogero fluid's Lax-matrix eigenvalue density has a boundary-independent thermodynamic limit given by a modified log-gas.

desk verdict Solid numerical study of the thermal Lax DOS for the hyperbolic Calogero fluid, with an honest but not fully closed boundary-independence claim at high density. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.13254 v1 pith:6CCQZLOL submitted 2024-11-20 cond-mat.stat-mech

Jitendra Kethepalli , Manas Kulkarni , Anupam Kundu , Herbert Spohn This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.stat-mech MSC 60B2037J3582C22
keywords LaxmatrixCalogerofluiddensityofstateslog-gasgeneralizedhydrodynamicsTodachainthermodynamicBetheansatzrandomtheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the eigenvalue density of the Lax matrix of the classical hyperbolic Calogero fluid, sampled from the thermal Gibbs distribution, becomes a deterministic, boundary-independent function in the thermodynamic limit. For the analytically convenient cosh external potential, it argues the joint distribution of eigenvalues is exactly a modified log-gas with a Bessel-K interaction term, Eq. (2.5), whose large-N free energy functional, Eq. (2.8), has a unique minimizer equal to the Lax density of states. Monte Carlo simulations up to N=256 are presented to show this modified log-gas matches direct diagonalization of the Lax matrix, and that the same DOS is obtained in cosh, box, and ring geometries. The paper further claims the low-density limit recovers the Toda-chain DOS and the high-density limit recovers the rational and trigonometric Calogero DOS, benchmarked against the thermodynamic Bethe ansatz. A sympathetic reader would care because the Lax DOS is the central input for generalized hydrodynamics of these integrable fluids, and a boundary-independent deterministic limit makes it a well-defined hydrodynamic ingredient.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Lax matrix $L_c$ of the hyperbolic Calogero fluid: diagonal entries are the momenta $p_j$ and off-diagonal entries are $i/(2\sinh((q_i-q_j)/2))$, so that $H_c = \tfrac12\operatorname{tr}(L_c^2)$. The argument is carried by the canonical map from $(q,p)$ to scattering coordinates $(\lambda,\phi)$, under which the $\cosh$ trap becomes $\sum_i e^{-\ell/2} Y_i \cosh\phi_i$ with $Y_i = \prod_{m\ne i}(1+(\lambda_m-\lambda_i)^{-2})^{1/2}$. The identity $\int_0^\infty dt\, e^{-x\cosh t} = K_0(x)$ lets one integrate out the scattering shifts one by one, producing the exact modified log-gas joint law (2.5) for the Lax eigenvalues alone. Taking $N\to\infty$ in that law yields the free-energy functional $\mathcal{F}_c[\varrho]$ of Eq. (2.8), with a quadratic potential, an entropy term, and a two-body scattering-shift term, whose unique minimizer is the claimed DOS. The same scattering machinery produces the Toda limit at low density and the trigonometric Calogero TBA equations (C.4)–(C.5) at high density.

What would settle it

Simulate the high-density $\cosh$-confined Calogero fluid (for example $\bar\rho = 11$, $T=1$) at $N = 512$ and $N = 1024$ and compare the Lax DOS and the scaled particle density profile with the box- and ring-confined results; if the curves continue to shift with $N$ or the density profile fails to flatten, the claimed boundary-condition independence has not been demonstrated.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that the thermal Lax DOS of the hyperbolic Calogero fluid, $\varrho_N(\lambda) = \frac{1}{N}\sum_i \delta(\lambda-\lambda_i)$ for the Lax matrix $L_c$ with entries $[L_c]_{ij} = \delta_{ij} p_j + i(1-\delta_{ij})(2\sinh((q_i-q_j)/2))^{-1}$, converges almost surely to a deterministic $\varrho(\lambda)$ as $N,\ell\to\infty$ at fixed density $\bar\rho=N/\ell$. For the $\cosh$ trap $U_C = \sum_i e^{-\ell/2}\cosh(q_i)$, the scattering-coordinate transformation yields the exact joint eigenvalue distribution (2.5), a modified log-gas whose Boltzmann factor is $\exp(-\frac{\beta}{2}\sum_i\lambda_i^2)\prod_i 2K_0(2 e^{-\ell/2} Y_i)$ with $Y_i = \prod_{m\ne i}(1+(\lambda_m-\lambda_i)^{-2})^{1/2}$; at large $N$ the logarithm of this product becomes the free-energy functional (2.8). The authors verify numerically that this distribution reproduces the directly diagonalized Lax DOS, and that the same DOS appears for box and ring confinement, establishing boundary-condition independence. They also identify the Toda and rational or trigonometric Calogero limits.

Load-bearing premise

The Monte Carlo results at system sizes up to $N=256$ are taken to represent the thermodynamic limit, even though the paper reports that the high-density cosh-confined results converge slowly and the particle density profile has not yet flattened.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In the thermodynamic limit the thermal Lax DOS is deterministic and independent of confinement, so cosh, box, and ring simulations all target the same $\varrho(\lambda)$.
  • For the cosh trap, the exact joint distribution (2.5) is a valid substitute for diagonalizing $L_c$; the paper verifies that Monte Carlo sampling of the modified log-gas reproduces the directly computed DOS.
  • The low-density Calogero DOS is the Toda-chain DOS, and the high-density Calogero DOS is the rational or trigonometric Calogero DOS, so the Calogero fluid interpolates between two exactly solvable spectra without fitting parameters.
  • The limiting DOS is a building block for generalized hydrodynamics of integrable systems, since it is the state variable from which conserved charges and their currents are constructed.
  • At low density and high temperature the DOS is approximately Gaussian with variance $T$, while at high density it flattens; the paper quantifies deviations with the Binder cumulant.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Not in the paper, but if boundary independence holds as claimed, one can initialize generalized-hydrodynamic simulations of the hyperbolic Calogero fluid directly from the box DOS instead of the more expensive cosh-confined Bessel sampling.
  • Not in the paper, but the reported slow convergence at high density suggests a finite-size scaling study of the central DOS versus $N$; extracting the exponent would tell whether the approach to the flat and TBA profile is algebraic or logarithmic.
  • Not in the paper, but the Bessel-K interaction in (2.5) is a temperature-dependent deformation of the log-gas, so spectral statistics such as level spacing or spectral form factor may show a crossover from Wigner-like to integrable behavior as density changes; the paper lists such diagnostics as future work.
  • Not in the paper, but the variational functional (2.8) could in principle predict the full crossover among Gaussian, Toda, flat, and TBA regimes without particle-level simulation, by minimizing $\mathcal{F}_c[\varrho]$ numerically.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the eigenvalue density (DOS) of the Lax matrix of the hyperbolic Calogero fluid in thermal equilibrium, using Monte Carlo sampling of positions and momenta followed by direct diagonalization. It compares three confining mechanisms: a cosh trap, a hard box, and a ring (the latter via the elliptic Calogero model), and benchmarks the results against the modified-log-gas joint distribution Eq. (2.5) for the cosh case, the exact low-density Toda-chain DOS, and the TBA solution of the trigonometric Calogero model. The central claims are that the thermal Lax DOS has a deterministic thermodynamic limit, that this limit is independent of boundary conditions, and that the low- and high-density limits are well approximated by the Toda chain and the rational Calogero model respectively.

Significance. If established, the paper would provide a useful bridge between integrable many-body theory and random matrix theory: the thermal Lax DOS is a basic input for generalized hydrodynamics, and the existence of an exact modified-log-gas representation is analytically valuable. The manuscript has genuine strengths: the agreement in Fig. 2 between direct diagonalization and direct Monte Carlo sampling of the eigenvalue joint distribution is an independent numerical check of the mapping in Eq. (2.5), and the low-density comparison with the Toda-chain DOS in Fig. 4 is convincing. The main weakness is that the high-density boundary-independence claim is not closed by the presented simulations, and the paper candidly acknowledges this in the final part of §4. The manuscript is therefore a promising contribution whose central claims are only partially verified.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4, Figs. 5 and 6] The high-density boundary-independence claim is not established. In Fig. 5 the comparison is between cosh-confined Calogero (C-c) and cosh-confined rational Calogero (C-r), both of which are subject to the same cosh trap; the paper itself states that neither has reached the thermodynamic limit, and Fig. 6 shows that the cosh-confined particle density profile is still far from flat at N=256 for ρ=5, 8 and 11. The good C-c/C-r agreement at these densities may therefore be a shared finite-trap artifact rather than evidence for the N→∞ DOS, and the only converged benchmark (rational Calogero in a box, which agrees with the trigonometric TBA) is not approached by the displayed finite-size curves. A direct high-density simulation of box-confined Calogero fluid, or an explicit finite-size extrapolation of the C-c DOS at fixed ρ, is needed to support contribution (iii) and the boundary-independence statement.
  2. [§2 and Fig. 2] The numerical verification of the modified-log-gas distribution Eq. (2.5) is performed only at N=64 and is reported without error bars or a discrepancy measure. Since Eq. (2.5) is the central analytical mapping used in the paper (and is taken from Ref. [44]), the claim of excellent agreement should be substantiated by, for example, the N-dependence of the integrated difference between the two methods or a chi-square per bin. Without such a quantitative check, the possibility of a finite-size coincidence is not excluded.
  3. [§3, Fig. 3] The statement that the Lax DOS becomes independent of boundary conditions with increasing N is supported by only two system sizes in the figure (N=128 and 256), and visible differences remain at ρ=5 (Fig. 3c). The text mentions N=512 but no N=512 data appear in the figure, and no statistical uncertainties are shown. A finite-size scaling analysis, or at least a third and larger system size with reported error bars, would be necessary to close the thermodynamic-limit claim.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] There are numerous typos, including 'sill define' in §3, 'tignometric Calogeoro' in the Fig. 1 caption, 'po' in the Boltzmann weight definition in §3, and 'Heavyside' in Appendix C. A careful proofread is needed.
  2. [§3] The Monte Carlo protocol is not described: no equilibration time, proposal distribution, acceptance rate, or number of effectively independent samples is given. Adding these details, and reporting error bars or confidence bands in all figures, would make the numerical results reproducible.
  3. [Appendix A, Eq. (A.28)] The truncation of the Weierstrass potential at n=±2 is introduced without a convergence test. Please quote the size of the omitted terms for the smallest ℓ used in the simulations, or compare the results with the n=±3 truncation.
  4. [Appendix B, Eq. (B.5)] The relation between the pressure P and the fixed density used in the main text is terse; the inversion of Eq. (B.5) should be stated explicitly so that the Toda benchmark is reproducible from the data given.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central modified-log-gas mapping is independently verified by direct simulation, and no prediction is forced by construction.

full rationale

The central analytical input is Eq. (2.5), the modified log-gas joint distribution for cosh confinement, taken from Ref. [44] (a co-author's book). This is load-bearing, but it is not merely assumed: Fig. 2 compares two independent Monte Carlo routes — direct sampling of the Calogero Hamiltonian/Lax matrix and direct sampling of Eq. (2.5) — and finds excellent agreement. That check is an independent numerical test of the imported formula, not a fit or a renaming. The low-density Toda benchmark (Eq. B.2) and high-density trigonometric Calogero TBA benchmark (Eqs. C.4-C.5) come from external [16,46,62,63] and prior [44] results and are parameter-free outside the model parameters; comparing direct MC data against them does not reduce a prediction to an input. The boundary-condition-independence claim is tested by independent simulations in cosh, box, and ring geometries (Fig. 3). The paper's own observation that the cosh-confined density profile has not converged to flat at high density (Fig. 6) and that C-c and C-r agree while both are far from the TBA limit is a validation gap or convergence caveat, not circularity: the compared models are distinct and no quantity is fitted to the claimed output. No equation is defined in terms of the target DOS, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central numerical results rest on standard Gibbs-Boltzmann statistical mechanics, the Lax pair and scattering-coordinate mapping imported from Refs. [3,44], and a specific truncation of the elliptic potential in the ring simulations. No free parameters are fitted: all comparisons use either direct simulation or derived pressures and normalization constants. The paper introduces no new physical entities.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The hyperbolic Calogero model with potential Vc(r) = 1/(4 sinh^2(r/2)) is integrable and has the Lax pair given in Eq. (1.6).
    Central setup imported from Ref. [3]; underlying the Gibbs sampling and diagonalization throughout Sections 3 and 4.
  • domain assumption The canonical transformation to scattering coordinates and the resulting joint eigenvalue distribution Eq. (2.5), including integration over scattering shifts, are valid as derived in Ref. [44].
    The modified log-gas benchmark used in Fig. 2 depends on this unproved-in-this-paper result, which is self-cited from a co-author's book.
  • domain assumption In the large-N limit, the K0(x) asymptotics justify replacing Eq. (2.5) by the free energy functional Fc[rho] in Eq. (2.8).
    This connects the finite-N joint distribution to the hydrodynamic limiting DOS; the derivation is cited to Ref. [44] rather than shown.
  • ad hoc to paper For ring boundary conditions, the Weierstrass potential can be truncated at n = +/-2 with negligible error for the simulated N and ell.
    Appendix A, Eq. (A.28), uses this truncation for the elliptic Calogero potential; no quantitative error control is provided for the parameter ranges simulated.
  • domain assumption At low density the Calogero interaction can be replaced by the Toda exponential potential, and at high density by the rational or trigonometric Calogero inverse-square potential, for the purpose of computing the Lax DOS.
    Section 4 relies on these asymptotic replacements; the paper checks the range of validity only numerically, with visible deviations at high density.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Lax random matrices from Calogero systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6CCQZLOL

@misc{pith2026241113254,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Lax random matrices from Calogero systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6CCQZLOL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.13254}
}
read the original abstract

We study a class of random matrices arising from the Lax matrix structure of classical integrable systems, particularly the Calogero family of models. Our focus is the density of eigenvalues for these random matrices. The problem can be mapped to analyzing the density of eigenvalues for generalized versions of conventional random matrix ensembles, including a modified form of the log-gas. The mapping comes from the underlying integrable structure of these models. Such deep connection is confirmed by extensive Monte-Carlo simulations. Thereby we move forward not only in terms of understanding such class of random matrices arising from integrable many-body systems, but also by providing a building block for the generalized hydrodynamic description of integrable systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.13254 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The plot shows the thermal Lax DOS of the Calogero fluid in a box for N = 64 and 128 (black and red solid lines) at temperatures T = 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 5.0 and 10.0 and particle densities ¯ρ = 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 5.0 and 11.0. The average is over 105 samples in every subplot. We compare the Lax DOS of this model with the analytical expressions of Lax DOS of the Toda chain (dashed yellow line) and the tignometric Calogeoro mo… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The plot shows the thermal Lax DOS for N = 64 at temperatures T = 1, 5 and particle densities ¯ρ = 0.5, 1, 2. The average is over 105 samples for every plot. We compare the Calogero fluid with external cosh potential (symbol C-c) with MC of the exact probability density of eigenvalues (symbol b) according to Eq. (2.5). fluid in cosh confinement. For this external potential, there is an explicit formula for the joint… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The plot shows the thermal Lax DOS for N = 128, 256 at temperature T = 1 and particle densities ¯ρ = 0.1, 1.0, 5.0. The average is taken over 105 samples for each plot. We compare the Calogero fluid with external cosh potential ( square symbol C-c), hard box potential (star symbol B-c), and periodic boundary conditions (circle symbol w). To compute the Lax DOS of the Calogero fluid for the periodic boundary conditio… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The plot shows the thermal Lax DOS for the Toda chain confined to (i) an external trap given by Eq. (4.4) (circle symbol “E-to”), (ii) a ring i.e. with periodic boundary conditions (triangle symbol “pt”) and (iii) a box potential (star symbol “B-to”) in comparison with…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The plot shows the Lax matrix DOS of the cosh-confined Calogero model (square symbol) and compares it to the rational Calogero model with either cosh potential (circle symbol) or box potential (star symbol). In addition, we display the exact DOS of the trigonometric Ca…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The plot shows the scaled particle density profile ℓρ(x) as a function of x/ℓ for cosh-confined Calogero fluid at ¯ρ = 5, 8 and 11 with N = 64, 128 and 256. Increasing ¯ρ, we observe slow convergence to a flat density profile (dashed line), which is expected for box-co…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [44]

    Spohn, Hydrodynamic Scales of Integrable Many-Body Systems, World Scientific (2024) https: //doi.org/10.1142/13600

    H. Spohn, Hydrodynamic Scales of Integrable Many-Body Systems, World Scientific (2024) https: //doi.org/10.1142/13600

    doi:10.1142/13600 2024

  2. [1]

    V. I. Arnol’d, V. V. Kozlov, A. I. Neishtadt, I. Iacob, Mathematical aspects of classical and celestial mechanics (Vol. 3, pp. XIII-505). Berlin: Springer (2006) https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-3-540-48926-9

    work page 2006

  3. [2]

    Chierchia, J

    L. Chierchia, J. N. Mather Kolmogorov-Arnold-Moser theory Scholarpedia, 5(9), 2123 (2010) http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/KAM_theory_in_celestial_mechanics

    work page 2010

  4. [3]

    M. A. Olshanetsky and A. M. Perelomov, Classical integrable finite-dimensional systems related to lie algebras, Phys. Rep., 71, 313 (1981) https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/0370157381900235

    arXiv 1981

  5. [4]

    Babelon, D

    O. Babelon, D. Bernard, and M. Talon Introduction to classical integrable systems , Cambridge University Press (2003) https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511535024

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511535024 2003

  6. [5]

    Cao, Classical integrable systems, In Soliton Theory and Its Applications, Springer, 152 (1990) https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-662-03102-5_4

    C. Cao, Classical integrable systems, In Soliton Theory and Its Applications, Springer, 152 (1990) https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-662-03102-5_4

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-662-03102-5_4 1990

  7. [6]

    Doyon, H

    B. Doyon, H. Spohn, Dynamics of hard rods with initial domain wall state J. Stat. Mech.: Theor. and Exp. 073210, (2017) https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-5468/ aa7abf/meta

    doi:10.1088/1742-5468/ 2017

  8. [7]

    Tonks, The complete equation of state of one, two and three-dimensional gases of hard elastic spheres , Phys

    L. Tonks, The complete equation of state of one, two and three-dimensional gases of hard elastic spheres , Phys. Rev. 50, 955 (1936) https://journals.aps.org/pr/abstract/10. 1103/PhysRev.50.955

    work page 1936

Show all 63 references
  1. [8]

    J. K. Percus, Exact solution of kinetics of a model classical fluid , Phys. Fluids, 12, 1560 (1969) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1692711

    1969 doi

  2. [9]

    Boldrighini, R

    C. Boldrighini, R. L. Dobrushin, Yu M. Sukhov One-dimensional hard rod caricature of hydrodynamics, J. Stat. Phys. 31, 577 (1983). https://link.springer.com/article/10. 1007/BF01019499

    1983

  3. [10]

    Toda, Vibration of a chain with nonlinear interaction , J

    M. Toda, Vibration of a chain with nonlinear interaction , J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 22, 431 (1967) https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jpsj1946/22/2/22_2_431/_article/-char/ja/

    1967

  4. [11]

    J. Ford, S. D. Stoddard, J. S. Turner, On the Integrability of the Toda lattice , Prog. of Theor. Phys., 50, 1547 (1973) https://academic.oup.com/ptp/article/50/5/1547/1839723

    1973

  5. [12]

    Flaschka, The Toda lattice

    H. Flaschka, The Toda lattice. II. Existence of integrals , Phys. Rev. B 9, 1924 (1974) https: //journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevB.9.1924

    1974 doi

  6. [13]

    Toda, Studies of nonlinear lattices , Phys

    M. Toda, Studies of nonlinear lattices , Phys. Rep. 18, 1 (1975) https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0370-1573(75)90018-6

    1975

  7. [14]

    Toda, Theory of nonlinear lattices , Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences 20 (1989) https: //link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-83219-2

    M. Toda, Theory of nonlinear lattices , Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences 20 (1989) https: //link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-83219-2

    1989 doi

  8. [15]

    Spohn, Hydrodynamic equations for the toda lattice , arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.06528 (2021) https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.06528

    H. Spohn, Hydrodynamic equations for the toda lattice , arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.06528 (2021) https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.06528

    2021 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Spohn, Generalized Gibbs ensembles of the classical Toda chain , J

    H. Spohn, Generalized Gibbs ensembles of the classical Toda chain , J. Stat. Phys. 180 (2020) https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10955-019-02320-5

    2020 doi

  10. [17]

    A. P. Polychronakos, New integrable systems from unitary matrix models , Phys. Lett. B 277, 102 (1992) https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0370269392909646? via%3Dihub#aep-article-footnote-id1

    1992

  11. [18]

    A. P. Polychronakos, Physics and mathematics of Calogero particles , J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 39, 12793 (2006) https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0305-4470/39/41/S07

    2006 doi

  12. [19]

    Kulkarni, A

    M. Kulkarni, A. P. Polychronakos, Emergence of the Calogero family of models in external potentials: duality, solitons and hydrodynamics , J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 50, 455202 (2017) https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1751-8121/aa8c6b/meta

    2017 doi

  13. [20]

    A. K. Gon, M. Kulkarni, Duality in a hyperbolic interaction model integrable even in a strong confinement: multi-soliton solutions and field theory , J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 52, 415201 (2019) https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1751-8121/ab3f42/meta

    2019 doi

  14. [21]

    Calogero, Solution of a three-body problem in one dimension J

    F. Calogero, Solution of a three-body problem in one dimension J. Math. Phys. 10, 2191 (1969) Lax random matrices from Calogero systems 23 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1664820

    1969 doi

  15. [22]

    Calogero, Ground state of a one-dimensional N-body system J

    F. Calogero, Ground state of a one-dimensional N-body system J. Math. Phys. 10, 2197 (1969) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1664821

    1969 doi

  16. [23]

    Calogero, Solution of one-dimensional N-body problems with quadratic and/or inversely quadratic pair potentials J

    F. Calogero, Solution of one-dimensional N-body problems with quadratic and/or inversely quadratic pair potentials J. Math. Phys. 12, 419 (1971) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1665604

    1971 doi

  17. [24]

    Sutherland, Exact results for a quantum many-body problem in one dimension Phys

    B. Sutherland, Exact results for a quantum many-body problem in one dimension Phys. Rev. A 4, 2019 (1971) https://journals.aps.org/pra/pdf/10.1103/PhysRevA.4.2019

    1971 doi

  18. [25]

    Sutherland, Exact results for a quantum many-body problem in one dimension: II Phys

    B. Sutherland, Exact results for a quantum many-body problem in one dimension: II Phys. Rev. A 5, 1372 (1972) https://journals.aps.org/pra/pdf/10.1103/PhysRevA.5.1372

    1972 doi

  19. [26]

    Sutherland, Exact ground-state wave function for a one-dimensional Phys

    B. Sutherland, Exact ground-state wave function for a one-dimensional Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 1083 (1975) https://journals.aps.org/prl/pdf/10.1103/PhysRevLett.34.1083

    1975 doi

  20. [27]

    A. G. Abanov, G. Andrey, M. Kulkarni, Soliton solutions of a Calogero model in a harmonic potential, J. Phys. A: Math. and Theor. 44, 295203 (2011) https://iopscience.iop.org/ article/10.1088/1751-8113/44/29/295203/pdf

    2011 doi

  21. [28]

    Ishimori, An integrable classical spin chain

    Y. Ishimori, An integrable classical spin chain. J. Phys. Soc. of Japan 51 3417 (1982) https: //doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.51.3417

    1982 doi

  22. [29]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Excitation spectrum of a generalised Heisenberg ferromagnetic spin chain with arbitrary spin, J. Phys. C: Solid State Physics 15, L1309 (1982) https://doi.org/10.1088/ 0022-3719/15/36/008

    1982

  23. [30]

    M. L. Ablowitz, B. Prinari, and A. D. Trubatch, Discrete and Continuous Nonlinear Schrodinger Systems, Cambridge University Press (2004) https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511546709

    2004 doi

  24. [31]

    Spohn, Hydrodynamic equations for the Ablowitz-Ladik discretization of the nonlinear Schrodinger equation, J

    H. Spohn, Hydrodynamic equations for the Ablowitz-Ladik discretization of the nonlinear Schrodinger equation, J. Math. Phys. 63, 033305 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0075670

    2022 doi

  25. [32]

    Brollo and H

    A. Brollo and H. Spohn Particle scattering and fusion for the Ablowitz-Ladik chain , J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 57, 325202 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/ad6411

    2024 doi

  26. [33]

    Doyon, Lecture notes on generalised hydrodynamics, SciPost Physics Lecture Notes, 018 (2020) https://www.scipost.org/10.21468/SciPostPhysLectNotes.18

    B. Doyon, Lecture notes on generalised hydrodynamics, SciPost Physics Lecture Notes, 018 (2020) https://www.scipost.org/10.21468/SciPostPhysLectNotes.18

    2020 doi

  27. [34]

    F. H. L. Essler, A short introduction to generalized hydrodynamics , Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 127572 (2022) https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0378437122003971

    2022

  28. [35]

    O. A. Castro-Alvaredo, B. Doyon, and T. Yoshimura, Emergent Lax pairs in many-body systems out of equilibrium, Phys. Rev. X 6, 041065 (2016) https://journals.aps.org/pra/abstract/ 10.1103/PhysRevA.95.043826

    2016 doi

  29. [36]

    Bertini, M

    B. Bertini, M. Collura, J. De Nardis, and M. Fagotti, Transport in out-of-equilibrium XXZ chains: Exact profiles of charges and currents , Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 207201 (2016) https: //journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.207201

    2016 doi

  30. [37]

    Bouchoule, J

    I. Bouchoule, J. Dubail, Generalized hydrodynamics in the one-dimensional Bose gas: theory and experiments, J. Stat. Mech.: Theor. Exp. 014003 (2022) https://iopscience.iop.org/ article/10.1088/1742-5468/ac3659/meta

    2022 doi

  31. [38]

    Doyon, S

    B. Doyon, S. Gopalakrishnan, F. Møller, J. Schmiedmayer, R. Vasseur,Generalized hydrodynamics: a perspective, arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.03438 (2023) https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.03438

    2023 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Doyon, H

    B. Doyon, H. Spohn, T. Yoshimura, A geometric viewpoint on generalized hydrodynamics , Nucl. Phys. B 926, 570 (2018) https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0550321317303875

    2018

  33. [40]

    Malvania, Y

    N. Malvania, Y. Zhang, Y. Le, J. Dubail, M. Rigol, D. S. Weiss, Generalized hydrodynamics in strongly interacting 1D Bose gases , Science 373, 1129 (2021) https://www.science.org/doi/ full/10.1126/science.abf0147

    2021 doi

  34. [41]

    Schemmer, I

    M. Schemmer, I. Bouchoule, B. Doyon, J. Dubail, Generalized hydrodynamics on an atom chip , Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 090601 (2019) https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.122.090601

    2019

  35. [42]

    E. P. Wigner, On the statistical distribution of the widths and spacings of nuclear resonance levels , Lax random matrices from Calogero systems 24 Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 47, 790 (1951) https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100027237

    1951 doi

  36. [43]

    Bogomolny, O

    E. Bogomolny, O. Giraud, C. Schmit, Random matrix ensembles associated with Lax matrices , Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 054103 (2009) https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.103.054103

    2009

  37. [45]

    Calogero, Classical Many-Body Problems Amenable to Exact Treatments Springer (2014) https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44730-X

    F. Calogero, Classical Many-Body Problems Amenable to Exact Treatments Springer (2014) https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44730-X

    2014 doi

  38. [46]

    Choquard, Classical and Quantum Partition Functions of the Calogero-Moser-Sutherland Model

    P. Choquard, Classical and Quantum Partition Functions of the Calogero-Moser-Sutherland Model. CRM Series in Mathematical Physics. Springer (2000) https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-1-4612-1206-5_8

    2000

  39. [47]

    X. Cao, V. B. Bulchandani, H. Spohn, The GGE averaged currents of the classical Toda chain , J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 52 495003 (2019) https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/ 1751-8121/ab5019/pdf

    2019

  40. [48]

    Moser, Three integrable Hamiltonian systems connected with isospectral deformations, Advances in Mathematics 16, 197 (1975), https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8708(75)90151-6

    J. Moser, Three integrable Hamiltonian systems connected with isospectral deformations, Advances in Mathematics 16, 197 (1975), https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8708(75)90151-6

    1975 doi

  41. [49]

    P. J. Forrester, Log-Gases and Random Matrices , Princeton University Press (2010) https: //doi.org/10.1515/9781400835416

    2010 doi

  42. [50]

    Haake, Quantum signatures of chaos Springer US, (1991) https://link.springer.com/book/ 10.1007/978-3-642-05428-0

    F. Haake, Quantum signatures of chaos Springer US, (1991) https://link.springer.com/book/ 10.1007/978-3-642-05428-0

    1991 doi

  43. [51]

    M. L. Mehta, Random matrices , Elsevier (2004) https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/ 9780124880511/random-matrices?via=ihub=

    2004

  44. [52]

    Oganesyan, D

    V. Oganesyan, D. A. Huse, Localization of interacting fermions at high temperature , Phys. Rev. B. 75, 155111 (2007)

    2007

  45. [53]

    Prakash, J

    A. Prakash, J. H. Pixley, M. Kulkarni Universal spectral form factor for many-body localization Phys. Rev. Res., 3, L012019 (2021) https://journals.aps.org/prresearch/abstract/10. 1103/PhysRevResearch.3.L012019

    2021

  46. [54]

    Prasad, A

    M. Prasad, A. Prakash, J. H. Pixley, M. Kulkarni, Long-ranged spectral correlations in eigenstate phases J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 57 015003 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/ ad1342

    2023 doi

  47. [55]

    Cotler, N

    J. Cotler, N. Hunter-Jones, J. Liu, B. Yoshida, Chaos, complexity, and random matrices , J. H. E. P. 2017, 1 (2017) https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/JHEP11(2017)048

    2017 doi

  48. [56]

    Gharibyan, M

    H. Gharibyan, M. Hanada, S. H. Shenker, M. Tezuka, Onset of random matrix behavior in scrambling systems , J. H. E. P., 2018, 1 (2018) https://link.springer.com/article/10. 1007/JHEP07(2018)124

    2018

  49. [57]

    Liu, Spectral form factors and late time quantum chaos , Phys

    J. Liu, Spectral form factors and late time quantum chaos , Phys. Rev. D 98, 086026 (2018) https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.086026

    2018 doi

  50. [58]

    L. A. Takhtajan, Integration of the continuous Heisenberg spin chain through the inverse scattering method, Phys. Lett. A 64, 235 (1977) https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(77)90727-7

    1977 doi

  51. [59]

    E. K. Sklyanin, On complete integrability of the Landau-Lifshitz equation , Report No. LOMI E-3- 1979, 1979. https://cds.cern.ch/record/121210

    1979

  52. [60]

    A. Das, M. Kulkarni, H. Spohn, and A. Dhar, Kardar-Parisi-Zhang scaling for an integrable lattice Landau-Lifshitz spin chain , Phys. Rev. E 100, 042116 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevE.100.042116

    2019

  53. [61]

    A. G. Korn, M. K. Theresa, Mathematical handbook for scientists and engineers New York: McGraw-Hill 25 (1968)

    1968

  54. [62]

    Opper, Analytical solution of the classical Bethe-ansatz equation for the Toda chain Phys

    M. Opper, Analytical solution of the classical Bethe-ansatz equation for the Toda chain Phys. Letts. A 112, 201, (1985) https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(85)90502-X

    1985 doi

  55. [63]

    Allez, J

    R. Allez, J. P. Bouchaud, A. Guionnet, Invariant Beta Ensembles and the Gauss-Wigner Crossover, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 094102 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.094102

    2012 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.