Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 38 references

Anisotropic manipulation of terahertz spin-waves by spin-orbit torque in a canted antiferromagnet

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Damping-like spin-orbit torque from a platinum layer can anisotropically shift both spin-wave bands of a canted biaxial antiferromagnet, coupling or reorienting them depending on spin polarization, yielding electrically tunable terahertz…

desk verdict Plausible mechanism and genuinely new polarization-dependent spin-wave map, but a factor-158 error in the SOT field conversion guts every quantitative prediction. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.13309 v1 pith:JWRGWOSA submitted 2024-11-20 physics.app-ph cond-mat.mtrl-sci

T. H. Kim , Jung-Il Kim , Geun-Ju Kim , Kwang-Ho Jang , G.-M. Choi This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.app-phcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords antiferromagneticspintronicsspin-orbittorquespinwavesterahertzmagnonicscantedantiferromagnetYFeO3wavedispersionbiaxialanisotropy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Antiferromagnets have two spin-wave bands, a low-frequency and a high-frequency one, and this paper argues that a DC spin current from an adjacent heavy-metal layer can tune both before the system starts oscillating on its own. For a canted biaxial antiferromagnet such as YFeO3, the direction of the spin polarization decides the mechanism: polarization parallel to the Néel vector couples the two bands like a spring, while perpendicular polarization reorients the equilibrium and lowers both frequencies. Using the material parameters of YFeO3, the paper predicts shifts of tens of gigahertz to more than a hundred gigahertz, pushing the operating range from hundreds of gigahertz toward the sub-terahertz. Because the same dynamics also drive magnetization precession that emits terahertz radiation, the result points toward an electrically tunable, broadband terahertz source for wireless and ultrafast applications.

What carries the argument

The central object is the effective damping-like spin-orbit torque field $H_{\mathrm{DT}}$ acting on the Néel vector $\mathbf{l}$ of a biaxial canted antiferromagnet. In the linearized equations of motion this field generates a coupling constant $\Omega=2\gamma\omega_E H_{\mathrm{DT}}$ when the spin polarization is parallel to $\mathbf{l}$, and it renormalizes the anisotropy terms when the polarization is perpendicular. The paper's picture is that of two pendulums, the low- and high-frequency modes, connected by a spring whose stiffness is proportional to the applied charge current. The same current-dependent resonant frequency enters the dispersion $\omega^2=\omega_0^2+c_c^2 k^2$, so both propagating and standing spin waves inherit the electrical tuning.

What would settle it

Measure the low-frequency standing-wave mode at $q=0.0167$ nm$^{-1}$ in a Pt/YFeO3 Hall bar under a DC current of $1.2\times10^{12}$ A/m$^2$ with the polarization along $y$. The paper predicts a shift of $-38.6$ GHz; observing no comparable shift would show the tuning mechanism is much weaker than claimed.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that damping-like spin-orbit torque provides a polarization-dependent handle on the spin-wave spectrum of a canted biaxial antiferromagnet. Writing the Néel order in spherical angles, the torque introduces terms that either connect the two eigenmodes when the polarization lies along the Néel vector, or tilt the equilibrium orientation and soften the anisotropy barriers when it is perpendicular. For YFeO3, the low-frequency band sits at 300 GHz and the high-frequency at 525 GHz at zero current; at current densities just below self-oscillation the paper reports shifts such as +85.2 GHz and -58.4 GHz for polarization along x, -106 GHz and -25.8 GHz for polarization along y, and -158.1 GHz and -157.3 GHz for polarization along z at $q=0$. The same shifts appear, reduced in size, at finite wavevector and in standing-wave modes, and numerical simulations of the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation reproduce the analytical dispersions.

Load-bearing premise

The predicted frequency shifts assume that a given charge current produces the effective magnetic field strengths the paper quotes, up to about 0.7 T for the highest quoted current density; if the real conversion is weaker, every tuning range shrinks in proportion.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At $q=0$, current densities just below self-oscillation shift the low-frequency band by +85.2 GHz for $p\parallel x$, -106 GHz for $p\parallel y$, and -158.1 GHz for $p\parallel z$, with corresponding shifts of the high-frequency band.
  • At finite wavevector the tuning persists but weakens: at $q=0.0167$ nm$^{-1}$ the $p\parallel z$ case still shifts the bands by -52.1 GHz and -90 GHz.
  • Standing-wave modes inherit the electrically shifted frequencies, so a confined antiferromagnetic cavity can emit tunable sub-terahertz radiation through magnetization precession.
  • Frequency tuning by spin current is nonlinear and the paper finds it several times more efficient than tuning by an equivalent external magnetic field.
  • The sign and size of the shifts depend on polarization direction, giving a three-axis electrical control knob for magnon band structure.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension is to treat the two coupled bands as a tunable beam-splitter for magnons: the $p\parallel l$ coupling strength, linear in current, could swap excitations between the 300 GHz and 525 GHz modes in a cavity.
  • If the spin-orbit-torque conversion efficiency can be calibrated directly from the frequency-shift-versus-current curve, the same device becomes a quantitative probe of the out-of-plane spin polarization generated by mechanisms beyond the spin Hall effect.
  • The weaker tuning at finite wavevector suggests that a patterned or periodic heavy-metal layer could selectively tune only certain wavevectors, enabling wavevector-selective terahertz filtering.
  • The comparison with a Zeeman field implies that a DC-current-biased YFeO3 device could modulate terahertz radiation at the current modulation rate, which might be exploited for terahertz communication encoding.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents an analytical and numerical study of spin-orbit torque (SOT) control of spin waves in the canted biaxial antiferromagnet YFeO3. From a free-energy model with exchange, biaxial anisotropies, and Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction, the authors derive coupled equations for the Néel order and identify polarization-dependent effects: damping-like SOT with polarization parallel to the Néel vector couples the high- and low-frequency spin-wave bands, while perpendicular polarizations reorient the equilibrium orientation and reduce the frequencies. The authors report frequency shifts up to roughly 150 GHz for currents on the order of 10^12 A/m^2, discuss self-oscillation thresholds, and compare the tuning efficiency with that of an external magnetic field. Numerical LLG simulations of the total magnetization dynamics are used to support the analytics.

Significance. If the quantitative results can be made self-consistent, the work would offer a route to electrically tunable sub-terahertz magnons in canted antiferromagnets and an appealing physical picture of SOT as a coupling spring between the two spin-wave branches. The analytical derivation is largely self-contained from a stated free energy and standard LLG equations, and the qualitative polarization dependence is a useful extension of earlier AFM SOT studies. However, the numerical simulations rely on undisclosed adjusted parameters, and the central current-to-effective-field conversion contains an internal inconsistency, so the quantitative predictions are not currently reliable.

major comments (3)
  1. [Methods, H_DT definition after Eq. (4)] The effective damping-like SOT field is defined as H_DT = J_c (hbar/2e) theta_H/(M_s t) (text following Eq. (4)). With the stated parameters M_s = 200 A/m, t = 4 nm, theta_H = 0.08, and J_c = 2.5e12 A/m^2, this formula gives approximately 82 T, not the 0.52 T quoted in the text and used in the figures. The discrepancy is a factor of about 158. This error propagates to all quantitative claims: the Delta-f values in the section on current density dependence, the self-oscillation threshold J_c,self ~ 2.73e12 A/m^2 with H_DT,self = 0.56 T, and the comparison with external-field tuning. At the stated M_s, J_c = 2.5e12 A/m^2 would be roughly 150 times the self-oscillation threshold, contradicting the 'just before self-oscillation' regime stated in the text. The authors must correct the parameter set or the quoted H_DT values so that the conversion is self-consistent, and then re-derive all quantitative results.
  2. [Total magnetization dynamics and Methods] The numerical simulations are described as using 'adjusted magnetic parameters' and 'energetic adjustment to reduce the simulation time' and as requiring 'alternating signs of DM interaction' in the mesh (Section 'Total magnetization dynamics'; Methods; Supplementary Note 1). The adjusted values are not disclosed. Because the numerical symbols in Figs. 2 and 4 are presented as validation of the analytics, using undisclosed parameter adjustments makes the agreement non-reproducible and potentially a fit rather than a prediction. The authors should report the exact parameters, the form of the energy adjustment, and the physical justification for the alternating DM signs, or demonstrate that the conclusions are insensitive to these choices.
  3. [Fig. 4 captions and comparison paragraph] The Fig. 4 caption labels panel b as Jc = 2.5e12 A/m^2 with p//y and panel c as Jc = 1.2e12 A/m^2 with p//x, whereas the main text uses Jc = 2.5e12 A/m^2 for p//x and Jc = 1.2e12 A/m^2 for p//y. In the same way, the paragraph comparing SOT with external-field tuning states 'at p//y, Jc = 2.5e12 A m^-2 is converted to magnetic field H_DT = 0.52 T, leading to Delta f = 85.2 GHz (k = 0 LF mode) and 58.4 GHz (q = 0 HF mode)', but those values correspond to the p//x case from the 'Current density dependence' section. These inconsistencies make it impossible to determine which polarization and current density underlie the claimed numerical spectra and the comparative claim of higher efficiency than external-field tuning.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Current density dependence section] Current densities are sometimes written without the 10^12 factor, e.g., 'Jc of 2.5, 1.2, and 3.5 A m-2' and '1.2 3.5 A m-2' should read 10^12 A/m^2.
  2. [Equations (5)-(12)] The typeset equations contain obvious corruption, including undefined symbols such as B in Eqs. (5)-(6) and missing exponents in several places. A clean, compilable version of the equations is needed so that the derivation can be checked.
  3. [p//y case, Eq. (9)-(10) discussion] In the p//y subsection, the text says 'for Jc = 1.2e12 A m-2 or H_DT,self = 0.25 T'; the subscript 'self' should be removed because this is not the self-oscillation threshold.
  4. [Methods, spin-current penetration] The phrase 'the effective penetration depth t of spin current into YFeO3 of 4 nm' should be reworded as 'film thickness' unless a genuinely different length is intended.
  5. [Numerical simulation description] The statement in the main text that 'we employed a linearized dispersion relation incorporating mesh and adjusted magnetic parameters in the numerical calculations' is referred to Supplementary Notes 1 and 2, but the supplementary material is not provided to the reader; the relevant values and definitions should be given in the main text or the supplement should be included.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Supporting numerical simulation is built from the same linearized dispersion with adjusted parameters; the analytic derivation is otherwise self-contained.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Results, 'Spin wave dispersion' and Methods, 'Numerical simulation'; Figs. 2b,d,f and 4]
    "To achieve enhanced resolution in dispersion relation, we employed a linearized dispersion relation incorporating mesh and adjusted magnetic parameters in the numerical calculations (see Methods and Supplementary Notes 1)."

    The numerical curves are presented as independent confirmation of the analytic lines ('lines and symbols indicate analytical and numerical calculated spin wave dispersion'), but the paper states the numeric calculation used a linearized dispersion relation and adjusted magnetic parameters. The numeric q = 0 frequencies quoted (300, 525, 703.5, 824.6 GHz) coincide exactly with the analytic f0 values, which is expected only if the adjusted parameters were chosen to reproduce those target frequencies. Thus the agreement between symbols and lines is constructed into the simulation inputs rather than independently predicted. The central analytic derivation itself remains self-contained; this circularity is limited to the numerical validation.

full rationale

The analytic derivation chain is self-contained: Eq. (1) free energy, Eqs. (2a,b) LLG equations, Eq. (3) elimination of m, Eq. (4) equation for l, then linearization yields closed-form dispersions omega^2 = omega0^2 + c^2 k^2. Material parameters (HE = 650 T, HD = 12 T, HKx = 160 mT, HKz = 71 mT, cc = 38 km/s) are taken from external literature, not fitted to the predicted frequency shifts. The frequency shifts at q = 0 and q = 0.0167 nm^-1 are direct analytic outputs, so the central claim is not a rename or a re-fit. The only circular element is the numerical cross-check, which is described as using the same linearized dispersion relation with adjusted magnetic parameters; its agreement with the analytic lines is therefore not an independent test. Separately, the quoted H_DT values are numerically inconsistent with the stated parameters (0.52 T versus ~80 T for Jc = 2.5e12 A/m^2 using the paper's own formula and values), but that is a consistency/correctness issue, not a circularity, and is not scored as such.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model uses established AFM plus SOT theory and literature parameters for YFeO3; no new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced. Free parameters are limited to simulation adjustments and chosen current densities, but the conversion inconsistency between Jc and H_DT weakens quantitative confidence.

free parameters (2)
  • Adjusted magnetic parameters in numerical simulations = Not stated
    The Methods say magnetic parameters were adjusted to reduce simulation time and enhance dispersion resolution; without the actual values, the analytic-numerical agreement is not an independent check.
  • Operating current densities Jc = 2.5, 1.2, and 3.5 x 10^12 A/m^2 for p//x, p//y, and p//z
    These are chosen as current densities just below self-oscillation, derived from the calculated critical current, but the specific operating points are presentation-dependent and not tied to an experimental constraint.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert dynamics with damping-like SOT terms
    Used as the equation of motion in Eq. (2); field-like torque is neglected to show dynamics clearly.
  • domain assumption Biaxial anisotropy plus homogeneous DMI energy model for YFeO3
    The free energy in Eq. (1) with Kx, Kz, and D is taken from standard literature for orthoferrites.
  • domain assumption Weak excitation linearization
    The equations of motion are linearized under theta(t) and phi(t) small, which is stated and used to derive the coupled mode equations.
  • domain assumption Uniform alignment of l under DC spin current
    The paper states l is uniformly aligned under applied DC spin current, enabling the plane-wave ansatz and equilibrium angle shifts.
  • ad hoc to paper Alternating signs of DM interaction in numerical mesh
    Supplementary Note 1 requires alternating DM signs to form a uniform canted antiferromagnet in the numerical simulation, a modeling choice specific to this work.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Anisotropic manipulation of terahertz spin-waves by spin-orbit torque in a canted antiferromagnet." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JWRGWOSA

@misc{pith2026241113309,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Anisotropic manipulation of terahertz spin-waves by spin-orbit torque in a canted antiferromagnet},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JWRGWOSA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.13309}
}
read the original abstract

We theoretically and numerically elucidate the electrical control over spin waves in antiferromagnetic materials (AFM) with biaxial anisotropies and Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions. The spin wave dispersion in an AFM manifests as a bifurcated spectrum with distinct high-frequency and low-frequency bands. Utilizing a heterostructure comprised of platinum and the AFM, we demonstrate anisotropic control of spin-wave bands via spin currents with three-dimensional spin polarizations, encompassing both resonant and propagating wave modes. Moreover, leveraging the confined geometry, we explore the possibility of controlling spin waves within a spectral domain ranging from tens of gigahertz to sub-terahertz frequencies. The implications of our findings suggest the potential for developing a terahertz wave source with electrical tunability, thereby facilitating its incorporation into ultrafast, broadband, and wireless communication technologies.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Wireless communications and applications above 100 GHz: opportunities and challenges for 6G and beyond

    Rappaport, T. S. et al. "Wireless communications and applications above 100 GHz: opportunities and challenges for 6G and beyond." IEEE Access 7, 78729-78757 (2019)

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    What should 6G be?

    Dang, S., Amin, O., Shihada, B. & Alouini, M.-S. "What should 6G be?" Nat. Electron. 3, 20-29 (2020). 12

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    Terahertz field enhancement by a metallic nano slit operating beyond the skin-depth limit

    Seo, M., Park, H., Koo, S. et al. "Terahertz field enhancement by a metallic nano slit operating beyond the skin-depth limit." Nature Photon. 3, 152–156 (2009)

    work page 2009

  4. [4]

    Physics in Medicine and Biology

    Beard, M. C., Turner, G. M. & Schmuttenmaer, C. A. "Physics in Medicine and Biology." Phys. Med. Biol. 47, 3841 (2002)

    work page 2002

  5. [5]

    Semiconductor Science and Technology

    Federici, J. F., Schulkin, B., Huang, F., Gary, D., Barat, R., Oliveira, F. & Zimdars, D. "Semiconductor Science and Technology." Semicond. Sci. Technol. 20, S266 (2005)

    work page 2005

  6. [6]

    Excitation of a magnetic multilayer by an electric current

    Tsoi, M., Jansen, A. G. M., Bass, J., Chiang, W. -C., Seck, M., Tsoi, V. & Wyder, P. "Excitation of a magnetic multilayer by an electric current." Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4281 (1998)

    work page 1998

  7. [7]

    Direct -current induced dynamics in Co 90Fe10/Ni80Fe20 point contacts

    Rippard, W. H., Pufall, M. R., Kaka, S., Russek, S. E. & Silva, T. J. "Direct -current induced dynamics in Co 90Fe10/Ni80Fe20 point contacts." Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 027201 (2004)

    work page 2004

  8. [8]

    Spin -torque ferromagnetic resonance induced by the spin Hall effect

    Liu, L., Moriyama, T., Ralph, D. C. & Buhrman, R. A. "Spin -torque ferromagnetic resonance induced by the spin Hall effect." Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 036601 (2011)

    work page 2011

Show all 38 references
  1. [9]

    Spin -orbit torque –driven propagating spin waves

    Fulara, H. et al. "Spin -orbit torque –driven propagating spin waves." Sci. Adv. 5, eaax8467 (2019)

    2019

  2. [10]

    Coherent terahertz control of antiferromagnetic spin waves

    Kampfrath, T. et al. "Coherent terahertz control of antiferromagnetic spin waves." Nature Photon. 5, 31–34 (2011)

    2011

  3. [11]

    Terahertz time -domain observation of spin reorientation in orthoferrite ErFeO 3 through magnetic free induction decay

    Yamaguchi, K. et al. "Terahertz time -domain observation of spin reorientation in orthoferrite ErFeO 3 through magnetic free induction decay." Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 137204 (2013)

    2013

  4. [12]

    Micromagnetic modeling of terahertz oscillations in an antiferromagnetic material driven by the spin Hall effect

    Puliafito, V. et al. "Micromagnetic modeling of terahertz oscillations in an antiferromagnetic material driven by the spin Hall effect." Phys. Rev. B 99, 024405 (2019)

    2019

  5. [13]

    Antiferromagnetic THz-frequency Josephson-like Oscillator Driven by Spin Current

    Khymyn, R. et al. "Antiferromagnetic THz-frequency Josephson-like Oscillator Driven by Spin Current." Sci. Rep. 7, 43705 (2017)

    2017

  6. [14]

    Spin pumping and spin -transfer torques in antiferromagnets

    Cheng, R., Xiao, J., Niu, Q. & Brataas, A. "Spin pumping and spin -transfer torques in antiferromagnets." Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 057601 (2014)

    2014

  7. [15]

    Terahertz -frequency spin Hall auto -oscillator based on a canted antiferromagnet

    Sulymenko, O. R. et al. "Terahertz -frequency spin Hall auto -oscillator based on a canted antiferromagnet." Phys. Rev. Appl. 8, 064007 (2017)

    2017

  8. [16]

    Spin -torque-driven terahertz auto -oscillations in noncollinear coplanar antiferromagnets

    Shukla, A. & Rakheja, S. "Spin -torque-driven terahertz auto -oscillations in noncollinear coplanar antiferromagnets." Phys. Rev. Appl. 17, 034037 (2022)

    2022

  9. [17]

    Tunable long-distance spin transport in a crystalline antiferromagnetic iron oxide

    Lebrun, R. et al. "Tunable long-distance spin transport in a crystalline antiferromagnetic iron oxide." Nature 561, 222-225 (2018)

    2018

  10. [18]

    Propagation length of antiferromagnetic magnons governed by domain configurations

    Ross, A. et al. "Propagation length of antiferromagnetic magnons governed by domain configurations." Nano Lett. 20, 306-313 (2020)

    2020

  11. [19]

    Anisotropic long -range spin transport in canted antiferromagnetic orthoferrite YFeO3

    Das, S. et al. "Anisotropic long -range spin transport in canted antiferromagnetic orthoferrite YFeO3." Nat. Commun. 13, 6140 (2022)

    2022

  12. [20]

    Q. Liu, T. Kim, K. Lee, D. Yang, D. Kumar, F. Hu, H. Yang, Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya Torque-Driven Resonance in Antiferromagnetic α-Fe2O3. Adv. Funct. Mater. , 33, 2305173 (2013)

    2013

  13. [21]

    Yang, D., Kim, T., Lee, K. et al. Spin-orbit torque manipulation of sub -terahertz magnons in antiferromagnetic α-Fe2O3. Nat. Commun. 15, 4046 (2024)

    2024

  14. [22]

    Antiferromagnetic Oscillators Driven by Spin Currents with Arbitrary Spin Polarization Directions

    Lee, D.-K., Park, B. -G. & Lee, K. -J. "Antiferromagnetic Oscillators Driven by Spin Currents with Arbitrary Spin Polarization Directions." Phys. Rev. Appl. 11, 054048 (2019). 13

    2019

  15. [23]

    Spin -transfer Torques Generated by the Anomalous Hall Effect and Anisotropic Magnetoresistance

    Taniguchi, T., Grollier, J. & Stiles, M. D. "Spin -transfer Torques Generated by the Anomalous Hall Effect and Anisotropic Magnetoresistance." Phys. Rev. Applied 3, 044001 (2015)

    2015

  16. [24]

    Spin-swapping Transport and Torques in Ultrathin Magnetic Bilayers

    Saidaoui, H. B. M. & Manchon, A. "Spin-swapping Transport and Torques in Ultrathin Magnetic Bilayers." Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 036601 (2016)

    2016

  17. [25]

    Observation of spin -orbit effects with spin rotation symmetry

    Humphries, A. M. et al. "Observation of spin -orbit effects with spin rotation symmetry." Nat. Commun. 8, 911 (2017)

    2017

  18. [26]

    Optical spin -orbit torque in heavy metal -ferromagnet heterostructures

    Choi, G. -M. et al. "Optical spin -orbit torque in heavy metal -ferromagnet heterostructures." Nat. Commun. 11, 1482 (2020)

    2020

  19. [27]

    Studies on orthoferrites at the Weizmann Institute of Science

    Treves, D. "Studies on orthoferrites at the Weizmann Institute of Science." J. Appl. Phys. 36, 1033-1039 (2004)

    2004

  20. [28]

    Review of recent work on the magnetic and spectroscopic properties of the rare‐earth orthoferrites

    White, R. L. "Review of recent work on the magnetic and spectroscopic properties of the rare‐earth orthoferrites." J. Appl. Phys. 40, 1061-1069 (2003)

    2003

  21. [29]

    Antiferromagnetic domain walls

    Papanicolaou, N. "Antiferromagnetic domain walls." Phys. Rev. B 51, 15062-15073 (1995)

    1995

  22. [30]

    Intrinsic magnetization of antiferromagnetic textures

    Tveten, E. G. et al. "Intrinsic magnetization of antiferromagnetic textures." Phys. Rev. B 93, 104408 (2016)

    2016

  23. [31]

    Phenomenology of current -induced dynamics in antiferromagnets

    Hals, K. M. D. et al. "Phenomenology of current -induced dynamics in antiferromagnets." Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 107206 (2011)

    2011

  24. [32]

    The m can be expressed regarding l by taking the cross product of l to equations 2a: 1~ ( )a  − m l l D l (3) By inserting Eq

    , where DT c( / )HJ = denotes the effective fields corresponding to a damping-like component of SOT torque, () 2 H setM  = is SOT strength, Jc is charge current density, Ms is the saturation magnetization (Am-1), t is the thickness (nm) of the YFeO3, H is the effective s...

  25. [33]

    Spin pumping and spin -transfer torques in antiferromagnets

    Cheng, R. et al. "Spin pumping and spin -transfer torques in antiferromagnets." Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 057601 (2014)

    2014

  26. [34]

    NMR observation of the spin structure and field induced spin reorientation in YFeO 3

    Lütgemeier, H., Bohn, H. G. & Brajczewska, M. "NMR observation of the spin structure and field induced spin reorientation in YFeO 3." J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 21, 289-296 (1980)

    1980

  27. [35]

    Coher ently controlled spin precession in canted antiferromagnetic YFeO3 using terahertz magnetic field

    Kim, T. H. et al. "Coher ently controlled spin precession in canted antiferromagnetic YFeO3 using terahertz magnetic field." Appl. Phys. Expr. 7, 093007 (2014)

    2014

  28. [36]

    Dynamics of domain walls in weak ferromagnets

    Bar'yakhtar, V. G., Ivanov, B. A. & Mikhail, V. C. "Dynamics of domain walls in weak ferromagnets." Sov. Phys., Usp. 28, 563 (1985)

    1985

  29. [37]

    Li, J. et al. Spin current from sub-terahertz-generated antiferromagnetic magnons. Nature 578, 70-74 (2020)

    2020

  30. [38]

    Vaidya, P. et al. Subterahertz spin pumping from an insulating antiferromagnet. Science 368, 160-165 (2020). Data availability All other data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the Supplementary Note or the correspondin...

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.